Тёмный

The Last Barrel of Oil 

Power Struggle
Подписаться 27
Просмотров 445
50% 1

Adam Pankratz is a professor at the University of British Columbia with a deep background in banking, energy, and mining. He joins Power Struggle to bring his unique take on the challenge (and costs) that switching from fossil fuels to green energy poses.
In this episode we discuss:
Adam’s start in politics and how that sparked his interest in energy
Where responsibility lies when making big change promises
His concept of “the energy transition” and how to avoid another Covid 19 scenario
The implications of AI and how much energy is needed to power innovation
The often-overlooked connection between a green economy and the mining industry
Why the last barrel of oil should come from Canada
Adam’s $14 wine pick!
🔔 Hit Subscribe for more in-depth discussions on the future of energy.
For audio versions of our podcast visit powerstruggle.ca and listen on the go in your favourite podcast app!
Reach out to us with thoughts, questions, or ideas at info@powerstruggle.ca
Videos posted on RU-vid

Опубликовано:

 

15 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 13   
@PowerStrugglePod
@PowerStrugglePod 13 часов назад
🔋 Welcome to Power Struggle! What are your thoughts on this episode? Got any specific angles on energy you're particularly curious about? We're all ears - your questions could spark our next deep dive! Remember, energy discussions can be charged (pun intended), but that's exactly why we're here. Let's make this comment section a vibrant exchange of ideas on the energy trilemma. Whether your priority is sustainability, affordability, or security, we're all playing on the same field - sharing one society and one planet. Your perspective matters in piecing together the full picture of modern energy. We're looking forward to a vigorous, respectful discussion. Let's uncover the realities of our energy landscape together! #PowerStruggle #EnergyTrilemma #EnergyDiscussion
@wisenber
@wisenber День назад
The first two weeks of COVID still had cheap power that wasn't intermittent. Two legs of the "trilemna" are already solved. It's the third leg that breaks the other two.
@PowerStrugglePod
@PowerStrugglePod 13 часов назад
It's true, those first couple weeks of COVID seemed to give us a glimpse of cheap, reliable power. But here's the thing - the trilemma is all about juggling affordability, reliability, and sustainability over the long haul. It's like trying to keep three plates spinning at once! You might enjoy diving deeper into this with our video all about the trilemma: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9jkmA9vglVs.html What do you think - is there a way to keep all three "plates" spinning smoothly? We'd love to hear your take after you've had a chance to watch!
@wisenber
@wisenber 13 часов назад
@@PowerStrugglePod The "long haul" is already addressed. Contrary to predictions from 60, 50, 40,30...years ago, known energy supplies today exceed what we had half a century ago. Technology transitions happens organically through displacement rather than compulsory regulatory replacement. Voters are already starting to revolt at the prospect and don't appreciate the lack of transparency regarding the actual cost they're going to have to pay, especially when the results of those costs are even less transparent.
@screwstatists7324
@screwstatists7324 День назад
Im sure it would be fine if they raised the union pensions. Just a few more regulations.
@1stAma
@1stAma День назад
It's astonishing to see who counts as an "expert" nowadays. I only listened to the first 18 minutes and the whole argument falls apart immediately: 1. The energy costs aren't the main problem of Volkswagen (although they obvioulsy shouldn't be underestimated) 2. The Greens weren's in the parliamant when nuclear energy was abandoned. This is basically where the whole argument falls apart. Why do you even invite someone like this and then post this video without checking a single fact?
@darkmiles22
@darkmiles22 День назад
1) Rising energy costs have hurt German industry broadly. Volkswagen is merely a famous name that can be pointed at (and you admit it is seriously affected by the energy crisis so what are you even objecting to?). 2) He doesn't say the Greens got rid of nuclear power in Germany, but rather that Merkel did it in part to satisfy the Greens and their voter base/movement. The point is not to blame a particular party but the ideology of green deindustrialization writ large. As an aside he notes that it happened "about 10 years ago" without mentioning that it happened in the wake of Fukushima. He is clearly dodging a discussion of Fukushima but idk why because Fukushima is an example of nuclear safety! Even in a earthquake/tsunami zone nuclear is still incredibly safe. 3) The Greens have had the top nuclear cabinet position in Germany since 2021 and have overseen the shutdown of the last nuclear reactors in Germany despite the Russo-Ukraine energy crisis and the reversion to coal reliance. The worst excesses of denuclearization can absolutely be laid at the Green party's door. 4) It is a bit rich to complain about inattention to facts and logic when you can't find any real flaws without watching 18 minutes into the video to find even these fake flaws to latch onto. You'd have better grounding if you complained about hot air and waffling since you can't actually find anything wrong that was said!
@wisenber
@wisenber День назад
"The energy costs aren't the main problem of Volkswagen " It was. "The Greens weren's in the parliamant when nuclear energy was abandoned." Except they were.
@1stAma
@1stAma День назад
@@wisenber No, Volkswagen states that the main problem is that the car market has broken down and less cars are being bought than before the pandemic. The energy crisis is an additional problem but not the main one. Nuclear power was abandoned by Merkel in 2011 after Fukushima. Since then all nuclear power plants have been shut down one by one. Please don't reply if you don't know the subject matter.
@1stAma
@1stAma День назад
@@darkmiles22 1) Yes it is a serious problem but not the main one. That's what I'm objecting to. But you seem to have been unable to grasp this due to an your inattention to what I said. Why reply then? 2) That's simply not true: "The greens were one of the key support groups the CDU / Merkel needed to have in order to remain in power". That implies that they were in a coalition (which they weren't). The CDU wasn't dependent on the support of the Green voter base. It's astonishing that you seemingly have to miconstrue my argument and misunderstand the argument made in the video to make a point. That's astonishingly self-important and dumb at the same time. 3) What does this have to do with it? 4) As shown above these aren't "fake flaws" but legitimate points that make this professor's entire argument pretty pointless and please don't reply if you don't understand the subject. It's quite rich but probably due to the fact that you are inattentive to facts (as proven above). This self-importance despite a total lack of knowledge of the subject is genuinely baffling.
@wisenber
@wisenber День назад
@@1stAmaVolkswagen stated cost issues AND people weren't buying vehicles due to EV mandates. The Greens absolutely were in the Bundesrat in 2011. And the last German nuclear plant closed in 2023. Your last sentence was projection filled.
Далее
It's Not About Scale, It's About Abstraction
46:22
Просмотров 45 тыс.
The "Energy Transition" is a Myth
1:18:24
Просмотров 28 тыс.
The Problem With Elon Musk
42:46
Просмотров 4,5 млн