Granite is generated from magma, underground so it cools slowly enough that three types of minerals form; they are quartz, feldspar and mica. The migration of the ions and the crystallization into these three specific minerals requires a LOT of time. The slower the cooling, the larger the crystals. I have seen granite in the Mojave Desert north of Scottsdale, AZ that cooled very slowly, miles underground. The individual crystalline components were up to 4 inches on a side! The premise that granite could be melted and quickly cooled, regenerating granite is ludicrous! This quick melt-and-cool process would produce lava, or perhaps amorphous obsidion glass, but certainly not granite. The objects and buildings made of granite are truly awe-inspiring and created by processes not duplicated today, but the melting-cooling hypothesis needs to be abandoned. I have melted basalt with a 12-inch Fresnel Lens and generated obsidion glass beads on the surface of the rock.
more low IQ a documentary is today, more likes he has. what about solar lens hypothesis on andesite? it seems tremendous to do, but possible. but on granite, anyway, there is a problem, pression...and the guy never asks himself about how to do molds...with an electric saw, and a good pair of eyes. lol. the documentary with Jacques Grimault was hundred times better. even if still far from perfect at many levels.
I think that you are missing the point, Lon. This 'movie' is nothing more than a 'suggestion of how the Pyramids' might have been built. There are dozens more, just like it!!!
@@johnsonhunglo1993 I like the insights into the possibility of poured geopolymer for the limestone blocks. That answers a lot of questions concerning the massive "blocks" that had to be lifted in every stage of construction. The white and brown limestone placement in the interior and casing is also well portrayed. I commented on the melting of granite and pouring it back into granite that was too implausible for me to overlook.
While making concrete and pouring it into blocks or around forms makes a lot of sense, the giant lenses to melt granite into large forms as in this "documentary" needs several demonstrations for me to give this any consideration. Let's build these lenses, based on the initial suggestion using the materials mentioned early on. Let's then show that these lenses have the ability to melt granite at a sufficiently fast rate that would permit the molten granite to flow into the form and solidify in a solid piece the size suggested in this documentary. Consider that this giant lens still has one focal point to concentrate the heat onto a spot. How large would that spot be, and would the heat generated be sufficient to keep the molten granite in a pourable condition long enough to fill such large forms. There are some interesting issues being raised, but likewise there are many dubious claims.
The making of concrete and pouring it into forms doesn't make any sense. The blocks of the pyramid are not the same size, they are the same height but the other dimensions are all different. If the concrete form thing were true wouldn't they use the same forms over and over? Also filling the forms up the way that is depicted and allowing the block of concrete to dry enough before removing the forms would take far too long. The giant lens theory to melt granite is akin to the earth being flat and just as ridiculous.
@@bobkozalov8821 i worked with concrete making formwork with timber i think the worker would us different lengths of timber or you would make a block 2 sides then fillin that’s the quickes way to build a wall so build a black4 shutters to fillin 2shutter and so on thats the quickes way just saying
We've already melted granite with fresnel lenses from large flatscreen TVs. I would consider this debunked. It stops being granite after you melt it and doesn't become granite again after cooling. @@bobkozalov8821 If you only have two sides for the forms, and use neighboring blocks as the other sides while pouring in place, it makes sense that they could be different sizes as you wouldn't be concerned with them looking the same when they aren't going to be seen. Why spend the extra effort to make sure you position the forms in exactly the same spot when it's unnecessary? I think this can be confirmed by the rows being equal width while blocks within the rows are of different lengths. I would need to see them uncovered though, and that's a problem for obvious reasons.
This is typical pseudoscience. The fact that it took several years to film this BS and no one bothered with even a 1/5-1/6 scale experiment is all you really need to know about the quality of "research" presented here. Make a 1m lens with historically accurate tools then melt some granite and pour at least a brick sized block. It would've been worth much more than all your endless amateur looking animated "reconstructions" combined.
I've been watching documentaries so long now that Hollywood movies are actually boring to me... This is the The Absalute Best #1 Documentary I've ever seen! I must have gone back 20 different times to make sure I understood all the ideas... Definitely the best explanation!
Fun watch but lots of misinformation. Drops of water are not identical. Granite cannot be melted to reform and get back granite. Many similarily built structures around the world lack ingredients for cement formula, and so on. The truth seems to be much wilder, and I am not talking about aliens here.Ah, yea... If the stones were molded, why are they all in unique shapes? It doesn't make any sense to make a unique mold for millions of stones, instead of one mold per level.
I have watched it twice. I think it's brilliant and very plausible . The lens melting granite idea is brilliant but only having burnt ants as a child with a magnifying glass I'm still in hmmmm mode on that. Sounds better than aliens or a magical lost civilisation. Brilliant doc for a theory and i will watch again
This is by far the most detailed explanation and demonstration of how the pyramids were built and it’s also by far the most detailed accurate work on any ancient history ever. Thank you team for this masterpiece. It should be adopted by universities for history lessons.
@@kylepatrickmaducdoc1719 The notion of "aliens did it" shouldn't necessarily mean literal aliens. It literally means "We don't know how the heck they - whoever they are - did it. We can't accept the idea of extraordinaire, so we decided to go for the bigger ridicule - extraterrestrials". It may or may not be aliens, which is immaterial. Even if it was aliens, having contact with them and employing their support is another feat by itself. That's why I don't take that argument literally, as it is irrelevant. In all variants, mankind was involved. How? That's what we need to find out.
Any geologist will tell you that small crystals in granite, mean that it cooled quickly at the surface, and that large crystals mean that it cooled very slowly (thousands of years slowly) deep underground. Also, I would need to see a demonstration of a giant magnifying glass melting granite at a rate of anything more than a trickle. Also, natural limestone, being sedimentary, would have bedding planes, whereas concrete would not. Are the bedding planes there or not? Also, making form work for the South American walls would be a nightmare because every stone is different and is rounded on the outside. Well done guys for doing all this work, but I am not sure this is the last word. People do carve stone you know.
Well there are bedding planes that can be easily seen with any Google image search. Not only that but the pyramid stones are full of fossilized sea creatures which formed the limestone
Megalithic stones were carved and transported all over the ancient world. There are places in the eastern Mediterranean and Egypt where a gigantic stone has been partially excavated, and was not entirely separated from the ground. You can also see chisel marks on the stones. I can't imagine anyone thinking the giant statues were made by pouring liquid into a statue-shaped mold. If they can carve and move giant statues, doing the same thing with rectangular blocks shouldn't be a problem.
AfterUpon watching this, All the theory of egyptians carry large stones from far away to build the pyramid just shows we think more primitively than the ancient egyptians. this video make sense
Mostly makes sense except all these sites have quarries and most have stones that were left on the road side. Easter Island and Peru. Baalbak has two stones in the quarry so why say the base was concrete?
I totally agree with you 100 perecnt this ia the only theory that makes sense,now someone shuld demonstrate an experiment about melting granit ,i believe that they used that technology because no way carry such weight hundreds tons of tona of granite in one piece ,also there are evidents on the Giza plateau of melted granit and inside the pyramids itself
Why buildings exist like The Valley of the Kings digging deep like creacy, Abu Simbel build directly out of the rock, the Tempel of Karnak and Luxor? All this pleaces defenetly build in or from rocks. They would not do this if they had some kind of concrete and this buildings proof that they where able to work with stone and transport it.
When you melt granite it turns into black brittle glass. The quartz fuses with the feldspar - so once it cools, you have a black glob like what you see on the islands of Hawaii. The natural granite coarse crystalline structure is gone. Naturally formed granite is igneous rock which is formed over time by not only heat, but massive pressure, moisture and gasses. Different process.
Granite can only form under pressure, otherwise all you get is obsidian. The makers of this movie know this and are lying for views. Shame on them for spreading lies and deceit.
Among thousands of documentary films I watched, this magnificent one is the best ever with no competition.ive literally enjoyed every minute to the max...thank you all.
