The Sheriff Refusing To Enforce Washington State's New Gun Law (HBO) 

Russ Gallagher yes they technically are but they do all of their work in a courtroom or their office. They don’t do “police work”.

@Russ Gallagher AG's are political hacks, nothing more. The sleaze drips off that scumbucket AG in Washington.

Hey vice come to South Dakota. Our state government has signed a law that will go into effect on July 1st that will make it so we no longer need a permit to conceal carry. So basically anyone in our state can buy a gun and conceal it with no permit.

Only 37 guns were bought back in New Zealand out of 1.2 million. I live in Texas and I plan on buying an M240 machine gun because it’s legal for a US citizen to buy and own one.

Ever heard of DACA?

Jonathan McCain That’s some fax brother, the oath is constitution first

That's a hard pill to swallow for a lot of people

Jonathan McCain Im pro-gun, but the Constitution was made back when muskets were commonly used. Edit: Once again, I’m pro-gun. My point is that as technology changes, laws change. These laws may actually grant you more rights. For example, the right to freedom of speech you had a few hundred years ago isn’t the same right freedom of speech that you have now. We now have the internet, so the laws changed so that the right to freedom of speech could be applied to modern technology. This also applies to the right to bear arms.

Arthur Morgan okay, should we limit freedom of the press to just a basic paperback? Or not allow you to say what you want online? Also there were automatic weapons that could shoot fairly quickly, and the founding fathers loved them but they were too expensive to get for the whole army.

caleb 356 Yeah I agree with you. Edit: You seem to have missed the entire point of my argument.

BOOM! Logic :)

Yes if you are not allowed to purchase alcohol or a firearm then you should also not be eligible for the draft, jury duty or to vote, many democrats pushing to lower voting age to 16 yet raise firearm ownership to 21 because they are not responsible enough... .

Voting too, considering most young people start out as liberals until life wakes them up and they learn whats really going on.

Completely agree, if they dont think 18-20 year old are not responsible enough for a AR, then why allow them to have a M16 or M4 or M249 and so on, when they enlist at 18-20 years old.

*SELECTIVE SERVICE* is not active

VICE has an agenda..............but wont listen to the common folk. : /

Vice is a tabloid propagandist for the left. I’m just here to see people put them down in the comments.

I don't like vice, but I will say in this particular video I was not too offended by anything said by anyone other than the mayor/governor whoever that was. I also feel like I must state that the only way to prevent predators from taking advantage is to show them you also have some big teeth.

@@travisclark7286 they are police officers acting on their own that’s not fair they can’t just change the law on their own will

@@CrowCreekOutdoors says the person who support someone who supports Fox News

source: dude trust me examples: I know them but I don't want to tell you

@@oculent8979 it’s a saying...

@@AlexIAm1415 no its not, it was coined about 10 years ago and it makes no sense because not once has it been proven to be the case in a modern state

@@oculent8979 It was proven in nazi germany, communist china and the ussr

@@chasethomsen7616 In every single one of these cases, the parties that took power did so with massive public opinion behind them. They did not do so against the will of the people. The organisations that opposed them were in a small minority and were easily dismantled even before guns were removed from the populace.

For treason

@@shockwave6213 Exactly

should be hanged for being a tyrannic parasite

I wish they wouuld "Remove" them in a variety of other ways.

First we would educate them, and then, if they adhere to their unconstitutional ideas and agenda = the BOOT.

Gale Morse greetings you folks are very lucky to have a sheriff that stands up for the rights of the people and the constitution the law of the land and the Bill of Rights I live in California seems like very few conservatives are over here but I’m here family and friends 2020 maybe they’ll be some arrest with prison terms or even the firing squad for treasonous acts against a sitting president and the American people they don’t believe in there obligation to the American people you’re lucky have a great day sir.🕶

The sheriff's over here in Franklin, Benton, and Wallawalla counties are like that, too! My "compliance training" was basically the sheriff and his deputies reading aloud the entire I-1639 law to us while simultaneously pointing out all the illegal unconstitutional parts that they refuse to enforce. Many of them fought for our country, and they said this treasonous commie legislation isn't what they fought to protect, and they'll die before enforcing treasonous laws. Olympia and Seattle can go f*** themselves. Their "enlightened" city ways are what's causing massive homelessness, drug abuse, unemployment, and rampant violent crime. Us country folk out in Eastern Washington don't have these problems, because we aren't goddamn socialists.

