The Reason Why US Tries to Land Gigantic F-15s Like on an Aircraft Carrier

Подписаться 1,5 млн

Просмотров 660 тыс.

50% 1

Welcome to this feature on Fluctus Channel! This feature discusses the BAK-12 arrested landing system on land and the modern arrested landing system on aircraft carriers. It also highlights various attempts by different aircraft to use arrested landing methods and their difficulties.
Fluctus is a website and RU-vid channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our RU-vid channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Опубликовано:

24 фев 2023

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 184

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

Thanks for mentioning my carrier’s May, 1964 operation to overfly and photograph French Nuclear facilities on Mururoa in the South Pacific. You are correct that there was some wingtip scraping on landing, but there was a full team of U-2 specialists onboard my USS Ranger CVA-61 for this exercise and Dragon Lady took off without problem or catapault assist. On takeoff, to prevent what we called ‘wing list’ a pair of ABHs literally held each tip as the U-2 gained speed/lift. Nice shots of Primary Flight Control by the way, a much neglected control Center on the ship. There are four main aviation control centres: Primary Flight Control (PriFly-control within 5nm), Carrier Air Traffic Control Center (CATCC-control from approach/marshalling to 5nm), Flight Deck Control (The Board- control on the Flight Deck/launch), and Hanger Deck Control. Both launch and landing are coordinated by PriFly and The Board.

@josephbarragan4601 Год назад

@TheOtherDerek Год назад

I was a Crew Chief on the F-15 for 12 years, the tailhook is for emergency use and as a hold back for maintenance engine runs.

@fredmdbud Год назад

The tailhooks on US Air Force planes are not for carrier landings, they are for emergencies to bring the plane to a rapid stop on the ground, such as a landing gear/brake failure. One example is the Australian F-111 that had to land its belly because the gear would not extend - it caught the arresting wire just feet off the ground, which prevented it from sliding beyond and off the runway.

@1975KyleDavid Год назад

I was about to make the same comment. The F-15 isn't designed to be catapulted.

@mysygisun3335 Год назад

そうですね、滑走路が破壊時に、600mの滑走路で、停止させる装置でもありますよね．

@superbirden57 Год назад

A great F-14 driver explained to me that landing on a carrier is tantamount to a controlled crash, hence the large thick landing gear.

@mcpaintball Год назад

I saw a cartoon once where the A-10 had the tailhook on the front, this would allow the carrier to just slide right up underneath the A-10 and catch it

@jakobholgersson4400 Год назад

I believe that it's also intended to give the aircraft STOL capabilities? I know that Danish Air Force did that to justify not buying Viggens.

@Mark-zc3mx Год назад

Did not realize a F-15 was gigantic. If you look I believe the F-14 was larger, but the Douglas A-3 was even larger and carrier based too....

@Mr.Robert1 Год назад

Reason why the Airforce just did a complete overhaul on the F-15. Do a web search under the F-15 X

@Knuckledragnation Год назад

Ah yes, the Whale. I was attached to a squadron in Southern Spain that flew these as well as EP-3Es. In fact, right before I landed at my duty station one of my squadron's deployed EA-3B's aboard the U.S.S. Nimitz crashed killing all seven crew members. After that, there were subsequently no more deployments aboard aircraft carriers for the A-3. The whale definitely was a big bird for sure.

@Mark-zc3mx Год назад

@@Knuckledragnation I was stationed in VQ2 from Feb 74 thru Feb 76 and in addition to the Ep-3E they also had the Connies ......

@Knuckledragnation Год назад

@@Mark-zc3mx OMG hey Mark right on shipmate. My apologies if I sound overly excited. I can’t tell you how much of a great learning experience it was for me. Both on and off duty. Where did you work within the squadron? I mainly worked in Maintenance Control and the office before that where the maintenance control officers worked. This is amazing. As I stated I had the best time of my life over there. From the time I stepped off the civilian chartered aircraft in spring of 1988 and met my VQ-2 sponsor till the day I had to leave because of medical issues in spring of 1990. Crazy thing to is my wife is from the Azores to which I’ve visited in the past. We are planning a trip to Rota, Andalusia, mainland Portugal and The Azores this summer. Anyways I had to leave Spain abruptly due to injuries and was medically retired from the Navy. Part of me will always feel like I left a little bit of me behind in Rota. Thanks Mark! ✌🏽🇺🇸🙏

