I think SRK said somewhere that he wants to do roles appropriate for his age and indirectly accepted that a large part of audience watched his movies as a gesture of support. That is pretty high self awareness for a movie star.
I think his speech is reflective of the stories and characters he wants to associate with now. Those holding him accountable for the roles he’s played previously are dismissing the concept of an evolution of an actor at this stage of his career
@@seventeencarat7090becz Ranbir gave a 1000cr hit (it's still running in theatre and goona cross 1000cr) at just 40 and he is better actor than srk and he is everyone's fav except ranveer and Deepika and their PR team
Maybe he said that because secretly he might be playing a big role in Don 3, where towards the end we see Ranveer killing him and becoming the new Don.
@@Sidharth_Das_50what's it with just "Bollywood"? Literally most actors in every industry barely keeps their word about what they preach. Being a Malayali, I know the kind of cringeworthy stuff we hear from our actors everyday.
I beg to differ with SRK. SRK played 'Don'. In that movie, he overcomes all odds by killing the good guy - Vijay. He didn't make sure that Don gets atleast a considerable suffering. 😢
the reason why srk's stance has changed on playing a dark character over the years is because he himself acknowledges the influence he has on the audience, i remember i once saw an interview of srk and in that interview he told that he had turned down the role of ala uddin khilji from padmavat because he knew he would make the character likable. and he didn't wanted such an awful character to be liked or idolized by the audience . i think this is the main reason for his change in approach in selecting roles over the years, as earlier, he was a struggling actor but now he is well established and know his influence over the masses , but then again maybe its just his personal choice which has evolved over the years.
He has said repeatedly that staring at Kajol in kuch kuch hota hai was wrong and he feels wierd when his children watch them. That's the difference between a man & bois
It is just an excuse to avoid playing challenging characters because he understand his limitations as an actor he cannot play Alauddin Khilji he cannot play animal character so it's just an excuse oh I don't want to play such characters because it affect society Joker😂
I believe that as one of the most beloved artists in India, he understands the importance of taking responsibility for his character's development. Perhaps this is why he chose to leave the role of Don Franchisee.The irony is that just a year ago, the same news media outlets that are now praising him were spreading negativity about him. Man, he is a silent warrior.
That man possesses an aura. His movies were attacked, family was attacked, a move that actually backfired on the haters bcz true fans came in his support massively and that chews those haters. Never have i witnessed the whole country gather behind an actor as great as srk. Yes there are many stars but SRK is in a different universe now.
I think SRK has evolved so much because the millions of people who look upto him and the things he do on the screen may influence this current generation as there is always a chance that heroes doing grey shades may become a trend like animal and people will try to imitate it, i respect his opinion it's his choice to do or not to commit such grey shades movies in the upcoming future
@antarikshchoudhury173Well, I guess it psychological. There are some films which people try to repeat after seeing in films and somethings which they don't try.
When we compare the negative roles of Darr, Anjaam and Don, there is a major difference. Anjaam and Darr belongs to a genre where the negativity comes because of hatred where in Don the negativity is because of profession. Hence, emotions generated in them are different.
@@shivamgusain5185 whenever SRK has played a bad guy,his character has died in the end except for in don.And you cannot really criticize him for that as his don arc was not completed you dk for sure he might have died in the end. SRK has been saying that glorification thing for years ex-old Aap ki adalat interview and anupama chopra interview in 2017 maybe.At this point whatever he says people always manage to misinterpret it. Now I know why he frequently avoids the public eye.
So what about Hum Tumhare hain Sanam and In Devdas where he hits Aishwarya to create that wound on her forehead?? those were not so called negative roles...but those were toxic af
I think it’s important to point out that Don is not a villian, but rather an anti-hero, after all the franchise is about Don not the other characters. Movies like Darr, Anjaam, and Baazigar were pure villians with agendas.
@@nishitbhardwaj9981 ranvijay is neither villain not hero nor anti hero. He is just a fatherless character who is a spoiled brat. He didn't have heroic qualities he was morally deranged and just wiping out the people danger for his family. He may be called a hero from family's perspective.
