The Khufu Pyramid Revealed 

@@s_mavi Nobody will miss me but that is unimportant. The pyramids are forever.

RIP

@@jean6872 Well at least you have my head spinning on whether that is really a valid thought. You will at least be remembered by some for a time. And I acknowledge your graffiti. Hopefully one day your work will be studied....

@@americannapalm Ordinary schoolteachers do not leave behind a body of work. Our students remember us and when they pass on there is no trace of us. I do wonder if my thesis will ever be read by a student studying the Spanish years in the Marianas. That would be a comforting thought.

@@americannapalm unlikely, but may he RIP

I've watched this at least 12 times so far, very intriguing

@@tommyandrews4992 The Riddle of the Pyramids shall endure.

I dont understand why you think this?

Have you looked into the tomb of the birds? There's possibly a huge system of caves under the giza plateau that's not been explored. Andrew Collins rediscovered this cave system and returned at one point for a another visit to find hawass and Co had gated the entrance. As you say, he doesn't want others to make these discoveries. It's potentially the biggest unexplored system in that area and seems to extend under the pyramids according to one scan they have done. Even the new corridor they found under the chevron area is dumb. After all these years, no drilling or anything invasive, turns out you just had to push an endoscope inside.

@@agentolshki4265 Thank you.

It is quite perplexing! Studying the past poses its own set of challenges compared to advancements in technology - but you do have a point 😉

Researchers have figured out most of it. Also they are using satellites with infra red to find more pyramids still buried under the sand

I believe it is us that still stack rocks today, suppressed technology to keep us enslaved.

If Musk offered $100,000,000,000 to reproduce this pyramid, I guarantee you it would be built.

@@randal_gibbons Definitely some food for thought!

You have to give him credit for coming up with the idea using only ropes and timbers. But we all know they had other means to build with.

His counterweight theory doesn’t explain how they got the counterweight back up to the top? Assuming they hauled the counterweight back up using manpower- why, seeing that the counterweight HAS to be heavier than the weight it’s pulling up, didn’t they just haul the lighter weight (the blocks) up in the first place?

@@BottleBri make the counterweight half the weight of the block you want to pull up, that way you pull half the weight

Asking the right questions! Hopefully, one day we'll know for sure.

It was calculated to be as high as the top of the pyramid would end up being so that when they pulled the outer blocks up through the gallery they would be able to reach the top. As the outside progressed the interior would as well. When they were done at the top, they took all material they used to build out with them on the way down n out. It was there to go up would be the only way back down to the underground where it all started from. There is One main tunnel going underground to access all corridors of the pyramid upward. Again they built up and deconstructed on the way down and out.

@@matthewpettit4367 This is an excellent theory.

​@@matthewpettit4367 that makes no sense to me. The Gallery is the mdchanism to counteract the weight of the stones not where the stones were carried through.

Unfortunately, i have no qnswer, but it seems exactly like you say. He just wanted to be buried in the middle of the pyramid.

Love hearing this and so happy you enjoyed!

The stones are made from ancient concrete for sure. They could melt and scoop rock. 👍🏻

You do know that the ancient Egyptians used saws with diamond fragments at the end to cut granite right? Just like today. Lots of what we know now is just improvement to old technology.

@@donnismoo1498 let's you are right for the limestone blocks, explain to me how you do the granite parts...

​ @Mike Carlton the problem when talking about the tools used (copper chisel, hammers/stones) is that from beginning (ancient egypt ) to decadence (roman annexation...don't take it to heart!) 3000 years have passed, and the tools have not evolved a bit. the most recent theories, supported by facts and not words, open on other questions but at least we stop going around in circles!

Stone mason myself. I went a few years ago to see the unfinished Obelisk in Aswan. Solid red granite, shit you not, they were scooping it out. Very very precisely. I have no clue how they do it. I’ve seen similar techniques today done with heat, but it destroys the natural grain structure. It’s incredibly what those fellow masons were capable of doing. Too bad there were natural cracks in the bedrock. My guess is, they got too greedy with the size of that behemoth. Would’ve weighed around 1,000-1,200 tons. Imagine lifting THAT.

Brien Foerester look him up on you tube he knows the real story

@@marcusgomez3307 LMFAO that guy is a fraud

you can clearly see explanattion in this video

@@marcusgomez3307 Thank you: I will, B.safe.

@@maximus-2307 Thanks: I will. B.safe.

Time travel isn’t possible sorry

Aye, although if it was just a one time choice I'd struggle to pick from Kennedy's assassination, Jack the ripper murders ,watching the defeat of the Spanish armada from the white cliffs , the murder of the twins in the tower of London and Dixie Dean's final 2 goals against arsenal in his sixty season.

Time travel is possible! You're doing it right now ;)

if you went back they would be building it so slowly you wouldnt see...lolz

@@dancingtrout6719 or maybe they capture him and then sell him as a slave.

Yeah, it truly took a vast amount of mathematical knowledge at the very least.

See my comment. I do not believe the white limestone blocks were cut before installation but were placed as square blocks and smoothed from the top down using the layer below to stand on.

The angle of each block doesn't have to be precise. As long as each one is cut to the same reference, it doesn't matter. One can be out a few mm one way, the next one a few mm another way, but when you have thousands, the errors all average out. Plus, the final finishing was almost certainly done with the blocks already in place. Very little math is needed. All you need is a way to place each block, in reference to a single known point, and the accuracy happens all by itself.

@@ashscott6068 well said my friend,I think they were there longer than they say that is why it is not written..

you can be fooled by MS archeology..

This is SUCH a good question. Let us know if you ever find the answer!

