Тёмный

The Most Hated US Submarine that Took Everyone by Surprise 

Dark Seas
Подписаться 403 тыс.
Просмотров 135 тыс.
50% 1

High above the Pacific Ocean, northeast of New Guinea, a single Allied American plane cruised through the night sky on patrol on January 10, 1943.
Below, the moonlit waves seemed peaceful despite the Pacific Theater being in full swing for over a year.
Suddenly, the pilot's eyes caught a glimpse of movement-a massive dark silhouette cutting through the water. It was USS Argonaut, the United States Navy's largest submarine, fresh from attacking a Japanese escort, part of a large convoy.
As the plane drew closer, the crew realized the true scope of the scene unfolding below. Argonaut was not alone. Now, a formation of Japanese destroyers surrounded her, closing in like predators.
Flashes of light erupted in the water. Explosions from depth charges sent shockwaves through the sea. The plane's crew could do nothing but watch as Argonaut was pounded time and time again by shells.
The submarine’s bow broke the surface at a sharp angle, a sign of severe damage. The pilots watched in quiet shock as the worst loss of life in American submarine combat history unfolded in the waves below.

Опубликовано:

 

10 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 62   
@jamesbrumgard9066
@jamesbrumgard9066 Месяц назад
Your description of the Makin raid is a bit off. The issue with the rafts was more of a problem when the Raiders tried to leave the beach and return to the subs. Also they were able to land undetected - the Japanese were not “waiting for them”. They did however respond quickly once the attacking force was detected (due to an inadvertent discharge of a Marine’s weapon).
@NoOne-zo6gj
@NoOne-zo6gj Месяц назад
I know stock submarine footage is hard to come by, but you have lots of nuke boats mixed in with WWII era boats in this one.
@Todd.P
@Todd.P Месяц назад
Oops
@jakeoreilly9627
@jakeoreilly9627 Месяц назад
@@Todd.P they saw the air craft overhead.
@mkvenner2
@mkvenner2 Месяц назад
It’s not that it’s hard to come by it’s that there isn’t a lot of it to begin with.
@boxjohhny5602
@boxjohhny5602 Месяц назад
I don’t think he knows the difference.
@donalddowning4108
@donalddowning4108 29 дней назад
And a brief glimpse of the father of the nuclear Navy, Hiram Rickover.
@philgiglio7922
@philgiglio7922 Месяц назад
7:04...its Russel Johnson...the Professor!
@ifga16
@ifga16 Месяц назад
Just as I became confident that Dork Seas was gaining in professional presentation, it does a massive dive into ruining a very poignant story of a hero boat. Why throw completely irrelevant clips of Hyman Rickover and nuclear submarines into the mix. Navy veterans, like myself, can tell the difference most of the time but the target audience has little knowledge of what a WW2 craft vs a modern one.
@alancaron984
@alancaron984 Месяц назад
Nautilus & Norwhal & Argonaut were all in the same class. All had dual 6” guns. Some of these guns are on display at Groton.
@NoOne-zo6gj
@NoOne-zo6gj Месяц назад
They were not all the same class
@chrispierdominici3891
@chrispierdominici3891 Месяц назад
RIP brave souls! May you have fair winds and following seas in eternity.
@dougwalker4944
@dougwalker4944 Месяц назад
.you need to reference the film footage used, be it actual, stock or movies that evoke the "you are there" feeling.
@johnduchesneau8685
@johnduchesneau8685 Месяц назад
I wish you made the effort to get WWII submarine footage instead of stock footage from the Cold War era.
@blakekeithley3400
@blakekeithley3400 Месяц назад
My uncle Mitch was Carlson‘s Raiders and would’ve been landed by Argonaut at Makin Island
@williamdodge5123
@williamdodge5123 Месяц назад
USS DIXON AS-37 79-81 Point Loma Ca. USS FORRESTAL CV-59 82-84 Mayport Fl. Circled globe from both commands 81-82 overlapped at Diego Garcia.
@butchbinion1560
@butchbinion1560 Месяц назад
Thanks. ✌🏻👊🏼
@ristube3319
@ristube3319 Месяц назад
4:53 “Ancient and clumsy submarine” 🤨 It was 16 years old
@coryfogle5353
@coryfogle5353 Месяц назад