I've done form work & I can't fathom how the outside sloping blocks were poured, form work exerts a hell of a lot of pressure. Most of my time was spent shoring up, or preventing the actual "box" shape, slab or whatever shape was required from; lifting, moving, or splitting. Now I never stayed in that job to become a master carpenter, or even really skilled, but pegging down a form on a 45` slope with no anchor for the outside portion/face must have been damn near impossible. I won't say it couldn't be done, just that I can't imagine how it could be done, the idea of a concrete mix is not as mad as some might imagine, but my wife (went to Egypt) said there are very small fossils in many of the blocks and the process of making a polymer "rock" would surely destroy those. Never say never... I'm always open to learning something new, even if I'm proved wrong about anything. We should always remain open to new theories. Excellent video, thank you.
@James Stewart I've only limited knowledge about any of the seemingly miraculous buildings and building techniques these people used, sometimes I enjoy listening to theories people have these days, even the far out crazy ones. I can't put anyone down unless I have proof, or superior knowledge on a given topic, still, some of these ideas force you to think "outside the box" and that in itself can bring about new knowledge. I love these videos (even if they are crazy) in the same way I loved Star-trek as a kid, they're entertaining and harmless as long as you realise they are just "entertainment" and given the state of the world outside we could all do with taking a step back, pausing for breath and taking a moment to enjoy life.. with all the craziness in it too. Thanks for commenting, I hope you & all yours are safe and well, best wishes from a simple man trying to make sense of it all.
I have been fascinated at the construction of these for a long time. Watched alot of alien theorists say it was built by aliens. But Quran always said pharaohs architect built pyramids. Could never figure out how they moved such huge stones so quickly. And how everything was so precise. Watching this movie makes perfectly logical sense. Thank you for explaining
@vincentk.8653 to be honest I don't know much about building and I dont know any masons. But one thing for sure it makes more sense than aliens. Advanced technology make more sense than aliens. So how every they did it is better than hearing aliens cam and built them then left, or aliens created us as slaves or whatever wild theory they pull out of their a$$.
@@DrBe-zn5fv READ THE BOOK, THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT, which has completely new theories about this subject ( WITHOUT MONEY) on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com, accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Română ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; NO MONEY ) I'm open to hearing new ideas and new arguments. Pragmatic people always cling to the popular proverb, burning those on the "Galileans" who claim that the world isn't flat ,or that the universe revolves around it ; so I prefer to give everyone a chance to present something new; YOU NEVER KNOW ?, (what if one of the 78 novelties proposed in the book on page 57 , is finally accepted ? ). Have a nice day. Thanks for watching! Hănțulie Ionel.
Surely if you melt granite and pour it into a mould it would become much softer - naturally formed granite takes millions of years to cool down and form if you were to break it's bonds by melting and then you let it cool in a much shorter time, minutes or hours, you will be left with a finished product much softer than the granite you started with. Also would like to see evidence of those lenses to do the melting, I doubt those could have been even thought up in those days and they had no chance of making a flawless magnifying lense with the capabilities you mention - if they did have the thought process to think up those lenses then they would have had telescopes, spectacles, microscopes - ancient Egypt has plenty of precision, but glass was only at the glass bead stage at the time academics date the building of the Giza pyramids.
@@N3m3sis43 READ THE BOOK, THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT, which has completely new theories about this subject ( WITHOUT MONEY) on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com, accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Română ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; NO MONEY ) I'm open to hearing new ideas and new arguments. Pragmatic people always cling to the popular proverb, burning those on the "Galileans" who claim that the world isn't flat ,or that the universe revolves around it ; so I prefer to give everyone a chance to present something new; YOU NEVER KNOW ?, (what if one of the 78 novelties proposed in the book on page 57 , is finally accepted ? ). Have a nice day. Thanks for watching! Hănțulie Ionel.
I had my own tile business and my helpers would always try to learn where to place the first ceramic tiles, like say a 200 sq. ft. Kitchen floor. You have to start exactly precise or if it's off by a 16th of an inch, by the time you get to the other side it grows and it's basically ruined. So theoretically the first stone will dictate the placement of all the stones to come. It's absolutely astonishing that the pyramid is exact considering its size, however it was done, it is the the top of 7 wonders of the world.
thats where the problem started.. inches and feets and yards and miles?? why?? why did some people do things that are allready perfect like the metric system, unnecessary complicated??
sorta .. but a tile job is in a dictated space where this was on a blank slate they could start anywhere any orientation any shape I know this because i play with Leggo's
Alien technology would have been the only way to pull off the mathematics of this ( let alone the physical plant build out). According to this documentary, the Egyptians were " apparantly"well on there way to understanding the physics behind nasa launches which is ridiculous.
Thoroughly entertaining movie, thank you. Whilst possible, I have 2 questions.... 1. When you "melt" granite and cool it, you don't get granite, you instead get gneiss. To reconstitute the original granite, you would have to duplicate the exact pressure, temperature and cooling duration. Failing which, it will not match the parent rock. Also, what formwork would withstand the temperature of molten rock and remain so dimensionally precise? 2. Whilst grinding parent limestone and sandstone rock and combining it into a "concrete" is indeed feasible, the grinding process would obliterate the fossil remains of the original rock, as it is sedimentary and contains many fossilized sea creatures etc. The newly cast "concrete" would then be homogeneous and free of fossils, along with having a different crystal structure upon solidifying. Weren't fossils found in the stones upon testing their makeup? Also a point of interest, the formwork required for casting such huge blocks would have to withstand massive hydrostatic pressure from the wet "concrete", so what did they use to retain such dimensional accuracy in the final product? It is a thought provoking concept though, I am not denying that.
It's not about thinking anymore I just not logical Lens getting to 1000's degrees temperature to melt Well building the lens like that is a huge challenge by itself This is just theory as many others Molds are always the same , no blocks are the same width
@@lucaspodolsky8979 well no. It is not literally impossible. It's not literally anything. It is feasible though improbable, with what we know and understand at present. Logic is only applicable to the standards and knowledge available, it doesn't take into account future knowledge. It was illogical in the 1600's to imagine flight, but today that logic is revised to incorporate new knowledge.
It not even about logic Think about it What they use to withhold over a 1000 degree material to melt ,what kind of mold will stand up to this temperature-pressure few thousand years ago - Cooper??? Ups Cooper melts at arund 1900 F but how you create or rather weld the side Than on the top it is so precise I've seen hundreds of pour-in foundation - 'Masons these days use very heavy steel forms to make sure walls retain shape . These blocks do not weigh 100 or 200 pounds or 300-400 kilos Wooden molds ??? Not absorbing moisture???? - keeping perfect shape after repeat use ???? Different widths - each block has a different size width wise - how you have visible joints - at least 2 sides .When u pour concrete, it becomes one mass These blocks have 6 sides - forget about 5, but have you separate the 4th bottom side from each block - pour in the mold- let it dry and slide it ??It is not crazy glue which dries almost instantly, They had chemicals that speed up the process ????? Each block is very - CAN NOT BE POUR ON THE TOP OF THE BOOTOM ONE DIRECTLY WITHOUT SEPERATION OTHERWISE WILLPERMAMENTLY ATTECHED TO THE BOTTOM ONE There is around 2.3 million blocks in 1 pyramid .....
By the way For centuries, we have been moving forward very-very slowly-except Leonardo... If Egyptian had that advanced technology, let's say 5000 years ago and using Cooper, somewhere on the way to the present, we've lost plenty of everything
The west has written history to suit the colonial empire building. But I think that in collaboration the world can change that to get the truth out to everyone
There are a lot in the comments section too . Give them fiction people accept it but give them facts with proofs and no logical alternatives they reject it. Idiots are everywhere
Not to mention the very recent carbon dating of the cedar rod fragments prove khufu didn't have it built those shafts were sealed 300-500 yrs b4 he was born, which also throws this doc's work crews post construction of largest pyramid
Ultimate generational souvenir. The meter, golden ratio, pie 3.14, mathematics, astronomy, royal constant, and chemistry all in one. This is so incredible and amazing!
