The Nazi Roots of Environmentalism and the Climate Change Fraud | Close Encounters Ep. 2 

Sweden is the rape capital of Europe, would you think a 16 year old girl would more concerned with that?

@@sevenswords8781 I guarantee you, Greta thinks it would be racist to identify who the rapists are

you do know her real name, yes?

@@vortex162 no?

She's a performer, have you seen her Mother?

You were ahead of most of us.

Watermelons, green on the outside......

The real ones aren’t they’re Nationalists.

@Harry Denny Thank you for being the classic Warmunist, using the Saul Alinsky tactics of Ad Hominem to push the cloaked Marxist agenda. When it boils down to it, all anyone needs to understand, is *who* is doing *what* with this special Garbage In - Gospel Out climate model weasel word science. You bleat the typical Doomer porn talking points, there is still ice in the Arctic (Al Gorebbles didn't put his COP15 lecture in his box office bomb), the Antarctic is not just the poster children glaciers on the west side with volcanic activity melting them, and the Maldives is still not flooded by CSLR. Key clue you are a Useful Idiot for the corrupt, useless, and pleading to avoid bankruptcy United Nations, is recycling the first sentence, dare you to compare how much George Soros has kicked into Warmmonger political hack organizations.

The interviewed leaves a lot to be desired, half truths are dangerous misdirections this man is a gatekeeper..

Meekseek, I'm not sure what a gatekeeper is. But, I think the death of life as we know in 12 years predicted by AOC is highly exaggerated.

Harry Denny, I don’t know what his writing or research ablitity is, since I haven’t read his book. However, I do agree that climate change has been highly politicized in Sweden and the US from the start. What is the solution that is proposed, other than levy a tax? Levying a tax will not stop India and China from doing what is life saving for their citizens. The US has reduced CO2 emissions significantly but unintentionally. Since natural gas is currently cheaper and releases less CO2 per BTU.

Ken Marriott- Of course AOC is worker bee, she's not only "highly exaggerated " she is but one of many, the fact is that the weather and climate is weaponized and controlled, that floats the climate change and global warming boat, it's that which needs to be exposed, that fact is constantly hidden & it's a matter of life and death.

They have to scare the youth with climate doom. They control their voters through fear. @@Meekseek

@@House4saleinessex You realize we are exposed to natural radiation all the time? The effects of all of the nuclear accidents has been the death of less than 100 people. It is by far the safest energy source we have. Even Chernobyl, which was the by far the worst nuclear accident, has people living now where this accident happened and they are perfectly fine. Chernobyl was the worst reactor too. It had no safety features and was an accident waiting to happen. The modern reactors can't melt down and produce a lot less waste. Much of a nuclear waste is actually used in cancer treatments. With all those fighting nuclear energy it actually is making the cost of fighting cancer more expensive. Do some research and you'll see nuclear is truly the best energy option we have.

@livey oone I'm an atheist when it comes to climate religion.

Safest ? When you jump of a building, it's totally safe during the fall. Nuclear energy is a temporary solution, but wind and sun are free. We just have to build clean systems to convert this energy. You forget two things : radioactive remains, we just don't know what to do with it for the next 100 000 years, and wars.

@@ofdrumsandchords LOL..wind is horrible. Kills millions of birds and produces very little energy and has a high cost for the energy it produces. Solar is really dirty form of energy. It requires rare earth minerals which are very environmentally destructive to mine. Nuclear produces very little waste and often the waste can be recycled or used for things like cancer treatment. Both solar and wind kill way more people.

@@SociallyTriggered Nuclear would be clean if it was fusion. And you don't seem to think we could find ways of producing solar pannels without rare earth minerals. and what about wars, and terrorisme. Franco bombed schools and hospitals during the civil war in Spain. It's a good strategy to attack nuclear installations, as it creates panic. Look what a drone just did...

Identity politics from the Left and the Right is all just meant as distraction while they steal your $$...

The Left has always been there, dividing people into resources for their aim. The Big Lie is that the Right is as extreme as the Left. The Right seeks small gov't, personal responsibility and liberty; the farther to the Right, the more Libertarian. The Left has polluted definitions to cover their abundant evil.