I think that answer may be the same as in Christianity as Orthodox never paint the coffin or graves...

I’ve thought that too very often, also such a great fete you’d think they would make lots of models of them & the Sphinx for the people of that time , if you go to Paris there’s a shop selling Eiffel towers everywhere because they are proud of what they made but none found anywhere!!! So no glyphs on anything & no models made ,they must have been really proud of what they built!!!

I think they didn't because they knew they did not made this pyramids, they just used them for what ever...

maybe because it was never a part of their culture? They were there at the beginning of their culture and at the end. And all the really old paintings and carvings are destroyed, changed or erroted. It is fact, that the cultures after them changed the history in stone for their benefits and glory. Just look at the bumbling carvings of hyroglyphs on perfect sarcophagus made out of very hard stone. The really old carvings are already destroyed like the pillar with the myth about Atlantis or the old capital city memphis with its tablets of wisdom teaching. Just a minimal amount of the old tradition has survived, but massively changed in greek mythologie and within some cultures of africa, especially in ethopia.

Maybe that's why the secret is still lost. They built it, said, "We should write down what we just did!" drank beer and said, "Aw, what the heck!"

You can build bloody great pyramid all maths that contains a pint beer should not be that hard.try buy pint out there now and you stoned.makes you wonder who were the most evolved them or Egypt now

HA! HA! Yes. Beer AND Meat - in the desert HEAT! HAH! Too many assumptions. Too many witnesses from generation to generation, not a letter or even a single dot altered in it's transfer from father to son to father to son, over thousands of years to negate.

@@tomfuller5585 😂🤣😂

Totally a "hold my beer" moment

Please watch "The Revelation of the Pyramids" (documentary). Theire you'll find more truth than these gullible theories presented here.

Nice.

Hit me in high school, had a panic attack. 😆 🤣 shit was fucking heavy. It's been 18 years since and time has only sped up. Just trying to enjoy the moments and make em count.

This is some good thinking!

It's also funny to think that they didnt know about circles and wheels. That's a riot lol of course they did.

Your ignorance is astonishing. Stonemason of 30 years.

@@OswaldBeef based off what evidence exactly???? According to everything we know, they did not have the wheel...... that means no pulleys, no cranes, no wenches, nothing..... Even the Romans attributed their success of building the Coliseum to the invention of the wheel crane. They couldn't have built it without.... and the Coliseum isn't even close to being as complicated of a build as the Giza pyramids.

Well, Brier is a specialist in mummies, not pyramids, so it makes sense he would be dubious of some aspects of Houdin's theory.

Shane Culkin dsdsdsds

Juklhjlh

there are ads al the time

LOL. What adds interruptions? I haven't experienced commercial interruptions on RU-vid for like 10 years. Do you people don't know about free add blocker, installed in a minute and youtube videos will never get interrupted by commercials? ffs

chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/adblock-for-youtube/cmedhionkhpnakcndndgjdbohmhepckk?hl=en

There's still the dilemma that if they actually built the pyramid the way his theory suggests it would have taken a few hundred years longer than the 20 the Egyptologists say it took....

@@SkippyHatesMe well they have yet to discover a physical internal ramp without knocking the entire pyramid down, hopefully. But I don't see how this method would have taken a few hundred years. Will watch it again but can't remember them mentioning anything about that.

@@aykutuckan1665 I was speaking in hyperbole bur floating individual blocks like that would take many decades longer than the 2 that are claimed at the very least. There are 2.3 million blocks of stone. That's 1 block placed every 5 minutes 24 hours a day 7 days a week 365 days a year for 20 years if the Egyptian's claimed timeline is to be believed. Color me skeptical.

@@SkippyHatesMe Great Pyramid. One block every 3 minutes!! Really? Well not really. It's one every 2.5 days per team ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bLB2DejCyN8.html

What ! They didn't know the wheel , and build this pyramid incl granite "kingschamber" . What a joke 🤣. Needed 600 man to move the blocks, how did they move stones stones that time 1600 ton as found in lebanon ?

We agree entirely! So glad you enjoyed again!

We agree!

Agreed. His ideas were gaining traction in academia, at least until the muon scans failed to detect an internal ramp. They did find cavities that may have been part of the system. The ramp may have been filled in for greater stability when it was no longer needed. I know of no better explanation for the Grand Gallery.

Lu Ann Lewellen - well could the dumb muons see that space shape that was filled in ??

@Lewis River om

It's censored on RU-vid. You cannot find it on YT, even with full name.

It had wider spread coverage over a decade ago when the documentary came out. Just do a Google search. It was on CNN, New Your Times, The Guardian, The Australian, China Daily, etc. when this aired on television. It has since been discounted after further scans found no internal ramp. That is why it gets less coverage in the 2020's. The grand gallery counterweight idea is still viable though.

They weren't working to a budget, or only there for the pay. If modern humans ever really wanted a bit stone pyramid, we'd build one that put the ancient ones to shame in every way. But in reality, if some random rich guy tried to have one built in the modern world, there would be red tape, health and safety issues, pay disputes, and every worker questioning why anyone would even want a big stone triangle.

Basically the builders were giant humans. End of.

Absolutely.

Perhaps this is an interesting addition to the story. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-k0nOw_ebmGk.html

It absolutely could be done with today’s tech, what your saying is wrong. It’s the money, reason and wanting is we’re the problem lays.

@James Mcanish with today’s tech though we have the capabilities and the know how to build computer based machines that can cut and polish every stone to a higher accuracy including the Granite. We also have Diesel powered machines that can carry and lift the stones. We certainly are capable if the wanting and funding was there.