Gale Morse and you have his back because he actually has yours! That’s the way it’s supposed to be!

WA resident here near Spokane. Much respect to this man and what he stands for and will always have my support. They want our guns well they can not have them. period.

GA resident here. Our gun laws are much more constitutional, but it always brings a smile to my face to see a man like this. A REAL patriot. I'll fight to the death for my guns and die knowing I ain't the last one that's gonna give em hell.

THEY ARE OUT THERE...more everyday

If a Sheriff disobeys the law they should be fired if you cant follow the law then you shouldn't be in office.

@@danpierce1120 yeshhh and the politicians who make ridiculous laws and try to limit guns should be hanged

@@reddead9473 Tell me how this law is ridiculous

@@danpierce1120 he's not disobeying the law, he's using his discression as the law directs. We want law enforcers to be able to think for themselves. But lefties just can't grasp that when their thinking isn't in line with the insane leftist world view. I say, let the leftist cities live under their own world view and laws, and in the rural towns, we will handle business in a compassionate and more neighborly way. They can have their crime havens.

To be clear.....almost every one of our rights have some sort of reasonable limits on them.

I can't hit the like button enough on that one.

@@miken7329 that's because people have foolishly allowed this infringement to continue unabated and unchecked.

@@pondererofdumbshit2669 are you meaning the word liberal? I sure hope so. ;)

@@miken7329 and if they do, they shouldn't technically. But your keyword is reasonable. Shall not infringe. Infringe is to limit. So no.

We got all the guns so we know who would win

@Toob247 Toob247 what does white people have to do with this

In a civil war. You hang all government officials period. That includes anyone that violates our rights. It would be a sad day in this country. As many children would lose a mother or father. And within 2 weeks there would be new leaders being sworn in to uphold the constitution. There would be riots in the cities. Mass graves being covered over. The only ones left would be gun owners. What do you do in a civil war. You protect the farmers. Without a farmer. You have no food.

Likely the military would side with the citizens since its THEIR families that would be on the front lines fighting and they aren't about to kill their own people for our corrupt, useless government. All the worthless politicians would probably be hanged and a new AMERICAN government would be voted in and meanwhile a temporary leader would be chosen. Bring it on bitches.

Lol youd be dead.... we need to restrict all guns boy. Guns are bad fpr society.

Welcome to Family Fued! "What group of individuals wants to disarm the public while also simultaneously being pedophiles?" . . . "Survey says... oh yeah yep you got it right it was Politicians."

Yes, and what's your point? If a small minority of people are stupid and immature enough to act like this and actually kill people, then yes, it has to be taken away from everyone. ONE school shooting is too many. ONE person murdering a cop is too many, etc. We should be treated like children if we're too stupid or lazy to do anything about this problem. But yes, it keeps happening, so I don't see the problem with guns being taken away. I hope they do it soon. Too many armed lunatics out there. Including most the people in this comment section I would guess.

@@blindmown Take firearms away from everyone? No. A sane, sober and moral law abiding gun owner should not be categorized the same as a criminal and punished. Responsible people should be allowed to own the firearm of their choice and not be harassed by government for it. The hypocrisy of gun control is obvious. Its already legal precedent that the police are NOT OBLIGATED TO PROTECT YOU. And yet we need MORE legislation to further restrict lawful gun owners right to bear arms. Denying them the ability to protect themselves if and when the police cannot reach them in time. I agree that school shootings, cop killings and the like are tragedies and we need to do more as a society to address them. But lets cut the crap! The gun control debate is politicized and perverted. Start telling the TRUTH about statistics, economic forces, race, political agendas and societal views of the mentally ill (to name a few) and have a real debate about real solutions to the underlying problems fueling gun violence. Instead of just violating the 2nd Amendment in the name of "public safety".

not most gun control laws are unconstitutional all of them are unconstitutional

Try not paying your tax and see if he supports your interpretation. He won't!

No, he's usurped the function of the courts. He will be recalled.

@@OslerWannabe lol, for what charge, following the constitution?

100% of gun laws are unconstitutional, including the ones that this Sheriff enforces. ALL cops wipe their asses with the 2nd amendment daily, don't let anything distract you from that

Sheriff Mike Lewis in Wicomico County, MD said he will NOT comply with illegal gun confiscation! Thank you Sir

Sherriffs like him should be hung from the gallows.