@@occupant9778 They try, but we're catching on.

​@@occupant9778 The false notion that Dems and Reps are "the same" and that they are putting on a tragicomedy routine to keep everyone distracted is untrue. It could be easy to believe, and surely there has been some truth in that, but no. It is merely one of countless falsifications, or lies, used by the Left, today's Democrat, used to trick their opponents. Trickery and deception is a major tactic used in fighting battles and wars, very simply. Fooling the enemy can and will change completely the outcome of a dispute. Between comparable boxers, it is key to altering a stand-off and winning the fight. One would wish that when the importance of America's future is involved, we wouldn't be lied to and cheated by a group of so-called Democrats who are moving forth an agenda that will forever wreck the economics and culture of America, and prepare America for ruination. Everything we hear, even be well-meaning "rumour-spreaders", must be considered and truth separated from deception.

@@occupant9778 the left are the only ones who try to control the banks who are above the law and who can get taxs dollars ar will

But the hockey stick is so evident in the raw data. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yqzl3imhQbY.html

YOu may be right about large things moving climate temperatures. But I'd rather not take the chance that we're screwing ourselves until we know for sure. Orbital cycles are more in play, solar cycles are secondary. But a confluence of all of the above can be either good or bad. Regardless, our inability to see or do anything about any form of pollution from them being too scary to deal with realistically speaks to a trend that needs work. It would seem self-delusion is preferred.

Well, no need to worry about plastics, either. We inhale more micro plastic than we ingest and the average life length is around 80 years here. Since plastics have been around since the 40s I'd say that the damage is not what it's made up to be.

The eco-loons feel too empowered to stop and listen to us tho

@@vendomnu I'm a "climate denier " but I would have to disagree on the plastics. Yes they have been around a long time ,however, plastic bottles are choking rivers in some countries and ate definitely a problem. Turning back to recycling glass bottles and using paper bags is an easy solution.

