No video :(

The Martin Baltimore Airplane Mystery: A forgotten aviation hero or a hidden mystery?

Подписаться 13 тыс.

Просмотров 18 тыс.

50% 1

The Martin Baltimore Airplane Mystery: A forgotten aviation hero or a hidden mystery?
Welcome to the future of aviation with the Martin Baltimore Airplane! In this captivating video, we take you on a journey through the extraordinary features and cutting-edge technology that make the Martin Baltimore Airplane a game-changer in the industry.
Prepare to be amazed as we delve into the innovative design, advanced systems, and unmatched performance of this remarkable aircraft. From its sleek exterior to its state-of-the-art interior, the Martin Baltimore Airplane sets new standards of excellence in aviation.
Experience the ultimate flying experience as we showcase the luxurious amenities, spacious cabin, and advanced entertainment options that will elevate your travel to new heights. Discover how this airplane seamlessly blends comfort, style, and efficiency to redefine the way we fly.
Join us as we unveil the future of aviation with the Martin Baltimore Airplane. Witness the revolution in action and be inspired by the possibilities it presents for the world of air travel. Buckle up and get ready for a thrilling adventure!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hello friends! Welcome to Mysterious Super Plane channel. Come to us, you will know the history and development of aircraft lines, aviation history from beginning to now. while delving into many lesser known stories of the aviation industry.
Please support us by subscribing to the channel. Thank you!
#Mysterious Super Plane#MartinBaltimoreAirplane
#AviationInnovation
#CuttingEdgeTechnology
#LuxuryTravel
#FutureOfFlight
#GameChanger

Опубликовано:

22 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 65

@pete1250a Год назад

Would it really be so difficult to get an actual human to narrate this?

@offshoretomorrow3346 Год назад

Bravo. Unwatchable.

@philhawley1219 Год назад

Another bloody Dalek.

@peteandresenfamilyadventur8742 11 месяцев назад

The narration is brutally bad

@L1V2P9 Месяц назад

This "Mk i" business is slipshod.

@Theogenerang Год назад

Find a drama student who needs a few bucks and ask them to narrate. It would make a world of difference.

@markallison4794 Год назад

I second that.

@tombearclaw Год назад

And they could probably help edit the script so that you aren’t repeating the same information

@lelanderickson1045 Год назад

I love how the code writers couldn't get their vaunted "AI" reading software to recognize Roman numerals...🤪

@vincentcondron588 Год назад

Yes finally somebody has gotten around to one of the forgotten bombers of ww2 I thank you for this very nice video 5 stars to you

@alanpearson7554 Год назад

The Baltimore went into British Service after Dunkirk. The aircraft was used in Malta for reconnaissance and bombing. A famous pilot was Adrian Warburton - a wing commander at the time of his death. Warburton's War, a great book worth a read, he was a recce pilot but shot down German and Italian aircraft in the Baltimore

@buzzer1961 Год назад

My mothers brother flew one of these as part of the RAAF from an airfield in Egypt during WW2, carrying out bombing raids on Italy in 1944. Sadly, he and his crew were killed during a fighter evasion training exercise when the engines stalled. He was only 21

@cartmanrlsusall Год назад

Robot voiced Wikipedia article, with a click bait thumbnail

@victorboucher675 Год назад

I think the US liked the Douglas Boston better and went with that.

@jebsails2837 Год назад

MK1, MK3, in military parlance is pronounced Mark 1, Mark 3 (sometimes written with Roman numerals). Narraagansett Bay

@tomdis8637 Год назад

Computer-generated speech. A mess.

@MrLucretius Год назад

I thought the MkIV being described as the M. K. Eye-vee was a nice touch.

@JohnSmith-yv6eq Год назад

Get rid of the AI voice...it's horrible and detracts from your presentation....

@jgryff Год назад

The computer-generated narration ruins the video.

@johnking6252 Год назад

I know that's how it is , but the constant mention of foreign contracts is a bit disquieting. But that's how it is. ✌️🇺🇲

@normansilver905 Год назад

Martin also built a fighter-bomber named the "Mauler." I too was a top quality performer but little if anything is ever mentioned about it. I flew one and its performance was well worth mentioning.

@johnjosephfontaine2712 Год назад

Computer narration.........NOPE!!!!! good bye 🤮

@barrytaylor6565 Год назад

I agree, but its a shame cos it was interesting

@thewatcher5271 Год назад

An Underrated Bomber Of World War Two Deserves Better Than The Steaming Pile Of, You Know, Which Is The Artificial Narration. Thank You.

@Beniah107 Год назад

The robo voice is a complete detraction to the article.

@gordonhall9871 Год назад

good design having guns in the wings

@Parocha Год назад

Why does the narration alternates the way the model, or “mark” is read? Sometimes reads MK I as “‘Em-Kay-One”, to later read MK III as “Mark three” (the correct way) to then revert to “Em-Kay”. That, and the way Roman numerals are read as letters is triggering as heck 😂

@tomdis8637 Год назад

Surely you can tell the voice narration is computer-generated.

@truthhurts9241 Год назад

Way back in the 1970s I made an Airfix model of what I think was called a Hampden bomber (or similar). It too was very skinny and had that weird stepped shape on the lower fuselage. Any connection ?

