Would You Be Prepared to Defend Yourself... And Then Pay $68,500 (Or More) in Self-Defense Legal Bills Out-of-Pocket? Learn more about how the USCCA can help you in this EXACT situation >> uscca.co/27vM
This is good now! However, if, IF Democrats attempt to take the weapons (by force), a lot of people will be going to the cemetery, not to court. Most of my friends say they will go down in a pile of hot brass.
Just remember this if they’re comfortable coming out right of the gate saying they want to confiscate our firearms I’m pretty sure they’re going to rig the election. Nobody puts that out and expects a possibility to lose.
Minor but important point: We have to stop saying "gun buy back." The government CANNOT BUY BACK something it did not sell. I bought my guns from private businesses. If the government forces me to give up my guns with a small remuneration to me, I have not sold my guns to the government. The government has plainly taken them, no matter what they chose to give me in return. There is no such thing as "buy back." It's confiscation plain and simple.
@@reginaldsimms199 that's very difficult to get away with if the courts are honest. If the courts don't care about the 2A, then sure, they'll come up with a 1000 ways to confiscate
@@anthonyumphrey519You will have to begin as an individual, taking action on your own. Maybe at some point in the future you can be lucky enough to link up with other partisans, but for the time being, you fight alone. Read Louis Beam's _Leaderless Resistance._
If this actually goes down, you got a plan or something like defending your house from professional swat members or running deep to the countryside? Or you gonna do the thing where people talk about boats and guns😉
When engineered ammo shortages occur as well as taxing and regulating ammo companies so that they can’t sell ammo or components anymore to civilians, thats an easy anti gun strategy! Other then finding alternative tech i don’t think you can preserve 2a when ammo is curtailed! Gov can even stop copper and brass raw goods from reaching civilian 2a ammo companies and only allow federal or olin to use the materials to make ammo for gov acquisition only!
@DTAP17 Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
@@ethangifford1673think the scariest is when the line is drawn, how do we know it’s drawn?when do we do something? Where do we go? Who do we rebel against specifically? Who would be coming for us? Would us soldiers really turn on their neighbors? Do we stand with sherrifs? It would be a first in a very very long time. The answer to any of those questions are a bit chaotic.
I definitely don't blame anyone for preparing. The ones I shake my head at are the ones that say crap like they wish civil war would just kick off so we can get it over with. Those are the dumbasses that's probably never seen real bloodshed and only know what they've seen in movies. Just ask combat vets and first responders what people are capable of doing to each other. That's a level of savage that few in the USA have experienced or understand.
Having access to all guns to make people safe is also an "oxymoron". Did having over a hundred armed LEOs at Uvalde keep the children safe in their classroom from a mass shooter? There has to be common ground when it comes to the 2nd Amendment.
But yet they get guns to protect them and fences gates to protect them? Also criminals that have guns aren’t registered nor should they have them to begin with?😂😂 What they gonna do about that? That’s right nothing cause it’s the American people that’s their target they want to enslave us all and put us in re education camps whatever the hell that means!!?
@@JasonRector-nd4liwhat is she mentally crasy, thats impossible, there are 35million guns in this country not including the stash that our military has
While she cant legally, if something passes, the agencies will act while litigation takes its time. Look at the ATFs record with bump stocks, braces and FRTs. They moved FAST to swing that "authority" they think they have. There will need to be resistance before things can be stopped if she gets into that office and can act. We need to be more active in the community and push for people to vote, push for education on the history of of countries that have implemented such policies. One thing with that though is that we CANNOT be negative, we have to be willing to stay tame and have discussions if we wish to make progress on this matter. The moment we get violent, or show attitude, we drive away people that could potentially agree with us
A couple of months ago I told my wife.If the black SUV's pull up.Go outside I am not surrendering. My wife looked at me and smiled and said Honey, I'm staying here.I'm an american too.😊 I love her
Fredrick Douglas used it in a speech in 1865, but it was actually said in 1830 by……. Stephen Decatur Miller may have originated the concept during a speech at Stateburg, South Carolina, in September 1830. He said "There are three and only three ways to reform our Congressional legislation, familiarly called, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box". This became his campaign slogan in his successful bid for the Senate on a platform advocating the abolition of tariffs
@@thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303They already did! With the fiat currency printing press inflation tax on everything! Once enough people feel the pain...
@@JBmusicartwrong the Supreme Court has already ruled common use firearms are protected under the 2nd amendment! Ar15s are common use over 20 million 😂
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
FFL's are required to hand over records when they close the business. Only paper records can be disposed of after 20 years. Electronic ones must be kept forever until closure.
