The SU-57 Felon - Russia's Answer to the F-22 

Not sure if that's anywhere close to true. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-N4-RwreHRRg.html plenty of video of multiple in formation. Love your video's btw

Perhaps you should research the difference between prototypes and serialized production models that are operational.

@@CWLemoine Flying in formation isn´t operational? it´s just CGI?

@@notabolchevik how old were the videos you saw? Those very well could have been prototypes that were doing the formation flying, as Mover has already said repeatedly, there were only 2 production models made and one has already crashed. It also is a DEFINITE possibility that the videos you have seen were CGI. The Russians love to try and fake people out by making them think they have more forces/capability than what they really do. It's a carry over from the old Soviet days.

@@CWLemoine touché, they did build 10 prototypes for flight testing which very possibly could be the aircraft in the video's. And I know the first operational wasn't delivered until last December. My comment was made without comprehending your all cap statement "OPERATIONAL (non-prototype)". I should think things through before opening my mouth...

@@CA-oi6ys dumbest thing I ever heard.

Russian planes are really good. Ukraine is using Russian anti Air. It says more about how good Russian SA systems are than how bad Russian planes are. Iraq didn't have anything like what Soviet Union put in Ukraine.

@CA163 not really honestly, the ruskies and the yanks, even europe all have very unique aesthetics

@@CA-oi6ys you wish buddy.

...and they smell like Borscht.

The worst one is the "RussianStalinist" guy, each comment he makes gets over 500 likes when there's barely any engagement. This is what Russia spends it's money on, instead of buying optics for their infantrymen. They're still heading into battle with iron-sights in 2024

The Ghost of Kiev is the most experienced Russian pilot.

@@Mathin3D but he's Ukranian... Was 😅

He very sexy man too

​@@Mathin3DHe never existed, just sad crap propaganda.

@@Mathin3D so..the cope of kiev? That never was real? lmao

😂😂😂 You clown.

1000 radars is not enough because one or two hightech radars is enough to track enemy and incoming missile

RUN.... here comes their 1 Su57....lol...

@@jonnieboyization И один в поле воин, коли он по-русски скроен. One in the field is a warrior, if he is Russian. In general, as far as I know, 87 units are planned to be released in the next few years. Which is not so little, especially considering its tandem with the S-70 UAV. In addition, the development of the 6th generation aircraft is in full swing. Has the F-22 shot down at least one aerial target in the last 20 years, with the exception of a Chinese balloon?

@@Russian-Stalinist Oh well, no need to use F22, older models are very capable.

Because it’s can! And airshow... 🤦🏼‍♂️

@@user-js7io7un4k Yeah he's just jealous to see that. As always this guy is arrogant like a lot of Americans cause they think they're the best in all domains. Actually, Russia in weapon domain is WAYYY ahead any country. Thanks to their knowledge into MHD. (Who came first from France by Jean-Pierre PETIT but my country is so stupid that they stopped him into this science and Russia continued to develop it since 50 years...) Nuclear engine for unlimited missile range + MHD for unlimited speed and maneuverability. Russia nailed it. And it works into air and under sea...... My only doubt about America into this MHD knowledge is that the B-2 bomber got the MHD technology... so maybe USA can also master this but why they didn't officially announce it... Like Putin did...

@@1980VINZ only department russia is way ahead in is aids per capita lmao

Bcs thos is post-stall fully in-control manuever that shows us its manueverbility

@@1980VINZ america,,,is and will stay leader in technology,,, this plane is a joke of a stealth plane , and un proven in combat,,,until then , its just another dog and pony show by the commies

@@usereisnunelf6092 i do

@@usereisnunelf6092 Pretty good chance someone out of the 360,000 people watching a video about fighters cares about how fighters look lol - and apparently Mover himself does as well. So real question is why do you care so much that you bothered to comment not once but TWICE?

@@usereisnunelf6092 I do .

@@usereisnunelf6092 That what passes for trolling nowadays? Good grief, times have changed.

@@usereisnunelf6092 this is trolling nowadays?. Good job. I seen better😂

Посылаю вам много любви в Словению! ❤ Спасибо, братья!