@@nil981 To support a breach of the Constitution is treason. What you describe should be done to the Sheriff is actually what is on the books for how to deal with traitors...which you clearly are on the side of.

@@nil981 Thankfully hangings have been outlawed. As for you... Don't be surprised if you get a knock on the door by either a sheriff (karma) or the FBI.

@@nil981 Why is that?

There's a difference between Sherrifs and any other police branch. Like he said, only elected police office in the Country. I also think they are held to different standards, i.e., enforcing the Federal Constitution.

@@aquilomanganelli175 Sheriffs have higher ranking than any local, state or federal law enforment offical - so even if, as the DA said, the state goes into enforce the laws, they legally can't because they have no say over how the Sheriffs operate. Sheriffs are also supposed to enforce the constitution and ensure people's rights aren't being violated - hence why they can overide all other law enforment.

He is a weasily little soyboy. Probably plays shoot em' up video games. Scared of the real thing.

It’s vice... come on now

One man can fight a battalion with proper equipment training and preparation imagine an army of oath keepers

Yep, they always seem to forget about Vietnam and Afghanistan and they weren’t even trained that well.

That's EXACTLY WHY, the 2nd Amendment was written...to protect AGAINST government overreach and control. We enough of that BS, from the British.

Ferguson is a pathetic joke. People are going to simply stop complying with these idiotic edicts. No background checks, no license, no records. Have fun collecting them. We all have a duty NOT to comply. This is coming to a boiling point.

He was making the best argument in favor of the Sheriff's who defy the unconstitutional I-1639 law, and didn't even realize it.

That sheriff should be fired

You say this until a sherriff starts doing something you dont like. What if a sherriff decided to take guns away, because they aren't the style of weapon present during the time of the constitution? And most folks with guns aren't in militias. Whether we like it or not, we are a nation of laws. MLK wrote about this. About taking the punishment for breaking laws, protesting peacefully, and taking things to court. If this sherriff and others had a problem, they should have taken it up to the Supreme Court. And just like everyone else who has problems with the laws... dealt with it the legal way. Imagine if every town sherriff did whatever he felt like it? Our country would be the wild west. And I'm sure some of you fantasize about the wild west, but it was an approximate 10 years span where disease, cannibalism, child brides, etc existed. And btw.... guns were left with the sherriff.

@PaladinJN01 Studios we have elected officials and 3 branches to interpret the laws. Imagine if everyone went around interpreting laws. Men could deny women and minorities rights because back when the constitution was written they were considered less. I love the constitution, but it is not infallible and couldn't have predicted the future. Like with technology and the electoral college.

Idk gray area the people of the state voted in support of the new gun laws. That’s democracy.

@@davidbeaulieu4815 internet didn't exist back hen. Founding fathers never could have seen this. So you're not allowed to speak on the internet without a license. You cool with that?

2nd amendment isn't about animal hunting its about Tyrant hunting and you have been complacent for too long.

Well said.

After dem debate last night I’m prepping for confiscation. If they want a war that’s what they’ll get. I got no problems shooting those who try to strip my rights, specifically my 2A one. Own enough acres of woods they’d have to get through hell and back for my guns.

Amazing how many people dont seem to understand this. when i hear ❄ s cryin about you dont need an assault rifle to hunt i cringe and think how stupid they must be to not understand the reason is to keep the govt in check

+buck Newton Yep. Why Australia and Canada are in miserable shape under tyrant rule...how do they put up with it? Poor bastards...how they must be suffering!

The government shall not infringe, and they didn't. The people voted for this themselves. ... No give are being removed. Age restriction an issue? Then why not carry permits for five year olds? Thinking things through... Not really something you people do, is it?

@@emilyhofland8219 I think prehaps the same could be said about you. The problem with you liberal types is you have very little life experience so you talk out of your ass and make very little sense. Give them One gun and they will take them all.

@@emilyhofland8219 The public doesn't have the authority to vote away the rights of others.

@@FreeMenDieFree feels vs reals... You feel they don't.. in reality, they did.

@@emilyhofland8219 By definition of what a republic is. They literally don't.

Yes and those who own need to move to Eastern Washington.

Journalist should maybe consider telling a real story not an opinion piece

@@aolcb,if they don’t have an audience,that might change!

