The M4/3 Lens Full Frame Doesn't Want You To Know About

Подписаться 157 тыс.

Просмотров 68 тыс.

50% 1

Man, what a lens! The micro four thirds advantage in full display. Probably the best budget telephoto lens you can get for wildlife photography and videography. I can't believe how light it is! Let's test out the Olympus 75-300mm f4.8-6.7 II on the Olympus EM1 III, in anticipation of the OM-1. Full frame can't make a lens like this. How does it compare to the Fuji XT4 with 70-300mm? And the Sony A7S III with the 100-400mm GM?
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, you'll lose all your muscle due to the lightweight gear. Then you'll meet a woman who loves you for what's on the inside.
Olympus EM1 III amzn.to/3rxEXJn or bhpho.to/3dp7UPL
Olympus 75-300mm f4.8-6.7 amzn.to/3oILuix or bhpho.to/3u2pfr5
Sony A7S III bhpho.to/3yeUW0q
Sony 100-400mm GM f4.5-5.6 amzn.to/3ISX6a7 or bhpho.to/3IQRQ6Y
Fuji XT4 amzn.to/31wORkb or bhpho.to/3mXJUs0
Fuji 70-300mm bhpho.to/3qoRhen
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetable...
Patreon for Monthly Q&A Videos / vegetablepolice
T-shirts and merch! vegetablepolice.threadless.com/
My Monkey Strength ebook payhip.com/b/VyEG
My Music from videos! Entire Discography 15% off vegetablepolice.bandcamp.com/
Random ass donations to paypal.me/vegetablepolice Thank you!
Q-Link Products changed my life! share.shopqlink.com/554.html
My Health Channel Vegetable Police / canadianwargod
My Music Channel Stern Beats / @sternbeatsmusic

Приколы

Опубликовано:

7 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 356

@cameraconspiracies 2 года назад

If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, you'll lose all your muscle due to the lightweight gear. Then you'll meet a woman who loves you for what's on the inside. Olympus EM1 III amzn.to/3rxEXJn or bhpho.to/3dp7UPL Olympus 75-300mm f4.8-6.7 amzn.to/3oILuix or bhpho.to/3u2pfr5 Sony A7S III bhpho.to/3yeUW0q Sony 100-400mm GM f4.5-5.6 amzn.to/3ISX6a7 or bhpho.to/3IQRQ6Y Fuji XT4 amzn.to/31wORkb or bhpho.to/3mXJUs0 Fuji 70-300mm bhpho.to/3qoRhen All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice

@Shrek_Has_Covid19 2 года назад

sigma 150-600mm on pentax q10 843-3372mm equivalent🥵🥵🥵

@tolstoidomar 2 года назад

honestly, that was actually really impressive taking the specs in consideration 👀

@AlpacoFilms 2 года назад

Ok, holy crap. I never considered this lens just because of the f-stop. But honestly I'm in broad daylight all the time anyway. This might be in my near future. Your footage looks really good! Thanks for doing this, man!

@richardwalker4518 2 года назад

I bought that lens a while back, you can forgive the plasticky build, lack of weather sealing, slow aperture and no lens VR when you realise you are taking it places that you never would one of the honking full frame superteles. You bring home shots and footage that you just wouldn't be getting otherwise. I usually just pack it with an EM5 and a couple of the dinky primes, super light, just throw it in a messenger bag and head out. Total liberation!

@maximme 2 года назад

yes, thats the BEST use case for m43. Just going for a stroll and bring along a light camera. If i dont get any shots, I am still happy cause I went for a stroll.

@InvertedHermit 2 года назад

When you compare the Tonys, remember that the equivalence only refers to the appearance of the bokeh, in terms of the actual light coming into the sensor, an f4 on m43 or an f4 on FF is the same. Same amount of light hitting the sensor relative to its size.

@crazyasianskills 2 года назад

The amount of people who don't know this....

@TheRoadrunner11 2 года назад

@@crazyasianskills like our beloved youtuber apparently xD Just posted a similar comment before seeing this.