Когда нибудь славяне поймут что вместе им безопаснее и веселее

Жму руку

Maybe they should focus on reducing its RCS to 5th gen standards before prioritizing its looks? Russian engineers are incompetent, as usual.

@@spritezeroxxx66 yeah like the ones we have in the United States specially Boeing and Lockheed Martin or you going to act like you don't know anything? 😅

@@spritezeroxxx66 долбоеб комнатный рассуждает о технологиях и вооружениях, в которых нихуя не понимает от словам совсем, дроча на порнхабе и проживая свою никчемную жизнь.. бестолочь ебаная

@@polako2 As far as I know, those companies design and build the best fighter jets in the world.

@@spritezeroxxx66 🤣🤣🤣 how old are you? where do you live? 🤣🤣 looks like you don't know nothing! the best because you said it?

pity it doesn t work doe

@@VladRadu-tq1pg Well clearly it does work. It's a non-tactical demonstration of the extreme flight envelope of the aircraft. I made efforts (not detected by you) to say they are a demonstration, not a tactic.

Yeah, these airshows actually show the performance envelope. The Cobra demonstrations in the 1990s really gave the West a wakeup call, and the Russian jets have shown extreme manoeuvrability well beyond that now. What actual tactical utility it has is debatable, but it shows they are very capable in...something..power/weight?

Yet when it has a complete combat load out, will it pass muster? F-35 says NO!!!

@@VladRadu-tq1pg *though

"the blonde looks nice" xDD

For someone who loves Tomcats so much, you'd think he'd have a sickness for the thickness.

@@gitargr8 Worship at the altar of gals with the big back yard.

No matter how many times people like to talk about the skinnier girls, most guys at the end of the day will bring home the thicker girls. Just saying...

In other words she's a thick chick

This is one of the best plaine in world right now with capabilities and capacity ocuracy

@@samvarupa2929 source: trust me bro

система Патриот из прошлого века такая подержите моё пиво)

выражение лица у мужика : "у меня на тебя сtoNt, а ты мне не даЙО*." (тока для СВОих, ш-ш-ш-ш) :)

@@alexyudin2128 И взлетела от Киджала прям в центре Киева, даже пиво не успела передать😆 ты же видел эти кадры в телеге, которые сняли украинцы как пэтриот на куски разлетелся😁

@@user-dl5fr4po3x ООООО целый один патриот из прошлого века успешный успех который мы заслужили есть чем гордиться)

@@alexyudin2128 А у вас украинцев есть что-то своё чем можно гордиться, чего-то я сомневаюсь у россиян хоть ракеты есть, а вот что есть у вас, не чего .

Thanks for the info

Greeting from Ireland mucker, stay safe lads and lasses

Damn. The Raptor may be out of service by the time the Felon is finally complete.... I didn't know this was the equivalent of YF22 Lightning.

@@mikek9297 5th generation fighters takes way to long to develop. No exceptoin - USA or Russia. YF-22 first fligh - 1990, F-22 first flight - 1997, full operational capability - 2008. If we will assume that furst ten Felons are same at as YF-22 - there are no any excessive time spent to Su-57 development.

@@Murphy252000 thnx, buddy. Need to plan to visit Ireland when it will be possible. Love Ireland culture, Guiness and irish whiskey :)

ukraine says otherwise

@@user-nv1gm2zj7y Imbecile

​@@user-nv1gm2zj7yand what was it the Ukraine said,oops,sorry can we go back and export our grain,so sorry Putin for listening to Brandon,and the Indian in England about bombing the bridge,😅

Take it easy comrade or they will have you in Ukraine knee deep in the mud getting killed

@@user-nv1gm2zj7y Ukrainian Village, House, school, hospital, nursing Home would like to disagree

I swear it’s like it’s gliding through the air😂

Su 35.

Посмотрите что вытворяет СУ-35. Это НЛО какое-то

Nor a stealth jet so not stealth.

Nor a stealth jet so not stealthy

Hhhhhhhhh absolutely right

😂

That's because he's American an he's arrogance it's hard to let go 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@bodeaciprian78 Really? He made objective remarks. The aircraft has always been criticized for its lack of stealth features, which was one of the reasons why India backed out of the partnership, and its clearly visible that the aircraft has poor visibility. The fact that it has no exports, not even orders, says a lot about it. It’s just that you’re a Russian troll who can’t handle that its not such a great aircraft that Russian propaganda portrays it to be.

