I’ve heard him say UV slows down proximal electron transport from food substrates, red/infrared allows for distal electron transport without food electrons. Infrared light changes density and structure of water which makes ATPase more thermally efficient. It’s astounding…
That is a great question and the answer is a lot. I’m still laying the groundwork for what is a mitochondria and what are the processes involved that determine their health. I will be working on many videos in the future talking about more practical aspects and life practices.
You have such great contents but it would be much more popular if the presentation pace is a little slower. It's difficult to digest for international followers.
Can you clarify your question? Classically creatinine has been thought to work on 2 proposed mechanisms, increasing intercellular water, and the donation of a phosphate to help with ATP production. My gut tells me that the more important of the 2 mechanisms is the water piece. The more we learn about exclusion zone water aka coherent domains and its role in redox chemistry for the cell, and its activation by IR light, this seems to be as important or more important for energy production. This likely why even Dr Jack Kruse recommends creatinine, and he is pretty anti-supplement which is saying a lot..
Hmmmm, I'm finding myself cringing a bit whenever I hear the term 'antibacterial', wondering how unintended consequences are lurking, potentially for mitochondrial dysfunction.
Any intervention we engage in, has risks and benefits. If I give you D5W which is just water and 5% dextrose in an IV, I could cause life threatening hyponatremia. So anything in the right dose can be harmful. I think we always have to be thinking about the delicate balance or risk vs benefit.
As always, great questions Ray. I know why you are asking this and bravo 👏 for listening to Dr. Kruse in his recent podcasts, Cameron Borg in particular. I’ve been really pondering this myself the last few days. I will have to disagree at this time with him about the significance of Warburg metabolism. Just because a few cell types use it, the cells in the eye that Jack is talking about, under normal non-cancer situations, doesn’t mean it’s not pathologic in cells, that are supposed to rely on oxidative phosphorylation oxphos to use aerobic glycolysis aka Warburg. For me, this take at trying to somehow normalize it, doesn’t make sense to me. Where I will agree at this time, is I do believe it has to do with a regression of older cellular mechanisms as an attempt at survival. That I believe is true. But Warburg metabolism is pathologic in most cells and likely is the Achilles heel to cancer and our best shot of actually non-toxically defeating the disease. I do think Dr Seyfried is fairly myopic in his views. I believe his work should be foundational and more effective protocols should be built upon his research which add in the quantum biologic interventions talked about by Dr. Kruse. That is my current belief and stance. Hope that helps.
Dr Kruse is my mentor, and I take what he says very seriously. I am open to being wrong or right on this issue. But I feel convicted that I am right on this nuance.
@@DrCaseyPeavler You both are great teachers, and I am fortunate to have come to notice that, benefitting immeasurably IMHO. Now, as community, learning and sharing is so desperately needed to predictively imp[rove finding pathways forward and communicating to others effectively.
Thank you for your kindness Ray! Agreed, we must remain open minded, willing to change positions/stances, and in friendly constructive discussion with like minded individuals. Couldn’t agree more.
I think the content is very good, but you could improve in delivering the key factors. It is not that easy to understand what these are... If everything in the video is a key factor, then nothing is a key factor.
I appreciate the feedback. I think if you were to on-ramp this journey on this video it would be hard to see what I am trying to teach. If it’s not, then sounds like I should attempt to deliver in a different way. Can you help give me some insight to where you are coming from?
@@DrCaseyPeavler this is the first video that I saw. I proceeded to watch a ton more. Maybe you could optimize for "content", like if someone doesn't know what a certain concept is tell people to go watch a specific video and link the video above, I would certainly watch. As in specific feedback for the way of delivering, you talk a little bit fast (my first language is spanish), a way of emphasizing is to talk slower when something is really important. Change the speed or it feels monotonous, even if you hace high energy. A speech is like a good symphony, it has dynamics. I thank you for your videos, these are very complete and popped in my recommendations. I wisg you have more views, I watch a ton of videos daily in youtube and these recommendations are what I see that repeats in the most successful videos with people talking. Also, if you could edit the video a little bit to for example zoom in or point to what you are refering. That could be a plus, but I understand if you don"t have time for that.
Wow that is amazing feedback. Yes I speak quite fast and have gotten alot of feedback about that. Recommending other videos to help explain past points made is a good idea. Thank you again!
@@DrCaseyPeavler i replied to another comment that I saw about someone critizing your speed. I used to speak like really fast, to the point that I couldn't catch my breath sometimes. I realized that made people think I was anxious, so I started taking some breaths before I speak to pace myself and relax, it is fine to take a small 1 second pause here and there. Also, one thing is to maximize the information delivered and the other is to maximize the understanding of the receptor. I would recommend to watch mike israetel's videos in renaissance periodization. He has a phd in something related to sports and the channel seems like a gym bro and nothing else, but he delivers really good messages. I specially recommend the videos related to dieting where he will explain the psychological aspects of dieting.
Thank you again. Yes I know Mike’s channel and have watched some of his videos in the past. I’ll circle back and see if I can pick up some pointers from him.
Scott me and you both. Unfortunately I cannot teach all of biology, biochemistry in a 10 min video. BUT if you stick with me, we will get to practical tips after we lay the groundwork of critical biological infrastructure and processes. That I can guarantee you.
@@DrCaseyPeavlerYou & me both; but which biochemistry texts would you recommend? I would appreciate that info. I'll do the work to save you time on laying down the infrastructure.Thank you.
I think pubmed is the best free resource available. Most papers will have an introduction which will explain the most up to date understanding of biochemical processes. Going to a biology or biochemistry book will just give you dogma that is probably way out of date.