@professionalpotato4764 2 года назад

The exposure is the same, but in terms of data captured it's just different. Smaller surface area, less photons, less data. Not inherently good or bad, but just a trait. We have to be realistic with ourselves, or our smartphones with the f/1.8 apertures would be insanely powerful if there were zero drawbacks. Just physics.

@youuuuuuuuuuutube 2 года назад

The same amount of light RELATIVE to its size yes, but not the same total amount of light, and that's what matters. So yes the equivalence function works very well, just multiply everything by 2 and it's valid for both light and bokeh.

@OUCGN 2 года назад

So what does that mean?

@jt663 2 года назад

Feel like m4/3 is a much better option for fast pace sports and wildlife telephoto shooting because of the crop factor, light weight and because of their speed.

@Princeton_James 2 года назад

True. I love it for wildlife!

@sergeyzakharov7326 2 года назад

af is much worse than the one on sony or canon and you cannot really shoot indoor sports due to poor high iso performance

@joseribeiro9564 2 года назад

Nop... wrong... wildlife usually is shot with low light and for that you need really fast primes and good ISO preformance, at least APSC format

@Princeton_James 2 года назад

@@joseribeiro9564 it all depends on what wildlife you are shooting.

@joseribeiro9564 2 года назад

@@Princeton_James maybe large mammals during daytime, otherwise will produce bad backgrounds and noisy images

@PhotoBob 2 года назад

Olympus goes under and then everyone starts loving their cameras 🤣. The new OM-1 looks amazing and is priced pretty good. 4K 60 no crop and their awesome stabilization on tele lenses will make it a beast for wildlife

@deleteddeleted821 2 года назад

m4/3 is not great for anything tbh

@4th_Lensman_of_the_apocalypse 2 года назад

@@deleteddeleted821 🙏🏽

@ridealongwithrandy 2 года назад

@@deleteddeleted821 obviously you have never spent some actual time with the format.I use M43, APSC, and 35mm sized sensors, each has it's uses.

@PhotoBob 2 года назад

@@deleteddeleted821 I shot it professionally for 5 or so years. It’s especially great for things like high volume schools and sports. Both of which are popular and lucrative niches. I also preferred it when doing corporate headshots with a backdrop. I didn’t need shallow DOF, high ISO, better AF, more resolution etc… working photogs value things that RU-vidrs don’t. Things like weight, ease of use, cost of operating, ruggedness, etc…

@skepsys 2 года назад

i wouldnt say it's a good price, considering the a7iv ($2500) and how cheap a used g9 is (i recently had one for $500andsomething, but i suppose you can find one for 6-700 pretty often). i guess if you're in their target, a wildlife or landscape photographer, it might be worth 2200 for that purpose .. but if you're not, i think although it is a good camera (and quite an upgrade from em1iii) it's not worth that money. 1500-1700 at most. and so far i havent seen video af proper reviews, but erveryone says af is quite good in photo - i guess they blew it and the video af sucks (compared to the similarly priced sony/canon)?

@RobShootPhotos 2 года назад

It's one of those lenses you expect not much out of it but then pleasantly surprised by what it did later on. It's happen to me multiple times with that lens.

@Yoko.Kurama 2 года назад

My fav wildlife lens is Panasonic 100-300 f4- 5.6. The stabilization is awesome

@marc.ristau 2 года назад

It’s also far better build and weather sealed and doesn’t cost much more

@chrisdwyer1477 2 года назад

@@marc.ristau and a faster aperture! I agree. I've had both and I much prefer the Panasonic. Better center sharpness and about equal in the corners.

@chrissnyder4439 2 года назад

@@marc.ristau On Amazon the LUMIX is actually $2 less right now. I love mine. Agreed on the build as it doesn't feel cheap at all, has a nice rubber grip for the zoome, and a bit faster

@chrisguli2865 2 года назад

Is it 100% compatible with the OM cameras?

@UrdnotAkongo 2 года назад

@@chrisguli2865 totally works, even focus peaking. As far as dual IS from lens + IBIS, I don't think Panny lenses has communication with Oly bodies.

@SirMo 2 года назад

Olympus cameras and lenses are so underrated. Great review!