@James Mcanish They used diorite pounding stones. Arsenical copper chisels were mostly used for fine finishing the Tura limestone.

@@philwhatever3903 Yep. And Craig Smith has even estimated the time and costs.

they should have given you the guest spot on this doc

I love that.

Sorry, the spiral ramp is filled with nothing but aluminum pull-tabs (just kidding - metal-detectorist humor). Bob should have said to the pyramid security guys: "I accidentally left my flashlight up there when I went up last time - I'm just going to get it now, thanks!" *inserts endoscopic camera* Wish it were that easy lol. Just being in those spiral ramps for the very first time in 4,200 years would be cool even if there aren't any artifacts - fingers crossed though!

I'm afraid you won't find any piece of anything as they were reused. Pieces of wood as lintel for exemple, copper tools were recasted, and so on. Raw materials came from far countries like cedar, tin and copper came from Sinaï.

@@ptitmalouin910 I was actually expecting to find the hall of records in the spiral ramp

So happy you liked it! You may want to check out some of the other incredible documentaries we have on ancient Egypt.

so you think pharaon climb inside a piramid and scratch his name? OK

@@maximus-2307 No, not necessarily. But there was an English 19tht Cent. explorer who also left graffiti up there (His name I forget, but check it out). and rumor has it that he painted the cartouch on the roof. (The chemical composition of the red paint is NOT ancient).

@@maximus-2307 ....All other structures there have a multitude of pictures and symbols testifying to the greatness of the builder."pharo"...except this one..........just a scratchy name on a rock!........come on dude. Duncan is spot on!. And you're expected to believe those people built this thing using nothing but a round rock as a hammer and a primitive chisle........ok!.

@@robertguest5215 the lie to us. it is obvious. the more exciting question is: WHY? I think, I know why...

@@m.l.3936 because it was easy, pleasing to the eye and a realy cool place to keep your stuff. i know they have other feature for them. im joking, but still...

That happens with all kinds of passions and obsessions

This man knows nothing those pyramids were built before the flood by the Atlantean Scribe of the Gods Thoth. Ask yourself why the Founding Fathers chose a Egyptian Tomb for their dollar bill's Great Seal. Why Nikola Tesla was obsessed with the Egyptian Pyramids? Why Edgar Cayce base his Akashic Records and Pyramid Prophecy? Why Helena Lehman base her biblical astronomy off of it? It predates 4th century Egypt by millennium built before the Epic of Gilgamesh Atlantean Great Deluge by Ningishzidda Thoth according to the Sumerian Tablets who also built a Spaceport in the Sinai. Even Mjackson's Dangerous cover exposing the Illuminati revealed Anubis Osiris dressed as Napoleon Bonaparte flanked by the Pillar of Enoch aka Iron Throne of Osiris turning men into light beings Ascended Master Djedi King Priest.

@@jamesclipper338 ok so tell us . who built the pyramids and how?

@@gtxoiltastebadMy pleasure. Depending on whose legands we refer to it could be the Atlantean Thoth, Sumerian Ningishzidda, Ethiopian Enoch, Greek Hermès Thrismegestus all the same 1st Taken Thriceborn King Priest Ascended Master who built it with his mind ie levitation cut the stones with sound or laser technology. It predates 4th century Egypt by thousands of years constructed prediluvian era. Might I suggest you purchase Billy Carson's "Compendium of the Emerald Tablets" he explains the meaning of those 15 impermeable Emerald Tablets in simple layman's terms. Thoth literally had 65k books related to sacred geometry aka elemental Manipulation, Astrotheology and ancient Astronomy. I've provided three sources for you to research on your own time and can provide numerous more thanx to Mjackson's Dangerous cover exposing the Illuminati revealed Anubis Osiris dressed as Napoleon Bonaparte flanked by the Pillar of Enoch aka Iron Throne of Osiris turning men into light beings Ascended Master Djedi Priest. Also check out Mjackson's Dangerous cover exposing the Illuminati. Two interpretations of it will appear one more explanatory than the other. However neither will identify the Great Pyramid I was able to using my knowledge of Anubis Osiris Thoth Enoch Metatron. To assist with the symbolism see: Secrets of the Dollar Bill and Satan on the Dollar Bill. Emerald Tablets of Thoth V Dweller of Unal www.crystalinks.com/emerald5bw.html Enki Speaks Sumerian Tablets Ningishzidda constructed the Great Pyramid and a Spaceport in the Sinai. enkispeaks.com/Essays/24ThothSphinxSinaiSpaceport.htm Combining the Five Elements www.willemwitteveen.com/article-1/ Iron Throne of Osiris turning men into light beings Ascended Master Djedi Priest www.williamhenry.net/2018/01/the-great-pyramid-and-the-iron-throne-of-osiris-turning-men-into-iron-men-light-beings/ Why Nikola Tesla was obsessed with the Egyptian pyramids bigthink.com/the-present/why-nikola-tesla-was-obsessed-with-egyptian-pyramids/ Tesla Atlantis Pyramid Energy Earthgrid and more blog.world-mysteries.com/science/tesla-atlantis-pyramid-energy-earth-grid-and-more-10-questions-to-ts-caladan/?amp=1 True purpose of the Great Pyramid and sphinx ie Stargate discover.hubpages.com/education/Giza-Pyramid-The-Sphinx-Their-True-History-and-Purpose Stop calling me Sphinx! I am Her Em Akhet ie Heru on the Horizon Crouching Lion Guardian of the Halls of Amenti daghettotymz.com/current/heremakhetsphinx/heremakhetsphinx.html Enochs Ancient Astronomy www.pillarofenoch.com

@@jamesclipper338 This all new age nonsense . I was just listening to Billy Carson interview and he goes off on all kinds of nonsense without evidence.. Yes he sounds smart and educated. But everything he is saying has no evidence to back it up . I need some meat and potatoes kinda proof. Something i can bite into .. I can't get into all this alien stuff without 1 single piece of evidence besides old texts

@@gtxoiltastebad Watch K19. Probably the soundest, most reasonable argument to date on how the pyramids, and much more, were created. And I am a big Graham Hancock fan....