If you buy some, you'll get US sanctions.

I genuinely thought everyone knew that

@@doghouseriley4732 good for you

@@shrek_2_on_dvd699 Bad for you then.

Did not know that, thanks

Ich hoffe Russische Piloten knallen alle Amimaschienen ab

​@@user-ne6um7nm7tне сомневайся.

Legend Sergei Bogdan, he landed a damaged Su-33 in France after hit by lightning

@@notabolchevik was a su27 drived by victor pugachev

No

@@Make-Asylums-Great-Again yes

@@myopicthunder Plane has leading edge flaps and uses them so yes….it does need flaps for T/O and landing.

​@@LockheedF22Raptor maybe loaded, clearly took off without em here twice

@@LockheedF22Raptor he’s talking about trailing edge flaps

ok, 32 su57s produced vs 195 f22s and over 1000 f35s

@@user-wp2xc6fj3w окей) тупейший пример) теперь введи сколько Ак и все их винтовки вместе взятые )) и ты поймёшь на сколько ты туп

@@user-wp2xc6fj3w There is no video that proves that the f 22 famous in Western propaganda has had a real combat against another fighter plane, it only exists in movies and video games. The F 22 is fantastic at shooting down drones, balloons and stationary targets, so what will it be like when it encounters a manned fighter jet? Well, this is nothing, while the F22 uses a missile worth several thousand dollars just to shoot down a 100 euro Chinese balloon. Well, the Russians, by just releasing a little fuel from an SU-27, shot down an MQ-9 Reaper drone worth millions of dollars.🤭

@@brutaladvance16.43 of course you havent seen the f22 in action, the iranian f4s didnt even see it until it decided to show itself

@@user-wp2xc6fj3w Where have I seen this before? HA, in Yankee movies and on the PlayStation.🤭 When the United States tries to build superhero stories linked to its identity, it is almost always fictional characters such as Captain America, Rambo, Spider-Man, The Incredible Hulk, etc. Let's take an example: we have Maverick with his F-14 Tomcat, a two-seat heavy fighter from the 80s, he easily shot down not one but two Su-57s, one of the most modern in the Russian arsenal. And what about Rambo, who took out an entire battalion of Spetsnaz soldiers with just a bow and arrow? However, in the end Russia decided to do the same by telling stories of triumphs. of feats. linked to your identity. Unlike Washington, however, the Russians do not need to resort to fiction.😎 Russia's adversaries dreamed of seeing NATO's war machine arrive in Moscow. Well, his dream came true. The NATO war machine did reach Moscow or, rather, was brought to Moscow after being TURNED INTO SCRAP on the battlefield by Russian forces a great humiliation for nato HAHAHA. It is incredible how they try to deceive people, the big problem is that millions of Europeans and North Americans read or have access ONLY to the propaganda of the toxic Western media of mass manipulation, these bastards are perverts, they intertwine everything for their own benefit.😡🥱🤧😴

Slovenija za Rusijo

💯

НЕ ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО ТАК ПИСАТЬ,ЭТО НЕ ВЫ ИМЕННО ТОТ ПИЛОТ.

It's definitely a nice looking aircraft

Не именно ты летаешь русский,не обязательно писать кто ты(хвастовство)

That actually makes sense. Thanks for sharing!

Thank you. I had wondered about that for a while. Seems like they've been using that ugly color for decades, and I figured there had to be a reason for it

Because it looks super soviet lmao

You mean in the cockpit? It's also used because it calms down the pilots.

I thought it was just the colour of the primer and they just didn't bother painting over it. Sky colour cockpit does make sense though to stop your eyes having to adjust as much between looking inside and outside

Forgot Russian your biggest threat is china

@Jason or weeks even

It has been used in combat for more then an decade

combat testing in Syria so far

@@maximus7809 Russian-Chinese relationship is like US-Saudi Arabia, the Soviets split away from Chinese alliance in the 60s-70s and still Russia and China aren't officially allies to this day

Very funny🤣🤣🤣

Okay Vlad we get it. You're jealous of an actual airforce.