@Mark-zc3mx Год назад

@@Knuckledragnation Mark, I arrived on a cold Saturday and was met at the terminal by the duty driver, and taken to the squadron and check in. Went to the barracks, which at that time was kitty corner from the base theater. I then walked off base, making it to the Virgin del Mar where I saw the sign Base Naval, and it was pointed back from where I came from. I never got lost again. After my stint in 1st LT Div, I was the mid-watch duty driver for a bit and then ended up on the 2nd deck back in comms. Back in my time, it was all the way aft and to the right. July of 74 we had the "Admirals" plane Double Nuts go down in Naples on takeoff, taking everyone. It was my first experience with the tragedies of the military. We also had another A-3 snap a wire on the Sara, and she pancaked into the water. Floated long enough for all the aircrew to be safely recovered. I met my wife while in Rota and we are going to celebrate 48 this coming year. I would like to go back but they no longer allow Space A travelers to debark in Rota, so if I want to do that I would have to fly out of DC and over to Jerez. I later came back to Rota for a second tour but this time I was out at Bldg 8 the Commsta since I was a Radioman. Was great to be a black shoe in an Airedale command. It was a great command and I forever cherish my time and memories. BTW I am a Mark too Mark

@DarthPlaya Год назад

Did I miss it??? Or did I just spend 15mins and NOT see even one F-15 attempt an arrested carrier landing? 🤨

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

It’s the gear-undercarriage my friend. They’d break . . . And they cost. I can just see the look on some Bird Colonel’s face as he read the damage reports.

@user-xz9hu4rd2v Год назад

“LIKE” on an aircraft carrier. All Air Force bases have arresting cables at each end to stop airplanes with brake issues.

@larshowen3319 Год назад

Thank you! You just saved me 15 minutes!

@Christopher_1775 Год назад

@@larshowen3319 Lol, me too. Thanks!

@Slackware1995 Год назад

It would be a very expensive single attempt.

@michaellewis9847 Год назад

F-14 has been retired since 2006. Why was it discussed like it’s a currently flying.

@judih.8754 Год назад

Good question. My interest was piqued when I heard F14 and saw the familiar shape. ( VF101 in the 70's)

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

@@judih.8754 excellent question. The Tomcat was a bird ahead of its time, and it showed! On my ships it often hovered at 50-60 percent operational. Lots of guys referred to it as ‘Our Edsel’!

@christopherfcunha Год назад

@@edwardweeden8837 yes! Ironically the F14 was actually designed somewhat form the F-111B program. The subcontractor for General Dynamics was Grumman. So the GD group was working on the F111A for the Air Force, Grumman was working on the F-111B for the Navy...but the plane was waay over it's 80,000 weight limit and the program was canceled. Not that the Navy thought the F-111B program was what they felt they needed in the first place but you can blame Secretary McNamara for that! Since Grumman was already working on the F-111B replacement they were allow to make a few prototypes to prove to the Navy that they could build a far better plane for the Navy requirements. There's a few documentaries on this on You tube.

@Dyson_Cyberdynesystems Год назад

Well... Technically it still does in the IRIAF.. But agreed not in the way the video presented it. In fact the whole video is a hot pile of misinformation..

@wagner9050 Год назад

On one of my Now DE-classified missions of rocketing around the Back Of The Moon. . I had to land on an aircraft carrier. I had to get the Shuttle to take a Very Long approach to slough-off speed... but we did it: me & Gary Powers my Co-pilot. Just as our hook grabbed the last Arresting Cable (I'd missed the 1st two on carrier's flight deck)... I was hollering loudly "Grab It... Grab It"... ... when my girlfriend did & 'pulled' me from my slumber.

@DarthPlaya Год назад

🤣🤣🤣

@nova3889 Год назад

Silly😂🤣🤣

@Make-Asylums-Great-Again Год назад

Your stories suck.

