Anyone else see the parallels between Junger and Tolkien. Both loved nature, both fought in the wars and were anti tech because of it, both rejected the modern world. Both had the sense of loss of something.
@@VVeltanschauung187 what that has to do with anything. . . But to be technical both are Germanic peoples, with Tolkien being a literal Ph.d. Germanic expert teaching as such at Oxford University.
@@wynfrithnichtwo8423 The British and the Germans were fighting over what is undisputedly the right of numerous European nations' supremacy & Britain wanted to turn most of it into its commercialized vassal states. Sauron is anything but Germany. Beady eyed anglos would have sided with Sauron like the industrial revolution loving, money grubbing snakes they are.
Wow incredible, I wish finding information on Junger and other Fascists was much easier. So far the best resource for our current age in the future of Right Wing thought for me has been Dugin Dugin wishes to combine the best elements of the previous three large ideologies of modernity (Liberalism, Communism, Fascism) in order to create something new for us which can both have meaning and create continuity with our past, but also project forward into the new frontier of Post-Modernity. He calls this project the Fourth Political Theory (4PT) I have been doing my own research into what a 4PT for the West would look like, and although it's very easy to find good information on what Liberalism and Communism actually is, as well as good critics of them, finding what Fascism/National Socialism actually is is very difficult (although not impossible). Generally what you will find is strawman criticisms. And I see it's for a good reason why the enemies of the Right do this, because Fascism immunizes one against both Liberalism and Communism very well Although Fascism/National Socialism definitely has it's failures ideologically (this is why I am a 4PT in the end not a Classical Fascist), one needs to study Fascism if we wish to progress beyond our current cultural dystopia. So long story short, thank you for making this project easier for us all
Why didn't Evola criticize the English character of bourgoise materialism like Spengler did? The broader appeal to Evola is that it allows most whites to uphold Prussian asceticism, however it fails to trace where the trace of soulless pragmatism/capitalism came from -- the same country where social darwinism and colonial slave trades came from