😂🤣👍🔥

F22 isnt really that great its all propaganda i mean if Russian S300 is shooting down F35s what chance does F22 have

@@noco7243 Russia has a bigger airforce than USA tf u on about

She is a beauty you are not mistaken.

I agree. It looks magnificent.

alot of Russian jets are very pretty in my opinion. from migs to Sukhoi's. but nothing beats the A-10

if there's something Russian aviation nails 100% of the time, is the looks. gotta give credit where credit's due

@@IronKing-jw6ku True. I am fascinated by all kinds of Russian military designs: tanks, submarines, warships, planes etc.

that's smart. Make the enemy underestimate it

I'd rather say it's lazy. They recycled the layout of the flanker, which of course keeps development costs down, but doesn't help with stealth.

It’s a classic, sleek design used for demonstration purposes buddy

@@angrybirder9983 Exactamundo, it looks like the Flankers uglier , fatter cousin, good thing it's stealthy, so it can hide how truly gruesomely ugly it is . I think I'll take the Checkmate instead.

@@theprinceoftides6836 Hey, the Felon isn't ugly!

I know right! 😁😁

При этом, это боевой самолёт!

Need a one son of the gun pilot, then all the impossible maneuvers will came out....

That is not a Kvochur Bell....internet has already done rounds on this after Top Gun: Maverick came out. That appeared to be a standard vertical climb in to J-Turn for target re-acquisition. Kvochur Bell defensive maneuver is this: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bwhjerfaAy0.html&ab_channel=Azyaz

@@EddieMitz the commentator on PA literally says, in Russian, that the 57 is executing a "Kolokol" which is Russian for "Bell".

@@ZarviroffSerge aaahhh....then I indeed stand corrected. I was watching this on my phone when I commented, so I didn't pick up the announcer in the background. I assume then that both instances (this and the one that I found way back when I first saw the maneuver) are of the same maneuver, just executed in different manners and for different objectives.

@@EddieMitz I have no Idea why my response didn't post yesterday. Anyway, there is a misconception exists in English-speaking world, and a lot of people do seem to think that Kvochur's Bell is the maneuver that's executed in the vid you've posted. People in comments there even discuss it and agree that that's Kvohur's Bell. It's 100% not. It's easy to find what Kvochur's Bell is, if you search for it in Russian. Russian search query for it would be колокол квочур or колокол квочура. You'll easily find other vids of it and the scheme of the maneuver. I don't know where this confusion comes from. And now it seems to be inflated even, after the Top Gun? Weird.

I live in St.Louis MO and the first time I seen the Eagle I was surprised to, and this plane is bigger I think.

The only way to truly appreciate the size of a tank is to be woken up by one at 0400 as it rolls past your tent ten feet away.

Yeah it really hammers it home when they do those "legacy" fly-bys with WWII planes. The F22 especially surprised me with ow big it was!

It’s no wonder that with the sheer size of the SU-57 in particular, it’s RCS is equivalent to that of the smaller F-18. So it isn’t all that stealthy but the RCS is still a little reduced

Here in the Netherlands, close to where I live is a joint US/Dutch airbase (where they "hide" the nukes) called Volkel. In the middle of the roundabout, they actually have a real f16 that's out of commission. These 1 engine jets are small af. Some dual engine jets are small as well, f18, for instance. Others like the f15 are huge af, though.

its also not like the russian goverment is gonna tell the americans how many they have built and that works both ways ain't no way the american goverment isn't hiding how many raptors are actually in service.

If only it were a beauty contest. 😉

If looks could kill, the Russians would actually be formidable.

@@niko7903cope.

А вы не воюйте с русскими. И вас никто не обидит. 😁

​@@vladkomar973You got only nuclear weapons.

It's not the su-57 is better than the f-35 in only one respect air shows

Yeah all 12 of the posing the threat! It's dump all the longs and go back, i don't think the pilots would have a look at each other. The only difference is that one platform has MADL and monstrous electronics and the other doesn't.

Skal ! ^v^

You can already get an engine upgrade for your F-35.