@shadowopsairman1583 Год назад

That's a Tug. Pushback truck is silly. It's an arresting system.Footage is older as the Airforce got rid of the crappy abu.

@ecmorgan69 Год назад

The F-15 is, to me, the most beautiful combat aircraft ever made to date. Just looking at its lines, the gorgeous, clipped delta wing, and the two ginormous engines always makes my heart flutter.

@Sagan_Starborn Год назад

F-14 Tomcat for the win. An F-15 with swing wings and an even higher lifting-body surface

@anomaly_echelon7994 Год назад

@@Sagan_Starborn The F-14 looks like an absolute space fighter ngl, but I think the F-15 is a tad bit sleeker and sexier than the F-14.

@hardingdies7811 Год назад

1) the Navy jets are heavier because they must be designed for a "controlled crash" on EVERY landing (which I have experienced) so their frames and landing gear are stronger and more robust than any equivalent Air Force plane. And they experience almost equal forces when launched by the catapult systems. 2) The C-130 is an exception to almost ALL other military aircraft because it can use it's engines to back up, allowing it REVERSE thrust when landing to slow it down. 3) Navy pilots have been shown to have higher blood pressures and heart rates when landing at night (fewer lights, moving ship and angled deck) than when in actual sir-to-sir combat (plus they have to find their ship first).

@dperreno Год назад

The F-15 was developed and deployed 2 years AFTER the F-14, and thus was it's successor, not it's predecessor.

@christopherfcunha Год назад

You tell em' Doug!

@1ThomasBug Год назад

What an all encompassing video! At least 99% of the audio is WRONG. The F-15 has 12,000’ concrete landing gear. Its little skinny gear, not being designed for carrier durability, would look like tin foil after the first and only trap the aircraft would ever make. It is a great aircraft all around: but not designed for carrier ops. Just imagine an Air Force pilot actually surviving the trap aboard the ship. He/she would be searching for the missing 9,700’ of runway. Then there is no bar, no exchange, the swimming pool is over the side, no tennis courts. Then they would look around and gasp “You do this kind of s - - t at night too?” End of USAF trying to be forced aboard aircraft carriers. 🤬🤯🤮DGBryan

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

AMEN T Bug. Plus with a 20 foot height could you imagine the chaos it would produce on a hangar bay ceiling? Let Grumman stick with the gears.

@christopherfcunha Год назад

You go Girl! Well said and acurate!

@drmarkintexas-400 Год назад

Thank you for sharing 🤗🙏🇺🇲😎

@saintzeno Год назад

It's always satisfying to watch wires catch jets, .. vise versa.

@sreed16 Год назад

A6, E-2C, F-111 RA-5C, A3, and many other pretty large aircraft. The F-14 is about the same length as a F-15 but is wider.. also the weight of an F-14 is nearly 3 times that of an F-15 when fully loaded.

@mysygisun3335 Год назад

一部嘘がありますね．最大離陸重量的には変わりはありませんね、海軍機にだけあるのではなく、空軍の戦闘機・攻撃機の全てに装備されてますよね．非常時の強制着陸用に．

@sreed16 Год назад

@@mysygisun3335 Do you mean on loaded or unloaded aircraft?

@AvengerII Год назад

"the weight of an F-14 is nearly 3 times that of an F-15 when fully loaded." Not quite true! The empty weight difference between an F-15 (A-D model; C model was 28,000 lbs empty) and and F-14A (40,000 lbs empty weight) was about 12,000 lbs. That weight difference is accounted for between the carrier landing requirements for the F-14 (which raised weight a minimum 3,000 lbs in structural beef and heavier duty landing gear) and the wing sweep mechanism to make the F-14 more aerodynamically efficient across its flight envelope (which mostly accounts for the rest of the weight increase over the F-15). There's very little difference between max loaded weight of the two planes. The F-14 catapult limit was about 72,000 lbs and a bit higher than that taking off from land (close to 73,000 if not 74,000 lbs!). A max loaded F-15C (3 external drop tanks plus 2 conformal fuel tanks) is 68,000 lbs. An F-15 can carry a total of around 33,000 lbs of fuel divided between internal capacity (roughly 13,450 lbs) and the 3 drop tanks and conformal tanks.