I think he just meant not to glorify an incorrect character if he played though.... Nothing more and i would definitely love to see srk collaborate with Neeraj Pandey in a thriller and Shoojith sarkar for a drama. ❤
I agree. Because if people are liking kabir singh and Ranvijay in animal, they are gonna take some things from character and those things may stay with them for their lifetime.
Movies influence society but you know what else does: Ceiling fans: ceilings fans might influence people to hang themselves increasing suicide rates in the country Swimming pools: people might be influenced to jump in pools and later end up drowning Fire: Some people might play with fire not understanding its consequences, leading to burns and possibly death, Cars: Cars influence people to drive which leads to some people getting into accidents and possibly death, Moral of the story: Everything is an influence in the world, hence god has given us a brain to decide what is right and wrong for us 😊
Movies influence society but you know what else does: Ceiling fans: ceilings fans might influence people to hang themselves increasing suicide rates in the country Swimming pools: people might be influenced to jump in pools and later end up drowning Fire: Some people might play with fire not understanding its consequences, leading to burns and possibly death, Cars: Cars influence people to drive which leads to some people getting into accidents and possibly death, Moral of the story: Everything is an influence in the world, hence god has given us a brain to decide what is right and wrong for us 😊
@@PS-792 Domestic violence and men having anger issues and eventually women suffer is pretty common in desi households. So when some of the actors and Vanga says, no one learns things from movies, I agree but It's in the society already and Vanga openly saying slapping your partner is a form of love, people who already beat their wife will see this celebration and think, " whatever I do with my wife is not that wrong " it’s a form of love ".
SRK is a multifaceted human being and not merely an actor to whom KK Mennon’s comment would apply to. Understanding the responsibility of his persona carries for mass entertainment and limiting himself as an actor for the goodness of society is commendable. The world can do more with goodness even if it costs creativity.
You guys are so gullible. Don't even see through the subtle agendas in his movies. That's not on him, that's on the director. But saying that if the character he plays does bad things should die horribly is kinda hypocrite, considering his character in Jawan just open fires in the metro station using a blood minigun, and also insults the NSG Commandos.
@@ASTHAPUROHIT-u9s what about Don series where he glorified a bad character? He is jealous of RK. This was very low shot especially gives how Ranbir Supported Dunky.
3 decades ago, he foretold his life story, “Haar Ke Jitne Wale ko Baazigar kehte hai” 😊 At an age where people retire, he had a rebirth. CNN thought they hit the final nail on the coffin last year 😂😂 Aptly named by his parents “Shah Rukh”
Srk in the last part of the speech where he mentioned that his family deserves the biggest cheer probably is the only moment I have seen him being so emotional in a public setting apart from the time he was talking about his parents on Simi Grewal's show..Shah Rukh Khan is not just an actor,he is a phenomena..When he is in his bad phase,we feel it..When he celebrates,we rejoice...Somehow,it feels like he is one of us❤ And the collaborations I wanna see are 1.Gauri Shinde again 2.Sriram Raghavan 3.Mani Ratnam 4.Vikramaditya Montwane And regarding the status Srk has reached both coz of age and experience,he should not do morally grey characters because he is now not just an actor,he is a role model and a representative of our country.New age actors have a long way to go to enter the leagues of Khans or Akshay.
@@slayer81there are so many underrated Bollywood jam stop the ignorance for once then you will see how many good movies Bollywood also makes it’s just that the noiser side is more that tarnished the name of Bollywood or say Hindi Cinema.
he ain't wrong. you can't glorify a toxic misogynistic character in that way. you don't understand how much impact it leaves on the dumb generation and specially young guys looking up at such characters
As far as future roles of SRK is concerned, I think SRK should do roles which are intense. That may be related to common man or larger than life, but intense. Last few movies which have not done well like Zero and to some extent Dunki is a prime example where people dont want to see him as a "chokra" doing slightly slapstick kind of role. People want him in intense roles with some gravity. Even Dear Zindagi role was too good where we had to take Jehangir seriously from scene 1.