Yeah in 5 years it won’t just be an F-35 fight. It’ll be an F-35 commanding a swarm of drones, supported by F18s as missile trucks and an Aegis cruiser or two. The Felon’s won’t stand a chance.

and now image if Russians would print money!

@@art_means_artificial Зачем!? У нас самолеты намного дешевле проверь.

@@PISEc412 you ever hear of “you get what you pay for?”

@@reboundrides8132 Да знаю. Но в том и дело что ты платишь за наш самолет меньше, получаешь больше. Ф22 до сих пор не как не может вылечится от детских болячек, а он выпускается уже давно и стоит пипец как дорого. Всё дело в деньгах, любое оружие по большим деньгам и это вов сём. Сравните Российское и американское . А качество ниже.

@@PISEc412 American taxpayers have to suffer, nothing personal, just business... the military lobby and private companies "take care of you."

Do you agree with him ( as a pilot) about the usefulness of some of those maneuvers as being "for airshow purposes", or is there close range and/or long range purpose?

@@jaysmith3259 In a vaccuum supermaneuverability and moves like self induced flat spins or cobras could, in theory break pesa locks or find openings to scan the enemy from behind in a one-on-one dogfight. However, along with doctrines involving multiple jets and heavy emphasis of BVR, as technology marches better radars make sudden massive energy bleeds less useful than regular energy fighting techniques.

come on mate stop lying you just use a simulator lol

Let me give you one reality you don't want to hear. UAV's

@@cuckoonut1208 I was in during the 70's and 80's. UAV's were not really a thing yet. They were still in their infancy when I left the service.

мне больше понравилось - ну вот то хуйня и вот то хуйня, но я не уверен, у русских видимо так принято

Всякий кулик своё болото хвалит.)))

@@user-pu8rp9il6f Это сложно назвать хвальбой. Лишь факты, касающиеся малоприменимого аспекта.

@@Ewan_Gaming. За историю России (начиная от княжеств и по сей день) ""малоприменимых аспектов"" принесших победы было столько, что о них толстенные книги писать можно. Генерал Мороз помог Александру Невскому в битве на Чудском озере, в войне с Наполеоном и в Великой отечественной Войне. Реактивная система залпового огня "Катюша" не была скопирована фашисткой Германией из-за огромного разброса снарядов. Советские же войска добивались от неё эффекта за счет массового применения. Танк Т-34 имел слабую броню, слабое орудие без дульного тормоза. Имел успех за счет дешевого массового производства, не требовавшего высококлассных сварщиков (на воспитание которых требуются годы). А отсутствие дульного тормоза позволяло вести, относительно, скрытный огонь. Автомат Калашникова не смотря на свои недостатки автомат № 1 в мире. Со сверх маневренностью Су-57, подозреваю, такая же история. Возможности этого самолёта лежат за пределами тактики ведения боя принятой в америке, что говорит о принципиальном отличии российской тактике, но не о её эффективности. Ну и сам характер подачи информации, с акцентом на мелочи и игнорированием принципиального, говорит о предвзятости специалиста.

Зачем нужно было вторжение в Украину

Well, that explains Cyka Blyat.

@@markvincentcocjin what does that mean

@@hassanjamal4212 it means Fucking beach

@@MasterLninio Russian is a cool language.any tips to learn it easily?

@@Hunterxrt interract with russians

Sarcasm?

There is a bit out there, check Millennium 7.

Nice overview video God bless take care

"There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know."

facts

@@crddrones3457 :) you too buddy

Really??? Link ?

@@mraviatorboii2510 its on their youtube channel, they had a stream the other day and are having another tomorrow morning at 4am pst

A new ace combat was announced too lol.

Deep inside I also wished Mover to review Japan's F-2A Viper Zero, hear it's based off from the Agile Falcon variant

With games like DCS and IL-2 on the market, I wonder what keeps people coming back to Ace Combat. I was an Ace Combat junkie until I found the real sims.

The fact that you're calling Ukraine drones "Nazi Zelensky machines" strongly suggests you're just a Russian propaganda twat.