Now if they'd cool it with the unnecessary drug enforcement, we might actually start to become the sort of free society the Founding Fathers envisioned.

True

A real patriot

Those who "interpret" the constitution MUST define and describe the AMBIGUITY that justifies their "INTERPRETATION". It's a plain word...plain meaning document. Watch out for the silver tongue attempts to create ambiguity where non exists.

I wish Wake County NC had a sheriff worth even half this man.

Amen

Tyrant control is more apt. Gun control is hitting what you aim at. LOL

Rubbish

@@IRNoahBody no thanks

Oh, the whole county is a "well regulated militia"? The only militias now are treasonous organizations waiting for an excuse to murder cops and soldiers.

States have the right to make their own laws. Look at federal minium wage is lower than alot of states. Hell the south succeeded over state sovereignty. Ooh by the way their generation say the younger generation is dumb and irresponsible so why would you want them to have guns drinking age is 21 for a reason!!

That;s liberals for ya. And they want to lower the voting age to 16. So at 16 you can vote on who makes these stupid fucking laws but cannot partake in what some of the laws restrict until 21.

Your aloud to go die for them you just cant defend yourself havent you heard

I enlisted and graduated from basic at 17

In most states you can purchase firearms if your under 21 and in the military, a policeman, or correctional officer.

18 year old don't run around in the military armed. They stay in the arms room, under supervision, lock, and key. I take it, your aren't a vet... Because your comparison doesn't actually work... Do us all a favor, leave the veteran talk to veterans. We don't need idiots speaking for us.

Idiots thinking you “interpret” the constitution when it is straight forward.

Maria Teresa Villafan while I agree with you that the second amendment is explicit in not being infringed, people make a living off of constitutional interpretation.

It's unconstitutional in their "opinion" my ass. If it goes against the constitution, it's unconstitutional. That's a fact, not an opinion. Period.

We the people determine the Constitutionality of a law, not those who made it. The Govt doesn't determine if their laws are just or not, we do.

Avery Ricco Yet another farce and more wasted money, the Constitution is written straight forward, there is no interpretation needed, it says what it says. Interpreters is just code for libtards spinning laws into something they agree with.

Protect yourself from others with guns... Smart. Whoever said MAD didn't work hey!

Lol five-five six timestamp

Amen. God bless ya.

Bob is such a fucking weasel. He pretends it's "convenient" that someone "believes" it is unconstitutional. Meanwhile this piece of crap just helped ban ar-15's in all of Washington. This latest gun reform is so blatantly unconstitutional. Bob is probably one of the biggest hypocrites I have ever seen.

I'm with you. Yes, protect yourself and your family with guns. Yup.

Greetings fellow Colion Noir fan.

Hello to you too.

We should remember that "well regulated" is very much a part of the 2nd and it does not give each and every person the right to own any gun, of any kind/type, in any number desired, with no proof of training, and no background checks.

@@RevolutionQueer militia back then was a term for all men between the age of 18 to 30 or smth so that definition back then counters your whole argument

@@josefradetzky8873 By your logic, no one over 30 should own "arms". The whole point of the admendment was to be able to draw a well regulated militia from the general population for the defense of a "free state". The 2nd critically says "the people" because regardless of who you were being a well trained gun owner was beneficial to the emerging United States as you could be called on to defend the liberty of the nation. This admendment was encouraging the people to be akin to army national guard and prepared to pick up their guns and defend the freedom of the state. I grew up in a rural area where everyone had at least 1gun, for good reason, and nobody touched the family guns until they were properly serious about gun safety and had been trained. I see too many folks with no business having access to guns, no trigger discipline, and no understanding of when their weapon is loaded getting their hands on guns. I think the 2nd has protection against this by stipulating training and regulation as part of the rights to own a gun. Further I think that weapon use, safety, training and background checks should be free and widely available to current and future gun owners and final licencing should be affordable (similar to getting a driver's license). On the other side, if a person proves to be a reckless or criminal gun owner the license should be removable and a person barred from owning guns to protect citizens from the domestic threat of a deranged killer with access to semi-automatic rifles.

Leaders of countries we were at war with when asked why you never invaded the United States their response. There are too many guns everybody would be shooting at us. Second amendment the original Homeland security

left: weed bans don't work. legalize it. also left: gun bans work dumb commies lol

@@recreationalplutonium Decriminalize, tax, and invest the tax into mental health care.