We truly appreciate your comment and thank you for watching!

That’s should be a crime. To suppress knowledge that literally changes history. Imagine how ignorant this man is. He looks like a fool now. There’s evidence that makes other old tired solutions to the pyramid implausible. Wake up. We see your desperation.

Give me One Non-Return 1st Class Plane Ticket to Egypt as I won't make it back and a gun and I will take that Arse Hole out so the Entire world will forever know All the REAL truths and answers and NOT just His Propaganda and Nonsensece that keeps his job/lifestyle alive which also lines his pockets with all he steals as he plunders Egypt's historical worth into Swiss Bank Accounts through his stories he Pens and that of others he rubber stamps while having No-One to answer too apart from himself. The Guy is Criminally taking advantage of Egypt its people and its heritage. I'm Sick of this self-serving Ass who thinks his answer is the Absolute Finale answer. It is like getting the truth from within the Vatican walls and Files under lock and key. Though with Egypt the world only has to topple one egotistical fraudster funding his lifestyle and not Tens upon Tens of Thousands of Catholics doing the same. When it comes time to open the files/scrolls, there will be a Mysterious fire, destroying all literature and files that have been locked away for far more than100 years.

@@MrMambott I don’t agree with violence but this guy must have the spirits of the dead chasing him. With so much fraud he really will get his in the end and it won’t be pretty. He needs to be stopped. What he is doing it truly evil.

@LTrain45 45 how do you know it was That one man who built the great pyramid? There was, as far as I know, one graffiti in an out of the way spot with his name. If there is other evidence, I would be grateful if you could point me in the right direction to research it.💕

Those that care to research for themselves know you're pretty much right.

He is very. Self..........silly. and. boring

Dr. Zahi Hawass is a douche bag.

Hes a fraud

He is the best

I THINK YOU ARE ALL DUMB FOOLS ONCE THAT IN THE HEART OF THE PYRAMID ARCHOLOGISTS FOUD CHARRIOTS WITH WHEELS AND IN MOSES TIME PHAROH HD CHASED THE JEWS ON CHARIOTS SO MUCH FOR YOUR CRITICISIM ABOUT WHEELS ON CE THE MUMMIES WERE FOUND INSIDE THE PYRAMIDS THERE IS A CONNETION WITH THE EGYPTIONS THEY CERTAINLY WERE BLOKES LIKE ALL OF YOU AND YOUR FOOLISHIDEAS AND TRY TO DESTROY HISTYORY.

Thank you!

I'd love to see it. Do you remember the name of the documentary?

obvs not zawi noclass

@@colinmalcolm2422 Ya mean Zowie HowAss, Chief Charlatan and Liar?

Il tell you why the Egyptian government don’t let someone stick a camera into these voids and be gone either it, the pyramids bring huge money to the country, they don’t want it solved.

You got that backwards.

@@Level3YoyoMaster indeed. Thank you.

Or the other way around

LOL

Evident? They were sun worshippers.

@A P What archaeologists think that? From everything I've read it's known that ancient peoples were as intelligent as we are.

@@librarylu These ancient civilizations were obviously far more intelligent than us. All we can do is speculate how these structures were built. We can't duplicate them with modern knowledge and equipment/machinery.

..mirror piramid to a merkaba spin it between your hands🧞‍♂️

Thank YOU! We're glad you enjoyed!

Those were built when the Dynasty, we label 0, arrived. There was a previous Advanced Civilization that was dealt a catastrophe, and had to experience a reset. That is so Obvious by the relics that circle the globe and Dr Robert Schoch, Professor and Yale Grad, sealed the old Mainstream's story's fate when he diagnosed the Sphynx "Weathering from Rain Water" pushing the date back to a minimum 11,000 years old. And it places it in the Age of Leo, as we can tell it use to be a Lion that underwent a re-imiaging, likely due to weathering also. The current era has a fastly emerging "New Mainstream", and I'm pleased to witness this, brilliant minds of greater vision, open wide, and demanding of the ethics that Science Research is supposed to be operating with and in respect of, using all the artifacts, data, and allowing the Findings to unfold the greater truths. ... *rather than a 19th Century "Darwinian Fraternity" that continues to "Try to place Cinderella's Shoe on Drucella's Foot."*

Beth Bartlett 👍🏼👍🏼 Well stated and my thoughts exactly...! The water erosion around the Sphinx is scientific proof that pushes the age wayyy back but it's only 'follow the evidence' when it supports a preconceived idea... Which is sad, when we're 'supposed' to be in an age of scientific superiority

They had no way to draw up plans . Logistics and work gangs would have been a nightmare without plans.

fullswing bull crap. Even if what you say is true , what you said about mainstream knowing the truth is bull.

How about the mortar between the stones at 60+ locations on the Great Pyramid carbon dated to Khufu's reign, or the large work-camp style encampment discovered around the pyramid also carbon dated to Khufu's reign, or even the Merer texts discussing moving blocks of granite to "Ahket Khufu" (Khufu's "Horizon" or an ancient Egyptian term for pyradmids)? The combination of that evidence is certainly more compelling than whatever so called "evidence" you have to support your crackpot theories. For me at least...