Just curious how you know all this. Of course if they don’t have but one it would be easier and cheaper to upgrade this one

Kind of stuff kills my love for the franchise. It's like they can't make a good Ace Combat game with real dogfights, so they gave them pulse lasers ffs lol.

@@Krystalmyth well what else kind of lasers would you use if not pulse ones

@@Krystalmyth lasers has been in the series for a long time though

@@Krystalmyth If you’re expecting “real dog fights” in Ace Combat, you’re playing the wrong game.

@@oatlord A lot of planes in Ace Combat 7 have the Tactical Laser System that fires a solid beam for several seconds, but unfortunately it was hugely nerfed compared to the TLS carried by the Falken in Ace Combat 5. The pulse lasers carried by the Su-57, F-15C, and MiG-31 are much more powerful.

Mover can be Doug De Muro for military aircraft: "THIS is Sukhoi Su-57 Felon and I'm going to show all its quirks and features and show you how it flies".

he can fly the f 22 all the day in Eglin

Maybe he can hitch a ride to Russia with Steven Seagal

Bigtruckseriesreview Motorsports Oh how I'd love to see that! I think Mover would jump at it. If we could just get past the current crop of idiot politicians who have chosen to return us to cold war status ( _THANKS for that, ya freaken flatliners_ !), it might even be possible. And Mover would deliver a fair review too, count on it. Unfortunately, our 'leaders' in Washington have made such things impossible. And even if we had maintained our previous post-cold-war relationship with Russia, it probably wouldn't happen. But man, if it did? Shit. Mover would become even more of a legend than he already is.

@@YaroslavNechaev Probably come out quite well except for Quality and Comfort. Quirks - 3 pitot tubes!

The 23 was something else.

I had some input on yf23 it should have gotten contract but our hyd mechanic screwed up and left landing gear had a little trouble so they choose yf22

@@johnfairchild1769 Comical. If the yf23 had being built you would be been saying BS against it and claiming it would have been great if yf22 was built. Dishonest creeps

my thoughts actually

@Jack Stucki The problem with Lada isn't the design, it's that the cars are cheaply made. And that's intentional. In Russia there's a large market for cheap, low-quality cars, people buying their first car or who can't afford a more expensive foreign car. Lada has a big share of that market. Lada could build better cars, but it would be risky and expensive. First because they'd be changing a working strategy, and second because even if they were able to build cars that match Japanese in quality, they still wouldn't be able to charge Japanese prices for a while, because with established brands you pay a premium for reputation.

He never needed afterburner mode to develop supersonic sound. The Su-35 could develop supersonic sound without afterburner, and the Su-57 is lighter than the Su-35

Shit youre right 😂

#Ship

Is that where the wingman moniker comes from? Lol

Good save attempt, but if you follow his eyes you see who he is actually talking about. Naughty naughty!

Tally! Bogey at 1 o’clock!

None of what that country builds is innovative. Everything they have ever developed is a rip-off of other peoples work. Be it the USA or Nazi Germany. See: RDS-1 vs Fat Man. VK-1 vs RR Nene. Tu-4 vs B-29. Mig-15 vs F-86 Saber. SU-27,35,37 vs F-14, F-16, Gripen, and the F-15 STOL/MTD (Which was tested and retired before the later Sukhois copied the identical 3D thrust vectoring for their aircraft, as airshow technological demonstrators, demonstrating to the west what we developed and discarded three decades ago). They copy, but always miss the little details. E.g. they didn't know about the all-flying tail of the F-86. They are unable to develop engine nozzles such as the F-22 and F-117. And they didn't even grasp the concern that their own college professor published the math behind stealth technology and even he didnt seem to know it could be used for stealth aircraft. And they sold literal tons of Titanium to the CIA for their Oxcart program, A-12, M-21, SR-71... Then they designed, built, and operated while ignoring the warnings about Chernobyl. Failure at ever step.

@@jj4791 sto kazzo number one

@@jj4791 USSR =\= Russia, my guy

@@jj4791 And it goes both ways. Do you think the F-35 is a novel American design?

@@jj4791 Wait didn’t America get a lot of its early engine designs from the UK.

Thats sergey bogdan. A very experienced pilot with flights on more than 50 types of aircrafts. He is also test pilot for sukhoi and hero of russia.