This film should be relaunched in cinemas worldwide. It would be good for Fehmi to be compensated. He has worked for us, for humanity. We can also DONATE to him.
Heat melting of sandstone, granit, diorite etc. results not in sandstone, granit, diorite etc. of different shapes, but in glass or glass like stone that does not look at all like the original stone.
Granit was not made in laboratory yet. Not a piece. Robert Gentry ... polonius halos in granit. I was wondering how they could melt granit with solar energy and create the same granit again. Magic
it´s a combination of natural elements mixed and fermented with the rocks and the sun heatin it to the point that it could be molded as some sort of rock jello cake.. :)
@Edwin Jansen actually there are various rooms and undergroud caves along with halls that have the right acoustics, i also believe they had already mastered how to use water and electricity for more detailed matters, so who knows how many more amazin ruins have been kept without rcords or solid proof. :)
I am a Civil / Construction engineer and I will address my points over few comments: 3- What kind of humans can take the intense heat of melting lava to work near it and under a hell of intense concentrated sunbeam you proposed?
Why authors of that theory won't create vases or status out of melted granite with use of self developed gigantic magnifying glass installed as they have proposed ? They made it looking so easy after all~
@@Tom_Mroz I've seen people melt rocks with a magnifying glass probably 3 feet in diameter and it worked. But ya it wasn't grannet and the didn't melt the rock into a form or anything cool like that. But never the less it was some sort of proof of concept.
I remember visiting Huanchaco, Peru and visiting the Chan Chan Huaca... simply unbelievable what I saw...The intricate designs and carvings from a past civilization...Talking with an Archaeologist from the States at one of many sites in the Area...He told me we are barely scratching at the surface of what we are discovering and trying to understand about the past...Thing's are not what they always seem...Great Documentary...Obrigado from Portugal!
While at Chicken Itza 20 years ago, someone in our group asked the guide/archeologist how the Mayans could have built the incredible structures there. His response: "There was extraterrestrial influence." I think he is correct! 🤗
This is the most realistic theory/study/documentary that I ever watched. At least, they use their common sense, not like those who says , the pyramid were built by aliens. My admiration to the team who made this documentary. Brilliant!
If the Egyptians had developed massive magnifying glasses, they certainly would have developed smaller versions for home fire starting and even eyeglasses. Let's not overlook plain windows as well. One other thing to ponder: Glass does not deteriorate and there would be many examples of this being found if it was used for thousands of years.
Maybe they did have smaller versions? No current discoveries of even the larger versions. So cant rule out the smaller versions just because they are hidden away or unearthed.
Either way, since the tools for machining are seemingly non-existent, except in the forensics of the stone itself (cut marks, drill marks, etc), possibly a more modern cover up?
@@dematidesigns5444 That's very true but it's not my responsibility to to prove something didn't exist as it's impossible to prove a negative. It's the author's responsibility to prove it's existence or at least show evidence of it's existence especially when his whole melting granite theory is dependent on the existence of these optical technologies.
@@dematidesigns5444 you are correct that no machining tools have been found. But you are also correct that there is abundant evidence of their existence, unlike the granite melting lenses in this video.
It's amazing. I love especially how the documentary thoroughly explain how the ancient egyptians discovered the basis of the sciences today. It is such a rich history, and so astounding beautiful to learn how they learned from nature, and observation.
The Egyptian pyramids, the Mayan, the Aztec, the Yugoslavian pyramids, the Alaskan pyramids., Did anyone notice how they have strong resemblance to the Meenakshi Temple and other South Asian ( southern India in particular) Temples?
@@saffiyehbrandhijaffer-mcne2800 they look similar however they are completely different in India and Egypt they worship or immortalize the snake and in mesoamerica (amarakapan) they believe in the dragons just like the melanated mongol. They had common knowledge but different idolatry.
This is an amazing documentary! As a retired builder I would like to ask how it's possible to pour molten granite into wooden forms, without them igniting instantly. I also don't see how its possible to slide a wood form off of fresh concrete .They have to be broken apart or pried away from the pour, and it can't be before it's completely cured. In order for blocks to be perfectly flat, the form wood has to be very thick or braced. Other than that I found this fascinating!! P.S. This is THE most interesting video on RU-vid if you're into history!
Maybe they used the method of old metal casters by making the mold from red clay?and as the for the forms according to how they were made they could have tampered a dryer mixture similarly to a shower pan for tile showers? Accelerator for drying? Just ?s
@@blindandok1415 Could be, obviously much of history has changed from what I was taught in the 50s & 60s. just the stuff they are finding in South America in the last 15 yrs. is astounding. Actually all over the world! It's changed my opinion on a lot of things.
@@seadog915 I appreciate your response.i agree the world is a bigger mystery than we may want to admit.there are others maybe we could share some video titles. I know of plenty.thanks george.truth is mandatory.but not so easily discovered.
@@blindandok1415 I was mostly referring to all of the cities and ruins they have found since the LIDAR tech. I watched one just recently where they found an entire city, hidden in the jungle!
@@seadog915 yes.i have also seen.but that is at the most softer of discoveries.the discovery of earth's hidden history is interesting but it's what is ahead thats unknown that is most interesting.most interesting times.
This makes alot of sense. Only one question. Has anyone bothered to actually try to melt any type of stone with a giant magnifying glass? The whole thing hinges on a central untested hypothesis and yet still makes more sense than anything I've seen put out on this before.
I wondered the same thing, but the basis of the theory still holds up, whether it was melted by a lens or some other means. There is another video on YT melting granite using radio waves. John Keely proved it could be done using music, or vibrations of a specific frequency. Given that light is on the same musical scale at a higher octave than sound, it's possible it had more to do with generating a specific wavelength than the heat generated by focusing sunlight. Just a thought :)
Might also have been chemicals, rather than glass. We have chemicals today that can create intense heat. Also there are signs of stone being "soften" several places in the world. Perhaps they where masters of chemicals for stone production after thousand of years of development.
yes Micheal Tillinger found out they used to melt granite in South Africa or what is now S,A check out some of his video's You will find out how they used to and still do it
I can't find a single credible example of granite being melted back into Granite of the same consistency it was. It always turns to obsidian or glass and not back to the origional colors or form in general. The pink granite in the Great Pyramid which is supposed to come from Aswan looks exactly as if it did come from Aswan, so they would have had to have melted it down and when it cooled it remained looking identical. At this point that would be an unknown heating process because other methods won't give you that result via sunlight or fire. I want to believe this and I will continue searching for the answers
I'm blown away that this video isn't being highlighted, discussed and celebrated all over the world. One of the greatest mysteries of the world has been solved in a detailed manner and I'm just hearing about it because someone sent me a clip on FB
@@drwinstonOboogi What claim or claims do u dispute? Only one im struggling with is his breakdown of the Kemetic measuring system but even that one is hard to dispute. Nearly everything else is plausible
I laugh at my knees. Cant u see it is a propaganda video by the woke guys? It is full of ridiculous fake facts. E.g., pls check out what happens to the granite if you melt it!!
@@waylunnakar pouring granite isn't plausible - basic geology tells you that. Also there is a prime example of an obelisk being cut from the bedrock at Aswan. Why bother if you could just mould it?
you are programmed just press accept and update your mind and you will realise your is a lie and the only truth the one and only GOD whose throne is high above the earth and the heavens.@@waylunnakar
A true masterpiece as well as a new point in human history. To those that see this with an open mind and open heart...we are truly blessed to have seen this. These days proving the real truth to people is so hard. They dont want to accept it and would rather be a victim to the shallow circumstances of the bias mind. Thank you to all involved in this production. I am forever grateful for your effort to bring the true story of life back to the people of the world. Thank you again with love, peace, and inteligence.