@thebigpicture-elpanorama 2 года назад

I love your style of video. Keep 'em comin!!!

@naturalismundi4359 2 года назад

Olympus comes back.... in a very game changing way.

@youranonymous931 2 года назад

For the money, if you're looking for wildlife or telephoto lenses, M43 is probably the best bang for the buck.

@ridealongwithrandy 2 года назад

Lately, I have upped my technique for BIF, and wildlife, amazing photos from my EM1X and the amazing 300 f4 pro!

@youranonymous931 2 года назад

@@ridealongwithrandy I'm on a Canon sx70 but was researching. And I came down to the Panasonic fz2500 or a m43 camera body with m43 telephoto lens. Really if you are on a budget, you can't go wrong with m43 set up.

@clifftotten7609 2 года назад

"She's pickup up dog poo,....It's unlikely that dog left it"...LMAO!!!

@bdssoaz 2 года назад

Man! Nice footage, with amazing stab! 😯 From a cheap plastic lens...wow! Killer combo there for hiking! Loved it! 👍

@kazino21 4 месяца назад

Amazing content and laughed all the way through, subscribed

@armanddimeo6575 2 года назад

I just used this lens at a Civil War reenactment. I could not believe how quickly I could work with a 600 mm equivalent. I saw people with APS-C cameras using these huge lenses that begged for a tripod. The darkness of the viewfinder due to the narrow aperture was sometimes a problem but this is a small tradeoff. Most of the time I was working in bright sunlight where this was not an issue. This lens is an amazing value for the $350 I paid for it.

@mantiq7768 2 года назад

Stunning shots of the birds! The slow-mo got the heart thumping

@leslieklein8757 2 года назад

I just discovered your ‘work’ recently. You are a hoot!! You don’t take yourself seriously (nor do I). But, you make me laugh. You have an acerbic wit and a creative mind with spontaneous and often outrageous thoughts that you spew unexpectedly. "Denigrate it all” could be you motto. I have an MFT camera with the kit lens. I rarely do V -ing and never log-ing. My advice to you - keep on truckin’!

@actstuntcam 2 года назад

Another great vid Kasey - cheers Cam from NZ. Starting to use my XT4 for some of my vids, but you can't beat the convenience of a phone - which you have advised your viewers of many times. Not regretting the Fuji purchase one bit though - everytime I see a clip I shot with it, I'm stoked :)

@sbowyer525 2 года назад

Amazing video - great job! Like you, I am interested in the OM 1 advancements. But this is impressive!

@ValentinKossenko 2 года назад

Damn, Kasey, that footage looks gorgeous! 😍

@C5films 2 года назад

Some really quality footage there, buddy. Saleable Stock Footage and some really nice compositions. This wildlife thing is suited to you Kasey. I keep telling you Micro four thirds is the way to go!

@jangarcia1338 2 года назад

I use that lens all the time! It is an amazing zoom range in a really tiny and light lens. Very cheap too for the quality you get.

@jiffijoff9780 2 года назад

So you're basically back to m4loosers. Took a while - but welcome back. Oh, and you're basically focusing manually. So you're into Panasonic realms also. All there is left is the so-called bad colors. I guess you'll get there too with post-production or that color conversion plugin. So, G9 already ordered? PL 50-200/2.8-4.0 or the Oly 40-150/2.8, both with their teleconverter? So in the end you rediscovered the strengths of m43. Welcome back, took a while but you made it. Full circle achieved. 😋👍💪❤️

@savannahphone 2 года назад

That kit looks the best. I always think those fast ff telephotos are for recording the superbowl or photographing lions from a land rover. Not for the man about town who likes a walk, a chat, and handheld tele filming of owls in the afternoon. Be interesting to see how om-1 bird af works in action. Nice chill video.

@paulemma8125 3 месяца назад

I haven’t see one of your videos in a bit, you really make me laugh!

@Princeton_James 2 года назад

The G9 is one of the best cameras ever made but the new OM1 does look awesome. Keep it simple- FF for the Toneh and low light and M43 for daylight.

@Photovintageguy 2 года назад

If you have lots of light the Olympus is actually pretty good for wildlife.

