Тёмный

The Mamluk Sultanate: Kipchak-Turkic Rule over Egypt | Khan's Podcast Episode 8 

Khan's Den
Подписаться 77 тыс.
Просмотров 8 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

30 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 71   
@KhansDen
@KhansDen Год назад
Listen to this episode on the go on your favorite music streaming services: bit.ly/KhansDenPodcast I fell ill a few days ago and therefore had to rely on automatic subtitles. Sorry for any mistakes.
@papazataklaattiranimam
@papazataklaattiranimam Год назад
Mamlūk authors almost always refer to their Sultanate as " the state of the Turks " ( dawlat al - atrāk dawlat al - turk/ al - dawla al - turkiyya ) . They usually seem to be aware of the fact that the reign of the “ Turks "
@mmmmm9138
@mmmmm9138 Год назад
Tashakur ulken Osman-Selzhuk bauyrlaryma. Kóp zhasar!
@najibullahnazari2213
@najibullahnazari2213 Год назад
I'm Kipchak Hazara from Afghanistan and i proud to be Kipchak Hazara 🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘
@synbuddy
@synbuddy Год назад
Do you know Qazak hazaras?
@najibullahnazari2213
@najibullahnazari2213 Год назад
@abamokreyzi9906 yeah i know
@synbuddy
@synbuddy Год назад
@@najibullahnazari2213 wow i'm Kazakh from Kazakhstan. Are they feel native Kazakhstan or Kazakhs? Are they remember that they are were a part of the Kazakh nation?
@najibullahnazari2213
@najibullahnazari2213 Год назад
@abamokreyzi9906 bro I'm Kipchak Hazara and Kazakh are kipchak
@synbuddy
@synbuddy Год назад
@@najibullahnazari2213 i mean i found in encyclopedia that hazaras have Kipchaks, Kazakh and Kyrgyz as divided tribes
@armorman8737
@armorman8737 Год назад
Dawlat Al Atrak Bahrid Mamluk Cuman-Kipchak,Turkmen
@papazataklaattiranimam
@papazataklaattiranimam Год назад
In the social hierarchy there were clear distinctions of status and power between “ Turks ” ( atrak ) , the term usually applied by native Egyptian writers to both Ottomans and Mamluks , and the Arabic - speaking indigenous population whom those in power often lumped together as " peasants " ( fallahin ) regardless of occu- pation or residence . Egypt: A Short History James P. Jankowski · 2000 · p.60
@waleedahmed630
@waleedahmed630 7 месяцев назад
There are a big difference between mamluk and othoman
@jivanselbi3657
@jivanselbi3657 Год назад
..though much earlier than Mamluk reign another Turkic leader named Ahmed Tolun ruled Egypt and his reign was called Al Dawlah Al Turkia (The Turkish State)
@graucanal
@graucanal Год назад
Great, Thanks from Brazil.