@sreed16 Год назад

@@AvengerII I found this: (so I used these numbers pretty much) Design: The F-14 is 62 feet 9 inches long, with a spread wingspan of 64 feet and a swept wingspan of 38 feet. Its loaded weight is 61,000 pounds. The F-15 is 63 feet 9 inches long, with a wingspan of 42 feet 10 inches. Its loaded weight is 20,200 pounds.

@AvengerII Год назад

@@sreed16 Oh, how lovely. You were STILL wrong about the loaded weights of the F-14 versus the F-15. Thank you for being a little snot back to me! I'll enjoy blocking you now! 😴 Dork...

@Retroscoop Год назад

Well, the RA 5C Vigilante wasn't a small plane either (23 m long), but the Hercules with its almost 30 m, wow.... It keeps on surprising me...

@Slackware1995 Год назад

First they compare some specs of the F14 and F15, but only if the F15 wins. No mention that the two fighters had vastely different design roles. Nor that the airframe, landing gear, and tail hook to handle landing on a carrier weigh ALOT to handle the stress. Then they try to compare landing an F15 on a runway with a completely different wire system to an F14 landing on a carrier. The F14 lands at a faster speed, just in case the pilot misses the 3 wires. When it lands, it has much less area to stop in with a very hard carrier island just to the right (starboard), a steel wall (stern) if the pilot comes in too hot, a really big swimming pool is the pilot comes in too far to the left (port) and possible other airplanes, helicopters, equipment, weapons and personnel close by. Not just an apples to oranges comparison, but an apple and pear to an orange and grape comparison. Like others have commented a waste of 15 minutes.

@stevesmith6236 Год назад

Very cool!

@426superbee4 Год назад

Those cables can cut a man into half

@uttaradit2 Год назад

excellent

@kunstdeskrieges3308 Год назад

wie gut können f 15 Kampfjets sein?die Technologie entwickelt sich.

@marinhosouza2635 Год назад

Very nice tecnics landing...

@joeburke5604 Год назад

Worked with the M-21 arresting gear in the USMC from 1972-1978. SATS

@uwekonnigsstaddt524 Год назад

Worked with the same gear also 1982-1995. Used also the E-28 and maintained the E-5 anchor chain gear, glad not one took it (abort gear at the runway overrun). Semper Fi!

@keithnoneya Год назад

Nice video, but I never saw any footage of an F-15 trying to land on a carrier. It's probably a good thing they didn't try because the landing gear on an F-15 would actually break off due to the stresses. Also the Navy doesn't use Push Back Trucks on Aircraft Carries on Naval Air Stations, it calls them Tow Trucks. Best Wishes & Blessings. Keith Noneya AT1 USN/USNR-TAR Retired.

@christopherfcunha Год назад

Keith if you like seeing aircraft that isn't usually seen being landed on a carrier you may want to look up the documentary on the C130 transporter. It too was considered for carrier operations in it's early days. Now that's a sight!

@keithnoneya Год назад

@@christopherfcunha Oh yeah that was really cool, not very practical though. They had to completely clear the flight deck of ALL aircraft for take off and landing for safety, but still a great feat in itself. Best Wishes & Blessings. Keith Noneya

@christopherfcunha Год назад

@@keithnoneya No..not very practical but I guess trying it opens up new ideas. Just like the concept of landing aircraft on a carrier in the first place. Thanks buddy. Right back at you!

@danodamano2581 Год назад

Very dissapointing. Quite a fluff piece. Not likely to watch more content

@viesquespron3080 Год назад

F14 Is more or less same length and weight than F15. Nowadays they are heavy and old expensive war machines. Last versions of F18 are much more competitive and operative for carriers.

@peetky8645 Год назад

cable arrest on land is for emergencies where loss of brakes or stuck throttle make landing dangerous.

@regtimmins1944 Год назад

The f15 was never a predeser of the Tomcat in fact they were both in serve at the same time in fact the f18 later the super Hornet were presider to the Tomcat both the super Hornet and growler can be found on caiers today

@christopherfcunha Год назад

Thank you Reg!! Exactly!