Also cause minimal load out ie pilot and fuel, nothing else. One can question was anything else taken out to lighten the plane further. Still nice looking plane and nice performance.

@@Stockfish1511 "and hero of russia" A great man wasted on a deplorable country.

@@mikek9297Deplorable to some, great to someone else. Its always about perspective.

@@mikek9297 As a non-Russian, Russia is a great country, though far from a perfect one, similar to countries like China, Germany, America, etc. Your disdain for the country is sad and frankly exposes you as someone who uncritically swallows propaganda.

Cant argue it’s “wrong or better”. Because it isn’t. It’s just a different design. If it were objectively inferior from a performance/design it wouldn’t have been green lit for production in the first place

@@Spectre-907 so by that logic all planes are automatically great because the design department has green lit them.

@@Spectre-907 assuming cost isn't an issue

Yeah it's not wrong or better, it's just stolen. Like the space shuttle. Like the F-15. Like the Concorde. How can they be proud of this?

@Anton Smirnov Lol I bet you can't compare pictures of all those planes and then say they were not stolen designs without laughing

@@bryanx590 what the fuck man? Why bringing politics, the guy just talking about military technology. Chill the fuck out

@@bryanx590 LMAO, your US lost vs Afganistan and run away like a dog. Pathethic.

@@bryanx590 Try backing that boast up.Remember Stalingrad!!

@@bryanx590 You obviously haven't learned enough Russian history to understand that Russia is the World's largest lake of quicksand.Stalingrad is the classic example.

@@bryanx590 Ukraine..Ukraine ...Ukraine .. Why you worried about this hole? Maybe you are ukrainian boy? your country is not centre of the universe

I think it will be harder to do a video on J20 because almost nothing is known for its capabilities and even at airshows the pilots are not pushing the jet at all to give us some idea on its maneuverability

@@jack99889988 It took the Chinese just a year to hack the F35 blueprints. Why design something yourself? Let the Americans pay for the design and if it is any good, steal it. Then they'll build twice as many, after all America owes over $28 trillion, it is effectively bankrupt and if it was a company it would be in court trying to get protection. But I'd be more worried about all those Chinese computer chips in your aircraft and arms systems. Just imagine if the Chinese could turn them off

@@doghouseriley4732 damn….. Chinese ‘dragon chips’

@@doghouseriley4732 Didn't know Lockheed Martin is so easy to hack. Login: admin Password: admin?

@@YT-xf1cy it's probably not directly ripped from a current platform. It's likely they got the data and blueprint on technical demonstrator or prototypes. Then develop it to suit their needs in the finished product. That's what they did with the J15.

Это чтобы их дети лучше спали )

Главное, не рассказывать про плазменный кокон у Кинжала, делающим его почти невидимым для радаров и то что он гиперзвуковой, а то вообще мозги вытекут. Они всё думают, что это мультики.

The Russians always build for rough field operations.

ah yes naval capabilities last time russia tried to use a carrier they had to tow it back to port

The SU-57 isn't an answer to the F-22 because the SU-57 isn't a true 5th generation stealth fighter jet. It is at best a 4.5 generation platform. Meanwhile, the USAF revealed well over a year ago that it had already flown a 6th generation fighter jet.

@@classicgalactica5879 Good point. And in any case, we've known for a while now that the Russians were at least a generation behind in terms of air assets. And the war in Ukraine tends to demonstrate that their supposedly decent aircraft like the Mig-35 can be shot down by old Russian SAMs because Russia doesn't even know how to operate their own fighters correctly. So yeah, they're no match anymore. They must long for the good old days of the mid-70's when the USA still view the Soviet air force as a menace. LOL

@@classicgalactica5879 Why wouldn't it be considered a 5th gen fighter?

@@classicgalactica5879 Hope the 6th gen fighter wouldn’t became another failure like the F-35

Ну да, американцам сейчас бы хвастаться самолётами 6-го поколения и воевать на них против чуваков с автоматами и палками😂 тогда да, вы круче всех

lol

Yes cause the flanker, frog foot and foxbat were all designed with slide rules and brains while the US used computers. Given equal systems guarantee Russian win.