@tasbykekerey1203
@tasbykekerey1203 10 месяцев назад
Kimek-Kipchak- Kazakh 🇰🇿🇰🇿🇰🇿💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼
@Reader_curiosity
@Reader_curiosity Год назад
The great state of the Mamluk Sultanate is one of the important countries in Turkish history. Sultan al-Muizz Aybak al-Turkmani is considered the first ruler of the Mamluks. As for Sultan Baybars the Kipchak, he is the true founder of the Mamluk state, who established laws, traditions, the army, and so on. Where the leaders, princes, soldiers and others were from the Turks. Mamluk history books mention the origins of the Mamluk Turkish sultans and to which tribe and clan of the Kipchaks people. All ancient historians as well as contemporaries agree that the Mamluk state is a Turkish state in the era of the Bahri Mamluks without dispute, which represents the culmination of victories and achievements and in the Mamluk era in general. Where the Turkish language was commonly used throughout the Mamluk era by the sultans, princes, and soldiers, and was used in the work of the court, and the use of Turkish terminology increased, and even the sultans used the Turkish language in poetry and translation, and therefore dozens of books appeared on the Turkish language in the Mamluk era. . The historian Ibn Taghri Bardi, criticizing some historians of his time, says: "He is excused for what was reported, due to his distance from knowing the Turkish language and cohabiting with the Turks." Turkish traditions were common in aspects of the Mamluk state. We find many books bearing the titles of the Turkish state, such as: "Al-Durrah al-Zakiyah in the news of the Turkish state." and "The Royal Masterpiece in the Turkish State." and others... We find this title in the stomachs of hundreds of historical books that appeared in the Mamluk era. In the book “Nuzha al-Malik al-Mamluk fi Mukhtasar Birah of the King of Egypt,” he puts an entire chapter entitled: “The Turkic Mamluk State,” and wrote under the title: Then the Turks and their state, and mentioned the Turkic state and their conquests. Ibn Khaldun says in his introduction to the state of the Mamluks: "Two hundred years ago in the state of the Turks.... and that is because the princes of the Turks were in their state...". In the Mamluk era, a new architectural style appeared, and endowments, schools, encyclopedia books, and others spread. Intellectuals of Mamluk origin played a pivotal role in shaping the general feature of culture and knowledge production in the Mamluk era. The Qalawun of Kipchak dynasty is the longest ruling dynasty of the Mamluk period. The historian Al-Aini mentioned the name of the Kapchak tribe from which the Qalawun family descends, which is the Burčoğlı tribe. As for the transition that occurred in the Mamluk era from the Bahri Mamluk dynasty to the Burji Mamluk dynasty, it was only a change in the dynasty. Where the customs and traditions of the Mamluk state continued as they were from the era of Sultan Baybars to its end, and also the Turkish language was the original language of the Burji Mamluks and was commonly used in names, terms, and others. We also note that all historians of the Mamluk era described it as the Turkish state as well, and this is what we find, for example, in the book of the historian Ibn Ayas, who is from the Burjiyya.
@serkankinden5150
@serkankinden5150 7 месяцев назад
Dear Khan's Den! Could you please correct subtitles, I could not understand some details. This topic was very interesting to listen, thanks for all your efforts.
@bogazicilifizikbilimcisi2482
history is written objectively many Arab historians were not objective and He was talking about the Turks with an epic narration. We could not be objective due to a national understanding of history, we generally exaggerated our heroism and this is something from the past. Today, Turks take their source from the objective Chinese, who wrote down their defeat and victory to the finest detail, in order to learn about their past in more detail, and they generally learn Chinese because our real history is not in the epic histories of the Arabs hidden in the tablets there.
@youknow8653
@youknow8653 Год назад
Many sources exaggerate events. None of belligerents of medeival era wrote objective data. However we tend to use these sources as clues to reach reality. Just like ernest renan said, history is an art. Also, from the west of uygurs, chinese sources become irrelevant/not enough as it becomes way too far for them to observe.
@frknmtl7832
@frknmtl7832 Год назад
Still, we cannot dismiss arabian sources as the chinese were far away from western asia while arabs lived in it. The source may be exagerrated but it gives us a perspective on events and battles happened during that time period.
@bogazicilifizikbilimcisi2482
@@frknmtl7832 yes alright
@Javlonification
@Javlonification Год назад
Welcome to Uzbekistan!
@bogazicilifizikbilimcisi2482
Despite the westernized understanding of history that blends Turkish history and Turkish religion with the psychology of inferiority, we have begun to realize that thanks to the strategic genius and world politics of the Turk, he was able to enter many cultures, not to assimilate, but to gain more power. Thank you for introducing yourself to the peoples of the world with your expressions as a Turk. Atatürk understood this and saw that the dominance of the world was to raise the Turks in Anatolia. Not by conquering the whole world and leaving the folk song down.
@عليياسر-ذ5ب
@عليياسر-ذ5ب Год назад
Atatürk: I am a Spanish Jew and my mother is Greek. Why do I care about you evil Iranians who killed the original Turks?