@Fell_Wanderer 2 года назад

@@Photovintageguy I have the G9 with a Panasonic Leica 100-400. Micro 4/3 is a great setup if you dont always shoot low light all the time and want a compact lightweight system.

@cheeeeezewizzz 2 года назад

@@Fell_Wanderer I shoot lowlight constantly with my g9. Not bad if you are willing to give up af and shoot entirely with f0.95 glass. Once processed my bar and club shots look great even at f0.95 1/50 6400 iso. Could be better, but that's why I'm waiting for a gh6 with a dual native iso sensor, cuz my bmpcc4k looks impeccable at 6400 iso

@Fell_Wanderer 2 года назад

@@cheeeeezewizzz I shoot woodland video's in low light with the G9 and Panasonic Leica 12-60 with decent results wide open at T2.8. Depends on what you want but micro 4/3 is a decent system and certainly not dead yet and don't think it will ever be because there are so many benefits in such a light and compact system. With regards to wildlife videoography/photography. Yeah, full frame offers better low light and Toneh, but I've shot up to ISO 6400 with the G9 and Panasonic/Leica 100-400 in low light and with noise reduction software, looks ok to me. I'm not a professional so not bothered about the slight advantages of full frame and I share all my stuff on RU-vid where content is more important than having the best gear.

@Princeton_James 2 года назад

@@Fell_Wanderer that 12-60 rarely leaves my camera, especially when traveling.

@Mrav79 2 года назад

These are no joke your best wildlife shots ever, go with an even smaller sensor, might work, who knows.

@TheTruthIsHere2024 2 года назад

I've been following your channel for a couple of time. I love your honest and authentic way to review stuff. I thought about buying a g85 or a gh5ii but after watching your reviews I've been thinking abaut the em5 mark 3. What's your thoughts on this on and could you make a review of it. Gratings for Austria

@sanderbos 2 года назад

I think the footage in this video looks fantastic, especially the part of the robin at 5:30 is so detailed. It confirms what I already knew, that with good light you really do not need full-frame outside.

@JailerGamer Год назад

This is also a youtube video with some compression. Gonna get this lens eventually

@swissjim4633 2 года назад

I have an Oli set up with this lens. I was very happy with it (especially the size and weight). However, I have picked up a second hand Fuji xt100 with 50-230 lens which has delivered some stunning images. It seems to be just that bit sharper. Still like Olympus but Fuji will be my go to from now in.

@joyfuldiamonds33 2 года назад

You're a delight to listen to. You're funny. Thank you for all the great info.

@yunfeng413 2 года назад

This is exactly what i need , Thank you.

@Leptospirosi 2 года назад

These are wonderful shots... Er... Cinema! 😬 Was IS2 engaged? Seems like the image snaps to the right or the left as if it was trying to hold the image when you pan

@silverlightphotoco 2 года назад

I really loved this video and how you're covering wildlife, and it covers my favorite lens focal length for Micro Four Thirds. I hope you don't mind if I copy a portion of a recent blog post I wrote for my website below? From blog post: I'm using VINTAGE 70-300 lenses (from the 90s) with Micro Four Thirds cameras (such as the GH4, G7, GX85 and G85) and I love that they render an image with a crop similar to a 600mm on full frame. My experience with this lens has been I've (almost) never wished for a longer lens, except for maybe the moon, or distant wildlife. I've used them for sports (mostly little league) and have been able to cover the entire field. As far as the "slow" max. aperture, I don't (usually) try to get f/2.8 telephoto lenses (because of the cost). My logic is that since the most common scenario to use such a telephoto is OUTDOORS, having a mere f/5.6 is almost always sufficient. The exception is when you're in a large indoor space and the light is low. In this case, I'm often using a focal reducer/speedbooster anyway, so my max. aperture ends up around f/4, and that works (even on a small Micro Four Thirds sensor).

@JegorM 2 года назад

Get the Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f4.0 IS PRO, it is a magical lens!