​ @Harry Denny , how ethical & trustworthy are the "best scientists"? "A conspiracy theory invented by an idiot" and "the best scientists in the field" reeks of scientism. *Blindly trusting science is idiotic,* especially when you take into account that "Scientists at MIT, Harvard, and Elsewhere Face Continued Fallout Over Epstein Connections; The largesse of wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted pedophile, now *haunts the upper echelons of science. * THE *UPPER ECHELONS of academic science continued to be rattled this week amid revelations that many prominent researchers accepted funding* from, or were otherwise friendly with, wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted pedophile and accused sex trafficker who hung himself in a New York City jail cell earlier this month. Buzzfeed News compiled a who’s who of physicists, biologists, neuroscientists, and other researchers who benefitted, in large and small ways, from *Epstein’s pet interests in science.* “Some say they are sorry,” Buzzfeed reported. “Others didn’t comment.” Among those identified were the mathematical biologist Martin Nowak, MIT professor of mechanical engineering Seth Lloyd, and “celebrity physicist” Lawrence Krauss. undark.org/2019/08/30/abstracts-mit-harvard-epstein-connections/ *Epstein said his approach to giving was aimed at achieving scientific breakthroughs.* But his view of the current state of innovation was surprisingly gloomy. “Frankly, Jeff, since the discovery of penicillin [in 1928], there’s been no really remarkable discovery,” he said. “I’ve followed the genome project, and there’s lots of hope. But in terms of a real product, there’s probably nothing that has kept more people alive than penicillin.” Epstein was quick to distinguish his approach from the path taken by other philanthropists, both dead and alive, many of them with wealth that far exceeded his own. “The [Bill & Melinda] Gates Foundation doesn’t search for smart people,” he asserted. “Bill wants to cure polio. He wants to eliminate poverty. But in terms of coming up with new theories of biology or some new form of mathematics, zero [interest].” *Epstein said he also dispensed with the accountability that typically goes with a grant.* “When I’ve given money to a scientist, they’re usually somewhat surprised, and then they say, ‘What type of reports would you like? Is it for a milestone from my next grant?’ And I giggle and say, ‘No, the concept is, you know your field best. Letting people with lots of money have input into what you do doesn’t make any sense to me.’" Asked whose approach to philanthropy he admired, Epstein said his sole role model was billionaire James Simons. A fellow hedge fund manager and a Ph.D. mathematician, Simons has poured some of his great wealth into a foundation that supports budding mathematicians and math educators. But unlike Simons, Epstein said he felt no obligation to help foster a more scientifically literate population. www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/09/what-kind-researcher-did-sex-offender-jeffrey-epstein-fund-he-told-science-he-died *As warnings about global warming* become more dire, *scientists retreat into escapist fantasies.* They envision establishing colonies on Mars. They *preach the imminence of the Singularity,* in which we become superhuman cyborgs or download our psyches into cyberspace, where we can live forever. Some pundits propose that we are already living in cyberspace, a computer simulation constructed by God-like aliens. A few decades ago, these science fictions were fun. But now, as temperatures and sea levels climb, they strike me as, well, decadent. There is a whiff of end times in the air. The *rotten cherry atop this mess is the scandal involving Jeffrey Epstein,* the financier and sexual predator, who took his own life in jail last August. *Epstein cozied up to leading universities and scientists,* who welcomed his attention. They took his cash, rode on his jet and flocked to his parties and conferences, even after his 2008 conviction for having sex with underage girls. [3] blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-decadence-of-science/ Where does science come from? "At the same time, Dee was also an important mathematician, political theorist, and proto-scientist, and *his intellectual heritage influenced Francis Bacon and the founding of the Royal Society,* the *oldest national scientific institution,* in 1660. Nevertheless, Dee is not as well-known today as other Renaissance men such as Da Vinci, Leibniz, or Descartes. The political situation of England in the Dee’s lifetime, swinging back and forth between Catholicism and Protestantism, was difficult to navigate. Shifting alliances and monarchs made Dee already lose much of his reputation while still alive, but in many ways, *he is disregarded today because of his involvement in alchemy,* magic, and the *summoning of spirits.* *In alchemy hides the germ of a protoscience that would later become the modern scientific method.* And in conjunction with the rediscovery of Hermeticism and Neoplatonism during the Renaissance, some of its ideas about personal transformation and individual paths to self-realization would, through the *Rosicrucian and Freemasonic sects,* pave the way to a proto-individualist ideology, sparking the French and American revolution whose ideals so define our modern world. medium.com/the-faculty/alchemy-and-the-problems-of-modern-science-e84bde3e6f6b eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2018/03/the-debt-science-owes-to-alchemy/ *Credibility is a combination of expertise and trust.* While *scientists persist in thinking that they should be trusted because of their expertise,* climategate has made it clear that *expertise itself is not a sufficient basis for public trust.* The fallout from climategate is much broader than the *allegations of misconduct by scientists at two universities.* Of greatest importance is the reduced credibility of the IPCC assessment reports, which are providing the scientific basis for international policies on climate change. Recent disclosures about the IPCC have brought up a host of concerns about the IPCC that had been festering in the background: involvement of IPCC scientists in explicit climate policy advocacy; tribalism that excluded skeptics; hubris of scientists with regards to a noble (Nobel) cause; alarmism; and inadequate attention to the statistics of uncertainty and the complexity of alternative interpretations. The scientists involved in the CRU emails and the IPCC have been defended as scientists with the best of intentions trying to do their work in a very difficult environment. They blame the alleged hacking incident on the “climate denial machine.” They are described as fighting a valiant war to keep misinformation from the public that is being pushed by skeptics with links to the oil industry. They are focused on moving the science forward, rather than the janitorial work of record keeping, data archival, etc. They have had to adopt unconventional strategies to fight off what they thought was malicious interference. They defend their science based upon their years of experience and their expertise. *Scientists are claiming that the scientific content of the IPCC reports is not compromised by climategate.* The jury is still out on the specific fallout from climategate in terms of the historical and paleo temperature records. There are larger concerns (raised by glaciergate, etc.) particularly with regards to the IPCC Assessment Report on Impacts (Working Group II): has *a combination of groupthink,* political advocacy and a noble cause syndrome stifled scientific debate, slowed down scientific progress and corrupted the assessment process? If institutions are doing their jobs, then misconduct by a few individual scientists should be quickly identified, and the impacts of the misconduct should be confined and quickly rectified. *Institutions need to look in the mirror and ask the question as to how they enabled this situation and what opportunities they missed to forestall such substantial loss of public trust in climate research and the major assessment reports. * curry.eas.gatech.edu/climate/towards_rebuilding_trust.html *Scientific beliefs are destined to supersede and replace primitive religious views,* once argued 19th-century French philosopher Auguste Comte. *His scientific positivism birthed today’s scientism:* the *notion that science has exclusive access to the truth.* qz.com/476722/be-careful-your-love-of-science-looks-a-lot-like-religion/