Go to www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com , accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Romană ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; no money ) and have some comment. Hănțulie Ionel

May be

Perhaps this is an interesting addition to the story. The people at that time were just like now, very resourceful. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-k0nOw_ebmGk.html

Yep, Houdin himself is completely convinced it's a second grand gallery to move the upper blocks of the relieving chambers

Our pleasure!

You're so welcome! We're happy to hear you enjoyed it so much and we agree - hopefully one day he's proven to be correct!

yeah like wheel on a sand would work very well, nice conclusion ainstain.

There were always images of sleds on smooth logs to help transpory blocks. Not sure if those illustrations we're ever period correct. Maybe having a wheel implies an axel as well, but I'm not sure of the historical accuracy

No, he didn't, but workmen painted names of Khufu on blocks before they were placed.

Thats interesting, you say Khufu's name was painted on the blocks - but why is there only one block with his name painted on it?

@@ianmarsden8568 There are three. They name three gangs; each one is based on a different form of the king's name. Only one was shown in the video.

@@librarylu proof? "graffiti 'found' by some european guys who blew their way into the pyramid looking for fame" is not proof.

@@iwillroam Why not.? It's true Howard Vyes had his workmen "blow" their way into the "relieving chambers" but the painted cartouches were already there, left at the time of construction. Sitchin was wrong. Even Graham Hancock had to admit that. "Cracks in some of the joints reveal hieroglyphs set far back into the masonry. No 'forger' could possibly have reached in there after the blocks had been set in place - blocks, I should add, that weigh tens of tons each and that are immovably interlinked with one another. The only reasonable conclusion is the one which orthodox Egyptologists have already long held - namely that the hieroglyphs are genuine Old Kingdom graffiti and that they were daubed on the blocks before construction began." Sitchin was pushing his own Annunaki nonsense and the evidence the pyramid was built for Khufu contradicts that. www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/172788-sitchins-folly-graffiti-in-the-pyramid/

The people who built the copy of Noas ARK in the Midwest of our country used the company cubits to lay it out GOD told Noa to use the Royal cubits so they made their copy way to small and are so dumb they don't even know that they were wrong

There was a guy that went to Egypt in 1850 right after the British conquered Egypt

He studied and measured it to a thousandth of and inche over 3 years of 12 to14 hours days

No but you missed the part of how the pyramid was built.

For me we should admit this is from somewhere else and think of what happen to the tools that have been used. There are other mysteries, for example small holes made on granit with high precision. Where are the tools? Who could have made this? Why? Could he have hidden the tools. Some blocks should have traveled 10s of miles. How?

they had rock beavers back then theyd build pyramids instead of dams

@Zero. What do you mean 'No' ? The cutting and movement of the 100 ton blocks was not mentioned in this video

@@auhrvjzihvezjxhhvvsnjxhxhv well there is a river in Egypt called the Nile and ships where a huge part of the power of the farao. If they could build a massive counter weight system I think they would know that 'hard hit with stone makes break' so with that logic soft hit makes tiny break😂 they lived in the bronze age that's after the stone age. and it isn't like a massive roman detailed statue so the tools could be a bit crude.

I'm still waiting for the latest results of the ScanPyramids project.

Doesnt even have to be in my opinion. This man is spot on

Martymooseyepthatsme 😂😂😂😂👍👍

Maybe that is what we said 100,000 years ago before that too lol.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-7H2-BawRLGw.html

None bigger

@@dontfoller9367 ­­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

Fun fact; black lives matter

@@Jamarkus_Delvonte Everything matters, some just matter more. Get my drift?

We're so glad you enjoyed it!

Same! To travel back and see these incredible things crafted in real time? Amazing.

@@magellantv that would be a dream come true to me.

@@SmoshDella Right there with you on that.

They didn't have to be smarter than we are today (some of us aren't all that smart) but they did have experience in pyramid building and models to help work out the problems.

@@librarylu Good point. :)

I mean its kinda hard when you don't have records of something. If we are being honest we can make ways to do it that would be technologically similiar to what they could of used.

100%

@@thunderlifestudios There have been quite a few experiments done on moving the stones, smoothing the stones, getting the alignment right....They had a lot of time and the tools to do the work. Remains of a ramp have been found that was undoubtedly used. The only question seems to be whether the extended ramp wrapped all the way around the outside of the construction or whether part of it was internal. Dr. Hawass, not surprisingly, dismissed Houdin's idea and said Bob Brier is a "mummy guy", not a "pyramid guy". The muon scan failed to reveal the internal ramp but it did find some things that could point to it. The 1986 thermal scan certainly is intriguing. I don't know what else could account for that shape. Jean-Pierre Houdin's hypothesis is still unproven but it makes so much sense I have hope more evidence will prove him right.

🙌

@@magellantvhello Brother, I love to engage in a discussion about how the counterweight was “reset”, meaning: how was it put back up on to the highest point in the grand gallery? Surely one would have to put as much energy in it, as pulling it down, but of course minus the energy that gravity pulls the counterweight down. So just having the counterweight pulling something down, gives one another problem: the weight is then stuck at the lowest point in the grand gallery…. And also: as I understand the corbelled walls of the grand gallery can withstand massive weights from above, but not weights from “along its axis”, is that right? So would it not be a huuuge risk to have the counterweight-rope(s) being ripped and sending the whole counterweight rushing down the grand gallery? I mean the fact that it still stands today tells us it (probably) did not happen….