She shouldn't have 20% approval. She says she is going to take one of you fundamental constitutional rights away and people are like "Take my rights! Take my rights!"
@@AllThingsFlightSim Anyone that thinks they'll be safe by surrendering their gun rights is stupid. But the average IQ is 100. We need to at least make the voting age 21.
Why would you vote for a politician who dodges debate and has made no statements to describe what her policy agenda will be? We the people didnt get to choose her. We the people arent being allowed to know what she stands for. Hard pass America. Let the ruling class know your not to be mistreated
People who are voting for her are only voting for her black half or that she is a woman. Those people don't care about policy. This is why it doesn't matter.
Exactly! The govt doesn’t have money, that’s our money so basically if you give them your guns for money you bought your guns twice with nothing to show for. Why can’t the left understand this. 😡
They will...the 1st thing every Totalitarian throughout history has done is to disarm the citizenry. Majority rule Democracy & individual Liberty are not Compatible - Govt is an inherently coercive, inefficient, & wasteful monopolist of ultimate decisionmaking & violence...All history demonstrates this & simple logic proves it.
@@ozymandias2666This is the question I wonder about the most. Some say local LEOs. That won't last long until sheriffs eventually say they won't enforce. Some also say foreign entity and that has all kinds of bad written on it. Interesting to think about.
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
They will use an Executive Order to grant Naturalised Citizenship to ALL RESIDENT ILLEGAL ALIENS, DAYS BEFORE THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION then march them into Registration & Vote immediately after, telling them who to vote for, not understanding their right to choose (THE LESSOR OF THE TWO EVILS)!
Paying attention to them allowing open borders to let criminals in makes me feel that it is part of the plan for this purpose. When crime gets so bad that the people cry for help, they declare a state of emergency. Orders to kick in doors to find the criminals and seize weapons while doing so, starting in areas where there are known weapons that have been registered. Just my hypothesis anyway.
Yes. A state of emergency. Just like the gun confiscations of law abiding citizens during Hurricane Katrina in the 2000's. Cops confiscated guns from law abiding citizens, which made gang activity waaay worse. And then the 82 d airborne showed up.
@@furious_melons674 I will, thanks. I read a little excerpt and saw how Pete Buttigieg's family was tied to the Gramsci translations. This is very interesting.
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
Actually that's not true.. EO's serve as law and usually reference the laws they rely on to be able to do it. Now Congress can choose to not fund an Executive Order, as in the case of Trump's declarations of emergency EO's to stop extreme worldwide corruption & human trafficking, and another to confiscate the assets of people involved in those extreme heinous crimes. So yes they do serve under the power of law until they are retired.
Like it or not, America basically started because of gun control. Taxation was certainly an issue but it wasn’t until the red coats tried to disarm the colonist at Concord and Lexington and the colonist had enough and basically declared war on England with “The shot heard around the world”. The right to free speech may be the first Amendment, but the right of the People to keep and bear arms was the first actual right acknowledged and defended. And rights have no meaning unless one is willing and able to defend them. I once heard that when an American president talks gun control, the American people re-arm themselves… ya gotta love this country.
"To conquer a Nation, first disarm it's citizens." - Adolf Hitler 1933 "This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!" - Adolf Hitler 1938 Oppressive regimes target civilian disarmament first because an armed populace is a check on tyranny.
I just wonder how many "supposed" gun owners will obey vs how many will not comply? Our founding fathers would be whipping all our butt's for what we have allowed our country to become!
@@jackmarston2515 We actually do. Put some thought behind it. As far as assets are concerned. Land, cars, the value of such things. Not many people will actually voluntarily give those things up to fight a war against other Americans ON American soil. Unless you are homeless and have none of those things, then maybe.
Funny, when the previous administration BANNED Bump-stocks through an executive order, there was no resistance talk. You people politely filed lawsuits and behaved like good little girls. It took until June 14th OF THIS YEAR to reverse it, and even then, silence... I wonder what it's like to have no morals or dignity? Idk how you people do it, honestly.
I wouldn't put it past the government to have your neighbors snitch on you. If you have a neighbor that has firearms you can turn them in and collect the cash reward if it leads to a conviction....something like $5,000.
If you don't go on the offense, you lose. A case needs to be brought to the USSC asking why a poll tax is illegal, why you can vote as you travel, and why you can't be treated equally for your right to keep and bear arms. The parallel is 100%, the court can't weasel out of it, but first, SOMEONE has to bring the argument before the court. Gentlemen?
You’re absolutely right. I was 12 years old when Marcos came to power and declared martial law in 1972. Almost immediately he shut down all media from printed to electronic. Then he came for our guns, knowing how much Filipinos love their firearms.
