Omg Brian Jones rocking his vox teardrop guitar just awesome...... Charlie Watts dapper as usual in collar and tie just wonderful RIP you two legends ❤️
Keith Richards was born with perfect pitch, sang in the choir as a soprano and sang for the queen and had a far better voice than Jagger technically. But since he started smoking at 8 and drinking at 9 his voice became hit or miss.
@@simplesimon4717 Yes!!!! Think, when Brian Jones, had another job .. an actor or something else,. They had never met ...so there were for sure no Stones.... Because he was the founder... It's so simple.....So BRIAN JONES was and is the Rolling Stones forever.... Mick Jagger and the others except Bill never speak about Brian and thank him for what they became !!!!... Sorry when I make mistakes my English is not so good, but I hope you understand!!! So no JONES no Stones...
@@waynecameron4579 ...Thank you!..I believe Brian Jones will be never forgotten!!! And now with the Internet technology, many younger fans of the Stones, have the chance to know Brian and also the truth 🙏🎸
And that is the raw and dangerous opposition to the Beatles? I'm bursting with laughter. Well done Andrew Loog Oldham. You really knew your job of manipulating the masses😂
Why the question marks? He was the most well known DJ of his day. Would you like us to be like a totalitarian regime where those out of favour get air brushed out of official photos?
@@2011littlejohn1 no but that clip caught me by surprise that's all. I realize he was a deserved famous DJ espe in the 60,,s and you can't take that away from him despite all else.
@@larry1824 I first heard him on Radio Luxemburgh in the late 50's presenting a life story of Glen Miller. I remember thinking how insincere he sounded. I was never a fan - my favourites were John Peel and Bob Harris.
Mic looks a bit awkward sometimes like a James Brown want a be but still great music. Mic is a James Brown want a be and Keith is a Johnny be good want a be. But they went on to make their own style.
Viendolos ahí, en el mismo escenario del NME, es que se puede apreciar cuanto mejores eran los Beatles . Absolutamente superiores y mas adelantados que los rolling stones
@@dandelion51 para empezar los Beatles tenian SEIS cantantes (si consideramos que John y Paul eran muy distintos cantando rock o baladas) en tanto los Rolling tienen sólo uno y sus coros son bastante comunes, las armonías vocales de los Beatles eran tremendas en estudio y verdaderas proezas en vivo sin monitoreo, la amplitud de estilos musicales de los Beatles era mayor, George solea tan bien como Keith en la guitarra y si bien el bajista de los Rolling es muy bueno, Paul es superior tocando líneas de bajo mientras canta y Ringo hizo lo que ningún baterista pudo... hacer riffs reconocibles de batería (por ej "come togheter" o "in my life" o "while my guitar gently weeps") nadie discute que los Rolling son excelentes, pero en la pileta de los Beatles no se baña nadie excepto ellos.