@@konstantinonassis7015 That's kind of easy if the grand gallery was indeed part of a counterweight system, the grand gallery ramp and the external ramp probably worked together, just like elevator counterweights: -once the counterweight of the grand gallery is at the bottom, you remove the large granite block that it brought up, attach some smaller blocks to that side, and then slide/roll/pull the whole thing down the external ramp until the whole counterweight system is reset at the top of the grand gallery. -That means someone would have to constantly haul some smaller blocks up for the counterweight part of the external ramp, but that's still way easier than the pulling the huge granite blocks... and they were already constantly hauling smaller blocks up through both the internal and external ramp anyway, so it's not as if they were short of some extra blocks up there to make the whole system work...

Watch Revelation of the Pyramid .

@ Dans Doves It's bunk. Sorry.

@@librarylu It isn't 4500 years old its many many times older than that and they where built way before the Egyptians

@@hullpestcontrol9162 Please produce some evidence for that. The date has been established by everything from radiometric dating to kings lists and pottery styles. The was no other civilization in the area, let alone one that was all over the globe and had psychic powers. Graham Hancock has sold a lot of books but he's still wrong.

@@librarylu you might want to come up to speed with what is happening in the US re ‘unidentifiable craft in the airspace’ as confirmed recently by Obama. The ‘alien fess up’ is rolling out and it could show that the earth HAS been and IS being engaged by super advanced technology. To think that this incredible structure was the work of people using sledges and ropes is quite ridiculous. Interesting times indeed.

Our pleasure!

This theory doesn't explain how they cut the stones and the technology they used. There is not a single painting telling us how they moved individual rocks. All we have a a statue pulled on a sled, that is not enough. If we don't understand the methods they used, we will never see the entire picture!

We as humans need an understanding of how they cut these rocks so precisely and placed them all so perfectly. This man’s inside ramp hypotheses is nice, but I need to understand how they cut these stones so precisely to not even be able to fit a razor blade between them. It’s either aliens or they had a technology that was lost somewhere along the way. Or the timeline is way off and people were giants when the pyramid was constructed. Mountains are the stumps of trees type of giants.

@@FinnaRealtawk2323 You watch too much sensationalist documentaries! There are many legitimate theories for the perfect cut of the stones. My favorite is the so called Egyptian concrete theory, where they poured a mixture into a mold and turned it into a rock!

@@goru426 Perhaps this is an interesting addition to the story. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-k0nOw_ebmGk.html

@@FinnaRealtawk2323 Perhaps this is an interesting addition to the story. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-k0nOw_ebmGk.html

Quarrying and stacking large stones doesn't even _begin_ to compare to the precision math/manufacturing required for bridges and skyscrapers and not being certain of the _exact_ process is far from not being able to find out how a thing was built... Just because you can look at the Hoover Dam and tell it's poured concrete and rebar does NOT mean you'd be able to know exactly which parts were poured with individual crane loads or a delivery slide/pipe and in what order _thousands_ of years later.

@@llYossarian You are obviously ignorant of the true precision and math involved in the construction of the great pyramid.

@@llYossarian I second that, you’re clearly ignorant of the topic of you believe modern “skyscrapers” and bridges compares to the great pyramid. Pretty much ANY engineer can look at a modern building or bridge then duplicate it. Yet you nor anyone else can work out the math to build the pyramids. Not to mention move the blocks or even quarry them.

No, today's architects could easily build a pyramid. It's just that we don't know how THEY did it with the limited tools and technology they had. It's not that we can't do it today with our advanced tech. Still though, doesn't take away from how impressive the pyramids are for the time they were built.

@@melodyvalentine8779 That’s a bit of an overstatement. Are we technologically capable of replicating the great pyramid with the exact precision and size? Yes. But only just. That’s the thing: we couldn’t build the great pyramid more precise than they did even with our current technology. That doesn’t even take into account the engineering in the first place from scratch. Could we build another great pyramid? Yes. Could we engineer another great pyramid? Kinda, sorta, maybe, probably not.

We agree entirely! You're very welcome, we're so glad you enjoyed!

thats exactly what they did do hang on i'll find you the vid that explains it all In the end it is so simple ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KMAtkjy_YK4.html

Seems an interior ramp would have been much cooler/ more conducive to efficient work of manhandling the slabs, vs in the sun, outside… making construction quicker ?

I also heard those markings are from when they were looting it, mainly the stone they took from the top, which I believe is the Ark of the Covenant. It would make sense if the tomb had ionization moving through the top, would create a rather plutonium like substance same as a nuclear war head.

The internal ramp is still there to this day.

@@guatam357 are you on drugs?

Had the same thought, most likely tallow used widely in Egypt for many purposes.

Surely any organic material would have decayed by now?

@@philiptilden2318 No Phil standard practice with pottery may well find traces on strone

@@davidprocter3578 Ok, thanks.

The Khufu Pyramid Revealed ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-AZnL4mL9KHE.html

Who or what do you think helped them?

I agree

In fact, the best thing for an archeologist is to find anomalies. That's how they get famous, and how science progresses. You really know nothing about archeology or how science, or scientists work, do you? Why are you here spouting such nonsense? You are implying archeologists are religious in some way. And that there is some secret ancient archeological doctrine they must adhere to, which is decided by some mysterious "they" somewhere? Look, science does not work the way you think it does. Theories are very specific things, which must explain all the evidence, and various theories compete with each other over time. But a theory is not an idea. It's not a concept, or even a hypothesis; it is a fully documented, thoroughly researched and reviewed explanation of the simplest possible nature. If you are not an trained and employed archeologist then it's literally impossible for you to have a theory on the subject. For a theory must get by peer review to even get published, let alone accepted. The people you listen to are nothing but conmen who use debunked garbage to convince gullible people like you to accept pseudoscientific nonsense. You are merely parroting the garbage sold by crooked and greedy peddlers of books, DVDs and $6,000 tours of Giza. Next time you see information about something ancient, ask yourself this, "What government institution, university, technical institute, research corporation, or national body is sponsoring this research?" If the answer is "none" then what you are watching is garbage, plain and simple. If the answer is "several" then what you are looking at is highly likely to be true.

but they didnt have the wheel... that means no pulleys right?