@@Suryakriti-w9inikita thakur has talked about it, it's called feminism in bollywood or something like that. If you still think nikita was wrong after watching that video, you're just woke
would love to see SRK collaborating with Mani sir, Raj & DK, sriram raghavan, vishal bharadwaj and Sukumar 🤞 presently, these are the most intelligent and wholesome directors in indian cinema.
even srk collaborates with these Legends who require great actor to do the movie he will fail miserably because he is just an ordinary actor right now he can't emote or Express from his Botox field face in his younger days also he was an over actor and Indian audience was stupid to think that over actor are great actor but current audience understand difference between over acting and good acting
There is a huge difference between an actor and a star.. we love to see Kay kay sir's acting but we don't follow him on the other hand we blindly follow our stars like SRK or Salman... That's why they are more trapped on this kind of positive roles, so nobody can question them about their character choices...
@@njha4531 really bro? Animal me Ranbir ke charector ko leke itna negetive baate hua but on the other hand Manoj Bajpai ka sardar khan ko cult bana Diya Gaya.. agar animal galat hai to GOW bhi galat hai or agar GOW sahi hai to Animal bhi sahi hai
@@malehachowdhury5614where do you guys get this word “glorify” from? Mid way through the film when you’re watching does someone come and whisper in your ear “you must imitate this” and walk you?
I feel last year SRK's movies worked just because people wanted to see him on the big screen and there's a huge wave of larger than life films going on rn. But, he should now take up roles like Swades and Dear Zindagi because audience is now matured and more people want these veteran stars to take up roles appropriate of their age. something that Amitabh Bacchan did in the early 2000s.
Want him to do more stuff like Swades, Chak De, Dear Zindagi... Maybe a sequel to Yes Boss with him having a mid life crisis.. Too bad Kundan Shah ji is no longer with us...
Did SRK tell your mom while he was having sex with her that he does corporate booking? Because with Salaar we have actual proof of corporate booking and fake collection. Even Box Office India made a note. What is the evidence against SRK? Are you jealous of SRK because your mom wants to have sex with him? @GSS77712
He didn’t talk about animal nor any other actor, see his old interview aap ki adalat 90s interview, he literally says the same . So that’s his mindset which is good and he’s not targeting anyone,he’s talking about himself
Difference is that that was an interview, he was probably asked about that. And this was a speech, he had no need to add this statement. He was clearly taking a dig at Animal
I guess in Animal, the ending was quite apt.. See, looking at a character like Ranvijay... I can say that he was not the one who was afraid of dying... He fought 100 of men alone after asking his cousins to stop and sing... he had several injuries and was dying but acted normally.. Because his biggest fear was losing his father ... And seeing his the lerson he loves the most, dying because of cancer helplessly was an apt ending punishment for him.
Couple of years ago they were hounding him today they are wagging their tails for him. It kinda shows how far dignity and humbleness can take you, we all should learn a thing or two from how srk carries himself
I think it’s something that he said considering himself… the position in which he is currently, the fan following, the attention that he gets even for smallest thing… so such roles if he does then it might spread even more and bad among his followers which I guess he doesn’t want it to happen… that’s why he said that if he plays such role at the end he should die badly in that role…
I think a lead of the film not always have to be a good guy...a bad guy can lead the film just like Don...But if you are portraying anti hero than obviously he is supposed to do bad things...you can't expect him to do good things...what is wrong in case of films like Kabir Singh is that Kabir is not shown as a villian but a hero of the film where he is doing everything wrong...whereas in films like Bazigar, Don, Anjam SRK is playing a bad guy so he is suppose to do bad things..... that's why it make sense when he made that statement...
Not every anti-hero have to die at the end of the movie. That would make the genre too predictable which is what Animal & reboots of Don did by staying away from the usual endings.