@@graemepennell how is that?

@@graemepennell Just shows Russia is systemically flawed from the ground up.

@@graemepennell umm no foxbat and flankers used computers for design not so sure about frogfoot though. Foxbat was the first ever combat fighter to use passed array radars.

Russia cant even find a buyer for that pos. It's hilarious that the program got cancelled

11 one of them crashed HAHA

I fly it in Ace combat 7 a lot. Gorgeous design, and maneuverability.

@@MrArcadia2009 cool, I'm looking for a picture to put on my wall 👌🇷🇺💪🤝

@@jeremyr7147 a lot of wallpapers, but mostly for phones. I got it on my lock screen.

For this moment No exist naval version.all planes produced now for "ground" fieldS.

no naval version, also there is really no place to put the arresting gear because there is a weapons bay there, and on top of that their carrier needs lots of repairs.

@@andresgarcia7757 And on top of THAT, they only had one drydock big enough to work on their carrier. _Had,_ because it sank about 3 years ago (with the aircraft carrier in it, and they were lucky not to lose it, too). Currently they're trying to build a replacement, but the project is already way behind schedule and way overbudget, and at least one project manager has been arrested for massive embezzlement.

@@andresgarcia7757 Actually there will be naval version, but it will be long time before production, cause there are plans for new carriers too. Certainly not for old Carrier-Cruiser (cause Kuznetsov is not really dedicated carrier platform and that is the problem with it, along with it's age).

I’m actually a fan of the Russian airplanes, it just looks like it is going to have to loose the rear weapon bay to accommodate the arresting gear. But in the other hand has loads of wing are so it might be really good at landing on carriers. The visibility issue is valid but for some reason most of the latest aircraft have really bad rear visibility.

Yep, just like when we paint canopies on the underside of our planes - any momentary "What?" from the opposing pilot can serve you.

I noticed the same thing and thought about the canopies painted on the bottom of aircraft like the A-10 and F-18. Those schemes can really add to directional que confusion, like whether they are turning toward or turning away. Painting an entire aircraft silhouette though seems more like a artful decision than a tactical one though.

темная краска это силуэт реактивного беспилотника ...охотник...

@@user-fs7mg7on1c охотник в разы больше , ты о чём и у него совсем другой силуэт! Охотник в 1,5 раза больше СУ 57 и пока что не вышел в серию!., но уверен что и су 57 тоже будут ставить плоское сопло как и у охотника!

@@Makarov190 а ВЫ найдите самолет с таким камуфляжем и посмотрите что нарисованно на хвосте

Lmaooooo Yup

You should see the Top Gun Maverick crowd. 😂

I mean my man over here mentioned covid 10 times when watching that crowd like that was the best thing to say as a pilot about enthusiastic folks coming to see the show... so maybe he's an "armchair" microbiologist working with Fauci by your analogy huh?😆

​@@upfront2375 No doubt Vaxxed and Boosted like a good boy.

nah its airshow stuff cos its not American... it has no use in combat 🤣🤣🤣

and he'll yeah its sick.. that thing can turn and bite you quicker than a rattlesnake.

@@martinpalmer6203 😂 CW Lemoine himself literally said that it was useful in combat. You must be blind and/or dead. Watch it again. No one really knows anything about the SU-57 _but_ Russia. However, the SU-57 is definitely more maneuverable than the F-22, everyone and their grandma knows that.

@@FF-jf8yg yep that sarcasm went right over your head... lol 😆

@@FF-jf8yg So no one really knows anything about it, but it's definitely better than the Raptor....😂 You are high, son and I guarantee you that the 22's avionics suite is 30 years ahead of whatever is in the Sukhoi.

Прикол в том, что су-35 "гоняет" все Ф-*, но про это им неудобно говорить.

@@tcebep ойбя) хватит а?

Russia better get to work on a better plane then😉

Because what we have out in the open for you to see his two generations old. YALL are way behind. The F22 was designed in the eighties lol 💪🦾

@@TreyWK I don't think you're included in the "we", can't even spell "you're" correctly.

She probably there just to watch the kids while the husband looks up to the sky

New delivery of the su57 has included the new engines