Q: Will the Tornado, F-16, and MiG-29 receive more flight model updates to increase their maneuverability and stability at certain speeds? The problem with the Tornado, in particular, is the weird flight model. In realistic and Full-real controls, the plane does wacky things that other jets do not, and in mouse-aim or simplified, the instructor restricts the maneuverability so much, that the plane struggles to do anything other than roll and try to force reversals when defending itself.
@@chiefturion7134 I don’t have the clearance xd. One other change that I’d like to be made to the F-16, and inverse for the MiG-29 is the low-speed handling. The F-16 should be worse at those speeds than the 29, and be able to be rated with by the swing-wings, while the MiG-29 is supposed to be the one that locks up more at high speeds and gets one-circled easily. Gaijin did the reverse with the flight models lol
@@flyingtiger0506 The Su-25 and A-10s are both supposed to be survivable. The A-10 is the only one that isn’t currently, but all Gaijin can really do is make the health of the tail and wings better because all of the flight control wires are considered as one unit for disabling, and that’s how it is on every aircraft.
Q. Why do you not allow players to change their game account emails? The game is over ten years old and bearing in mind that it has a 12 rating means that people will have changed or lost their emails or even used their parents emails to sign up for it.
You can, I don’t removed exactly how I did it, but I made an account with a school email and I changed it to a personal one. You just have not looked hard enough I guess?
This is exactly what happened to me. I had lost my accoutn for about a year because of this. However, if you contact support, they can add an email to your account.
there's an option for that if you check you account in gaijin's website, if you lost access or forgot the email you can contact support and describe your problem
Excellent episode. Loving the Tornadoes in-game, too. ❤ Regarding strike aircraft (and this is something myself and others have asked many times before), when are you going to correct the Ki-102 Otsu's combat designation as "Strike Aircraft" as well as give it it's missing armament? It's currently designated as "Interceptor". The Ko model is the interceptor variant (which we're still waiting for to be added to War Thunder).
By what definition is the Tornado a third gen fighter? Both the Air Power Development Centre and Aerospaceweb (by far the most common definition schemes) consider it a gen 4, though perhaps not a great one
Personal opinion on the Tornado: Having worked on it irl im pretty pleased, yes, genuenly surpised on how well its outer appearance and cockpit is modeled. In game, i only own the Naval Tornado, wich btw. carried the same armaments as the ASSTA 1, so GBU bombs should be available. It only differed in the ability to carry AS.34 Kormoran missiles. Those are my biggest thing i have to be picky about, the missiles would need a fair bit of work. Their flight path is unlike described by the german military in their videos about the tornado on their official YT channel, also they always aim for the super structure so the only way to hit components is shooting them from top down, instead of shooting them flying low from kilometers away, casue they would fly over the ship. Besides that, im pleased with the imroved flight perfrmance with the latest patch, well done, it doesnt rip as fast anymore. Im kinda missing the terain following autopilot feature, but besides tat, it does what i needs to do wonderfdully, and that is being a bomber and bomb things. Spaded it in a few days doing base bombing and ground pounding in WT. To kep it short, it needs some work still, with armament and flight perfromance/characteristics, but it has been wonderfully implimented and im very happy and would like to thank the developers for giving germany a plane type that was needed. Thank you
Gotta say, I love the Tornado, and the idea of it being present in the game, along the F-16, always hyped me. And now it's here! Can't wait to (maybe?) see the ADV variant as well: some define it as the "Tomcat with no Phoenix".
The Tornado IDS variants in the tech tree are 11.3, but the event IDS is still 10.7 because it has no GBUs. Gaijin, GBUs do not affect air battles, so why is my Tornado IDS still 11.3 in air battles?
@@milkelangelo1 And that's stupid. Why would I want to play an 11.3 plane which is 10.7 somewhere else? Why is it 11.3 due to purely air-to-ground ordnance? Why does that also apply to air battles? It makes no sense.
What are you gonna do about it? I also think mixed battles should have a separate br from air, but it's not like we can make the change. Besides, the 10.7 one is from an event, meaning you either got it by playing enough during the event, or you gotta pay it (as well as find as seller), and we all know that paid stuff is designed to generally do better
Flying the IL-2? NO WAY! I have standards (+there was only 2 of them in the game when I started to play so I never unlocked the rest). And for the Tornado ... I'd say it arrived too late, and it makes DoA. Germany and the British already had a plane for its role, and I rarely see Italian things in top tier, and all are easy targets in air RB. I like the plane it self tough, I even had a British one as a toy as a kid.
In all truth, some Cold War vehicles fit in with the World War Two asthenic and work well with it, for example the early IS series tanks or the M41 in the American tech tree Aside from those examples I wholeheartedly agree
BTR-ZD. PT-76B. M42. M103. Kugelblitz. BTR-152A. ASU-85. ASU-57. G6. Type 75. Sub-I-II. ZSD63, M26A1, pretty much every French post-war tank for about a decade. ZSU-57-2, pretty much every Swiss TD below 7.0 that’s post-war. Would you like me to add some more?