I think Srk should play a character of psychologist as he did in dear zindagi with different stories being him the central character. Or a movie of family man where he will save country from consequences of Artificial Intelligence
I believe SRK means that he makes sure the characters face consequences for the actions they do. In KANK Dev has an affair with Maya and that destroys his marriage and permanently damages the relationship with his son.
Look who is speaking doing the ads like Pan Masala with so much achievements and money can't refuse this lucrative offer, when you travel and see the huge banners of these stars with pan masala ads and roads , public places, tourist places are filled with spits you can't even imagine.
Also really tired of explaining that the issue isn't with violence and violence against women shown in film if it's relevant to story arc, but the issue is glorifying the actions done in the film. After Jared Akhter's criticism, animal pr posted "let love be free from politics of gender" are they for real? That is the issue being irresponsible with your choice of words than filmaking
Movies influence society but you know what else does: Ceiling fans: ceilings fans might influence people to hang themselves increasing suicide rates in the country Swimming pools: people might be influenced to jump in pools and later end up drowning Fire: Some people might play with fire not understanding its consequences, leading to burns and possibly death, Cars: Cars influence people to drive which leads to some people getting into accidents and possibly death, Moral of the story: Everything is an influence in the world, hence god has given us a brain to decide what is right and wrong for us 😊
Everyone seem to be completely missing the point that in Animal, in the end Ranvijay loses. He couldn't save his father no matter what he tried. In the process, he lost his senses (literally), alienated his wife and traumatized his kids, he didn't also get the love and affection of his father. So Animal is not glorifying anything. But the director did not try to hit the message over the head and hence lots of people missed it... Not every story is about good positive people going good things, sometimes stories can be dark too.
leave it bro , no use of explaining , people nowday's specially in india doesnt understand shit about movies , people even called oppenheimer and intestellar a bad and boring movie , so what to expect, they are like worse than a 5 year old when it comes to movies
Even if he 'lost' at the end, there are thousands and thousands of ppl like who admire him, take him as a symbol of masculinity, and defend him to the T. This is what is highly disturbing!
@@ayeza7267 who the fuck is admiring him 😂, let me tell you one thing brother i dont know in what fairytale you are living in , in reality nobody gives a shit about such petty things , they just go spend 200-300rs enjoy the movie and go back to their work , even the teenagers , they dont give a damn about it as soon as they leave the theatre , then there are few people like you whom i mentioned in My previous comment . The arguments you are giving are too childish and outdated now , thousands Of movies have been made across the globe and thousand type Of character have been written , from the most pathetic and distrubing to the sweetest and heartwarming things are shown on big screen for last 100 yrs , i genuinely laugh at stupidity Of such boring comments like yours , like who the fck are you to speak on behalf Of all the people that are getting influenced , why you think that our teenagers are retarded to not understand the difference between a fucking fictional surface level story and real life , when they themselves are going just for fun and enjoy their time in theatre , who are you to comment that this one fcking movie can influence and ruin them😂 , grow up buddy , dont just comment with the herd of social media , think for yourself
Karthik Subbaraj + SRK with Santosh Narayanan’s music combo would be fresh. Looking at how he pulled it off with Raghava Lawrence, it would be interesting to see how SRK is utilized as an actor rather than a star.
Even in animal hero lead actor suffer alot, his loved one would lost, his wife and children would leave him. He ends up as a failure and becomes lone! Finally we should not forget maya meemsab movie of shahrukh.It's always easy to point out others faults. Jai hind
Everyone is completely missing the point that in Animal, in the end Ranvijay loses. He couldnt save his father no matter what he tried. In the process, he lost his senses (literally), alienated his wife and traumatized his kids, he didn't also get the love and affection of his father. So Animal is not glorifying anything. But the director did not try to hit the message over the head and hence lots of people missed it...