There is truth here... theres also speculation, here... the all-black thing was hilarious. Molten granite.... the person who commented on this was correct.. it's impossible. Still though... much of this happened.. interacial just like Cleopatra. Of course it was interracial.. ultimate way to set rapport with closeminded tribes... send the dude thats their color to do the talking... Egypt, being the only civ, like this, probably had grest relations with the phoenicians... then i could see all this happening
@@teedepefanio5687 conceptually I love that they took it past the known speculations. Factually yes, I was shaking my head. However that doesn't mean I think I know more or less.!!!
@@Oldwhiteguy the building methods seem pretty on point that's my main gratitude for the production...other things I shook my head and said no no no out loud. The old drag the stones theory never checked out with me they were either poured and cast or uh...something.
Listen, if you think that a hunter gather society barely out of the Stone Age figured out advanced geometry from farming, was able to craft a giant lens (yet no other evidence of glass making from these people) used to melt rock (😂) and figured out the centimeter from water drops (😂😂), filled and set 1 stone every 2.5 seconds, even filled other asymmetrical, wildly shaped and perfectly-fitting stones around Egypt (and elsewhere)...you don’t understand what “plausible” means. It had some animations that made it *look* plausible, but in reality it is still not. You can’t melt granite - quarried 600 miles away - with a magnifying glass 😂. And that’s what the king’s chamber is made of. No mention of this in the video. No mention of complete fossils found in eroded and broken stones. Concrete doesn’t have fossils. It tries to state as fact that the kings chamber is located where it is specifically for religious and ritualistic reasons, completely ignoring that all other pyramids have entirely different layouts. I invite anyone to watch a walkthrough of The Great Pyramid, watch people to struggle to climb the steep incline of the narrow passages (with stairs added that weren’t there originally), to nearly crawling through the tunnel “entrances” to the so-called Kings/Queen’s chambers, and tell me why you believe these people intentionally built it this way with a funeral precession of their King in mind. This video begins by stating more plausible explanations (advanced lost civilization, etc) before laying on the bullshit.
1.- How could they build such large magnifying glasses? 2.- Didn't the wood that was used to contain the molten grain burn at 1200-1500º? 3.- Who gave them this level of mathematics and geometry? Were they Neolithic and knew all this? and did they not know the iron and almost neither the wheel? It is very strange and at the same time, improbable. I get the feeling that we are not prepared to fit the truth because the world would collapse. The documentary is very well done, but there are many things that don’t fit. Much remains to be investigated.
Between 14000-12000 Years ago the Sahara turned into desert. The People had to leave to their homelands and most of them reached the land of the Nil. They was forced year by year to learn to survive the floods. They learned 7000 Years how to manage the problems. And so they became what we all know the egyptians we all admire for their knowledge in so many things.
That's the age old question in almost anything. Which came first the chicken or the egg. They would have had to have a huge lens out of no where to melt the glass to make a huge lens. This is a question humans will never have an answer for. Aliens using lasers is more plausible.
I'll offer my standard argument against the theories in this film. Let's look at modern times for a moment. In the last 150 years we went from horseback to having rovers on Mars sending data back to Earth. The ancient Egyptians lived in the Nile Valley for thousands of years. If they had the knowledge indicated in this film, what happened to it? Given that the advancement of man is more or less linear, the human race should be much further along than we are if the methods proposed in this film are anywhere close to accurate. So what happened?
@@Mike-in3cp Yeah, I would agree on that rough timeline. It would be interesting to know how much of an affect it had on the world and its knowledge as well as how much it set things back. This was due to a meteor impact. Still, that's 2100 years BCE so all of that knowledge was lost? Caesar burned Alexandria in 48 BCE so that didn't help either. I would like to better understand the timeline of human knowledge.
And yet so simple....I think the reason the Egyptian gov is so hesitant to explore these ideas....it'll make the white man and his lies look weak compared to the black man and his brilliance of that era.
This might be one of the most beautiful films i ever seen in my life. Thank you for the effort to rise a better future for humanity. From northeast of Brazil, here is another voice of the choir, till it's heard and settled into the hearts around the world.
The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off. I worry about when a population becomes distracted by trivia, people who put junk culture on a pedestal when its a tool to distract for the people. Meanwhile, the face of our planet, the biosphere, is being sharply changed by man, destroyed by "psychopaths" corporations, people die every day and the world goes on like nothing happened. The perfect dictatorship would have the appearance of democracy, a prison without walls in which the prisoners would not dream of escape. A system of slavery where, through consumption (Apple, Rolex, Nike, Johnnie Walker, Armani, Ferrari, Louis Vuitton...) and entertainment (Marvel, Disney, NFL, Star Wars, Adele, NBA, Pokemon GO, Game of Thrones, UEFA...), slaves would love their servitude (producing dictatorship without tears, a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies). That system is our enemy. It is all around us. It is the world, the wool, that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth (a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch, a prison for your mind). This system organizes our economy, our politics, our habits, our lives, and even provides us with rates and credit cards and gives us the appearance of happiness. And this seems to be the final revolution. You've felt it your entire life, that there's something wrong with the world, but accepted as normal (wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it). Like everyone else you were born into bondage. It seems that we have been born only to consume and to consume, and when we can no longer consume, we have a feeling of frustration, and we suffer from poverty, and we are auto-marginalized. And many are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.That's how it is with people - nobody cares how it works as long as it works. I only hope we understand that reason before it's too late. Fact is that when we are mesmerized by someone (corporations) we lose all sense of analysis and reflection. It is important to realise that everyone is born with a brain, so I'm being pragmatic by saying no one has the right to be ignorant.
@@thedangerous1 for example they implied the pyramid was composed only of precision cut stones which is rubbish. Also they implied most of those came from far away which is also rubbish, Giza plateau was the quarry for the vast majority of the pyramids construction material
As an antidote to this misleading propoganda, that suggests ancient non- white, people's were not intelligent and needed outside help because they were brown skinned Africans, therefore unable to achieve great architectural feats. This French film depends on not telling you that the Nile flooded every year during which the Pharaoh hired the tens to hundred of thousands of farmers, who due to the anuual flooding become skilled stone workers after a few years. It also does not acknowledge, that this annual flooding was the perfect time to ship rock slung between two ships via the Nile with a carved channel that cut through the rock to the Sphinx. This film also overstates the hardness of the various rocks. Most of the Pyramids are limestone which when quarried from the Giza plateau is soft and easily cut with copper saws. "Ancient Aliens debunked" answers all of the misleading claims in this French film that says brown-skinned humans were too stupid to build the Pyramids. I suggest you all search for and watch "Ancient Aliens Debunked". If you value challenging information about ancient civilisations, if you value the concept of our ancestors being intelligent, sophisticated beings who had knowledge that they developed with their own intelligence search for this alternative move.
@@captainsensiblejr. more over they forgot to mention the fossils found in the stone! SGD RU-vid channel has great explanations and experiments on this
The only thing I find improbable is melting granite. Melting it is one thing, but creating the energy required to keep it molten long enough to cast is something quite different.
@@HotjeKvovg Nope. NOT possible. Also ... idiotic to propose, when moving a 50 granite block is MUCH easier and we KNOW FOR A FACT that's what happened. Do you idiots ever bother to read books - and find out what we ACTUALLY know about the Ancient Egyptians - or do you just rely on RU-vid videos for your "research"?
I'm working on ways to do this... not melting per say, but rather softening through sets of high frequency, localized vibrations. You don't need to melt a whole block if you can just make the part you're cutting into a putty. I'm in the hypothetical stage, and honestly, I have problems already.... Sound waves get LONGER in a dense material, because the sound travels FASTER through it. So, we would have to start out with sound waves too high frequency to produce through speakers. Perhaps they got vibrations to occur in dense materials first, somehow, maybe via chemistry, or electricity (piezoelectric effect). I'm thinking cymatics were used to transport the blocks if they were not formed and created.
