The Most Penetrating Shell 

The japanese have history been lazy when naming their war materiel

How do you call HE shell? Type 10HE

You know what Type 10 "forelight" XD

Because that APFSDS was made exclusively for Type 10.

Just like the US and calling it the M4 Got your F-4 supporting your M4 while you take your M4 and load it full of M4 and shoot while your buddy in the M4 takes his M4 and fires back, missing your other buddy in the M4 Am I missing anything? Oh yeah They are covered by a F-4

or the front of a panther

Or driver hatch of Tiger

@@strategiccommander4736 to be fair the driver hatch of the tiger has such an bad angle, since it‘s on the roof, that nothing can penetrate it

​@@17Trees33 it's a joke

​@@Angelthewolf you're thinking of the cupola, which is for the commander

Just imagining it shooting out a mini figure type 10 mbt toy out of the barrel at 2000m/second

@@gront5172 1700m/s

@@gront5172 They will be supplied from Tamiya

An M1, towing an M1, is ambushed by a unit of german infantry. The seargeant's life is saved when shrapnel pings off his M1, so he yells at the squad to fix M1s to their M1s, while they fire at the germans using their M1s, M1s and M1s. They are confident taking the engagement because if the germans turn out to have a tank, the squad has a M1 standing by. And if any enemy aircraft appear, there is a battery of M1s nearby. The engagement finally ends when they call over the radio for fire support from nearby M1s

​@@i_nameless_i-jgsdfKazariiiiii!

*shell shattered*

t34 tree

The fuel explodes

I have object 292 and it's very op in my opinion because is have 700mm+ of penetration

@@SOVIET_UNION999 692mm*

@@nooti3589 isn't it 695-700mm

@@nooti3589it's 695, actually

Nah don’t even use the apfsds, the HE is actually fin stabilized if you look at the shell (not shell card) and just shoot it at drivers port and it one shots

Wunderwaffe not included

There is no way a hypothetical ww2 tank could penetrate more armour than a modern tank with modern ammunition

​@@DTfishing07gaijin improved panther ll's APCR in the tutorial, so he made an ironic comment. (English is not my first language)

​@@DTfishing07just do the tutorial again and see the panther ll apcr penetration

its just to demonstrate

pre leo 2A6 ???

@@uthopia27 I think at that time Germany had only 2A5 and every nation beside Italy had a ~480 pen APFSDS at best. Ariete had ~620 with insane post pen performance. But it was balanced in a way that Ariete was second slowest and worst protected top MBT, so it was still a skill relying vehicle. But then snail added new top shells for most MBTs and also nerfed Italian top shell. And that's how Ariete became useless: why would anyone play "slow Leopard 2 wannabe with no armor" when there is Leo 2A6, M1A2, T-80BVM and stuff like that?

@@user-ni4dn2ml3h Ahh, the good ol days of Italy, now they have a completely useless tank missing all of its armor, thus it gets penned by .50 cals and an anti air that's a whole br bracket too high

​@@user-ni4dn2ml3hbecause they were dumb enough to be born pasta.

There is nothing stopping the developers from reducing the penetration of its projectile, because there were no projectiles for the object’s gun, not even prototypes

​@@phant0m_98ну вообще-то были даже обстрел проводили как я знаю

​@@phant0m_98были

​@@phant0m_98are you joking? It's real tank's gun, that still uses for prototypes

@@user-vx2ph9ui4i а кто говорит что орудия не существует? Я говорю про снаряды, это история как с об120, всё есть, но вот снарядов нет)

smol boi

Italian supremacy

🗿🗿🗿

The M11/39 should be banned, it has literally the same pen but more explosive filler, as if the L3's wasn't enough

Bob Semple would like to know your location

on what gun? An APHE?

Back then, their tanks are really bad😂

Back then, their tanks are really bad😂

Back then, their tanks are really bad😂

​@@janrafhael2885go to see the B2 centauro

why need a high pen shells for paper tanks 🙄

​@@milokhanh313yh def a bad idea to have a gun that can destroy tanks with easy from far distances

Gaijin doesnt care, the tusk package is already modelwd completely wrong

@@thesupreme8062 but arent the documents about the tusk package still classified?