Even if he got a happy ending, i would have still liked it. Its a fictional character, kya justify karna hai? As long as you have brains you’re good to go. People should complain about real world issues instead of complaining about movies. Like what, you got your feelings hurt by a fictional character? 😂😂
He is absolutely right! Movies that portray negative consequences for the protagonist can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, they emphasize the real-life repercussions of poor choices or immoral actions, sending a cautionary message about the importance of ethical behavior. However, when these negative outcomes are glorified and stylized, there's a risk that the intended lesson gets lost in the allure of the cinematic presentation. The danger lies in the potential for the youth to romanticize the rebellious or anti-heroic behavior, overlooking the underlying message about accountability. It's crucial for filmmakers to strike a balance, ensuring that the narrative serves as a powerful reminder rather than inadvertently glamorizing actions that may lead to adverse consequences in reality.
My two cents on SRK's negative roles: I think the genre or tonality of Don is different from that of other movies like Darr and Baazigar where he's played a negative character. Those movies are dramas/thriller that is centred around a few characters and a stand-alone story, with high emotional stakes and so on. Characters in these movies are (supposedly) realistic - as much as they could be within Indian cinema, I mean. So here, it's sort of more important to see the bad guys punished, or if they win, it should be devastating and not celebrated within the world of the movie (unless it's a sattire, but none of these are). Don, on the other hand, is like a comic book franchise - no one walks into the theatre expecting it to reflect our lives or even the world we live in. It's like a fantasy and we just want style and mass and see the adventures of some character - could be a superhero or a good guy (as it most often is), or a charming, charismatic bad guy (like Don). So I don't think there's amy hypocrisy on SRK's part here (but as you pointed out, even if there was, this is SRK of 2024 - the last Don movie came out in 2011 and people evolve with time).
So what should ranbir do , shall he stop experimenting ? Doing just one genre ? Playing romantic character all the time If ranbir does that he is not an actor , because it fails the entire idea of being in acting profession if you getting typecast , i think only ranbir is true actor because he had portrayed so many different characters in his career .
Movies were used to entertain people, but now they consider it a university. Why do we 'have to' learn from movies? Man!!! We should grow up as a society.
What about Don?!! Bro is forgetting that he is an actor, so it is very bold to claim he makes sure the bad guy dies . It is the story writer and the director who decides what happens to the character
3 Directors: 1. Sanjay Leela Bhansali: Devdas was one of the best SRK movies of all time, it has been etched in the history of the INDIAN film industry. A reunion between the two would be interesting. 2. Sandeep Reddy Vanga: I know, I know, controversial but I wanna see him play a villain or anti-hero in an SRV movie, similar to his role in Darr, Duplicate, and Bazigaar. 3. Anurag Kashyap: While his aura is such that Anurag's screenplay writing of almost a Western would be somewhat crazy I wanna see him in a true Anurag Kashyap-style movie. Another name, I know, would never happen is Quentin Tarantino. I want to see him in a Hollywood Western with or opposite Christopher Waltz, and Samuel L. Jackson. Michael Madsen, Tim Roth, and Leo Caprio.
I think more than SRK changing his stance on what film stands for, he has just come to the natural realisation that he has become a larger than life persona at this point, SRK the person is so influential and so powerful that he has the power to influence millions. Whether you like it or not, a significantly large part of our population still sees films and certain actors as gods and will follow them. And I think SRK understand that he more than anyone else will be the one that gets followed and worshipped the most, which is probably why he wants to do morally good roles. Simply because he understands his influence and wants to be responsible. Surely, that limits his creativity but maybe he's giving more priority to the 'with great power comes great responsibility' type mindset and maybe will exercise his creativity in his producing ventures instead.