@@growthisfreedomunitedearth7584 They had electricity and hifi (I've heard of the Bagdad batteries) to transform rock? That's no more than speculation of almost cosmic proportion. Copper saws, sand and water could be used to cut the stone. Splitting techniques, chiseling, drilling holes, it can all be done. Dig ditches, use the Nile and have stones drifted on rafts or sailed on boats close to the pyramids. So why UFOs, Annunaki, lasers, plasma cutters and the whole fantasy factory 'that Science always tries to hide'?
The Western world theories just seem so ridiculous. They paint Egyptians as being so brute, rigorous, and cruel. When they probably were elegant and enjoyed life. That's what I think highly evolved persons would do anyway. Not slave all day building in the sweltering heat.
@@danilogiusti7818 the least they could do is at least try some of these silly fucking ideas BEFORE they present them as fact. And melting a small chunk of granite with a fresnel lense is NOT proof of granite being melted and poured into clay molds. Where are the myth busters when you need em?
I've always been fascinated with ancient Egypt and this was a wonderful documentary, better than anything I've ever seen from National Geographic. It really showcased the mathematic and engineering genius of the ancient Egyptians. While I'm not 100% sold on the idea of using the sun to melt granite (that would need to be an awfully big lens) this seems much more plausible than the insane belief that ancient Egyptians cut granite (with bronze tools) into perfectly smooth proportioned blocks and then transported those multi-tonned blocks for miles using only man-power (or boat power) and then stacked them neatly on top of each other. And, of course, it took the French to put the truth out there. I would never expect something like this from a British or American source.
As always, what is not mentioned is drowned out by what is, like what about the sedimentary lines of limestone in the large areas that are supposed to be concrete? And the real reasons for the underground shafts which had flapper valves for water. And the name of the pyramid which means " fire in the middle`.? The limestone was cut the same way it is today ,very easily with wedges, awhile is way faster than crushing stone into powder. Only the height had to be exact, and the end of each row needed to be exact. The round pounding stones wor real fast when a small camel dung fire is built then doused with vinegar. Each worker had his space and stood shoulder to shoulder with his mates, hundreds of them . The grant was taken from huge lava fields. There's a type of gravel called " rotten granet", Grant is easily dissolved with the right techniques. These guys should have worked in a grant quarry for a few days and seen how easy professional workers cut and move grane. Some of their stuff is good, but they never have gotten their hands dirty. I wish they were right, but I wish they were masons. Anybody ever wonder why graduates wewr a " mortar board with a string on it on top of their heads? Cause apprentices carried mortar on top of their heads! Some wascast but there's way too much wool being pulled over our eyes
Watching for the 3rd time and loving every minute! Thank you to all who made and partook of this film and research. May we never think we know it all, there is always something to learn.
Learn this.. if you melt granite it turns to black obsidian and will not resemble its original form, like the vases try melting granite and having large quartz structures in it not possible it would be mixed and uniform. As a form of black obsidian
The issue I have here with the “melting granite” theory is that there are actual experiments on RU-vid right now of melting granite. It turns to a glass/obsidian type of material. It doesn’t melt and pour back into it’s former state. It looks different
That's interesting, can you post a link? Perhaps there was something added to the granite to change it's chemical structure to prevent it from turning to an obsidian-like state. Do not see how those stones could have been lifted to the height and placement in the pyramid unless they were poured there in place... It's by far the most logical explanation I have heard thus far. Is there a competing theory?
@@rustedlight Do a search for Pierre Houdin. He shows how the Grand Gallery was used for a sled that acted as a counterweight to lift the large granite stones. There are actual scratches in the Grand Gallery caused by the sled riding up and down it. To me, it makes a lot more sense than the theory of casting stones.
I imagine the idea is to mix the components similar to when making mortar, melting it, and pouring it to actually make granite, not to melt and pour already existing blocks, like the "documentary" suggests. Doesn't mean that's any more realistic though.
@@Cerl84 Because only the Great Pyramid had chambers above ground level. It was the roof stones for the Queen's and King's Chambers that were so heavy. The regular pyramid blocks were small by comparison.
In the beginning of the movie the Egyptian obelisks were to big and heavy to be moved by man. Later in the movie the Roman's came down to Egypt and snatched them all up to move to Rome.
This is the best explanation of history and math I have ever seen or heard. More than that, everything makes so much sense. Thank you for sharing this with all of us! I hope that many millions will watch it!!!
everything makes sense except the very foundation of the build being a fallacy, as in melting sand or whatever they were melting into lava will never produce granite or anything remotely close to it
Yeah but series are like farts most of them stink and you have to listen to them and you can either golf clap or make a frown depending on how good it was but either way I don't need the guy who farted standing up screaming I farted at the top of his lungs
@@boopster4033 and you proved my point you don't want to listen to what I said and I don't want to listen to what these guys say... the whole point... They are opinions not fact... Unless you're f****** 6000 years old and were there you don't know for sure so you can postulate all you want but you don't actually know but the people with the most backing can scream their point and Theory from the top of their lungs... But they don't know
@@aarontighe553 You might check out Michel Desmarquet's lecture on RU-vid and The Thiaoouba Prophecy. All chapters, 1-13, are available on RU-vid as well...
Melting 100t of sand in an hour requires something on the order of 450,000kw of power. At high noon in Egypt they can get about 1kw out of a square meter of sunlight. So, this magnifying lens would need to be 450,000 sq/m in area lol. So…. Me thinks that isn’t how they did it.
Nah dude. Do your homework. A 5 foot diameter convex piece of glass glass can liquefy granite. Check link if u don't believe me. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-I3pCs7jwK7I.html
Don't you understand that ordinal pharos where alines with technology that could transport they galaxy level distances So do you think they understood concrete
I would be more convinced if a replica lense was constructed so we could witness this molten rock theory in action but, nonetheless, it's a compelling theory
John Hutchison would have used 'frequency generation' to melt the stone . Not from heat but from temporarily disassociating the atomic structure with frequency . My assumption is the Great Pyramid was built pre-flood when they had technology far superior to what exists today .
@@davidleomorley889 [Ancient Egyptian] Pyramids were not tombs. There have never been any mummies found in any Egyptian pyramids. Neither are there any ancient Egyptian texts that state why the ancient Egyptians conceived and built their pyramids. Indeed, there are a number of ancient texts that state the pyramids were not used as tombs.
@@davidleomorley889 Gobekli Tepe is 11,000 years old, that's a fact, recently found, so how can we be sure that a civilization did not exist before the end of the ice age??, You are taking the side of academics, your view is no more provable than my view.
I dreamt that all the pyramids on Mother Earth light up. Lights upwards. I remember thinking wow there are so many different pyramids around the globe. Sending love and compassion to all who reading this 🙏🤗🌹
These are all great theories, the best I have heard in regards to ancient Egyptian construction technologies. In any case, I am a New Yorker, thus by nature a cynic and a skeptic. I am not sold on the melting of volcanic rocks via parabolic lenses during that epoch (4,000 years ago). If someone, ANYONE could explain THAT to me, it would be highly appreciated.
I'm guessing New Yorkers (and most other places in the world) must be VERY cynical and skeptical about their leaders response to the kung flu. Meanwhile in Florida common sense prevails and all is well by comparison. I agree with your comment but I'm not too concerned HOW they melted the rock, only that they obviously DID as this theory is so perfect it must be considered fact. If this idea is ridiculed and suppressed then we're right back to current times with the tried and trusted award-winning drug that Joe Rogan, for instance, used to cure himself. The drug that if acknowledged as a remedy would have PREVENTED Big Pharma getting even bigger with their experimental stuff.
The ideas presented in the movie are not "theories." They are speculations or at best "hypotheses." Theories require experimentation and multiple confirmation of those experiments and their outcomes. An idea that has become elevated to a "theory" has achieved a very high degree of certainty. Hypotheses are important in that they lead to further investigation, but they should not in themselves, be taken as the final "answer."