@philiphamilton955 2 года назад

I've not used the 75-300, but I'm not surprised it did well with just the IBIS. I tried the 100-400mm and did not like it. The 100-400 has three options: IBIS, IS, or both.. OK, both is not sync'd but I want to test all three. In my experience, IBIS only was the best of the three. I have the 300mm f4 and 40-150mm f2.8 but I was looking at the 100-400mm 5.0-6.3 IS. The 300mm is awesome, but I want the flexibility of a zoom in the 100-400mm range as the 300mm can be difficult to find your subject. Put two camera bodies (EM-1 ii) on a tandem mount and simultaneously recorded HH video at the dog park while using the 100-400, 300, 40-150 + 2x side-by-side. The 300 with dual IS is the best but it's not a zoom. The 100-400 and 40-150 + 2x have almost identical FOV... I put a measuring tape in the scene and could read where it entered and left the frame.. The 40-150mm F2.8 becomes 80-300mm f5.6 with the 2x teleconverter and comparable to the 100-400mm f5.0-6.3. IDK how or why, but the 40-150 with just IBIS was consistent and typically better than anything I could get out of the 100-400. The 100-400 might have less micro movement, but then it makes big jumps when you pan, recompose, or reposition. It might be good for photos, but not video. I already own the 40-150 so I sent the 100-400 back and purchased the 2x converter.

@andorsipos7101 2 года назад

i was wondering what direction youll be taking your channel in, now, that you got comfy and attached to things and probably wont travel anymore :( but i have to say im enjoying this wildlife videography a lot! maybe one day youll be traveling AND doing wildlife videography ;)

@GotBettaBeats 2 года назад

Great footage

@stephenfox5133 2 года назад

Now that’s a ‘wow’ product. I shoot m43 but had always dismissed that lens as likely junk on account of the huge range & poor aperture - oh, and relatively cheap price. There ain’t nothing wrong with that footage though, …I might get it now.

@filmstudiojapan 2 года назад

Hey Casey, don't quote me on this but I think on Olympus when you set it to max stabilization, it is "tripod mode" where you want to try and be static with your shots, and less stabilization allows you a bit more freedom to move around. Again, don't quote me, but I met with Olympus top brass when the EM1X was released, and he showed me allot of tricks.. sadly it was off camera and my memory is shit. I had actually suggested to him that they build user adjustable curves into the adjustment like on Alexmos gimbals so you can control how smooth the lead in and lead out are + speed while panning.. which would in essence stop stabilization jerk if set appropriately for the type of shots one is trying to achieve.

@rodmehta5356 2 года назад

Agreed. User error all over, entertaining nonetheless 👍

@Falk4J 2 года назад

These shots of the bird eating berries are friggin awesome 😍

@JCB-Distribution 2 года назад

The Best Ice Stick Duck content ever.......

@Bolton115 2 года назад

Wow! That bird footage is simply amazing for handheld. Sharp and clean.

@scubari 2 года назад

New mic ? thanks for vid!

@FlatWaterFilms 2 года назад

I use F/11 F/16 a lot on bright sunny days. lol .Have to admit. the 5D with a 70-300 L is a tank.

@paradisetravelTV 2 года назад

Wow that Olympus 75-300 is impressive.

@counterweightshenanigans2808 2 года назад

I'm impressed with this lens. Might get it instead of the 100-400.

@warrendibb394 2 года назад

I use the old 4/3 ED70-300 Toneh 4-5.6 on both my E1...........and with an adaptor on my OMD EM1 and although it's bigger and heavier than the newer m4/3 lens featured here it's still a whole lot smaller than any aps-c or FF equivalent, and it just works!

@zeitwille 2 года назад

seems similar to the 40-150mm .. it has good colour redition. stopped down it's point on. enjoy

@timwynn6079 2 года назад

looking forward to hear your take on new OM-1 camera.

@momchilyordanov8190 2 года назад

Even our beloved host on this channel, known for squeezing the worst of any gear, actually got some impressive video here :D Honestly - it looks better than I thought it will

@AlgPortfolio 2 года назад

HELP! This is my favourite lens, but today while cleaning it I noticed that there's dust inside. How does it get there and how to get it out?

@unclejerry486 2 года назад

that is surprisingly good quality!

@danmar007 2 года назад

"Don't moon me." Nice video. Makes me want to go out and look for some deserving models.