Nowadays people takes everything for themselves...why SRK simply was talking about his journey and his life ..but no everything is a problem to them ..🤧
Two collaborations 1. Shah + Vikramaditya Motwane (SK vs SK / Shah vs Saif) / (Or my preference Lootera version) 2. Shah + Dibakar Banerjee (Any movie based out of Delhi - Kinda like Khosla or Oye Lucky )
I think that Shah Khan knew the extent of the influence of films on young people and their strong attachment to the characters, especially when there is a kind of evil and madness in them, as the film Darr, Anjam and Ram Jane did, which left negative feelings among fans for several years
I was watching some of your videos from 2020 a time which all of us wants to erase form our memories but what I realize after some of those is the lack of big releases in Bollywood made you create videos about some underappreciated gems of not only Hindi but also different languages of our country which made me remember one thing which my art teacher ones told me that tougher time makes us reach deeper part of our personality to really even if for a short period of time make us thankful for little things which makes life bearable thank you for your work and please continue to your great work for as long as you feel desireable.
I dont care if SRK likes or hates Animal because i know he'll never preach to the audiences to like or hate one kind of movies. I love SRK nevertheless and like Animal despite its flaws.
A Collab between srk and Sameer vidhwans could really be something to watch out for. His romantic aura can be appropriately adapted and materialised in a gripping storyline and crisp direction.
I want to see SRK with Konkana in an Indian version of Before Sunset where the characters talk endlessly right through our hearts. ❤ Someone pls read this comment and convey the message to film makers.
This video will haunt him in the future when he will be in love with a script by Sandeep reddy vanga. Let see first what Vishal bharadwaj is cooking for srk.
Shahrukh khan with Vasan bala would be a great collaboration. The style of Vasan Bala and range of Shahrukh khan would be a treat to watch for everyone. These two combined together can make “The Cinema” and yet have something for everyone in it
i would love to see him collaborating with Sriram Raghavan, he should also consider collaborating for a commercial drama movie with R Madhavan, also RaOne 2 with a good VFX choice and director should be Nag Ashwin. SRIRAM RAGHAVAN, MANI RATNAM.
They complained why are people getting mad they are speaking up about Animal but when SRK speaks up about his opinion, he cant say anything he wants. What hypocrites.
"If i play a bad guy, i make sure he suffers a lot". Does movies like Don/Don 2 where he plays a drug dealer killing innocent people. I mean if you have a stand kindly stick to it. Don't be hypocrite.
@@sergemerto256 Lol it's Animal makers who did corporate booking. Jawan, Pathaan was houseful for a whole month. Animal had small number of people. Animal is shit. Jawan is not. Son of a b***h.
SRK with Raj and DK will be my choice in an Action-Comedy(I want same director duo with Akshay too) PS: Us Jammy Us, I wrote this before your integration
Tell your SRK just to deliver a Single Cinematic Brilliance like Barfi! Forget about Sanju, Rockstar & Animal. These three are out of his imagination😂😂.
Imagine if Shahrukh played the role of Ranvijay of Animal How nuanced and elaborate that character would be Devdas modified No offense to Ranbir Kapoor
@@RohonNag Ranvijay was anything but grounded. The character and actions at times were over the top. I enjoyed watching it but many times in the movie, it could clearly be seen that they were trying too hard.
SRK is right and had usually played responsible, family friendly roles. Even if he plays bad guys he ensures they die in end are shown as villains and not generate sympathy or show him as hero
But the thing is we need more movies like Animal where something different is offered. TBH jawaan and pathaan were meh and have no rewatch value and only earned because of srk’s break. If these were released 5-6 years ago when srk was having a bad run, they would had done mid business. If srk does more movies like jawaan and pathaan back to back they will probably bomb. He too needs to do something diff now
Dunki was actually a breathe of fresh air.. it's only criticism is not being an excellent 5 star movie because Hirani has directed it. But still it's a good watch and I am sure it will age better than pathaan or jawan
every noise around amplifies the revolutionary cinematic impact animal has had had on uts contemporaries. nevertheless who wouldnt want a srk & raj &dk project with authentic raw character, thriller and the unique humour of the duo
Jammy I think you need to watch the entire part with rajat ji as he also explained his parts were not glorified at all as he was HIT by everyone including heroines…..so yes it is debatable whether they were glorified or not but his point of view remains the same and c’mon everyone knows his social responsibility is 1000000 times more than someone like kk menon or even from srk 30 years ago
The problem is not with SRK but the gen Zs or people who can’t differentiate between fiction and reality!! The presumption of all good & all bad exists nothing between it exists!! I wanna say that don’t judge people on the choices they make because it’s not there reality it’s there job
SRK and Raj and DK would be crazy, coz in my opinion SRK is an actor whose acting potential is yet to be discovered, and Raj and DK with Their ability to create such wacky and crazy characters and making them relatable that would be something to watch out for
Evolution of thought, evolution of society and the audience Back then toxic masculinity or toxic feminism was not a thing but now the whole dynamics have changed hence what SRK said in 1990s were true for its time and what he just said is kinda true for today's climate. There's a lot of hate and aggression in the world the last thing we need is to glorify it.