@islombekochi
@islombekochi Год назад
To make accurate. Kutuz was cousin of sultan Jalal ad Din Manguberdi last Xorazmshah of Anushtegin dynasty. Which means he was not kipchak but oghuz karluk. Baybars him self was kipchak.
@MM-fv1pi
@MM-fv1pi Год назад
History says that the Kipchaks-Cumans were very very blonde! Confirmed in so many historical references.
@teovu5557
@teovu5557 Год назад
dna on cuman kipchak graves says they were more eastern looking then western n its common for tribes to be named after the color of thier horses especially the cream/yellow color kipchak horses.
@MM-fv1pi
@MM-fv1pi Год назад
@@teovu5557 trolling wont work here since there are abondant historical references approving the Kipchaks to had been completely white. Go back to your original homeland in Hindustan or Nubia. By the way, do you even now what does dna analysis mean and what could be refered of its results?
@papazataklaattiranimam
@papazataklaattiranimam Год назад
We wuz Kangz
@sorongana5346
@sorongana5346 Год назад
@@papazataklaattiranimam 🤣🤣🤣😆😆😆😆😆
@flllopakk
@flllopakk Год назад
If somebody wondrrs if im not wrong kipchaks are late cumans btw is Baybak a version of Baybars?
@zariaalhajmoustafa2573
@zariaalhajmoustafa2573 Год назад
‏‪2:04‬‏ No salah aldin is his title is a real name is Yusef
@zagrowth8260
@zagrowth8260 7 месяцев назад
If cuman inscriptions didn’t exist, people would call Cumans indo European 😂
@el-arabist
@el-arabist 6 месяцев назад
You are a Turk-hating Loser Idiot 😂😂😂
@middleeastrenwarriormen1017
Daulat Al Atrak
@tszkinmak6556
@tszkinmak6556 Год назад
kipchak also rule india in 1220
@mmmmm9138
@mmmmm9138 Год назад
He is not qypshaq, that a common name, he's tribe a Berish, in Baiuly El!)
@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat
@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat 11 месяцев назад
Shut yo mouth stupid kazakh. you existed 500 years ago, how can you know his tribe. he was Tobykti tribe of Kipchak Nogai
@karaosman891
@karaosman891 Год назад
In french language please😊
@Sayfalkhaldy8559
@Sayfalkhaldy8559 Год назад
The first incorrect point of this podcast is salahuddin was a title bestowed by the fatimid caliph upon him, his name was Yusuf bin najm ad deen ayub, of kurdish descent, secondly, the slaves were not captured, you forgot to mention the political scene at that time, which coincides with the emergence of the mongols, displacing many turkic tribes in proximity with many escaping and some not so lucky and ended up being enslaved and sold in slave markets with many ending up in the court of the ayyubid sultans in the levant, where they were prepared for position of command and statecraft in the future. I know the owner of this channel is probably a patriotic turk which i dont see any problem with and probably wants to portray the turks as great and all that which is okay, i have listened to many of the podcasts with regards to the early origins of the turks and their empire and what is said is exactly as i have read in my quest to know more about the nomadic empires that were so crucial in shaping history in both asia and europe in medieval time but i think its a good thing to be objective with regards to history as it regards people whom we do not see and in many cases there were no written records of what was taking place and some sources might have been from contemporary empires like the chinese or byzantines who always looked at the nomads as barbarians, Keep up the good work.
@oguztribesmen294
@oguztribesmen294 Год назад
Very interesting, I wouldn’t even consider it a Turkic empire. Alltough it was ruled by Turkic people. I mean Türkiye is the land of the Turks Alltough the president is Georgian
@teovu5557
@teovu5557 Год назад
turkiye is called turkey but 99% of turkey is greek armenian n kurdish dna. real oghuz live in turkmenistan.