@Slackware1995 Год назад

Tomcat was 2 years older.

@amilhollywood3880 Год назад

Eructus, pone la posibilidad de subtítulos en español también!

@gordonlawrence1448 Год назад

You are not comparing like with like. For a start the F14 is heavier to withstand rough landings on aircraft carriers which are inevitable in some weather conditions. Add to that the swing wing which adds a significant amount. The F14 also had a much more powerful and therefore heavier Radar. Then of course the Phoenix is a very heavy (for air to air) missile. . So the hard points need to be stronger therefore heavier. The F-14 also had the somewhat heavy kit for catapult launch too. Also the F-14 could fly 100NM out loitre for 4 hours in a CAP and I cannot imagine an F-15 doing that without re-fuelling. In fact with only a little more than a 1000nm range for the F-15A in combat configuration it would be struggling to patrol for 2 hours and still have naval reserves (more than USAF reserves due to deck landings incurring so many wave-offs in bad weather). So they are not even close to being the same thing.

@your_royal_highness Год назад

Gigantic? Ok, how about landing a B-52 on a carrier? You would have my attention then

@markwintz6000 Год назад

he's right

@KZYSGWR Год назад

oh, 5:15　Yokota Air base Rwy18

@paulc1173 Год назад

F-14 is still sexy’r and the F15’s wing is being forced through the air with BIG motors, while the Tomcat flows through the air with its wings and wing box / tunnel. Did she say F15 is the 14 predecessor???

@harrybuckner8232 Год назад

Paul C yes she did..and she was mistaken.

@jarodu5869 Год назад

February 26th 2023 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

@jasonmbrown2795 Год назад

U2: It's landing experience (on an aircraft carrier) was NOT entirely successful. Duh! C-130: Possible does NOT equal practical.

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

Please see my post about the U-2 landing elsewhere here. It DID complete the mission.

@426superbee4 Год назад

The landing gears and tires take a lot of punishment, Plus the grabbing cable hook

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

Onboard my ‘Birdfarms’ we changed our AG wires every 100 Traps…

@426superbee4 Год назад

@@edwardweeden8837 wow

@bluecadillac Год назад

"...many countries invested in acquiring a fleet of aircraft suitable for operations on an aircraft carrier." Really? Which countries would those be? How many is that?

@marcradermacher6244 Год назад

So what's was the reason for the F15s exactly?

@buildingandfixing4397 Год назад

1:05 can you spot the error?

@mr.m6315 Год назад

If you want to see an F-15 land on an aircraft carrier this is not the video.

@jjflash1987 Год назад

Because there is no video of an F-15 landing on an aircraft carrier.

@chriss-nf1bd 7 месяцев назад

The C130 never had a tail hook, It was painted on the side. Look mom no tail hook...

@TheBOYO74 Год назад

C-130 never used a hook on the USS Forestall trials you even said it was touch and go landings also

@aaronsanborn4291 Год назад

🤣 the F-14 was just as big as the F-15 lmfao

@10actual Год назад

This is nothing new. In 1965 the USMC, at Chu Lai (Chinese for Krulak) used a system much like the carrier arresting systems so Marine aircraft could use the airstrip for fighter jets until the strip could be lengthened. Support for the Infantry was necessary and part of the Marine air/ground team.

@ashkanabedian6883 Год назад

Instead of all this mumbo jumbo you could have installed an engine on the deck to blow air in the opposite direction.

@MikeBaxterABC Год назад

12:39 A Hercules can land on an aircraft carrier without a hook .. Easily! .. stopping at the control tower even. "Look Ma. No Hook!" :) .. The tests show it can be used to resupply a carrier in action , all it takes is a command to do now ...

@alienone6854 Год назад

If the United States can get a B25 off a WWII carrier, we can do about anything.

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

We CAN shoot ‘em OK, but can we TRAP ‘em OK?

@paulmurgatroyd6372 Год назад

Of course you can land F-15's, like, on an aircraft carrier.