In another documentary they go deeper into the mathematical data the Pyramid conceals; meter, pi, the speed of light, circumference of the earth.. The Revelations of the Pyramid it is called; ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2fS9ixfQ_no.html
uuum... there's this thing called post rationalisation..? like when you notice that my bed is hanging off the ceiling and you see that if you look across two of the corners it points to the fridge which you observe has just been opened by the cat, so it must have been a hungry feline that lynched my bed, you conclude, meanwhile Syrius was nowhere to be seen, which was unfortunate for your hypothesis wasnt it but never mind?
uno de los mejores documentales y la teoria mas logica que he escuchado sobre las muchas estructuras que hay en muchos lugares de la tierra. GRACIAS por este documental.
Uhmz well maybe Thoth came from thought? thinking?| one could describe the emergence of a thought to be born out of nothing and therefor everything, out of our universe,in our head, a sign from god, from the stars out of nothing. Then off course years later this is interpreted as a alien entity. Makes sence to me anywayz
And 1 more question Each block of pyramids has different width and visible at least from 2 sides joint lines ,front nand top 1) In order to get different widths you have to have different molds - milions of them 2)You can not point joint it as it pushes material down 3)You can not leave the space between blocks and slide when it dries is already permanently attached to the bottom block 4) How you separate bottom of each block ,even if there was something they were able to put it under, how do you remove it from the bottom with all that weight pressing down So lets create scenario for the 2 course.... corner block is molded - than 2nd mold in that case rectangular mold is attached or slide,concrete is pour on the top of alrady dried bottom block - is there a separation between 2 of them ????or you wait untill 2 block dries ???? And than you slide it out from the mold (how long you have to wait for concrete to dry ???) What they had to use on the inside of the mold to separate it - duck fat ? , there was no steel . It is possible that wood will hold the outside pressure and not bowed These were not brick !!! Very heavy blocks
Wow! This just pulled together the centimeter, Water droplets, magnifying glass, Egypt, Peru, free masons, knights templar, metric system, philosopher stone, cement, sacred architecture, pi, the golden ratio, and racism!
I don't understand the rule about the size of droplets... different quantities of water will produce different sizes of droplets? Won't they? How is it possible to always produce 1cm shapes if the amount of water used is not fixed?
@@j.m.w.5064 I guess you're not understanding what a "droplet" of water means. It's the smallest size a droplet of water can be sure to surface tension. Not a vague "drop" of water
@@paddle_smith Yes, I really don't know. It's a real question and not covered criticism. I just couldn't follow the explanation. ...when I look at my kitchen sink, I see shapes smaller and larger - so under what circumstances do they form 1cm? Cheers.
I think you will find the catastrophe that happened was the Younger Dryas impact and the sphinx is in the time of Leo and in general, the civilization is a lot older than said here.
@@gxhcsmhvc what the hell is that got to do with an event of 12000 years ago or the recognition of the great year of Leo??? Have your jab and go back to sleep!
Agreed. All of the geological, archaeological and anthropological evidence supports the period 12,800 - 11,600 years ago as the time of the Earth Catastrophe. Did you notice the movie briefly showed Immanuel Velikovsky when describing the catastrophe around 2100 BC? Velikovsky's theory is that Venus was birthed from Jupiter in Biblical times and as Venus was drawn toward the Sun it passed very close to Earth causing gravitational effects (like lifting the water of the Red Sea) and electrical, magnetic and other effects like raining hydrocarbons (manna from heaven and oil in the Middle East). Velikovsky presents mechanisms - based on Jupiter birthing Venus about 4000 years ago - to show how events in the Hebrew Bible could be "true." While Velikovsky makes a compelling case and interesting reading his theory has been pretty thoroughly debunked. So why would the authors of this movie include Velikovsky to suggest the Earth Catastrophe happened during recent times and the Egyptians are the "pre-Flood" technologically advanced civilization that was destroyed in the Earth Catastrophe?
@@jbfrodsham that's not tired ppl have learn a lot from tiktok maybe what u watch on their r stupid ppl but from I watch tiktok has a lot on there u can learn from or just enjoy good content
Thank you to all helped make this movie/documentary. You all did a wonderful job, especially asking all of "the right" questions. And not accepting the same repetitive explanations that have been repeated for the last 150 years, and everybody accepting the "narrative" that never really made sense. Just wanted to be polite and move along. And not end up in an Egyptian jail cell. lol
It needs a lot of effort to produce a documentary like this, develop the theories and illustrate them in interesting fassion. Good job, thinking out of a box and try to give us an alternative to the common theories. Thanks for your effort. Nice script.
Lol you got that right VERY MUCH "few knowledge and truth" , i think you accidently got that right 😅 (As in there wasn't much "truth and knowledge" at all . You know what youtube is like for idiots misinterpreting stuff, wish i didnt have to type this bit but experience shows i should , every time 😅)
@@tyrrellharvey this video just made this documentary real to me. Thank you!!! If only everyone in the comments could see what a small lenses can do to metals.
OMG RIGHT ON, YOU NAILED IT EXACTLY I HAVE been a stone mason for 57 years, and I spent my last 20 of that mold making and CASTING CAST STONE, Portland cement and aggregate, color,,fibre for strength I found HONEST, Level, Plumb, square, GIVES YOU The Golden ratios I AM STOKED MY MIND FOUND ALL THIS SACRED GEOMETRY!!!!!!!! THANK GOD I AM HONEST LOVE ALL LARRY ANTHONY SCHAFFER GREAT WORK PLEASE SHOW NEW VIDEO OF POURED CRYSTAL LENS AND SHOW YOU MELTING GRANITE BEFORE I FOR I DO IT ROCK ON L. A. S.
I am completely bedazzled by this epic documentary - I've visited the Great Pyramid when I was young, and felt the shear power of the Massive Chamber with the sarcophagus/graphite basin in it. I felt something very true and powerful that day. I must admit, my theory was more focused on the resonance side of things, being that Graphite in terms of acoustic reflections is ideal for maximum reverberation. I always felt that chamber was like a hospital surgeory room, using resonance/voice & harmony to heal an inviduals body of diseases and infections, due to the material of the walls, it was able to effectively create feedback as the sound had no where to go other than back on itself.. using sacred geometry to position the voices around the body for the full effect to be reached. or so that was my theory..
@@tampauser6879 I was 13 years old when I went... and not all of it hit me then, only the raw power of the resonance in the chamber, sooo pure.. I then went onto persue my career in music even further, eventually going on to study a masters in audio engineering.. Whcih is why I thought my theory was so strong.
Finding the harmonic resonance of something allows you to do amazing things. Tesla was able to destroy a building with a hammer, and he also blew out a few power distribution stations when his experiments hit the resonance point of the circuit. If you have a round pool, it's pretty easy to generate three-foot waves in a 15-foot pool with a period of one second.(my kids love it!). A far as healing, however... our bodies are *way* to complicated for that. We are not guitar strings. As far as pyramid power is concerned, Mythbusters busted it fairly convincingly. Then again, they did not repeat the experiment with 7.75 million tons of stone...
Interesting video with some plausible theorys but the Molton granite theory doesn't address the bore holes found, the disc like cutting marks left on some blocks or the partially cut blocks not to mention no evidence has been found of a "lens".
Also. If they were trying to hide this info from the initiated there wouldn't be any plain glyph of the technology. Like the pile battery/djed pillar, the dipole antenna/uas scepter, the light bulb, cables, generator, the oscillator, it's all there
i have just recently visited the Great Pyramid of Giza and watched this amazing documentary and can quite honestly say that this completely answers the questions you have on how they were constructed but more importantly tells us that we need to be using solar power in more dramatic ways to reduce our energy consumption its so so simple thank you Fehmi, will be sure sure to share this documentary
I don't understand! in what way would it reduce the overall energy consumption? or did you mean something different and simply articulated it incorrectly?
@@cepheus7391 . Overall ? Who mentioned that besides you ? Do you think maybe its about fossil fuel consumption reducuction, not overall energy usage reduction ? Right ?
