The Real Reason Liverpool BLEW IT against Palace 

literally reads a sponsorship script soullessly and expects us to use a service he's never even checked out himself

TrueGeordie says Pep has the easiest job in the world. This guy is a joke.

@@bujjidoppi. Are you saying that a manager (Pep Guardiola), who has won 12 trophies while he’s been in this country is a joke, I am afraid the joke’s on you, the man is a tactical genius, a God even.

@@Pep_is_a_God_1604. I meant True Geordie is a joke. Pep is the greatest manager that football has ever seen. full stop.

Geordie be like: "lets grab the most disliked, delusional, overreacting comment under each video and bring it as a fact in the next episode"

But what he said was a fact though? Literally straight stating the amount of trophies Klopp as won. Just because the truth hurts doesn’t make it an opinion.

@@TothBen8 You're giving him too much credit. It's more like ""lets grab the most disliked, delusional, overreacting comment *from my own brain* and bring it as a fact in the next episode"

😂😂victims fc 1 pl in 9 yrs

First thing he says is “Liverpool have the easiest fixtures” we play 4 away games in a row and have Villa away who just beat his team 2-0 at home🤣

Arsenal supporters often have delusions of grandeur.

The whole panel are like it - including Brian he’s surrounded by yes men wafflers

completely ruins the show every time lol

That's RU-vidrs for you in a nutshell. Say anything but say it with confidence and never admit you're wrong.

tbf there is a reason he made football look like Djokovic playing tennis against a 14 year old girl

Everybody hates a winner.

One has 115 charges and unlimited funds the other doesn't. Maybe pep may test himself one day like great managers do. Rafa benitez Jose mourinho Carlo Klopp Tuchel

@@jamiehayes5888 Ok keep telling yourself that.

@man.q it's true , has pep ever won a trophy with a team that is considered a major underdog ? Will give you 5 minutes to research it 🤣 His the best manager regarding team building , his awesome at fabricating a football team . But his never proved he can do it with a lesser team that has financial restrictions. That is a fact , tell me different?

@@jamiehayes5888 thats a silly argument, the best are never underdogs because they are better than everyone 🙄, must Usain Bolt cut his foot so he can be an underdog in a 100m race?? that's stupid.

@@jamiehayes5888 that's a stupid argument, the best are never underdogs...because they are the best..they have beaten their nearest opponents and earned the title of being the best. that's saying Usain Bolt should test himself by running a 100m final in the Olympics with sandles instead of getting Puma to make him the best running spikes money can buy...your logic, if you can even call it logic,.. is ludicrous 🙄

Likewise if they're found guilty then people that support City are going to claim it was a kangaroo court and wouldn't be satisfied as they already view them as 100% innocent in their head.

I agree, I felt this way about Chelsea when they were battling man united people don’t often give credit to them clubs because of getting brought and the money that came with it. But they put on a hell of a performance season after season and played great football (I know some people don’t like Chelsea way of football but they would still win games like 4-0 and it they’ll be some of the best goals you have ever seen) My point is I agree and we have to take into account these players have still played there ass off and made seasons or matches that will be remembered for a long time. you gotta respect them type of clubs like city chelsea in a way because of how good they are and the memories they created

completely agree. Everton have spent to the point of FFP points deductions, even accounting for covid and women's team expenditure, United have spent over 2 billion pounds (the most of any prem team ever), Chelsea have spent the most in any singular transfer window, twice, and Arsenal have outspent Manchester City for the last 3 seasons. This notion that Man city are uncatchable when it's seemingly all down to awful transfers, sackings of managers, poor facilities and infrastructure as well as back room staff, purely points to incompetency. Everyone is happy to laugh at Manchester United and Chelsea for doing so poorly, yet if they were doing any better people would want crushing points deductions and transfer window bans. Also, to you point, City have "dominated" literally one league season, the 100 points season. The year after, City won it by a point. The next season, Liverpool blew the entire league out the water and went 25 points clear. The season after City were 11th in November and there were 7/8 different league leaders with Liverpool prevented from winning the title again due to mass injuries. The season after city won by a point again. Then city had to catch an Arsenal team that had to merely maintain a 2-0 lead against West Ham and Liverpool to all but win the title. City this season had to rely on both Arsenal and Liverpool dropping points. How is this considered some juggernaut of a team when in basically every season City relied on teams dropping points carelessly. yes it's impressive what pep has done, but it's more impressive how poorly every other team throws away points

And 1993

Lmaooo because united did it off the back of having the best academy in the world. Most of united greatest talent can be traced back to carrington and not the Middle East and the “companies” that fund man city’s success

@@j.jswatt1401LMAOO 😭😭😂😂😂😂 okay sure they did 💀💀💀💀💀

Arsenal and Chelsea took their share of titles in those years too. It is the lack of any real competition now. Could be 6/7, 4 in a row and back to back trebles for City.

@@chivachum you probably started watching footy when social media came around but go do your research on the class of 92 u bum

I can’t wait for when you’re competing in League 2 😂😂😂

Copium is a hell of a drug

You do realise those are actual charges, right? It’s your ‘clubs’ job to prove their innocence, not the other way around. Until then, your ‘club’ will always be known as dirty cheaters.