They are also pedants, so they won't call you a skeptic, they will use the more appropriate term 'denier', you are denying what has been empirically proven. The evidence is there, in more scientific fields than you could care to understand

@@wheels7289 if you can show me actual evidence go ahead. All the evidence (not made up) that I've ever seen let's me know the only problem is the people pushing the agenda

@@TheRastacabbage James Jones I suggest a combination of your own confirmation bias and the filter bubble would be the cause of your lack of insight. I could go on and on about things like the Koch brothers, real evidence of warming, multiple streams of correlating data etc etc. If you wanna see a big collection of climate change conspiracy nonsense overturned then try watching Monckton Bunkum. Secondly you might want to ask yourself this question: What cognitive dissonance/s could you possibly be resolving by believing climate change is a hoax?

@@wheels7289 no evidence then. Just the usual claims about things that aren't true. I'll wait patiently for the proof that humans have caused climate change over millennia. I'm sure many people will be interested to learn about these ancient industrial revolutions that we are all ignorant of

@@TheRastacabbage cliche burden of proof shite.

I'm an American who moved to Sweden and it's pretty shocking how conformist opinions are. And sometimes the "right opinion" changes pretty quickly, and everyone just goes along with it, leaving me very confused about what I'm "allowed" to say or not lol! We Americans can be bad about that on certain topics (9/11, soldiers, cops) but it's another level here...

@@baxterandcotton You should have moved to Denmark, instead. And I don't mean Copenhagen - they're back-up Swedes.

Is there not a solution that Greta could shout her mouth. You have Greta and i am from Belgium and we have Anuna De Wever. People really hate Anuna is Greta loved in Sweden?

eviken1982 oh mainstream media makes it sound like everyone loves Greta. I think a lot of people do actually like her. What I find so crazy is that many intellectuals like her too. But I talk to a lot of normal common sense people and they things like most of us here.. I personally don’t hate Greta. I hate they way she is being used, I hate the ideology. I think she as a person is actually pretty special, there are not many people in her age that would be so committed and passionate about a topic as she is. Most teenagers today worry more about their Instagram than to actually be passionate about something. But i think she is definitely wrong in her message and I worry about her psychic well being..

@@stefanhagwall2056 Well we hate Anuna because she does it for the fame. Just like Greta is always on the news so is Anuna but many of Anuna her topics doesn't go about Climate Change. It went that she says she has no gender, even they showed her filthy bedroom on the news. Then she said my body is not made to protest in the cold and so many other things.

or feelings 😉

Adrian Sc lol I feel you man.

Richard Fox I didn’t say it was Journalism. I said it was an interview and a good one.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZlilDqz5f9M.html Climate grifters gonna grift. Interesting that her boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein was trying to use young women at his ranch in New Mexico to give birth to a multitude of his children. Eugenics is alive and well and has a safe place amoung the left.

Its needed to make steel also

And look at Sweden now: rape capital per capita of the world, shootings, bombings, stabbings, muggings. African and middle east invasion. Swedes are emasculated

Katsu Zatoichi Do you live in Sweden? Do you anyone from Sweden?

@@misilen24 - no

Katsu Zatoichi Then might I suggest you ask a Swede if we have free elections etc.. I will happily answer your questions. I am born in Sweden and has lived my whole life here, so I ought to know...

@@misilen24 - is it not correct that everyone can see how you vote? You have to pick your selection while all can see? - and is it not so that Swedish politicians have been conducting 'social engineering' in Sweden?