@sabrekai8706 Год назад

I build a Baltimore model, Frog I think it was. I remember "flying" it around in the park near my home. That would have been 1966 or so. I'm surprised there are no larger scale models of it by the mainstream companies. Special Hobby did both the Maryland and the Baltimore but other wise it was mostly vacuform kits. .

@truthhurts9241 Год назад

@@sabrekai8706 Blimey, vacform kits, I remember being to scared to get one. Didn't know how to get the bits lined up properly. In my defence, I was just a kid. Frog models haven't heard that mentioned in donkey's years. Getting old and arthritic's a right bummer isn't it.

@sabrekai8706 Год назад

@@truthhurts9241 You got that right. Retired two years ago, the bod is falling apart. Trying to paint figures or handle the endless numbers of tiny bits is rough. Can't count the number of bits (Plastic and PE) that have gone into low earth orbit. Hard wood floors, and I still can't find most of them. As for vacuforms I've collected about 12-18 of them, all 1/48 scale. Most have been superceded by good injection kits. Some, the B-47, the Neptune and some WWI stuff is still worth doing. I did a Yak 38, turned out pretty good. The nozzles were way off but the kit came out when all that was available was fuzzy photos taken from intercepted aircraft.

@truthhurts9241 Год назад

@@sabrekai8706 I'm just getting back into models after a great many years, people keep buying them for me as they can't think of anything else for Xmas. Got a good few Airfix to practice on but treated myself to a posh kit. Trumpeter's Challenger 2, over a tenner for a 1/72! This thing better have bells on it and make the flipping Tea. (Edit... just remembered that Challengers have the obligatory Boiling Vessels so yes it can make the Tea but you know what I mean.)

@sarge245 Год назад

No, the Hampden was a British design from the Handley Page company that first flew in 1936. Nicknamed the Flying Suitcase by it's crews it was narrower than the Baltimore at only 3 feet wide but could be considered similar in appearance to it.

@ralphbalfoort2909 Год назад

The Mark K"eye" was the Mark one (Roman numeral I).

@mikepette4422 Год назад

maybe stop using a robot

@Idahoguy10157 Год назад

Is it the Martin Maryland or Martin Baltimore?

@davidmurphy8190 Год назад

Martin made both, the Maryland and the Baltimore. A Maryland was the recce bird that spotted the Bismarck and Prinz EUGEN.

@Idahoguy10157 Год назад

@@davidmurphy8190 …. I thought Bismarck was spotted by a PBY Catalina?

@iskandartaib Год назад

Bawlton-Pawl.. 😂

@Giloup92 Год назад

Please use the metric system.

@guylr7390 Год назад

It’s just reading the Wiki article. Welcome to your AI overlords

@hughfraser1547 Год назад

WHY oh WHY are these auto voices used, MK eye eye eye a !!!

@richardw64 Год назад

Constant repetitive information.

@GabrieleBielli-vh3cx 6 месяцев назад

I search a pics of serial FW358? It's possible found?

@patrickendicott354 Год назад

I never heard the narrator; so I missed all the excitement that I read in the comments. Thank God I didn't have to listen to the voice of the commenters😮

@patrickendicott354 Год назад

The content, when read rather than heard, was excellent. 😊

@victorboucher675 Год назад

Hudson replacement for the Brits.

@andrewcomerford264 Год назад

No, the Hudson replacement was the Ventura. Ironic that the Hudson did pretty well in a role for which it had never been imagined, but the purpose-built Ventura was a steaming turd.

@darrellid Год назад

@@andrewcomerford264 What makes you say this? I have not encountered that opinion in my readings.

@HeedTheLorax Год назад

Wow this is pretty bad

@coastalbbq1 Год назад

"the raf"? R A F computer generated

@joedudek5976 Год назад

This channel just runs AI generated material. I am not impressed, nor have I learned anything special from the content.

@dmnewlin Год назад

It’s R A F, never “raf”.

@MisterBethany Год назад

Well, it depends, not formally no but the RAF was often referred to as 'the Raff' by many people during the wr. And after too, as I only heard ot from older people in the 1950s

@johnmcguigan7218 Год назад

Let's just call him HAL.

@jamesbugbee9026 Год назад

HAL would B insulted

@shaneharrison4775 Год назад

None remain that's so sad great old bombers

@brinx8634 Год назад

Lovely voice. 👎👎👎

@danieldonaldson8634 Год назад

well here’s another don’t show me channel to block

@bryanparkhurst17 Год назад

Raf? Do you mean the R-A-F....Royal Air Force

@discount8508 Год назад

🤖it was a sexy machine ..........as was the narrator

@johnnyfisher596 Год назад

I hate to say but I couldn’t make it half way through the video because of the poor presentation. There is too many small things that shows the narrator has no true knowledge of this subject. A good example is the machine guns used. They are referred to as 303 British and 50 caliber not 7.7 and 12.7mm ( the US M2 50 caliber is actually 12.5mm, the 12.7mm was the USSR’s heavy machine gun). The narration sounds like it is straight from a portly written book by someone bored to death.