@KhansDen
@KhansDen Год назад
My family is of Oghuz Turkmen origin. Guess I am the one percent, then. 😎
@oguztribesmen294
@oguztribesmen294 Год назад
@@teovu5557 me and my family are Oghuz Turks (also Called Turkmen) as well... so idk about this
@papazataklaattiranimam
@papazataklaattiranimam Год назад
👽
@aslanersoy8970
@aslanersoy8970 Год назад
​@@teovu5557 another peraian clown ... 😅
@zakijamil8986
@zakijamil8986 Год назад
change the voice
@KhansDen
@KhansDen Год назад
Already did, see newst videos
@zakijamil8986
@zakijamil8986 Год назад
@@KhansDen Ah ok nice. much better
@MCorpReview
@MCorpReview Год назад
Mamlukes= unsullied😊 did aybaq kill St. Louis?😊
@La-Stranger
@La-Stranger Год назад
Was the British empire a German empire ? by your logic it would be Same for Russian empire or for the French empire, this is a dangerous game that u are playing I hope u are aware of it
@Reader_curiosity
@Reader_curiosity Год назад
You are making a big fallacy. The Mamluk Sultanate is a Turkish state, while the current Republic of Egypt is not Turkish. The Kingdom of the Franks in Gaul in the Middle Ages is a Germanic state, while the current Republic of France is not Germanic. As for the Kingdom of England in the Middle Ages, it is a Germanic state, and the current state of Britain is definitely Germanic, because it is based on the migrations of large Germanic tribes and the continuous Germanic heritage from the Middle Ages to the present era. Such as the current Republic of Turkey, which is built on the great Turkish migrations and the Turkish heritage, and that the current situation of the Kingdom of Britain is similar to the current situation of the Republic of Turkey.
@ChristopherTanne-se3pz
@ChristopherTanne-se3pz Год назад
The word beg cames from ir anic bagga or slavic bog. It isnt turkish!
@zagrowth8260
@zagrowth8260 7 месяцев назад
Beg is mentioned in Kultegin inscription, that big stone written in Orkhon Turkish dating back to 5th century. It is in Mongolia
@ChristopherTanne-se3pz
@ChristopherTanne-se3pz 7 месяцев назад
@@zagrowth8260 yes 5th centry is late. Bagga is older . Far older in iranic shaname
@zagrowth8260
@zagrowth8260 7 месяцев назад
@@ChristopherTanne-se3pz bring a primary source
@La-Stranger
@La-Stranger Год назад
Turkish propaganda at its finest
@KhansDen
@KhansDen Год назад
The Mamluk state was literally called „State of the Turks“ - LITERALLY in both Arabic and Persian sources. Are you denying these facts?
@La-Stranger
@La-Stranger Год назад
U are reaching out with ur propaganda, here are some facts about the „Turk state“ The mamluk empire was never connected to any Turkic state of Central Asia. The population of the mamluk empire was never Turkic by any means. The ruling dynasty was mostly by heritage Turkic but that does not make it a turk state, same is for the British empire who mostly were Germans( ruling dynasty) and still were not a German state. Do u get my point ?
@La-Stranger
@La-Stranger Год назад
@@KhansDen ^^
@La-Stranger
@La-Stranger Год назад
By any means I’m not trying to dismantle any achievements of Turk culture cause it’s one of the great cultures in the history of our planet who had till today huge huge influence in world history. But trying to rewrite history is by any means BS
@xxxxxxxxx3944
@xxxxxxxxx3944 Год назад
The orghuz Turks in Anatolia ? Lol
Далее
СОБАКА И  ТРИ ТАБАЛАПКИ Ч.2 #shorts
00:33
The Complete History of the Hittites
45:59
Просмотров 1,6 млн
The Mongol vs. Order of Assassins War
16:12
Просмотров 1,6 млн
The Entire History of the Ottoman Empire
21:45
Просмотров 793 тыс.
Ranking Every Ottoman Sultan from Worst to Best
20:03
Просмотров 389 тыс.
The Rise and Fall of the Ottoman Empire
37:00
Просмотров 853 тыс.