SRK Makes sense..👍 He sounds like he is pointing animal...I strongly believe that content in animal movie is not good for our society...It spreads wrong message to young people of the country. It is absolutely NOT COOL to behave like an ANIMAL and not facing any consequences for the same. This is my individual opinion. I can't do anything apart from feeling for poor souls who are celebrating the animal movie.
Would love to See SRK collaborate with Karthik Subbaraj, Mani Sir and Kamal Sir. All these dudes are cinephiles. Fantastic and honest speech. Ever so inspiring and articulate is SRK. In my view no jibes at Animal - these are just SRK's views. Not everything we believe relates to current trending matters. However what was direct was his view on analysts and critics. This actually echoes The SRV because truth be told...SRK and all these artistes are the reason Critics and YTbers have a stream of income.
He has reached a point in his life where his tag as a superstar will most of time triumph the actor. While i would love to see him play something along the lines of Don we know thats not going to happen in the current atmosphere where every minute of things are judged and scrutinized.
having grown up with SRK and his movies , the roles he chooses are for his audience who watch him and waited for his movies good or bad .. his audience watch him for the 3 hours of goodness either love(DDLJ, mohabattein ) patriotism (swades, dilse, chakde )or comedy zero, duplicate , KKKG etc , SRK can never be envisaged as the protagonist /antagonist of Animal, i dont want to see him in those roles, SRK brings joy in 3 hrs ... i leave my issues at home when i watch him ... SRK if you ever read this mate , cheers for entertaining us over these decades stay blessed
5:21 I think that line was intended at the villians in our society that in reality does things to hurt, to divide. Maybe. Love this guy, love his films and love his comeback!
Not to mention apart from Don, his Red Chillies Production also made a film called Ittefaq, starring Akshay Khanna, Sonakshi Sinha and Siddhart Malhotra. and the bad person escapes and wins at the end, who had k!lled someone. So I don't think BAD PERSON SHOULD LOOSE, should be a rule for cinema.
Don't think srk is entirely right here..he definitely played a bad guy in Don series,but still his role was glamourised in it(he didn't die a death like he said here in that either, didn't he..?)
Vidyut jammwal's new movie titled as crakk has been released. And i dont see a single youtube movie reviewing channels reacting to its trailer. I really wonder why nobody is reviewing it.
People truly have lost their minds not everything is for discussion he said that if he plays a negative character he makes sure that they get a bad end is it wrong to say in 2023 like isn't this what we want in real life ? All of these guys in comment section are triggered as if he slammed Animal he didn't memtioned it tum logon ki dari may tinka ae
@@mental9453 Lijo Jose Pallissery. He's a famous director from Kerala. His most famous works are Jallikattu and Nanpakal Nerathu Mayakkam (They're the most famous. He has made many other good movies too). If you want u can check out his films. His next release (which is lead by Mohanlal and is highly anticipated) is Malaikottai Vaaliban
Action is the flavour of the year, SRK capitalised on it and how... Well deserved in my opinion. He has his pov and one can only respect and acknowledge it given the year he's had, personal turmoil or box office failure couldn't deter the perseverance of a King. He Came He Saw and He Conquered.. Simple.