​@@thesupreme8062 😂😂 you know betrr then gajin 😂😂

@@justuskid9577 yeah as they dhowed

@@thesupreme8062 you are a joke nothing more

German technology🗿🗿🗿

@@DarkOperator Germany 🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿

also gaijin approved that german will get 2a7v, thats means dm73 ;) gl with 900mm pen apfsds

Lol M829A3 Is the Best APFSDS in the World💪🏻🦅🇺🇸🇺🇲🇺🇸🇺🇲🇺🇸🇺🇲🇺🇸🇺🇲🇺🇸✝️ Silver Bullet Gang🗿

@@spacemane_officialidk it was approved. Is there already a date where it will be added? Also the 2A7?

1200-800 somewhere in tween there

DM63 and DM73

Share the docs to Gaijin

9M113 has 1200mm tho lol, and 9M113FM-3 is going to overpressure the shit out of anything with no ERA.

Yeah, its a missle, missles suck because they get fucked by spaced armor and composite armor is far more effective against them too, and lets not forget their extremely slow travel speeds when compared to apfsds

Which is a missile, not a dart

@@atoprime3184it’s a tandem warhead currently very little Era/ composite/ spaced armor work well against it the Javelin has tandem warhead as well. The best thing to do is not get hit these missiles will knock out any tank that doesn’t have an active protection system that can intercept them before impact.

Ofcourse ATGMs has bigger penetration, for example SPIKE LR has 1000m, but the difference is that ATGMs travel at speeds of aproximetly 200m/s while APFSDS travels at speeds of 2000 m/s

50 cals have like 36mm of penetration and they don't go through mbts side..

@@Prowamfordihno yeah and having taken low BR vehicles to high tier, I can tell you, you need at least 80-100mm of penetration. MBT’s have so much spaced armor, spaced crews and even spawl liners that you can’t see in the X-ray

@@verstappen9937 correct

​@@verstappen9937spawl liners? It does nothing

@@LanaaAmor depends brother, but it has a chance to just eat your shell straight up. and if were playing the same game, "a chance" of it happening means it does it all the time

I don’t think the kf51 uses DM13, probably DM63, DM73 or DM83

@@arem3823 I was talking about the naming conventions of German tank rounds. DM, which means: "Deutsche Modellbezeichnung" (German Model Number) and then the number 1 because this round will be brand new, it's the first variant of 130mm APFSDS. The next number depends on the type of ammunition, for APFSDS rounds that is the number 3. The reason the KF51 will use a new round is because it has a 130mm diameter cannon not 120mm, meaning it can't fire any of the rounds you mentioned due to the smaller diameter of those rounds, hence the new round, probably called DM13 or some variation of that. Though the Bundeswehr may add something to the name or change it in some way to avoid confusion.

Причем тут птуры, про танки же видео

​@@ВМФ_СУ-57где 292 ?

shells not missiles

No, the number after the "type" is the year it came into service, so both the tank and the shell came into service in 2010, this applies for all tanks, even WWII. But back then they used a different calendar rather than the Gregorian which is the one we use

​@@Alex53AceWell I knew the Type 10 got its name from when it got put into service. Not so much for the ammunition itself and assumed that it was named that way. Thanks for clarifying.

Missing Challenger 2🇬🇧 (Sang Woo)

Agreed

well... Free Palestine 🎉

@@omarallaham77 baka

@@Morichika_Rinnosukeやめてください😭

It's already free from the british, you are trying to colonize it again with islam now.​@@omarallaham77

Just like all Soviet tanks

@@divan_politika228 t80bvm only has 580mm of pen bro

@@leogunt I understand

Он и не входил

Ису 152 зашёл выпить вместе пивко

Why?

Only 3 has been destroyed, you just another sheep following islamic propaganda

@@musso9yh3 how is your propaganda? When is public knowledge?

@@musso9yh3 they are not fooling anyone mate only telling me the truth

@@Ghost-kv3vj what are you saying

@@musso9yh3 I was responding to your comment but it seems it has disappeared

Its a rocket Not a shell

they haven't unlocked israel yet they have to level up their geography

lmao the t80-90 only has 580mm prn

t-90m 1118mm​@@astacx

In reality,the Leclerc have more than 650mm penetration.

Dm63 is just dm53 but with better performance in cold weather

same reasom why we dont have the M829A3/A4

dm 83 does not exist…

Some reasons to we don t have the OFL120F2

Because then other nations are going to get the same rounds with 800mm pen and there will be no armor left at all.