@@warpedone3711 "behind every blade of grass is a rifle"

@@jordanjoestar8839 Japan leaders quote

gunlover1955 Saudi Arabia bans guns I suggest people who are anti guns head there

@@wosimtahan8576 And china, vietnam, cuba, north korea.. Hmm, almost like the less guns the people have, the more of a shithole it is...

Fredrik Carlén You left out Venezuela and its soon to be conforming sister state Calizuela.

Wosim Tahan Or they could go to Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan, South Korea. Many many countries.

@@wosimtahan8576 the corrupt government bans guns to stop the population from overthrowing it

It's we the people run the government

That's absolutely right !....it's government of the people , by the people, and for the people....our Constitution and Amendments stay ....period.....

For every gun they confiscate in violation of 2A, they need to pay a pound of their own flesh.

That's definitely speculative.

@@denverlilly3669 how do you feel about what recently happened in Canada then. It’s a very probable speculation.

Complete support in the GOV. Not necessarily among the plebs.

If there was backlash, I bet she wouldn't have won in a landslide (enough to effectively have a single party government until next year).

Yep, liars as usual.

@@fiend1191 liars that won the nz election in a huge landslide

Almost unanimous rejection by the firearms community. Compliance rates sub 10% and the only politician to fight the bans had over a 10 fold increase in votes.

And what is it that you think is a statistically insignificant threat?? Guns? About 1.4 million people have died from firearms in the U.S. between 1968 and 2011. This number includes all deaths resulting from a firearm, including suicides, homicides, and accidents. Doesn’t seem all that insignificant to me.

By that logic we should ban all vehicular transport since in the same period of time cars caused 1.96 million deaths. So, how about we break those numbers down into suicides, criminal homicides, deaths caused by law enforcement, homicides commited in self defense, accidents, etc. Even in criminal homicides, lets break it down by gang violence, mafia violence, cartel violence, isolated incidents, etc. and then we can properly analyze what the data actually means. Lets also include the location of these crimes, how many are being conducted in urban areas with strict existing gun laws. Then, break it down by the type of firearm, handguns vs rifles. Lets also see which types of bullets are being used. Lets also look at the actual history of gun control laws and see the intentions and the results of those laws. And after all of that lets talk about the sctual intention of the 2nd amendment, none of that "its meant for hunting" bullshit. After all of this if you can still prove that the only way to solve "gun violence" is banning guns, then I'll glady vote for it.

Yes,the same 2 clowns that are stalling our $30 car tabs.I can't wait until these 2 are thrown out of office!

No Real Citizen Except Maybe A Democratic Communist Party Member Would Ban Good People From Owning Any Weapon Legal On The Street

Actually us voters in Washington did vote and pass this law. It doesn't prevent purchasing anything. I just bought a new AK47. Facts matter.

Lance,like the Governor of Virginia saying,”the people wants gun control or they would not have elected Democrats”! Northern Virginia has the most votes and very few guns.

@@barneyrice8502 Yeah, and no real citizen would allow for redlining districts and gerrymandering and outsourcing but you morons are fine with Republicans doing that so long as you get your guns.

You have an excellent thought.

Stand your ground. We don't retreat no matter what.

Exactly! They'll break the law themselves to aid and abet these criminals, especially if ICE wants them because they're criminals! No matter that they're all breaking the law every single day they're here in this country. They have no problem in helping these people break the laws every single day, because they themselves are corrupt beyond reason, that stuff is second nature to them. It's what they do, it's who they are. Acting like they're taking some higher road not traveled, when it's nothing more than them breaking the law by helping other people break the law. Nevermind that it's in the constitution that these people are here illegally. Logic and common sense escapes them about vetting people coming into this country, when they could be drug lords, drug mules, drug users, criminals, and on and on. The term illegal somehow doesn't equate in their mind, because their ignorance and self righteousness and arrogance blinds them to their own stupidity. Watch "Seattle is dying" here on youtube. Very eye opening look at how corrupt the public officials are getting, restricting the cops from being able to do their jobs, no more arresting drug users, they're simply let out off charges the next day, and the cops aren't allowed to touch the illegals. And of course, helping the criminal element avoid ICE... ya, that's real big... Kate Steinle thanks you Don't get me started on open borders, and free stuff for everyone, especially the illegals... if these guys in their own party can't see these guys are wacked, that probably means they're just as wacked as they are. It's hard to have hope for the future of this country when this very mentality is growing up in our educational system, the leaders of tomorrow are liberal as they come, and getting more insanely radical by the day. It's going to be interesting to see how gun control plays out. Because like someone said... come for our guns, and it's war. Gun control doesn't work, it never has, it's an illusion. Gun control only affects the law abiding citizens. Criminals are laughing at your gun control laws, and they're hoping that they come for our guns, because then we'll be left defenseless against not only them, the criminals, we'll be defenseless against a tyrannical government imposing their will upon us, and turning us into a communist country. Ya, not happening.