@tygrallure6895 Год назад

Come on now it's pronounced "Bok" and "Moz". Power Pro lead the way! 💪🏾

@toopoetic2 Год назад

That's right, Power Pro Prime beef baby. One thing that bothered me was the fire fighters pretending like they operate and maintain the arresting system. All they do is rewind the tape.

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

@@toopoetic2 and perhaps pick up the pieces…

@michaeldoxey1240 Год назад

The F14 came before the F15 by almost 2 years!!

@rosariolazcanogarcia7021 Год назад

F15 tren reforzado y alas plegables

@kokomo9764 Год назад

They do not try to land an F15 on an Air Craft carrier. It simply is not designed to do it. The landing gear alone would not last. Maybe they tried it a couple if times but nothing ever came of that.

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

Except very expensive and tangled undercarriages!

@wessnyder6192 Год назад

Like on a Carrier, Not On a Carrier….

@zachansen8293 Год назад

f15 is small compared to f14, right?

@anonymike8280 Год назад

The F-14 was retired by the United States in 2006. As of 2023, Iran is the only remaining military operator.

@jacksonlee3771 Год назад

The landing gear of a F15 could not withstand the rigors of carrier landings.

@JM-lk6wo Год назад

It possibly could, ONCE. After that, the aircraft would probably be good for spare parts to other aircraft...

@jacksonlee3771 Год назад

@@JM-lk6wo no way. the gear would collapse on impact

@JM-lk6wo Год назад

@@jacksonlee3771 that's why I said it could land ONCE. After that, the plane would be scrap.

@DivineMisterAdVentures Год назад

Great and amazing. The F14 came in about 30' over my head looking like a flying Tyrannosaurus that had seen a lot of fights - it had multiple metal patches and other deep scars, and it belched smoke as it glided in. I just happened to be in the right spot at the right time and had no idea. The thing is, that particular airplane was a Marine on its last wings and it showed it, on the edge of still civilized Irvine, California.

@jjflash1987 Год назад

There has never been a Marine F-14 and I highly doubt any US F-14 flew with multiple metal patches from combat.

@germanbeer2466 Год назад

Make peace, not war

@BigJwlz Год назад

The F-15 is an Air Force jet, not Navy.

@chriss-nf1bd 7 месяцев назад

Sense the mothballing of the F14. the Navy hasn't has a fighter aircraft and forced to employ a multi role aircraft.

@samijansamijan7052 Год назад

Oh maygood Goodyear ok thankyou full

@Ironwarpigg Год назад

9:29 lol

@jeromeheim6246 Год назад

Yea we're was the F15 landing on a carrier

@SafayatulIslam Год назад

It's 3.48am in my place. Why am I watching this? I don’t even have any aircraft or any aircraft career!!!

@nousagi_tetz Год назад

えまってなんでタイトルだけ日本語で見えるの？

@michaelstinson5317 Год назад

What is Precautious? No such word! You can take precautions or you can be cautious. But not be Precautious.

@mam362 Год назад

"like" on an aircraft? geez

@Milkmans_Son Год назад

You had one job...

@gregophilip6858 Год назад

they should continue with the f15 rather than the f14 stick with what works

@jjflash1987 Год назад

The F-14 has been out of service for many years now. There are no flyable versions in the US. Only Iran may have a few that are air worthy.

@susanwahl6322 Год назад

I still think that the F-35 is ugly.

@africaunite3823 Год назад

cap!!!

@Mr.Robert1 Год назад

TRY'S WHAT DO YOU MEAN THEY TRY? WE DO ! WE HAVE 11 FULLY FUNCTIONAL AIRCRAFT CARRIERS GROUPS CURRENTLY AND MORE ARE BEING BUILT AS WELL SPEAK MORE THAN ANY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD BY FAR! LT Rob United States Air Force Retired.

@milchani Год назад

I'm surprised how can you keep saying the same thing using different words for 15 minutes straight.

@GrumpyOldMan9 Год назад

10:42 Russian giving way to an American.

@ursus9104 Год назад

Strange that the tailhook mount holds the entire plane's weight without breaking.

@tonyc7352 Год назад

Except it actually holds way more force than just the weight because of very quick deceleration.