It’s alarming how subtle and calculated these disarmament tactics are becoming. We need to stay vigilant and continue to defend our rights at every turn.
That's the case in effectively every nation with a disarmed population...violent crime using a different weapon skyrockets. Look at Japan (?) with the machete weilding dudes hacking 25+ people and nobodies able to stop them
We did not forget the United States of America is a constitutional republic. We did not forget that the 10th amendment enshrines states with rights not granted to the federal government. We did not forget that the 2nd amendment grants the right to keep and bear arms. So, let’s see you march on Texas, Alabama, Montana, Oklahoma, etc. with your executive orders!
The thing is with enough people who own guns there's no way. Even if she makes an executive action, supreme Court will throw it down on the ground and 30 seconds so it's just posturing.
You realize that at least half of the states allow private sales right? They can only keep track of in store sales, they have no method of keeping track of private sales. That says nothing of 3D printing, and people who own lathes and cnc machines. You clearly aren't an owner though, or you'd know this stuff.
@@noktumwhatever753 and how was that purchased originally... from a dealer or store which ran the check and got the S/N and we can also make our own firearms with no S/N so whats your point
@@joshbissett1181 the point is if ATF came to you saying you bought a firearm (privately from Mr. Doe.) All you have to say is I sold that gun to a friend but can't remember which friend it was. Point being is private sales are most difficult to track.
@@ricks.1092 exactly its nun of their business we are in this position bc cowards comply or very ignorant of our freedoms or they are the enemy!, not calling you a coward I am just stating this and agreeing with you brother
So many arms owners not registered to vote in many many states…all need to register and vote…gun registry got to be abolished and get individuals working toward registration and confiscation as direct consequence with serious jail time…criminalize it resulting in long jail time…
Imagine an "atf" agency who solely attacked the First Amendment. Yet every single day they attack the second. It's ridiculous to its core. It's slapping the entire classrooms hand for one kid who always steals candy.
Executive orders do not create law that is binding upon the citizens. Executive orders can only apply to agencies and officials who are a part of the Executive Branch.
This is why words matter they keep saying they want to reduce gun violence deaths, but all of their policies for gun control would just be trading in one type of crime for another.
This is why Missouri Had made a law that any police either federal or city county or state can not in any way attempt to over ride the 2A or they will be arrested and prosecuted. It became illegal to come to our state and try to take guns. About 4-6 months ago our state was taken to court and the law may have suffered to some degree after that , I’m going to look it up now to see but every state needs to protect their citizens in this way
@@ddstanfield9259 yeh well your lucky you live in Missouri . I live in Minnesota which is basically the next california. (State where George floyd happend )
Correction on Kamalas statement at the beginning. Some congresssional members HAVE HAD THE COURAGE, to stand against unconstitutional legislation and executive actions.
Chief Justice John Robert's is already on record saying any such attempt would be tantamount to "adjudication through extortion." At which point the Court can rule to invalidate the appointments. They're not going to allow themselves (1/3 of government) to be weakened or stripped of power. Look for their reasoning to cite a violation of the "separation of powers" and "coequal branches" clauses of the Constitution.
They already are saying 2A has nothing to do with owning firarms and is about people right to assemble a peaceful malitia. Wtf is an unarmed peaceful malitia. A group of dudes standing around in camo pants?
No sitting president left or right has the power to take your gun rights, only the courts, and she knows that especially being a former Ag and the only reason she is saying that is for political posturing!
Our forefathers had just come through a Revolutionary War with a tyrant in England and knew how important it was that the American citizen had the right to keep and bare arms for their personal freedom and liberty. They realized that gun ownership would and could stop a "Government" that was becoming like the King of England - Do as I say or you will be jailed. In America we have reached that point where politicians "THINK" they know more than we the people. My local Elected Sheriff of our county knows the oath he took to protect and defend the constitution and has told me personally that if ordered by the Governor or POTUS to confiscate firearms - his reply would be that he has more important things to do.
United Arms Organization For those who do not understand the meaning of ‘'Rights, we need to make it clear once and for all: The 2nd Amendment does not apply to semi-auto rifles, nor does it apply to bolt action rifles, pistols, or revolvers. The 2nd Amendment RESTRICTS GOVERNMENT. The technology of the firearm is irrelevant. The restrictions on government remain the same, regardless of the firearm. The Second Amendment was not written to grant permission for citizens to own and bear firearms. It forbids government interference in the right to keep and bear arms, period. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. This also applies to the other 'Rights!. They are not granted, they stipulate inherent rights that the government may not prohibit." LAW OF THE LAND