There's a couple cities/towns out there trying to do just that

@mike sixx awesome

Civil War will not be between the Democratz and Republicans. . Who were the fighting parties in the LAST CIVIL WAR. FEDS vs STATES. States better wake the hell up. Once the guns are gone the FEDS (Democratz if they ever get back in office) are gonna walk in, imprison all state and local politicians and detractors and nationalize everything. Do you REALLY BELIEVE that the Feds are gonna look at the property and money in the state of Ca, Il, Oregon, Washington et al, and say - "Yea, keep sending in your federal tax and you can keep sales tax, gas tax, income tax, property tax, YEAAAA just keep it all. NAWWW! Think of NIGHT OF THE LONG KNIVES. Libs are DUMB and RUTHLESS, a BAD combination if you have something they think they want. They are gonna come in with an army of drug dealers and gang members and kill all the politicians, shoot the cops, bring in federalies and just keep EVERYTHING - THIS IS HOW IT EFFEN WORKS! LOOK AT HISTORY! THIS WILL BE THE CIVIL WAR, FEDS AGAINST THE STATES - JUST LIKE THE LAST CIVIL WAR-REMEMBER? THEY WILL TAKE THE GUNS FROM THE LIB STATES FIRST. (Ca, Oregon and Washington) ESTABLISH A BEACH HEAD AND MOVE EAST. THE FEDS WANT THE ENTIRE COUNTRY UNDER ONE UNION THEY CONTROL. DONT TOSS OUT THE REBEL FLAG. YOU ARE GONNA NEED IT.

@Randy Rome that is a very good question.. They know alot of the laws their are in forcing are unconstitutional & yet we still hear & see them locking people up for them or worse people getting killed because of them, civilians & police...

And the governor that and district attorney should be arrested and charged with treason.

And protect the citizens

And the laws of the state he was elected in.

And the laws of the state in which he was elected from!! And the laws of that state should enforce the laws that are stated in our constitution and shall not be infringed upon period.. End of discussion..

@G and most of them armed guards are like 60 years old and aren't really paying much attention to anything other than ladies and playing peek-a-boo with their little ones. If you want to put the life of you n your kids in Barney Fife that's your choice, but other people have a right to make their own choice. And if it differs from yours Doesn't mean it's wrong, just means they have the same right to choose as you or I

And he understands the law, much better then the lawyer politicians.

i salute this sheriff

He’s not the only one, MOST cops are like this

You know he still enforces unconstitutional laws right??

Amen

The most famous socialist in history.

@@reallyoldrookie433 he pretended to be a socialist he was a fascist but neither government style works so its nor that huge of a deal

Yes cause your handguns will stop modern day war machinery like tanks, drones, bombs, etc. Americans lol

He also said that the media is the most powerful weapon to bring a country to it's knees or something like that. If Trump is a Nazi, he is the worst Nazi I have ever seen!

Just remember who they will be asking to drive them also law abiding citizens of America do you think the American military will take up arms against its citizens because the politicians told them to do so yeah right buddy good luck

That's exactly what I said when I heard the question.

The tone the commentator had seemed a bit Holier than thou when he made that comment. Does "Vice" look down on people with a respect/adherence for the constitution, not just the 2nd Amendment? Hmm....and the Attorney General, geesh. He says "that's convenient" referring not enforcing something that "they" deem unconstitutional. They have the agenda. One piece of your rights at a time.