В тундре нет ланцеат

3BM60: ah new toys for me to play with Those tanks aren't going to be any different really their weak spots are still extremely glaring compared to Russian MBT's like the T-90M who also have spall liners as well and the tendency to just shrug off rounds

@@zeffy._440 the t90m sucks, the penetration is low, the weakspot is even bigger and deadlier compared to western mbts, people are just scared of it so it works

@@zeffy._440T90 sucks.

@@alexs5744 Abrams sucks*

@@viniciusamaralribeiro6526 that would be NATO tanks which have massive weak spots, weak armor, weak cannons and are easy targets on account of their sizes

1000 mm of pen??

Габарит - возможно. От кумулей - верется меньше, но тоже возможно. От ломов - точно нет.

What about the hood

@@fallenmouse6366 ah ok, ty

KMS Bismarck will do

@@potatomine6678 1. It's not in the game 2. It's just Bismarck

​@@potatomine6678 KMS Bismarck aka a super overrated ship

Also M60 AMBT TTD

Currently there is no known information regarding the capabilities of Chinese tank rounds, so they just use info from Russian ones

Honestly, russian CAS is absolute bullshit, and russians also have full lineups while germany has to struggle with 2 good mbt s and 1 AA. The 2a6 is excellent though

merkava использует композитную броню, которая может остановить не только противотанковые снаряды, но и тандемные заряды тандемные заряды могут легко пройти через Era, но гораздо сложнее пройти через композит только большие тандемные заряды на больших противотанковых системах могут пройти через композит

​@@yazovgangAlso most modern tanks have one thing:Active Protection System

Yes

yeah but they want to go even bigger for no reason

@@Anoymous911No you can’t pen the front of the BVM or M1A2 SEP or 2A6 or Chally with only 400mm plus the 600+ rounds have better velocity so they hit faster and harder

@@Old_user123 most of them can't and can, and yeah you probably need more then 600mm pen as well

@@Anoymous911 so my Cent mk 3 at 7.3 with 384mm of pen is enough for top tier?

"Damaged" 😑

​@@clarencecastro6956destroyed*

@@zeffy._440 not a single tank was destroyed 😑 All the videos that hamas posted are all cut, and does not show the after math of the explosion And if you're gonna be soo confident to say that it was destroyed at least provide some proof,source, or evidence

@@clarencecastro6956 lmao we saw in those videos that every one of those tanks were destroyed. The tanks didn't move after being struck, started burning and their crews did not leave those are pretty good indications of said tanks being destroyed. Hamas cuts the video only after the strikes were made and the damage was observed. Also satellite images show that 23% of the false states vehicles were taken out within 5 days many of which were in fact tanks. So you can keep coping

​@@zeffy._440 destroyed means to damage something so badly that it cannot be used..... And not a single one of those videos even show a single destroyed merkava or even damaged so badly that it cannot be used anymore. The Tanks didn't move in the video since they are obviously checking if there are damaged modules and if the crew is okay and still operating. And burning on the outside doesn't mean equal to being destroyed since it's obviously the molten hot copper of the rpg failing to penetrate the armor thus emitting flames, and merkava tanks are equipped with fire extinguishers and tightly air locked so it is absolutely impossible to identify that it is burning from the inside by only using your eyes also if a tank crew isn't leaving after a hit it is basically a clear indication that it means they are still alive and operating inside the tank properly, and the actual indication of a tank is getting destroyed are if the crew is quickly exiting out the tank since it means that an uncontrollable fire has taken over inside or the ammunition rack is about to explode or a massive internal explosion in the tank which caused the turret blow up which are not present even a single one of hamas terrorists propaganda videos. Also only 130+ vehicles we're only damaged/destroyed that was confirmed by the UN, also if you got your source from bulgarianmilitary..com(in which I found your source of 23% destroyed vehicles in 5 days at) which is a fakenews website that was rated and approved by Scamadviser..com, and Scamadviser..com was identified and confirmed by other websites to be a complete fraud and uses review bots to keep its ratings high and is well-known for promoting dozens of fakenews/misleading websites and articles by automatically generating reviews on those websites while also not providing clear details about those websites, and it has been doing this since 2018. And stop spreading false information online, your just embarrassing yourself and making yourself look like an idiot 😑 Also israel isn't a false state, and keep coping