@tor2919 2 года назад

I need the new OM1 with the 300mm prime on this channel immediately

@ekjellgren 2 года назад

Had this one but sold it to get the 50-200 + 1.4 tc. Zooming goes in different directions also, so no more Oly for me :)

@charliejg 2 года назад

Lucky thing for that squirrel it wasn't eating a pile of raw cashews....... LOL!

@chitownarcher5645 2 года назад

Good video since there is a lot of light. Try at dawn or sunset. Which one does not have a video recording limit? I think the Fuji XT 4 has a 30 minute limit.

@radiozelaza 2 года назад

Still better light than my Tamron 18-400 3.5-6.3 ... or is it?

@hauke3644 2 года назад

Have you tried the G9 with 100-300?

@p4ul.f708 2 года назад

Seems like a really good lens ! :O

@fktygglbtchbtch1384 2 года назад

a fellow bird photographer sold his and bought my pana 100-400mm lens. He loved it.

@SuperJupiter33 2 года назад

pretty cool...The hands on for OM-1 are out ,Gordon Laing

@JohnDrummondPhoto 2 года назад

You really could have used optical stabilization along with IBIS. Maybe try out the Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm f/4-5.6 II POWER O.I.S. lens. It's the same price as the Olympus, 1/2 stop faster wide open and has OS. You're really getting into the nature video scene. Told you, it is addictive!

@cameraconspiracies 2 года назад

I have tried that lens with the Oly, it wasn't stable. You can't use dual IS unless on a Panasonic body.

@JohnDrummondPhoto 2 года назад

@@cameraconspiracies Thanks. That kinda sucks. You plan to test the GH-6 when it comes out (with "improved" DFDAF)?

@ezekielfernandez4077 2 года назад

You found a niche that m43 really shines on..

@jiffijoff9780 2 года назад

Yeah, and it only took 3 years and about five hundred comments to realize that m43 is strong on the long focal length. Now with 90% manual focus let's wait for the G9 to return, might need another 500 comments. 😂😋👍

@ezekielfernandez4077 2 года назад

@@jiffijoff9780 i remember he used to make fun of wildlife photographers too haha... Im glad to see him get into wildlife

@LexTNeville 2 года назад

We get those goosanders and sparrows in the UK too. Your robins are way different to ours. Glorious AF.

@SuperSlackOff 2 года назад

A video on making camera gear reviews / photography channel for RU-vid would be helpful to a small but niche community. On a budget. I am kinda lost. I don't know what I am doing right or wrong, some advice would be really helpful.

@Radhaugo108 2 года назад

Have you gone to Ottawa yet?

@cfrazer 2 года назад

I'm new to dslr and your channel is quite helpful thabk you. I have a Panasonic g85, would this lens work with my g85?

@cameraconspiracies 2 года назад

Yes. Panasonic also has a 100-300mm with stabilization you might like better.

@cfrazer 2 года назад

@@cameraconspiracies I'll look into it. I'm looking at taking your advice and get out there and take video of Bird Butts 🐦 and hope for better. So you know I went with the g85 from your advice so it is all your fault lol. I just couldn't justify the cost of a Sony a7iii. Maybe in the future.

@tech-utuber2219 2 года назад

Ahhh! In the first moments of the video I thought you were holding the new OM-1! Not your fault, I just thought it as logical by now that you would qualify to receive one. I'm sure that there was a important boardroom meeting about it.

@k1k13004 2 года назад

I'm actually convinced. For the first time you could make me buy something :)

@OutRAjious 2 года назад

finally after 2 years chose an Olympus Pen f on the spur of the moment…. couldn’t resist the looks

@orlangurs 2 года назад

Sony has it's own analogue 70-350 that can be used with a6600. I tried this combo for wildlife video handheld, liked the autofocus, but stabilization seems to be a lot worse, than here, even though the lens and the camera are stabilized and they are of the same manufacturer. Maybe I was doing something wrong, don't know, will investigate further. Especially because gimbals and tripods are not allowed in the park near my home.