Ennex don't be so sure the libocrats won't go buy a gun or guns weather or not they are legal

Yeah, you have one side with all the guns, knowledge and training, and you have the other side that doesn't know which bathroom to use and are armed with dildos. Real tough decision there

Always be prepared tho, you never wanna underestimate anybody

This is where it gets kinda scary. I live close to where the Bundy's occupied the refuge bringing awareness to government overreach. The federal government has a private army it's not just a left right thing but also to elaborate further.... dont you think other countries might make investments into an outcome of a global powers civil war. Say russia wants the left to win they would have tanks guns maybe even boots. But seriously it's the last thing we want just a small example people with diabetes or heart complications couldn't get medicine. Most people couldn't get groceries reliably rtc

@@orbyboy123 agreed, never ever underestimate your enemy, that is how you get your ass kicked..

I totally agree.

Right.

In America you need to be 21 to drink alcohol, I joined the Army at 18 and deployed to Iraq when I was 20. Couldn't buy Alcohol.

Even in Canada you can buy a gun at 18... yea our laws are completely cucked around it, but 18.

Fukof

@@harrybaulz666 Yes you need to

@@harrybaulz666 domestic enemy

Seems to be hiding something...

It's not about bones you can have bones and balls but where's the sense?

Deputy Boner

He has seen to much don’t bother him

Amen

That would be why they won't publish it.

Assuming that whole incident isn't a false flag (which it could very well be), the NZ government moved very quickly to exploit it. Governments being generally slow and inefficient, the speed at which their government moved is highly suspicious.

Unfortunately, that needs to be proven first.

Keen R the just following orders thing got NAZIs hanged. Yes you are correct if you feel as a serviceman that an order is in violation of the UCMJ than you can refuse that order. You have to prove it illegal at a court marital though. The US military don’t take orders without thought. They don’t follow blindly. During the Gulf War a tank commander (a Lt Colonel) was ordered to retreat by his command (a two star Major General). He refused to retreat based on observations in the field and moved forward and defeated an entire battalion of armored tanks. Saving many lives. He was given a Bronze Star for his actions. If it went badly than he would’ve ended his career but he knew front field observations what command didn’t know.

@Keen Ragree totally. unfortunately in 2010 via executive order, the oath of enlistment was changed. the first part stayed the same. but the second the part that read, "I will obey the LAWFULL orders of those appointed above me..." was changed to " I will obey the orders of the president of the united states and those he/she appoints above me." now Keen, not saying this to you, but I will say it to everyone else out there. if you do not understand the difference and need it to be explained you will 1; never understand and 2. have a bright future as a gulag/concentration camp guard.

@@kyledailey so then until it is proven that federal immigration law is unconstituonal, which will never happen because it is not, then all sanctuary cities and states are in violation of the constitution and the president can and should cut federal funds to them. see how that works. don't even try to give me the 10th amendment argument as it does NOT apply to immigration.

@Keen R historically you are right. however as far as the military today, I can't speak for the LEOs out there, I can't agree with you. the reason I say that is because though I have been retired now for 15 years I still have some connections within the Army. I think you would have been more correct about the military if Obama hadn't forced the issue. that's right, the over 300 generals and admirals that he purged from the system was primarily d/t his insistence on swearing allegiance to him. that and of course oath keepers. ironically the units with the highest numbers of oath keepers are the spec ops community all branches, and combat arms. I think if the democrats (modern day national socialists) want this war, they are going to find out that the rank and file trigger pullers are not going to side with them. I do see your point and acknowledge the fact that their pay check will be at risk, but that is about the only thing the government has over their heads. god willing we will never find out. I sure as hell don't want to see a Marxist revolution here in the states. no thanks have seen to much of that and had to clean up to many messes caused by that bull shit already.

Wrong, he alredy got fired... and law is been follow.. We have to hard regulate fire weapons, they are not good for society.

@Kyle Longjohn Let me know what mistake I made Mr Longtong

Excellent SHERIFF **** NEED MORE LIKE HIM that understands the US. Constitution. ....*🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 and patrol rank and file

@@michaeljennings5860 Not everybody gets a gun brah....He needs to inforce the rules.

@@RocketDRA so if the rules said "anyone who drives a Ford, slash thier tires, confiscate the automobile and crush it" should he enforce that law?? Look up Supreme court ruling Marberry V Madison, the sheriff is correct, and he has discretionary power on any law that is unconstitutional.

We are headed for another civil war. The left has grossly overestimated their own capability and have taken for granted the protection offered to them by the very people they vilify.