@mohammed ilyas ?

Look here. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Fe2c-xbXmi4.html, new finding amongs experts. The scientific test on the rocks seems to show that rocks from the first Pyramid (saqarra) were the result of casting of geo materials, they call it geopolymer process. X-ray test showing the rocks contains bubble and the lower density at the upper part of the rock compared to that of the bottom, seem to be valid evidence that rock were casted from materials as commonly found in rock, such as silica. Thats why , as expert said, that man-made rock' seem like and indeed as strong as natural rock.If that theory is accepted amongst expert with further experiment/test,, then you are very reasonable to say the solution must have been different, that what the worker brought up were not rocks, instead it was geopolymer-dough (transported using basket) , look similiar when we see builder pouring concrete to make pillar when building a house. In addition, please notify that up-until now, expert found no gap among stacked stones, no abundant chip of rocks as waste from carving the rocks, no machine and tools (relating to cutting big rock and carving the block) found around the site ,these also indicate that the block of stones were not resulted from cutting and carving stone block.. With the theory of geopolymer, no more question about how and how many labor to brought-up a solid rock weighing tens of tons, and how they smoothly carved 'stones'. However the question about the geometric structure and how to arrange those 'man-made' rock still remain. Now how about other pyramids like Kufu, were they allegedly built through the same process as explained by theory above? I have no idea

​@@anekata217 the geopolymer theory is a fallacy : The fact that this is not true is attested by the presence of nummulite fossils in the vast majority of the stones used in the pyramids and in the rock remaining in the quarry, which is only a few hundred metres away. This rock is a sandy limestone, or if, you like, a limy sandstone. If this rock had been processed as claimed, the fossils would have been destroyed.​ The other casing stone which has mostly been robbed, was a finer grade limestone from the Tura or Tora quarry just across the river and a little to the south. Easily floated across on barges. The only granite is in the so called Queens’s and King’s Chambers and the load relieving structures above them. The origin of this granite is exactly known.

@@seantice well, it s a new information for me. thank you very much. however, i need to see your reference so i can learn it

I Doubt that. 🤣 Humm... Very Interesting 👍

​ @Lu Ann Lewellen What about the saw marks and circular holes/core drills in some of the granite in Egypt? Curious for your answer

@@ricardochat4283 They were left by ancient tools. Egyptian copper contains arsenic which makes it harder than ordinary copper. They also used abrasives, and probably water. Traces of abrasives have been found in cut marks. Water makes limestone so soft it's easy to work.

@@ricardochat4283 On "circular saws": ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-49gyaGXWmZ8.html

@@librarylu Sounds possible, thanks for the answer!

The counterweight solves nothing and only moves the issue one step back. Evevators use counterweights but the weight and car are always part of the same system and always connected together. Here is the issue with use in the pyramid construction. How do you get the counterweight (same mass as block your moving) back up the rear ramp once it's pulled the load up? The counterweight only helps as it moves down and now you have to drag it back up... But then how do you get the counterweight back up for the next cycle? Use basic physics and think about energy to find another way to falsify this hypothesis. If the counterweight system made it where a few men could to the work of hundreds do some addition and think. If it takes a certain amount of energy to move a stone, then it will always take that amount worth of energy. The smaller number of men would need some pulley system and pull that rope a huge distance. Simple machines don't reduce the energy needed to do the job, they just alter how it's input and output. "There is no free lunch", and all the work still has to be done either by one guy or thousands. The counterweight system he (hypothesis guy) talks about is nearly a free energy machine as described... If you neglect the effort it takes to lift the counterweight, then this becomes "so exciting and totally believable". PS: I can't stop, forgive me. Wood was very precious, and I wonder about ropes. How thick would a rope need to be to withstand 600 men worth of force? Could such a thick rope ever be part of a pulley system and actually function? How many ropes did they need and how long would they last under these multi ton loads?

@@ToxicityAssured well yes, if you think one dimensional a counterweight doesn't do much for saving you work. But you can certainly lift something that otherwise couldn't be lifted. Modern cranes do not work without counterweights. They don't have to move, the pulley system in the gantry does that. The counterweight can be stationary for a crane like machine. Or it can actually move or be moved with a pulley system, even stacked to increase or decrease weight. Plus you can reverse a pulley system where one end moves very fast and far, and the other slow and little, you turn a lot of motion into a lot of torque. Or change the fulcrum and you can reset your weight easily. A counterweight isn't always supposed to be equal to the opposing weight. Like how pumpjacks work, the counterweight is still difficult to move, but as it travels around and gravity can kick in PLUS the motor you now have an advantage on the pump cycle. As for ropes and pulleys, just look at ships rigging and anchor ropes and you get your answer. Counterweights may be 10 separate stones that 20 ppl can move, vs one big stone that takes 100ppl. It could be water that they simply poured back down hill. Thinking is good.