A glorious boat, but in 1941, a sub built in 1925 is ancient.
@ristube3319
@ristube3319 Месяц назад
7:15 “Nautilus” was built and is now a museum in my city of Groton/New London, Connecticut. Bizarre seeing my city in old b&w film.
@BUTCH0120
@BUTCH0120 Месяц назад
That Nautilus - SSN-571 - is not the WWII Nautilus.
@mkvenner2
@mkvenner2 Месяц назад
That’s the nuclear attack submarine
@rogergoodman8665
@rogergoodman8665 Месяц назад
​@@BUTCH0120: Your correct, SS-168 USS NAUTILUS shown in this video was sold for scrap in 1945.
@reaver1414
@reaver1414 Месяц назад
The true "scope" I see what you did there lol
@ristube3319
@ristube3319 Месяц назад
ZING!
@mikkeljensen1603
@mikkeljensen1603 Месяц назад
Talking about nightmare CO.
@johndyson4109
@johndyson4109 Месяц назад
Argonaut? That's a weird name for American submarine sounds like a British submarine name..
@cruisinguy6024
@cruisinguy6024 Месяц назад
Royal Ncy ships always have a very British sounding name, and I agree this sounds British
@kevinsoundmixer
@kevinsoundmixer Месяц назад
The next sub was named "HMS Crumpets"
@hilliswaddell5658
@hilliswaddell5658 Месяц назад
 Search USS Argonaut (SM-1) Article Talk Language Download PDF Watch Edit "SF-7" redirects here. For other uses, see SF7. For other ships with the same name, see USS Argonaut. USS Argonaut (V-4/SF-7/SM-1/A-1/APS-1/SS-166) was a submarine of the United States Navy, the first boat to carry the name. Argonaut was laid down as V-4 on 1 May 1925 at Portsmouth Navy Yard. She was launched on 10 November 1927, sponsored by Mrs. Philip Mason Sears, the daughter of Rear Admiral William D. MacDougall, and commissioned on 2 April 1928. Although never officially designated as "SS-166", at some point she displayed this number on her conning tower.[11]  USS Argonaut underway. HistoryUnited StatesNameUSS ArgonautBuilderPortsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine[1]Laid down1 May 1925[1]Launched10 November 1927[1]Commissioned2 April 1928[1]FateSunk by Japanese destroyers off Rabaul on 10 January 1943[2]General characteristicsClass and typeV-4 (Argonaut)-class composite direct-drive diesel and diesel-electric submarine[2]Displacement Surfaced: 2,710 long tons (2,753 t)[4] (standard); 3,046 long tons (3,095 t) (full load)[3] Submerged: 4,161 long tons (4,228 t)[3] Length358 ft (109 m) (waterline),[8] 381 ft (116 m)[3] (overall)Beam33 ft 9.5 in (10.300 m)[3]Draft16 ft .25 in (4.8832 m)[3]Propulsion As Built: 2 × BuEng (MAN-designed) direct-drive main diesel engines, 1,400 hp (1,000 kW) each.[3][5] 1 × BuEng MAN auxiliary diesel-electric diesel generator, 300 kW (400 hp)[3][5][6] Re-Engined 1942: 4 × General Motors Winton main diesel engines, 1,200 hp (890 kW) each,[7] 1 × GM Winton 300 kW (400 hp) and 1 × GM Winton 150 kW (200 hp) auxiliary diesel generators,[7] 2 × 120-cell Exide ULS37 batteries,[6] 2 × Ridgway electric motors, 1,100 hp (820 kW) each,[2][3] 2 × shafts Speed Surfaced: 15 kn (17 mph; 28 km/h) (design);[3] 13.6 kn (15.7 mph; 25.2 km/h) (trials)[2] Submerged: 8 kn (9.2 mph; 15 km/h) (design);[3] 7.43 kn (8.55 mph; 13.76 km/h) (trials)[3] Range8,000 nmi (9,200 mi; 15,000 km) at 10 kn (12 mph; 19 km/h);[3] 18,000 nmi (21,000 mi; 33,000 km) @ 10 kn (12 mph; 19 km/h) with fuel in main ballast tanks[3]Endurance10 hours @ 5 kn (5.8 mph; 9.3 km/h)[3]Test depth300 ft (91 m)[3]Capacity173,875 US gal (658,190 L) diesel fuel[10]Complement As Built: 8 officers, 78 men[9] 1931:[9] 7 officers, 9 chief petty officers,[9] 71 enlisted[3] Armament As Built: 4 × 21 inch (533 mm) torpedo tubes (bow; 16 torpedoes),[3][9] 2 × 40 inch (1,016 mm)[9]minelaying tubes aft (60 mines),[3] 2 × 6 inch (152 mm)/53 caliber Mark XII Mod 2[9] wet type[9] deck guns[3] 1942: 6 × 21 inch (533 mm) torpedo tubes (4 bow, 2 stern external; 20 torpedoes),[9] minelaying tubes removed,[9] 2 × 6 inch deck guns as above, 2 × 20 mm cannon, 2 × .30 caliber machine guns NotesTwo Battle stars Design Interwar period World War II Awards
@sarkou34
@sarkou34 Месяц назад
Errr, Greek mythology..? Jason &
@kevinsoundmixer
@kevinsoundmixer Месяц назад