@@realliam6513Thats not how The Law works. Innocent until proven guilty, PL has to prove City are guilty, not the other way around

No, no they wont hahahaha

Exactly

If Liverpool has Isak instead of Nunez the title would already be ours

Shut up have u heard my man this season

Everyone has rinsed him this season

Werner never even got close to the amount of goals nunez has scored 😂

Couldn't have said it better 👏

His legacy is one league title in almost a decade at the fourth richest club in world football. He's massively overrated and overhyped.

In a fair and just world he’s walking away with the 3 titles

And thats your problem......calling man city a sportwasing institutions is EXCUSES AND SHOWS 0 ACCOUNTABILITY Man city didnt make curtis jones miss that chance

@@tycarne7850he also won a title in Germany against a Bayern team who had a complete monopoly on the league, and constantly had his best players sold from under him. It’s taken over a decade for someone else to win a title there, it’ll probably take about another decade until someone else wins one in the prem as well

Only Pep retained the league and created an invincible aura for City.

mancini won it on goal difference against the most dominant premier league team ever and pellegrini won it because both liverpool and chelsea slipped in the final 2/3 games. People love to discredit pep for how much money he's spent and not acknowledge what he's utilised that money for, something United, Chelsea, Everton and Arsenal haven't been able to do

do you realize who liv is up against 😂😂

@9:45 tbf he literally says that no one was expecting them to

@@natalielewis8460 CHEATS !! Is that who you are referring to !!

@@puffin7285 Oh ok !! Fair enough!!

​@@Mohammed-dy6xbgreattt..... now show me klopp's prem titles

Robbo out for 3 months Trent out for 2 months Allison 2 months Jota 2 months Salah went to afcon miss 3 weeks Jue to injury basically 3 months Thiago nuff said Matip out for the season Konate enough said

115 charges

@@kukie1932 Sign injury prone players, win injuries in crucial parts of your season. There is a reason no one was in for Matip, Konate or Thiago. Them being injured should not be unexpected. Salah leaving for the AFCON was not an unknown. So you are looking at very similar situations between City and Liverpool injury wise.

Yes but look at city’s squad depth. When you have a few hundred million pounds sitting on the bench I don’t think injury’s is an issue. While Liverpool has had to use academy players

Fuck that. Last year no on expected Arsenal to even be in Top 4 but in the end we had of the most embarassing bottlejobs of all time and people will never forget that. Liverpool at that position week ago should walk this league.

​@@robhans5I'm a Liverpool fan and I never expected them to win

I knew liverpool would be there again this season. Just how they finished last season. Winning almost every year.

i can say the exact same thing about arsenal last season, so to say they bottled it is fair

​@@mokingaming6574 Arsenal were 2-0 against Liverpool and then clearly dropped in performance and drew 2-2, then Arsenal were 2-0 against West Ham and clearly dropped in performance and drew 2-2, then finally against an already relegated team Arsenal went 0-2 down at home and barely managed to scrape a 3-3 draw. The capitulation was something unbelievable. It was unlikely but I could believe Liverpool losing. It's not bottling...yet.

100% agree also if u actually look at the charges they were getting us to the table not us breaking the rules at the top

Back to back trebles would be so insane… and I was happy to win nothing this year, big blue shark incoming, cry cry cryyyyy

You're delusional if you think all the 115 charges against Man City aren't true.

​@@sunoolee9467you are like the community pool , think for yourself everyone is using you...😂😂😂

@@coolfamily7451115. 115 charges my man. That is TOO much smoke for there to be no fire. Manchester City were even caught making fake companies overnight and “partnering” with them. It was a sham. If you don’t they are still doing shady stuff still, as well as the other top clubs, then you are gullible one here not him.

Good

Then stop watching lol. You just come here to whinge?

What about city representation ?

@bhumikjoshi4573 City would need to have fans to have a representative

@@bhumikjoshi4573one of the people sitting at the table literally does city’s media work, even though he’s a Tottenham fan, city is his 2nd team

@@dec0ysquid Yeah, they got 99 points and were clear at the top after 25ish games. City were not at the races that season but Liverpool fully deserved it

yeah I think it was 28 games, 25 points clear. also if it weren't for covid, they probably would've gone unbeaten the entire season

@@danielmarsh1376 Probably would have lost a game or two I reckon but no title can really have an asterisk, it is such a weird concept

Because City won more after that

Both Chelsea and city have also won those trophies in conventional seasons, Liverpool can't say the same when it comes to the premier league, so it's an easy stick to beat them with

also Liverpool massively underperformed when covid hit. Liverpool were 25 points clear of city 28 games in, the biggest gap to second place since Mancity's 100 point season. Were it not for Mancity beating Liverpool after covid rulings came in, Liverpool would've won the league unbeaten