​@@oBseSsIoNPC I'll still disagree with the way the video showed it and the way you originally explained it. Sorry about my limited dimensions and only coming at it 1d. My best counterweight system is in 3d, but plans are underway for a 4d and maybe 5d version by Q3 of 2025. However, these new imagined situations bring up good points. But cranes use counterweights for balance only. The lifting force is done by an electric motor. Cranes are a totally different example that still happen to have the word counterweight in it. If a crane is to have a fixed stationary counterweight it can only lift one weight load in one position. I don't want to go on about this anymore. Let's agree that a modern tower crane is functionally very different from what he claims was used to move the granite blocks. Apples to oranges. "doesn't do much for saving you work." work = force x distance You can never save work! Big force a short distance (counterweight of near equal mass) Small force a long distance (pulley system) Pick which you talk about one at a time. "But you can certainly lift something that otherwise couldn't be lifted. " Yes, using a pulley system you can do this. If the counterweight is near in mass to the main weight and you can't lift the main weight, then you can't lift the counterweight. Your quote implies he used a pulley system and not a large counterweight system. Chaning a fulcrum doesn't reset the weight. Yes, the input, output and fulcrum can be moved, but it changes the mechanical advantage of the machine. [had to eat, back at it] If you say the counterweight system could have been many smaller stones moved individually, that's like the rock verion of a pulley system. Small force (little rocks) long distance (lots of trips). Yes, that could work. That is the only way it could work. If the big granite rock is too heavy, you must use stones that you actually can lift and add them together. The anchor rope to hold an Egyptian ship would see an order of magnitude less stress. How much force can the wind and some slow-moving water exert? If they used ship ropes for this project, could I assume they used pyramid 60ton blocks for anchors? OMG, you compared the equivalent of nylon mooring line from a small cruise ship to the high-tension steel cable of a crane needed to lift a granite block. "It could be water that they simply poured back down hill. " ???🤔 Why lift the water to pour it down the hill? What water? Is your next move to suggest water is wet? Thinking is good. I prefer to do most of it before I type.

@@oBseSsIoNPC thinking is good, but you don’t seem to think. 2000000 stones in 20 years is 200,000 stones per year, or 5000 enormous stones per week that have to be lifted up 10 floors above. 500 stones per day. 50 stones per hour. 1 stone per minute. Think before you open your mouth. Counterweights are a joke.

@@Leibniz2001 you misunderstand the context of my comment. The theory holds up against others, but I am not a believer in classic pyramid building. There is no way they leveraged around these blocks, without even chipping one of them. The discussion is about, what if and how to, considering evidence that's thousands of years old. The entire theory of chisels and counterweights falls apart in the quarry, transport and precision of even a single stone.

I took the pyramid tour while in the army way back in the 80's. There is exactly 138 of these structures in the country. The red pyramid is my favorite. If your interested they recently discovered a pyramid in Bosnia. It is massive and tremendously dwarfs the pyramid's of Gaza. Check it out.

@@matthewmcpadden2084 Bosnia pyramid isn't a thing.

2 elephant.

The Bosnian Pyramids are a current archeological investigation still going on at this moment.

Ok everyone replying to@@matthewmcpadden2084's comment saying negative stuff, here is what I just looked up www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-mystery-of-bosnias-ancient-pyramids-148990462/ but my question is, why am I barely finding out

Well said, this theory is the only one that makes sense, unless we can prove otherwise. But the scientific way to solve it by the 3D model is already very convincing.

So true, and if you can get your hands on a book name Stonehenge Callanish Standing Stones The Great Pyramid Of Egypt The Book Of Moses and the Prophets The Answer to Life's Mysteries you will see that there's also a Devine spiritual symbolic meaning to the PYRAMIDS and the SPHINX pertaining to the Eternal FATHER ,SON, HOLY SPRIT the Holy Godhead of Creation it's really an eye opener will shine a whole new light on it. Peace

I'm not saying it was the aliens, but it was the aliens. Levitation with sound waves and melting the rock and letting it reset, which is why the seam is so perfect.

You're being sarcastic right?

@@Veldtian1 No, telling you truth. This is what they said they did.

Herodotus knew shit. He was also amazed like we are today.

Awesome! THANKS

We appreciate that, thank you! We have a bunch more free docs on our channel if you're in need of more!

pandai

Preach

Am with you there.

Same

You 💩

This was a load of garbage and anyone buying into this idiot's theories are morons.

@@crazycoolclips Hater.

Thank you! We agree.

Thank you!

it's almost like there a painting's that match the tiny figure 🤯

@Unga Bunga PePe nice meme

Then after an extremely sofisticated society which built all these insanely incredible structures in record time....forgot how to build them after a bit of a drought and some global warming/cooling

No, everything was most certainly looted long ago. People have been going in and out of that thing for ages. Nothing was left behind.

@@chadbarrett6644 You saw them loot the kings chamber

i didnt mention how they transported hundred tons blocks with boats :)

@@boxicool you just make bigger ships then

@@goyonman9655 sorry grave robbing was a well known thing in egypt after the arabs came there

Pyramid texts weren't used until about 100 years later. There are three names of Khufu in the relieving chambers; they're part of the names of work gangs and were left there by workmen. One is so out of reach even Graham Hancock had to admit it could not have been forged. Dr. Hawass gave him a private tour. Hancock's retraction is on his website.

Jean-Pierre's argument has nothing to do with who built it; his hypothesis has to do with how it was built.

@J C He's a successful architect. He was barely interested in ancient Egyptian history. That's Dr. Brier's forte. Houdin was focused on the construction from an architect's point of view. Craig Smith took a similar approach and even calculated the time and cost to build one today. There are many lines of evidence establishing the who and when. There's really no argument there and no need for architects and engineers to be able to tell a piece of 4th dynasty pottery from a 5th dynasty pot.

You raise a very important question!

The pyramids are built on bedrock, mystery solved.

Thank you, we're so glad you enjoyed! And that is an excellent question and one to definitely be considered.