I don't know what kind of intimidated world you come from, but you don't have to ask. Not because of what the law might say. But because, what are they going to do to you? If anything, all they are going to do is send you a demand letter and ask to take down your videos and stop distributing the text. Nobdy does anything. It's the internet.Capture the video and repost it with German subtitles.

@@anonymike8280 you fogot how jewtube works.. you tell the truth.. they will take you down.. small channels first..

@@cyberhawk80 and what is found on this video is not the truth.

@@Meekseek can you please explain? I like people to challenge things and what you are taught but if you have no proof that he "made this up" then you sir are ignorant. Climate change looks more of scam for taxes then for "saving" the planet.

Question. Is the German translation of Atlas Shrugged accurate and literary?

The communists were brilliant environmentalists? Their industry cared nothing about the environment, extreme pollution, Chernobyl, the largest open air nuclear tests in history. But I agree with your grain assessment, this is a non argument.

The idea that socialism and national socialism, later cleverly rebranded as nazism share common ideas is spot on though. Both movements share common modernist ideals about reshaping society and the natural order. It is not a coincidence that both ended up producing propaganda, war, and concentration camps.

Stilgar yeah, I should have said they had some great environmental policies. You’re right in general they weren’t an eco friendly government. Although Chernobyl was an accident so I’m not sure you can count that against them even if they did cut a lot of corners. After all they didn’t actually have a policy of radioactive contamination.

Stilgar idk man, yeah they used a lot of the same mechanisms but I would argue the real commonality between nazi Germany and Stalin’s Russia was the type of men in charge and both of them having absolute power. To claim much of a link between the two ideologies has always seemed a bit of a stretch to me.

Just see Greta. Their new little mascot. But of course gobels daughter also was used in propaganda

They should be anticipating climate change instead of primarily focusing on trying to prevent it. They should have created massive ocean dwellings by now.

No. What he was talking about was that acid rain -- which I recall learning about growing up -- was allegedly demonstrated in the Adirondack Mountains of the US in the 1800s, prior to McKinley's assassination. When the lumber companies came in and cut the trees down and burned the stumps of the trees they cut, it was found that the soil had de-acidified, and as a result, fish and wildlife came back to the area. Where Theodore Roosevelt came in, as the first "conservation president," was that at that time, other conservationists said, "Don't cut any of those trees down," referring to places like the Adirondacks. As a result, the area acidified again, and the fish and wildlife died out again. The issue is that Teddy Roosevelt never said that we should not use natural resources -- he always said that we should be able to use resources, if we cleaned up the environment after extracting them. This was partly the reason why he established the natural parks system as federal lands, as before that, industries had extracted natural resources, and a lot of the time, left things a mess, whether it was the lumber and paper mill industries, or industries like mining. The Conservationist Movement was who tried to say that _any_ use of environmental resources was unethical or immoral, despite the fact that today, the lumber industry actually has an industry standard that when lumber is harvested, they replant the trees they cut down. This results in a "crop rotation" plan of sorts, where an area will take 30 to 50 years and regrow, before being cut down again. This is also why paper mills have largely gone to recycling paper products, and making more out of that raw resource. The key, however, to understanding the modern AGW movement is that during the time of Teddy Roosevelt, the acidification of the soil was a known science. During the 1970s and 1980s, this science was hidden from the public, which is why it had become so rampant back then. The thing about the whole environmental movement today, with so-called "green energy," is that the proponents of "green energy" think innovation and incentivization have stalled, when it comes to nuclear power. Fact of the matter is, the French have solved the meltdown issue of nuclear power by redesigning the fuel rods, while also developing better and more effective safety protocols. Meanwhile, Chernobyl is being repaired, and now has a steel dome over Reactor No. 4. The US has not improved reactor designs since the 1970s, and has had two major disasters with its designs: Three-Mile Island in 1986, and Fukushima, Japan, only a few years ago. I mention the nuclear question because back during the debate about acid rain, it was claimed nuclear power plants contributed to it, when the science said otherwise, which was hidden from the public by the US EPA. Yet, the kicker is, nuclear power is used by every major military force in the world, including the Chinese and Russians, as motive power in things like submarines and aircraft carriers. The technology is proven safe and reliable, yet the AGW proponents and their Green allies would have you believe that nuclear is just as bad, if not worse, than coal, and we should only use wind and solar. And Germany, ironically, after this interview, tried to go to only wind and solar, only to switch coal-fired powerplants back on after 6 months of rolling brownouts.