@harrisoakley711 Год назад

USA

@dnicolaslouis. Год назад

Porte avion.

@miketan4803 Год назад

Stop mixing up f14 and f15

@C.Europeo Год назад

Podíais poner traductor al español para saber bien de que se trata, Saludos.

@user-lg6jw5iu2l Год назад

Metric!!!

@tettazwo9865 Год назад

I seriously doubt that the producers of this drivel or the broad that reads the script have any clue of aviation.

@wendellburkhart8169 Год назад

Scam ¡!!!

@tettazwo9865 Год назад

What actually is the point of this vapid video?

@christopherfcunha Год назад

The point is views on RU-vid and making money from it.

@7vampirycprf6d32 Год назад

🇩🇪🖖🏼☮🇺🇦🔱🕊🚜🚀🌉💥😎

@tronghungdao251 Год назад

❤❤❤😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉

@rickylistman8279 Год назад

Seriuosly....f15 aren't that hard to land on a carrier. It's just a wear on the equipment. The United States has landed a AC-130 successfully on carrier multiple times. just for the fk off it. Just so we know we could in an emergency.

@agnelodsa788 Год назад

F15 is not gigantic!

@echohunter4199 Год назад

In other words. The US Air Force is training its pilots and crews how to land its aircraft to land either on short runways or aircraft carriers in preparation for an upcoming conflict with China and Russia, likely within the next 12-20 months.

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

Gotta be able to land on those tiny islands they built in OUR South China Sea when we occupy!

@jjflash1987 Год назад

No, that has nothing to do with the land based arresting system. They are for emergencies only.

@manlouie8783 Год назад

12 to 20 months? That coincide with the reminding time of Biden's presidency.

@JM-lk6wo Год назад

Aircraft such as the F15, F16, or the stealth aircrafts (assuming they are equipped with a tail hook) could possibly land on an aircraft carrier ONCE! It is a certainty the airframe would be overstretched, likely one or more tires would blow out and the landing gear would be broken. Naval aircraft,designed for catapult launch and arrested landings are very different than land based equivalents, the landing gear is orders of magnitude stronger, the entire airframe is overbuilt to withstand the much greater stresses of carrier operating conditions.

@RealMTBAddict Год назад

Help from the year 2083

@Mr.Robert1 Год назад

YOUR SCREEN NAME IS MOUNTAIN BIKE AND YOU'RE FROM THE YEAR 2083? NEXT TIME WHEN YOU PLAY GAMES, MAKE A SCREEN NAME THAT SOUNDS MORE CONVINCING IT WOULD WORK BETTER FOR THE FOOLS.

@Mr.Robert1 Год назад

MY GUESS IS YOU'RE FROM ASPEN AND YOU JOINED RU-vid IN THE YEAR 2013 HOW CAN IT HELP YOUR DUMBASS?

@sreed16 Год назад

@@Mr.Robert1 In 2083 they develop a keyboard button above the left SHIFT and below the TAB key.

@realistic.optimist Год назад

IF McD could modify a F-15SE to a Naval variant would be wonderful. BUT congress will never allow the defense contractors to miss out of 20 years of R&D and hundreds of billions of dollars wasted. The F-22 and F-35 were colossal wastes of taxpayer money.

@colinvannurden2467 Год назад

Good video

@kenharty6016 Год назад

The f15 is only 5% faster than an f14. So not easily outpased as you mentioned.

@edwardweeden8837 Год назад

F-14 could out-fast a F-15, if you removed all the variable geometry / hydraulics, but now we are talking imaginary!

@harrybuckner8232 Год назад

Being a F-14 is heavier than the F-15, it could go faster in a dive.

@kenharty6016 Год назад

@@harrybuckner8232 maybe the f14 weighs almost twice as much can you imagine if it was made with newer materials how fast if actually would be that would ne a fun ride

@GolddenWaffles Год назад

@@kenharty6016 the frame was mainly made out of aluminium, it would be hard to make it lighter. But with modern tech there can be less wires but so would the F-15 which it does now. The F-14 was a great plane overall, and it also beat the F-15 on multiple occasions, but it had its prime.