The tornados thrust revers should work in the air as it is connected to the ground safety switch. Moreover shouldn’t the thrust revers and airbreaks work at the same time as the reverser would blow into the now open air breaks and damage it, so there is a safety switch as well or better said the airbreak retreats automatically
@@izanagisburden1080 haven't had any issues with the MiG-23Maf yet, but I guess that is down to the high wing loading on the Tornado, though the rolling overload is still annoying.
Q: now when there has been a lot of new vehicles for all nations, are you planning on remaking/updating the "climbing the ranks" series to include the new machines
@@ChengLegend almost all of Czechia's indigenous designs are APCs, and their actual tanks are all soviet modernizations. during the cold war they used soviet tanks, and in WW2 they used german ones. they have very little in terms of tanks designed and made in Czevhoslovakia/Czechia worth adding. it would basically be a german tech tree until rank 3 and a soviet one to top tier with some custom modernizations.
¿Will Italy receive in the near future the Oto Melara Draco 76mm spaa? It's almost equal to the OTOMATIC since both have the same gun but i think it would be nice to have something merely better for the italians even if it's only better in movility.
Q: for tanks with 2 loaders, if 1 of them dies, how does it affect the reload rate? And tanks without a loader, do they simply never lose any loading time even if some crews die?
If it's an auto loader they don't lose any loading time even if you lose some crew. If 1 loader dies loading time is reset and loading is increased by a lot. If no loader can be replaced by let's say the commander then I believe it is doubled and if there is a replacement there is a smaller but still noticeable penalty.
Tornado have not the correct CM dispensing system holds its back. 56 big caliber flares together with its minutes of continuous chaff deployment would be perfect. I think we should get a mechanic switch to start continuous chaff release.
What do we think of the tornado? Really cool but DOA and terribly implemented. It was nerfed 3 times before release and the flight model is abysmal. The ADV can rectify some issues but should already have been in game. She is such a cool jet it's sad
Q: Why does the leopard 1a5no launch four of its eight smoke grenades at a time and not two like the leopard 2s or the leopard a1a1 L/44 could you please fix it just for the sake of saving the few smoke grenades you have
I've grinded the entire British tech tree on another account but had to get ride of it because of hacking reasons, but anyway how can I get back up to British top tier quickly on my Spino7095 on my new account and I have the Sea Harrier. If I can get the Harrier GR7(I already had the Harrier GR7 on my other account before it got hacked) that would be helpful. Thank you Gaijin and see next week.
Hey, in Do 335 A-0, there is this red cross on white background on the right side of pilot's cockpit. Does it mean, it was used by medic's during the war?
@@MCP2002 they did change the german tornado engines, but i think it's more for accuracy then balance, since britain has even worse engines, and the difference is just a couple kilonewtons anyways
Gaijin I would like to ask a question. How come some times tanks with little armor bounce massive caliber shells? I had a game where a t 50 bounced my shell when I was using a Emil at close range (128mm gun)
you can watch Oxy's american tech tree series and the episode with your preferred tier to find out what vehicles are worth using. he does a very good job at explaining the use of each tank.
The glorious Tornado.. My favorite aircraft. I literally loved this aircraft when I was a kid. I couldn't wait to see it in game. I was excited for the Lightning and man it was good... But given I only play Sim battles in VR... The Tornado is the biggest let down ever. No radar in sim? You don't start with flares/chaff.. You start in an attacker with x2 missiles, against mig-23 -29's that are fully spaded. It's tedious. It's not worth my time or effort. Absolutely gutted how simulator has been left to rot. Even If I had bombs, You can't get near the convoy of factories. Using Guided munitions in VR is Hellish - is the full screen really needed when the cockpit has TV monitors? That you can't use? (mouse scroll doesn't work) It's not really the plane thats broken. It's the non existence of ID FRIEND FOE (IFF) --- They had it in ww2........... Please fix the way OP AAA in simulator on factories - convoys - carrier and ships (the runways and battle fields are perfect leave them) I have paid good money for ground pounding aircraft that I cannon use. Hundreds in fact! Guess how that makes your playerbase feel? I'm defiantly not the only one. I'm sick of having to go in chat and advise people NOT to attack targets.... Because it's instant death - they leave.. Probably never to return. Not everyone can or wants to dogfight... Warthunder is boiling my piss Kind Regards Ralgernok PS The port of Dover currently has a mangrove growing in it. I don't think this is historically correct. Please check it out.
The buffeting graphics need to be amended in game they are no way that harsh, and a Tonka’s intakes wouldn’t buffer with the rest of the wing, just saying 🤷🏼♂️
Yes it is, there is no impossible to evade missile in game, as much as you are aware of the missile and you know how to do it you can without problems, there are many tutorials on RU-vid about it.
hello war thunder we are a community where our pc ran war thunder but due to the constant updates war thunder no longer works on our pc so we ask you if you can make a war thunder lite or optimize it. thank you