@manuelyagui1920 2 года назад

Consider getting a Olympus camera if you want to make handheld wildlife video, even the cheaper Oly models will give you great ibis like the m10 mark iii.

@TimsWildlife 2 года назад

I put my 300 mm f2.8 Nikkor on a pocket 4k and it is sweet!

@WhoIsSerafin 2 года назад

Oh man I was expecting your humorous commentary on the new Olympus revealed

@cameraconspiracies 2 года назад

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PmP-qK_anAs.html

@meme4one Год назад

1:02 me vs the guy she told me not to worry about.

@billy9506 2 года назад

3:00 That's not how calculating light/aperture/crop works. You can multiply focal length and aperture to get effective FOV and DOF but not light transmission. The light transmission per mm2 of sensor (as near as) for f/2.0 will be the same on FF and M43 so absolutely no need to multiply.

@fujiwildlifevideography9288 2 года назад

I'm finding APS-C to be the sweet spot for wildlife videography

@2ShoesPhoto 2 года назад

I had this lense, sold it thinking I could get the same thing or better with the 40-150 f/2.8 Pro with a 2x teleconverter. I 100% regret selling that lens.

@adriandobre9366 2 года назад

12:29 - with so much snow the camera is tricked by it and lowers the exposure to protect highlights, but it is always overdoing it, just do atleast +0.7 in snowy conditions, but on that particular one without sun reflex you could have gone to + 1.5, +2

@thedexterbros 2 года назад

13:24 those pigeons are so fluffy and stuffed they eating good

@stephenfox5133 2 года назад

12-100 f4 PRO should have Sync IS also. Worth a test💯👌🏻

@jay-by1se Год назад

I subscribed at " I'm filming vaccinated people"😂😂😂👍❤️

@aaronperkinson8314 2 года назад

This thing is great in bright light...also, have taken pretty nice pictures of the moon as well...

@KeywordManagement 2 года назад

You should do review on the PANASONIC LUMIX G II Vario Lens, 100-300MM

@Wave_Drop 2 года назад

Beautiful quality video. Now, please get yourself an OM-1 and try it together. Thanks man :)

@jasonsawkins523 2 года назад

change stability for range in camera or in the quick menu go to it and hit info to change distance. i dont get how this was entertaining but I enjoyed it lol

@weizenobstmusli8232 2 года назад

Imho, the perfect entrance into wildlife tele. The iq is surprisingly good, it is small, light and cheap. Ultra comfortable.

@KPGuitarStudios 2 года назад

Just add the OM-1 and you will be in Wildlife heaven 👍

@Weechoo 8 месяцев назад

I have the G9 (and G9 II recently) and a 100-300 II and it doesn't look anywhere near as sharp at 300mm as in this footage. It improves when I stop it to f8 but still... this footage doesn't seem like it was stopped down, just look at the Toneh! People on forums say that this lens is similarly bad to the 100-300 at the long end, but that's not what I see. This one looks amazing! Or maybe it's just some sharpening in the camera? But still convincing. The stabilization sucks big time though, I'd like to see this lens on my G9 II, how would the IBIS handle it in video. And I always recommend something like 60P for handheld videos, low frame rates need a tripod and nd filter and stuff, 60P always looks a lot smoother and less jumpy, even when it's not slowed down. 60P is the future. ;)

@chcomes 2 года назад

i know it did not work for you, but the g9+100-300 will have better stabilization, similar weight and the zone af works quite well if you use it right- 4k60 for good content

@jeffburdick6734 2 года назад

I had the 100-300 but traded it for the 70-200 and liked it much better. Now I have an S5 and a brand new 70-300. I'll try it at a wildlife preserve next week...

@attilaishere_barcelona7935 2 года назад

8:01 you could have not seen the number 2 offloading action on Sony... I say good content!

@fastcat9805 2 года назад

Have you tried 100-400 leica on the g9?

@jeffslade1892 2 года назад

Yeah, the equivalent Lumix lens is faster and stabilised. The Lumix Dual (G9 etc) eats IBIS for breakfast. Olympus will support Lumix OIS lenses with their own "Olympus Dual Stabilisation" which they don't talk about, it is not synchronised but works.