That's why they earned the nickname "watermelon". They might be green on the outside, but definitely red on the inside.

Not many real, essential differences between Communists and Nazis.

This is the mistake almost everyone makes. Apparently they never called themselves "Nazis". They were National Socialists. Communists are INTERnational Socialists. Although, socialism is just a stage before communism, really.

@@richardmcguinness6359 The NAZIs were socialists. They weren't communists because Fascism doesn't believe the state should own the means of production but rather just control and regulate it. Aside from that one thing, I can't find any difference between Fascism and communism.

@@victorbarnes6898 Exactly! As Hitler put it: "Why nationalize industry when you can nationalize the people?"

You should see Realclimatescience.com

Hint that’s not a word!

Steve Jovan Seems apt to me..

Linda Bowman Really then cite it! Evilness is not a word!

12 Volts That’s the best that you can do? No actual policy !

12 Volts Again this is the best you can do? A debate about the meaning of a word rather than the public policy issues regarding specific leaders? Do you have any background in any related scholarly field? Hint Trump is the President of the USA not Great Britain!

The left controls Wikipedia and will put in any propaganda they deem necessary to control the masses.

Wikipedia is not to be trusted on anything the least bit controversial. Axe grinders can't be kept out of it. Look elsewhere.

Ask Tim Ball and Mark Steyn about Hokey Schtick Mann suing them......

@king offa I agree that the climate has, and always will change. I also believe we can't be doing it any good by cutting down forests and burning fossil fuels. Just saying that it may be sensible to keep researching it and not just dismiss it as "alarmist". People are obsessed with taxes, which are the price of civilisation. Most of these are the same people that complain about 'big oil' companies running the world. Can't have it both ways.

Go back to the dark ages just in case it is real you mean ?

@@julianbrock6198 Why go back to the dark ages? Why not just move forward to a sustainable future? We'll have to one day, why not now?

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZlilDqz5f9M.html

If only they had captured the Ad-Blue wells of Brussels first...

@@vendomnu Had to look that one up. Ad-bleu or Ad-blue?

@@eckyhen Blue. It's basically piss. The 'secret' ingredient is urea.

@brjema1 my grandgrandfather live 98 years and he was a heavy smoker, he smoke the shittiest cigarettes you can find in a communist country, cheapest ones 😉

@brjema1 All things considered, the risk isn't that large. It appears the vast majority get away with it. But then there are several other miserable lung diseases it can cause too.

Pollution and climate change are 2 separate things.

CaptainDuckman Why Is He Wrong? I think The Operative Word Here Is Extreme. I Thank You For Your Answer.

the extreme left wants to redistribute wealth from the West to the 3rd world; the extreme right would rather start the World War 3

@@ireneuszpyc6684 I'm just a little to the Right of Attila the Hun :-), and I don't know anyone who wants World War 3. By anyone I mean ANYONE.

@@stevenwiederholt7000 ; there're fascists in the U.S. (pretending to be White identitarians, like Richard Spencer & Greg Conte) who would start W.W.3

@@ireneuszpyc6684 1. What makes you think they are on the Right (Conservative)? 2. Yes there are Real fascists in America, you can find them at family reunions looking to pick up chick. :-)

@ that's not the question. The question is if everybody knows that the climate has always changed without the industrial revolution then what is all the craziness about? Why should society be shut down for no reason?

Yeah but not renewable in a sustainable way at the current rate of consumption

@@abb5596 what are you basing your opinion on? Are you just guessing? Please back your assertion.

@@hazel555 Sure mate it's called fact, didn't realise you were so shit at maths It takes thousands if not millions of years to form naturally and at the current rate of consumption it will be gone in 50ish years (according to BP.) that's not sustainable is it, takes millions of years to form and we will use it all in a few centuries. Sure in a few million years there will be oil again, making it "renewable" but we as a species might be long gone by then

@kirk mcloren yeah you missed the bit where I said naturally, also coal isn't petroleum

@@abb5596 in the 1970s people like you said it would all be gone by the year 2000 lol they also said there was a ice age coming. Lol

Ashwood Heathen miss the point much?

