Looks matters a lot but also what you are inside. As an example, nobody really wants to be a spouse of traumatized person. People who are with them are with them due to pure pity. You don't want unstable wife or husband no matter do you admit it.
@@Star17Platinum17 If the person is ill/traumatized it's off. No matter how good looking or nice she/he is. People deserve stable spouses and children deserve stable parents.
Exactly, this judgment should be made with photographs of people without makeup and under natural daylight, paparazzi photos for example...then you can see the reality😂😅
let's be honest... it's not too easy to make a scale.. all things considered, this *is* indeed pretty d*mn accurate. at least 85-90% accurate. 👏👏 bravo
Alright. It doesn't seem objective to rate girls with makeup on as 8-10 (esp those starring in a commercial with a whole team to shoot her from the right angels, do her hair, makeup, edit the video afterwards etc.) and ones, whose pictures were taken on mid quality cameras, without the proper lightning, no makeup emphasising their facial features in an advantageous way. Also never got the part with body modification. What kind of deformations she has 0:17? I think that girl has pretty attractive facial features tbh, so no guesses why she was given only 1 ahah Also third girl in group of "threes"(0:48) - don't see her being either overweight or, as it was stated, having "wast amount of flaws". Like she just plucked her eyebrows and that's pretty much where it ends. Why not to give her 7 idk, loved her And, if anything, only smn making this kind of videos can be labeled as "Subhuman range", darling ❤🥰😘 Now, how "4" can be "slightly below average" on the scale out of 10? Like, have you been to school before and have they taught you math? First woman at the "4th" group (0:54) has beautiful facial features. She's just probably not in her 20 ies anymore, lil bit of ageism moment as i can see. Same goes about the second gorgeous women at this group. 1:00 - for real? Why would you even think of giving her 4? Bcs she's not your type? I fell for her already ❤ Next, girls rated 7 were just with their hair and makeup done and higher quality cameras compared to girls rated 6. That's what matters when rating women, aha 8-10 - they all are pretty much of the same level of attractiveness. But guess what? Now we have vids, yay🎉🥳 (i wander if, for example, the 2nd girl rated 5 on 1:09 also starred in film or was just recorded on a video, would she become 8? Probably yeah (for me she's initially in 8-10 group ❤)) If the author of this video is more than 6 y.o., i can't even guess what kind of person he is, fr
Your first point is dead on - needs to have apples to apples of makeup/lighting not without or same-same. Though cmon - with some of the others like 0:48... are you telling me if I met you and told you you kinda look like 0:48 or 0:54, would you feel good about yourself? The list is inflated anyway from real world standards. Real world standards is like 5-6=average looking, 7-8=no obvious flaws, everything is solid, 9/10 is like that then something that elevates above, either particularly rare-colored eyes or face shape. Same for guys.
@@johnbigelson7471 well, like I said girl at 0:48 can just grow her eyebrows back, do smth abt her hair (like new haircut or hair styling). Though it's her choice ofc. And yeah, if you'd say me I look like her i won't really feel insulted)) Her eyes are beautiful, her nose is not hooked (neither it's bulbous or wide), her mouth is cute. She's just not maintained and well-groomed, if that's the right words to say. Women at 0:54 is way older than i am, so your point here to say i look like her fades away. I'm not in my 40-s or 50-s and have no idea how I'll look like at that age. Many of us will look not as attractive as in our 20ies as we grow older. It would be more appropriate to find her picture when she was young and than compare her with other young girls in this video. Just Google "young barbra streisand" (it's her) and than say smth.
@@jst_kristie No I dont doubt she was more attractive as younger, I can see it in the facial structure. But when you're saying if the others fix this or that they could be better, I agree! But that's true for most guys too - most people who take care of themselves and are in good shape are fairly attractive, it's rare someone just strikes out at the genetic lottery....so I guess I'm saying that's all we have to go on - how they present themselves to the world. if anything this list says a woman can be ordinary looking, slap on makeup and be in good lighting/clothes and guys will think she's an 8.
Very few people are attracted to women these looksmaxing channel consider a 9+, they just rate based on how much a face is aligned to mathematical perfectness(that too incorrectly) which need not be necessarily even attractive to the beholder(it's subjective and differs for everyone), that slight mathematical imperfectness accentuates their face if anything in a lot of cases...
@@SquallSZ bro u are realistically 4 but i recommend you plesde shabe all thqt facial hair because doesnt şook good on you and your hair looks messed up you can try fade type haircut
@@Brutalcel-lm5if please do more. We need to give reality checks to foids that are 4s which are the majority that criticize videos like this who think they are 9s because of simps. Toilets in 2024 = women
@@asdfg1346on yeah defintely will do that in the nearest future. U9ly women nowadays really think that they are 10 jfl and they don't know who's real 9 or 10
Nope man i thought the same about the girl on 1:08 is the most naturally attractive and beutiful i guess its only you and me man all these boys be looking at the fake models nowadays man
@@Brutalcel-lm5ifvocê nao devia usar pessoas com deformações ! falta de respeito , coloque só as pessoas bonitas nas comparações, isso parece gozo, mais dignidade!