@Unkl_Bob @Unkl_Bob does it say reduce fossil consumption, or does it say reduce energy consumption? I can't tell you what they meant that is why I asked. I didn't need to say overall as it is bound to the statistic. I can't reduce human water consumption without it reducing the consumption of water overall. I cant recude the amount of air we breath without it reducing the consumed oxygen overall. Maybe they did mean fossils, which is why I made an assumption that maybe it was just articulated incorrectly.
The pharaoh asked Haman, his deputy and partner, to build a huge monument to prove to the people that God does not exist. Here Pharaoh resorted to the technique used at that time in construction which was lighting fire on stones in order to pour the needed stones for the monument. The Pharaoh said after that: “So kindle for me (a fire), O Hâmân, to bake (bricks out of) clay, and set up for me a Sarh (a lofty tower, or palace) in order that I may look at (or look for) the Ilâh (God) of Mûsâ (Moses); and verily, I think that he [Mûsâ (Moses)] is one of the liars."( AlQassas : 38).
They briefly mentioned rainfall around the sphinx but didn't that occur well before the Egyptians? The rain fall on the sphinx would mean its much older than they claim.
In the Sphinx itself it is written. I'm here since the beginning of civilization. But which civilization? This documentary disregards such investigations from John Anthony West and Robert with water base centimeters that is insulting.
I applaud the logic on this documentary, however I personally do not see a race that is extremely advanced in chemistry, thermogenic, astronomy, mathematics and physics but their language was still based in hieroglyphs. In reality, it would take hundreds of years of learning, teachings with trials and errors without any evidence of books, schools, or even the super magnifying lens that can define the master pieces of engineering, science and technical advancements used to build the pyramids of Egypt. Don't get me wrong, this documentary led me to finally understand the way pyramids were built, yet there are so many unanswered questions; for example, if this civilization was so ahead of time, why would they choose to start building in a place where the climate was too rough if they were able to travel anywhere? Why would they take precious years of their live building a enormous tomb for 1 Egyptian monarch if they are smart enough to think that is just a waste of time, energy and resources for just a tomb, regardless any religion? Theoretically, if the Egyptians built these pyramids 2600 BC, where are the records or hieroglyphs explaining the use of Pi, metrics or golden ratio hundreds of years before they began construction? Who were the Egyptians scientists, engineers, architects, planners, contractors, designers, teachers, etc. that planned and work to create these monuments? I believe the author and researchers of this documentary are on the right track to discover the truth of the past, however the timing and purpose of the pyramids and/or other massive monuments around the world, not only are way off but still are another hanging theory and inconclusive. At this point, I personally cannot disregard ancient alien theorist or 800,000 BC advanced human civilization theorist using the methods described in this documentary; I am sorry, but I can't see these methods used in an early prehistoric bronze age dynasty.
But on top of everything: what was the scope of the pyramids, then? Please don’t say they were tombs, which is totally ridiculous. Honestly, it is a rethorical question: they were piezo electric power stations. Same as the one Tesla designed.
Concrete limestone as postulated could be expected to have a lifetime of less than 100 years, 200 years if we allow for the dry environment. Moreover, concrete is known to spall on compression joints without internal reinforcement or inter-joint cushioning.
A company in Texas explored the recipe for Roman marine cement, and proved its strength and its increasing strength in seawater over time. It took a long time for roman blds to crumble some still stand. modern cement is really kind of weak. So what was the mixtures of the cement for above water cement in roman times. They did experiment a lot too. Yet still not as good as the possible mixtures shown in the video. lol sorry I just want answers!!!
@@NeetchianQueen Roman concrete draws its strength from the use of volcanic ash and the resulting interaction of the ash with sea water. One point is, if the Egyptians had all the knowledge and infrastructure to make the indestructible concrete posited, why was it not used continuously for other structures?
@@wisedupearly3998 "(W)hy was it not used continuously for other structures?" - Maybe the knowledge of the engineered stone technology was kept to a select group of people (like a guild system) and its use reserved for sacral buildings. - Or maybe it was used continuously for all kinds of structures, we just haven't looked at Egyptian ruins through this lens (pun intended!) yet. Unfortunately, engineered limestone seems to be indistinguishable from the real thing. What's needed is a quick, easy and economical way to test sites to confirm that they're constructed of a man-made material - and the willingness of Egyptian authorities to allow such testing.
It is time to give back to Africa and Africans. A good deed is something one returns, Thank you for acknowledging the Mothers and Fathers of civilization is Africans and their contributions.
This documentary is the best among many others to explain how the pyramids could be built, even though I am still not fully convinced. The engineering skills and scientific knowledge required to accomplish such a task of building a big pyramid are still mind boggling.
They are indeed staggering works of mathematics and construction engineering and full credit goes to the Bronze age Egyptians who built them. I highly doubt they used any of the techniques postulated in this film, other than the basic geometry we know the Egyptians mastered.
@@rishik7665 I believe the Pyramids were made using conventional, known methods. The French architect Houdin has a very plausible theory that uses an internal ramp and counterweights. Whatever the exact techniques the Egyptians used the Great Pyramids required a vast organized labour force including engineer mathematicians, master masons, qarrymen, stone lifters, tool makers, transportation, rope makers, food supply, beer brewers, everything. I include brothels because they were basically built by young men drafted off the farms and villages. The Great Pyramids, in terms of man-years they took to build, must be among the single most expensive constructions ever made. I don't buy Aliens, or Atlanteans, or some lost advanced high tech. A RU-vid channel called Ancient Architects treats this subject very well. I'll post a link. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gBpUU5uqIi8.html
Free your mind and the body will follow!You believe the centurys of lie’s .Let the truth flow.Thank the Most High.The truth crush to earth has risen again. The devil is a lying demon and there no truth in that beast.His day is coming soon it good to be alive to witness their demise.
I really appreciate many of the elements of this documentary, the open mindedness, the courage, and the impressive amount of research. I especially appreciate that many other alternative views are being given fair representation. The challenge I had was with the assumption that Afro-Egyptians traveled the world and carried out massive architectural projects without leaving a significant genetic signature in those locations. I am still more inclined to align with many of Graham Hancock‘s theories about a predecessor civilization which disseminated these wisdom‘s across the globe - including astronomy, mathematics, the art of working stone, and similar spiritual doctrines. I do also love the promotion of geopolymer and concrete construction methods . I noticed in one of the comments the difficulties with the use of lenses to melt the granite where it too quickly hardens and re-coalesces into glass. The end result dictates some manner of stone softening which appears visually consistent with scoop marks out of native stone and to me points toward a chemical process. In many locations around the world there are artifact deep, detailed handprints casually scoped it into softened stone which could not be accomplished if the stone were thermally molten. Overall, an amazing documentary, and I’m profoundly indebted for the new information about the cm to water drop correlation!!!
The assumption of “Afro-Egyptian” if that’s not a oxymoron rooted in historical racist thought next is like the phase “Black African”? The ancestors will always set the records straight.
I tend to agree with this view, it's been a while since i've looked into ancient history but didn't Robert Schoch pretty much prove beyond reasoable doubt that the Sphinx is at least 7000 years old due to the weathering? And i'm sure there are many other archaeological sites around the world that heavily suggest they are much older to fit this narrative? I'm not questioning the engineering in this documentary though, it's obvious these structures where not cut from stone but formed somehow.
@Alex Shakespeare Wow such kind manners, you really conduce someone to trust and accept your enlightened proposals and carefully considered suppositions.
Our genetic signature is in fact all over the continents. But the world is so racist they’d better believe aliens built these things than admit black people did it.
@@kimfowler6612 READ THE BOOK, THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT, which has completely new theories about this subject ( WITHOUT MONEY) on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com, accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Română ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; NO MONEY ) I'm open to hearing new ideas and new arguments. Pragmatic people always cling to the popular proverb, burning those on the "Galileans" who claim that the world isn't flat ,or that the universe revolves around it ; so I prefer to give everyone a chance to present something new; YOU NEVER KNOW ?, (what if one of the 78 novelties proposed in the book on page 57 , is finally accepted ? ). Have a nice day. Thanks for watching! Hănțulie Ionel.