​@@sarkou34It was a joke about British.. eh nevermind lol
@vernonrozelle74
@vernonrozelle74 Месяц назад
See that the crews were well integrated -/ only MERIT & ABILITY applied to “Boat” crews . Subs are considered “boats” in the US Navy !!
@johndyson4109
@johndyson4109 Месяц назад
(Losses) What was the class of sub.?
@NoOne-zo6gj
@NoOne-zo6gj Месяц назад
Argonaut Class, they only made 1, not unusual back in the day to only make 1 or a few of a class. The first boat built of a class name, is the class name when it come to US submarines. There are also variants within a class too, but it is its still part of the same class.
@kenthatfield4287
@kenthatfield4287 14 дней назад
It seems to me our higher command need to know what's going on out in the field in this case out on the high seas and the kind of ships that they have to use and of course the sorts of u-boats that they have and what their purpose is. Because this one officer decided to use the wrong u-boats and got 105 men killed. That must have been a real good crew because they were still able to sink a destroyer and I would might say a destroyer of the line since Japanese Navy didn't have too many old vessels in their Navy. I think that all officers should spend some time among the ranks of the fighting crews and fighting men. It's really a travesty that the infantrymen or the sailor has to know everything but the officers don't hardly know how to tie their bloody shoes. If you are an officer who knows what you're doing I congratulate you. But if you don't know what's up you better do something quick before the next war comes up.
@franksmall1313
@franksmall1313 Месяц назад
This could have been better done but still the people in the war did their best with what they had to work with. This was a great site but how this was done is not high level work.
@williammoreno2378
@williammoreno2378 27 дней назад
Good narrative, but the non-WW2 submarine footage sucks.
@auro1986
@auro1986 Месяц назад
all your military hardwares are hated though some exceptions are there
@mingfanzhang4600
@mingfanzhang4600 Месяц назад
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
@mingfanzhang8927
@mingfanzhang8927 Месяц назад
❤😊❤😊❤😊❤
@vincentstouter449
@vincentstouter449 Месяц назад
Don’t use stock Nuclear submarine footage for WW II boats! It’s just dumb.
@allakin8574
@allakin8574 Месяц назад
Ditto with using photos of Hyman Rickover
@seadog686
@seadog686 Месяц назад
Making major gaffes is this site's trademark!
@williammoreno2378
@williammoreno2378 Месяц назад
Yes it is!
@kevinsoundmixer
@kevinsoundmixer Месяц назад
"...the crew realized the true scope of the scene unfolding...." Get it?? Scope?? Hehe.
@balladeerbuzz3688
@balladeerbuzz3688 Месяц назад
this video is ridiculous, often as not showing grossly inaccurate images of MANY other boats, of other eras; SOMEBODY should vet the video footage. this is unacceptable. GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER!!!! "dark seas" are darker due these idiotic & obviously uncaring blunders, and they disrespect the courage & sacrifice of brave sailors!!
@mingfanzhang8927
@mingfanzhang8927 Месяц назад
😊😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂
@mingfanzhang4600
@mingfanzhang4600 Месяц назад
😊
@Bazerkly
@Bazerkly 11 дней назад
Videos are all wrong...
@JayBunting
@JayBunting Месяц назад
Damn,im actually first
@remilekunakanny4816
@remilekunakanny4816 Месяц назад
Lol am second
@tbolt5883
@tbolt5883 Месяц назад
Thumbs down for using incorrect footage of subs
Далее
The Triumph and Tragedy of USS Harder
39:04
Просмотров 167 тыс.
iPhone 16 - презентация Apple 2024
01:00
Просмотров 55 тыс.
The Enemy Plane The US Refused to Destroy
15:50
Просмотров 276 тыс.
The Device that Won WW2 - The Cavity Magnetron
18:33
Просмотров 1,6 млн
How a World War Two Submarine Works
30:52
Просмотров 5 млн
What Voyager Detected at the Edge of the Solar System
51:03
The LARGEST Warship Sinking in HISTORY by a Submarine
36:17
The Other Flying Fortress You Haven't Heard About
13:09
The Most Lethal Airplane Hunting the Seas
13:12
Просмотров 276 тыс.