@@tf0256 an unfair advantage against United, who have outspent every single team in the league for the past decade, and bought the best players from every team the decade before that? unfair against Chelsea, who have spent the most any team has ever spent in a single transfer window, twice? Unfair against Arsenal who have outspent Mancity the last 3 seasons? Were it not for Blackburn, Chelsea and City, United would've won the first 6 ever premier league titles consecutively, and then from the Arsenal Invincibles until Ferguson's last season (7/8 league titles in a row)

@@tf0256 they're presumed guilty of breaching these charges whether they go to court and are proven innocent or not. Everton have breached ffp and been given two points deductions, would you say they're better off from spending that money than before? Moshiri has almost singlehandedly ruined that club structurally. Chelsea have gotten significantly worse since spending unscrupulous amounts, and are pending an investigation. Have they gained an unfair advantage or become worse? It seems Mancity are the needle in the haystack of teams that spend a lot and have actually become successful and improved, and because of that fans are calling for relegation and expulsion. Also, what do you define as "unfair"? Because to me, City have merely bridged the gap with their expenditures. It's taken a decade of self destruction from man united for City to be even considered as good a team, still nowhere near the dominance mind you. So "unfair" to me is a competitive law restricting teams to their own minuscule revenue generation in comparison to United and Liverpool and expecting the league to become more competitive.

@@tf0256 my point is that because of how dominant Manchester United have been due to amazing managerial leadership and being the dominant team during the rise of huge commercialisation, they have become solidified as a an "apex club" to coin Brian's phrase. In order for any club outside the top 6 to break into that block, you either need an insane amount of luck, or huge investment. Man city have had both to get into the position they're currently in. The "rules" are clearly not fit for purpose as Manchester City have allegedly breached them and still been able to complete a treble. They also limit clubs like Brighton and Brentford who essentially have to get lucky in order to arrive in the top 5/10 because they can't compete with the wages and transfers of other clubs. That means they're limited to a smaller group of players that want to come. I'm pointing out the flaws of the ruleset which limits smaller clubs (in terms of revenue) and solidified the "big six." That to me is unfair

Pep took over a league winning team and has spent more than any manager at a single club in the history of the sport.

@@user-zr8sx6jp8b No he hasn’t. Chelsea and United have both spent more. Ferguson spent significantly more than anyone else and he just gets a pass whilst guardiola doesn’t.

@@jackloughridge7617 I'll repeat: Pep has spent more than any manager at a single club in the history of the sport. He has spent over £1.4bil since taking over City. Fergie spent a lot because he was at United for 20 years. He did have a few big fee transfers but United were very rarely the biggest spenders in each transfer window. City spent more in the final 4 years of Fergie's United reign than Fergie did in 20 years.

@@user-zr8sx6jp8b of course he has. There is no other manager aside from klopp who has been at a top 10 club worldwide as long as pep in the recent period. You can’t directly compare the amount spent by pep and ferguson because there was significantly less money in the game at that point. By that logic David Moyes should be more successful than Wenger because he spends more money than wenger did. You can only compare the amount of money spent compared to other clubs in the time that a manager spent there and by that logic City are the 3rd highest spenders in the league in the time guardiola has spent there whilst Ferguson was by far no.1.

@@user-zr8sx6jp8bhe didn’t take over a league winning team?? City finished fourth that year. Hadn’t won the league for the last two years

they're also all the best he's ever used depending on the amount of money he's given. I also don't know how much Brian knows about computers or network traffic

I want Newcastle to get relegated only to see this guy suffer. When NU got taken over, he wasn't complaining oil countries taking over football, Infact he was making claims about how NU will be next city. Guy has a body of an elephant, brains of a mole. Hypocrite.

This means Spurs and Arsenal have always overachieved and can't be call bottlers because they've never been expected to win anything

@@kenrahhubchannel Arsenal have picked up a few F.A. cups, Spurs have nothing for decades.

Also Liverpool was on a low point you see klopps goodbye and they treated the final against Chelsea as last game of season , and since then it’s just not great football , palace , Atalanta , man United twice is just doesn’t look like mass amount of pressure Liverpool we seen in the klopp era

Alright tshigamongogongogagabobo

Liverpool fan here, pep is light-years better than klopp.

it would be like saying Ferguson has the easiest job in England when he won the treble in 99. Literally makes no sense

People absolutely thought and knew those players would be good. Not sure where you were but KDB was touted as a wonder kid for years. Gundogan was the controlling midfielder in a dortmund team that made it to a UCL final. Ake was established as a really good young defender long before he played for city. To say no one knew these players would be good is crazy. None of these players were surprise hits save maybe for Foden

Yeah and city ain't dropping no more point because they're serous unlike those 2 bottle clubs

I 100% agree. I still think city will win it, imo they are the greatest premier league team of all time. But it’s no where near done.

​@@vghiknbopkvdd665rdzzAfggwho do you support?

They got smashed at home to Atalanta too. Their season is crumbling.

Lad we got 99 points and didn’t win the league obviously we’re gonna be defeated

Well u spent 900 m and only won 1 premier league so u can’t talk about spending

@@ransfordadu-nsiah96 I really cannot understand why the media likes to assume Klopp and Liverpool aren't amongst the biggest spenders in Europe. It's really embarrassing for his legacy. They may think they're doing him a favor but they really aren't