Were should care about people.

It's all in their book "The First Global Revolution" published in 1992...the same year as the Rio Earth Summit...and the same year as the U.N. published it's book "The United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century". I own both books. Interestingly enough, before 1992 there were virtually no scientists publishing climate hysteria articles...then all of a sudden there were lots of them. This also reminds me of another example of the misuse and corruption of science. In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association was hi-jacked by homosexuals high up in the organization who worked with an outside activist group called The National Gay Task Force, to declare that homosexuality had to be removed from the list of abnormal deviant behaviours because it was innate (genetic). And there wasn't a single scientific research article published as an investigation into genetics...it all started afterwards into the 1980's, and many researchers declared at the start of their research that their goal was to prove that homosexuality was genetic...(which it isn't). If you want to go further into the corruption of science you can go back to the late 19th and early 20th century where about 10 unproven assumptions were adopted by those who were materialists (you can find that in Rupert Sheldrake's "The Science Delusion"). Materialism is one of the tenants of Marxism and of the modern day green/totalitarians...and yes the Nazis did create policies that the environmentalists mirror today, so it comes full circle. If I get up the courage I want to write a book which I will title "The Final Hitler :and why you will enthusiastically support him" because the same conditions that brought Hitler to power are present again today...and ...a 2000 year old prophecy from the Bible describes conditions under which the anti-christ or counterfeit messiah comes to deceive everyone and rule the world until God destroys him and his followers (The Book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ).

I think human stupidity is sufficient to explain the movement.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZlilDqz5f9M.html But they represent civil society .. LOL

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZlilDqz5f9M.html

.. And 5G, genderism, feminism, islamism.. Basically everything to control you and fight freedom, and fight Christians..

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZlilDqz5f9M.html Climate grifters represent civil society.

I thought the 3rd Reich invented the Volkswagen and the autobahn so more middle class people could have cars. Is that “green”?

"The actual costs are hurting the citizens of Green governments." Scandinavian countries has de facto higher green taxes than any country and they provide a quality of life that rival that of the absolute majority of the US populace.

neglesaks You are just repeating propaganda. Have you ever been to United States, and compare it to Scandinavian living standards? Considering the ignorance of your assertion, I’m assuming you’ve never left your basement.

Dale F yes i have been to the US. have you been to any Scandinavian country?

I consider the American way of life better cause we have more freedoms.

"I consider the American way of life better cause we have more freedoms. " Apart from gun rights, what freedoms specifically? Also, is the Texan way of life the same as they, say Vermont way of life or Washington way of life?

whats so bad about fracking

loser face clearly you haven’t had fracking done near where you live

@@loserface3962 earthquakes and potential water contamination mainly

I thought greens with red interior, think there will be no sharks ? weve only got 12 years or is it ........? the only shark being jumped here is your utter cognitive dissonance

"So what you are saying if all the co2 was removed from our atmosphere along with trace greenhouse gases our planets temperature would remain the same.?" That is usually the unspoken upshot of many denialist claims.

neglesake Well if people wish to believe our Earth is flat, or we are entering an ice age,or man has never set foot on the moon,it don't make any difference,from here on in our planet will continue to warm and every soul on-board is invited to this permanent vacation,Climate Chaos maybe a few will get lucky miss this journey and be abducted by Aliens.?

The Voodoos , go see OPPENHEIMER RANCH PROJECT channel, may help clear your confusion

The Voodoos , go see OPPENHEIMER RANCH PROJECT channel, may help clear your confusion

Liz Sharp Yeah sure i will send him a donation if you like,.......LOL I mean you can't be serious.? you don't think he believes in what he is saying.?

Right because of that globalist crap XR and Greta the actor. This guy is another of the many telling half truths. XR and Greta are not protests, they are engineered consent operation, the UN and World Banks can't demand a new system, they need a social movement to demand it.