Nah lol

The civil war will not be left vs right... It will be Patriots who desire freedom vs. the corruptive and tyrannical American government. They are the problem. The true battle will come when we have to put a new government into place.. let's hope its a libertarian style government that values freedom and we are not putting the same corruption into place as we have now..

HousingDinosaur Kind of like skeet that move better than a clay pigeons, but not as good as real birds.

@@thatguy22441 I have lately wondered to myself, what would people on "the left" do if the S.H.T.F.? How would they survive? How would they not starve to death? How would they not thirst to death? I'm just asking.

Vice finds one Sheriff that uses "in my opinion" to give it's viewer the impression that the Second Amendment is not the final authority - why don't you talk to all the other Sheriffs that actually know these "laws" they are passing are unconstitutional. Liberal trash

Why exactly?

@@pablocejas01 why what? Specify.

@@clydecallaghan8982 if you are deemed not responsible enough to own a firearm, drink alcohol, or even use tobacco in some states you shouldnt be able to join the military and fight for the freedoms you cant have. You cant have it both ways.

They already changed it you can't smoke until you're 21 but you can die for your country at 18.

@@PenguinGaming That argument has been going on for at least 50 years when I was first affected. I was stationed at the Treasure Island Naval Electronics School (land owned by San Francisco) in 1967. I could go to the Enlisted Men's Club but couldn't get an alcoholic drink because it was state property and state laws prevailed. I could drive across town the Presidio of San Francisco (Federal Land) and have dinner, have a drink and never be questioned. It appeared to be a the state's discretion. My opinion then was that, as has been stated here already, if I can be drafted or enlisted to defend my country, at any given age, I have earned the right to anything legal for anyone over 21. If any man or woman agrees to put their lives on the line for the protection of the United States of America, those same states should be obligated to acknowledge that those Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, Airmen, and Coast Guard be respected as legal adults in every way. There should be no distinction in that regard, between military and civilian. A valid Military I.D. should be all the proof required. I felt that way when I enlisted in December, 1966 and I still feel that way!!

Weed is legal in colarado and illegal federally do some research dumbass

The feds can still raid weed depots if they want in Colorado and California... charge them federally and the state cannot bail them out. The state cannot supersede federal law

What about making a drug illegal goes against the constitution @Jay Cole? Your clearly super smart so explain that to me

@Jay Cole i have no clue what you're talking about... This is the worst straw man attempt I have ever seen. Do you work for MSNBC or CNN?

@@GetDown-or-LayDown Or... instead of trying to get people to spoon-feed you, (You seem to want others to do your thinking for you) you could go to the search engine of your choice and type in something to the effect of "drug laws unconstitutional" and read why some think this way. Alcohol prohibition was done with an amendment to the Constitution. Drug prohibition did not.

I would have said that i took an oath to defend the Constitution. "Shall not be infringed" is pretty clear.

@Tread Knought 100% truth

Not Politicians...."Socialist" ingnore our Laws.

@lilbunnyfoofoo TY Patriot. I stand corrected also Thank you for the clarification for my shallow binary answer. wwg1wga🇺🇸🗯

@@johnmac6475 I'd put your RU-vid videos on private. Also do you think it's right for the majority decide what's right for the minorities?

The Constitution says that a crime must have a victim. No drivers license, speeding, public intoxication etc. This same sheriff collects revenue and throws innocents in jail while violating the same constitution all day long. Yes! is the answer to your question. Can this same sheriff arrest someone against their interpretation of the same constitution just because a crooked judge backs him up? I'm just playing Devils advocate here. I believe in "Shall not be infringed" but I also believe we should not need a drivers license to travel and I do not believe in victim less crimes. Both written in the constitution. If you bother to look.

They are left leaning, but you have to appreciate the fact that they even cover this side of the story. In this instance at least.

@@josephwhite6047 they are very Left always have. Many Right wings advocates won't even consider talking to Vice with there clear agenda to try to portray the bad of people.

@@jamesk5541 fair point. Nice name btw

Christian Clark : Funny how they lead of with the NZ shooting and the banning of weapons use and say it’s so hard for that to happen here. Well no shit Sherlock, NZ never had to fight a war to gain independence and they don’t have a Bill of Rights which specifically says “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

@@Flyingmikey62 ..there is one other point: I'm a NZer - there wasnt 'overwhelming support' for the banning - there was simply next to no consultation.