I liked the film, but the question remains: how is it that you can't slip a piece of writing paper between the stones? Plus you would find it hard, if not impossible, to remove the moulds from between the stones without causing damage to them, as you 'd have to knock them out. I've cast concrete.
@@wraith6766 Even if the block dries completely, if you make it with similar materials it will look and act as a solid block and will stick together. Pyramids today are torn up so you can see each individual block. You can see an example of poured concrete added onto dry concrete in the shafts how they form together as one even if misaligned slightly. They would have had to have a staging ground to make and dry block and transport it to the spot.
@@dambigfoot6844 I've never worked with this medium so this is just speculation, but I wonder if this mixture behaves differently than concrete. I wondered as well why they would cast individual blocks instead of larger pieces to minimize effort
Interesting theory, and makes more sense than banging out a couple of million blocks with primitive tools then hauling them up a ramp. BUT QUESTIONS PERSIST: How did this advanced mathematics suddenly bloom in the Bronze Age? And why did Egypt quickly revert to being a primitive society? Melting granite with a gigantic magnifying glass might work better in animation than in practice; has anyone tried this in scale? Egyptologists don't seem to like the poured concrete theory, but it ought to be pretty easy to prove: One of them claimed that all the blocks are of different sizes, and I'm not sure that this was answered sufficiently.
Surely they already had powdered rock to use, in the form of (eroded) sand and gravel? Rock only melts for us at vary high, furnace teperatures. The maths were known from long before., and maybe did come from life from Plieadies
I'm skeptical about a helluva lot of things here, especially in regards to the measurement system bit. The diameter of water droplets is not constant, so the whole argument kinda falls apart at that. Even if they DID invent the meter, why didn't they keep it on public record and stick with cubits (which weren't really fixed in length, since humans don't have the same forearm+hand length. Even royal cubits weren't actually fixed. Royal cubit rods actually vary by a few 1/10s of a centimeter) instead? Also given the variance, it's possibly a coincidence that one possible value of a royal cubit just so happened to be the ratio of the surface area of a sphere to that of a cube. Now onto the construction. The idea of using molds doesn't really hold up considering the various lengths of the stones, like you said, so... yeah. Sure, the molds could vary in size, but to the point where no stone is alike? Next, there's the idea that they used concrete. It is plausible at first sight, but I'd like to ask where they got the materials and how they made it. Volcanic ash seems like a plausible explanation at first, but Egypt doesn't have any volcanoes, and the historical record does not show Egypt trading with places that DO have volcanoes. Plus, in regards to the granite thing, how'd they make the lenses needed to melt it in the first place? The vid kinda just said "heat the mix to 1000 degrees C" and left it at that. How did they get to 1000 C in the first place? This isn't even all of it, but those are my main gripes with the thing.
@@improvise9840 You're more on the right path. Things were left because they couldn't be lifted. That obelisk is marked to be cut in 3 but it split. There's loads of things omitted in this documentary and completely ignores paintings that they left on walls showing different methods.
most of the stuff in this doc is incorrect unfortunately. when you melt granite it becomes a form of glass, it doesn't turn back into granite. also yes all the stones are different sizes and shapes, not uniform like from a mold. they are limestone, which is soft, which explains how they could be cut easily. i dont have all the answers but this doc is BS.
This is beautiful. And it makes a lot of sense. The Egyptians were true artisans and pioneers in construction and their work still endures to this day.
@@ddeano101 Thanks. Learned something new. I didn't know if you heated granite it turns to Obsidian. Its still fascinating what the Ancient Egyptians were able to build. The symmetry and precision of their work. It makes you wonder how such big stones were able to be moved, especially the huge granite cap stone above the ceremony or burial chamber.
Absolutely LOVE this brilliant film. What you share on how the Pyramids were built is new to me, I have always known who the builders were. So it is great to see the original founders of civilisation, those that were removed, reinstated here in such a powerful and visual way. It always amazed me that people would rather believe in Aliens than give credit to Africans. All the evidence points to these facts, not least that the Pyramids are still in Africa. In my Book Opening to Spirit - there is a chapter called Out of Africa, that traces much of the migration you mention, in India, the Olmecs, Europe, Christianity all taking its cue from Ancient African Civilisation in KMT. It was so good to see this visible recreation of magnificence. And for once to see credit given where credit is due. Yes Ancient Egyptians are the first scientists of humanity, Fathers of chemistry, physics, Maths, and geometry. No there were no aliens, or Atlantans, instead we owe it all to Africans. And this fact is raising its head from under the rubble it was buried in. It is time for the entire world to remember and pay their respects to the Masters of Art, Architecture and Alchemy. The Foundation of all Civilisation. Thank you for this awe inspiring film.
The film lacked one most important part......the proof...why not build a lense and show us all the power of god (sun) today!!.. by using the same means as available in the day of understanding today....why have you not done this?, it makes my spider senses tingle.......you have given us a great computer simulation of how the pyramid was built but it all comes down to can you really prove what you say?....from the sun turns granite and other hard minerals into liquid? to solidify hard mineral liquid back into hard shape formation (HSF) created by man....if so and there are no other forces at work why in there not in this 3.5-hour documentary (which I have enjoyed greatly) a demonstration of the process?....My only thought is the size of the lens...and then that opens up other questions to its creation....and if possible.....if the sun was more fierce in the past or in the current or future or all flux on other bearings?.... Simply said the video is a great key that fits...yet with all the trouble you have not proven to turn hard granite into liquid and back again....if they could do it back then, why not today? It is the thing that raises one's questions about the fact.....lots of given formulas on the video yet no actual test on the solar lens at any scale....why please?
Did you even watch the video I mentioned? I never said anything about cement.. 🤦♂️🤦♂️ that's alright, remain oblivious to the truth, thats all I'm trying to show you..
You can believe the bs the video you watched contains instead of knowing that precision high tech tools were used in carving the granite statues, pottery and obelisks that we can't even copy with today's technology.. but go ahead and believe they used magnifying glasses to melt stone, totally absurd, especially when you can look up videos of people doing that exact thing and it's plain to see that what this video suggests is ridiculous..
@@ketchupcommander I had seen the video before. The problem I see is that they make Obsidian with the melted granite. According to the movie, the granite structures the egyptians make by melting granite has the same properties as the granite they started with. It needs to be proven that this is possible,without changing the chemical structure of the rock. It also needs to be proven that you can melt granite using a lens made using the technologies the Egyptians had available to them, not a modern day lense.
And WHO actually built them! Not congoid Africans from Deep South. They may as well showed Asians here. They had to make em black as sheit for political reasons
I would like to see a demonstration of the building techniques involved in making a 5 meter diameter lens too...oh and by the way, what was the molten granite's crucible made of?
1. Show me evidence that a drop of water was the origin of a centimeter. 2. Show me evidence that the Egyptians could make a lens that large. (Or, had a glass making industry. Where is all this Egyptian glass ?). 3. Show me that such a lens could melt granite. Lots of conjuncture here but no evidence.
I was very enthusiastic about this documentary then they talked about the giant lenses and the melting of granite. I mean let’s keep and open mind and we the humans underrate ourselves a lot but I just don’t see ancient Egyptians using this type of technology.
After watching this documentary I went back to my maths and geometry! Finaly, there is a logical explanation of one of the mysteries of the past civilizations! Great doc!
@@MrGino714 it doesn't makes any sense , the size of the drop is determined by the amount of water of the drop, they didn't explain what was the standard drop, you have small drops and big drops it depends , you have to stablish a standard and a system , same as with the concrete I Knew about this when this theory came to light some years ago and it made total sense to me but still there are holes that need to be filled , I would say it's the more plausible but you can't accuse of someone to give dumb explanations and you do the same.
