The UFO Movie THEY Don't Want You to See (2023) 

What we also learned here is the one of the lowest bars for intelligence and critical thinking is the United States Congress.

Shows like this really piss me off. "There is nothing that can break the laws of physics!" Yup just like the world is the center of the universe, the world is flat or the sound barrier can not be broken. Science is all about learning what we thought was truth only to learn it is not. To have the closed mind and say we will not able to go faster then the speed of light or not being able to find some way to travel light years, that person is an idiot.

INTELLIGENT life on Earth is debatable.

Mick West is a Genius

I think the most revealing thing about this video is the ATC saying pilots report wrong altitude all the time...That's something I don't want to hear.

13:40 "is it possible that some aliens might come to us from a different part of the universe that might have different laws of physics?" Her immediate unblinking answer "NO. It is not possible. The laws of physics are the same everywhere." One thing I've learned in my 50 years of being a live human being: whenever someone says that something is impossible all they have to do is wait for a while and they will be proven wrong every time, without exception.

We did not invent mathematics, we merely discovered it...

"We" don't have a clue about the laws of physics!

A piss poor effort at debunking the Ariel school incident. And a very disgusting character assassination of Dr John Mack. "His whole thing was persuading people" what a bunch of total BS.

Being a witness to The Phoenix Lights, how do you explain an object the size of many football fields being viewed by over 10,000 people. This object was tracked on radar from northern to southern Arizona, and clearly not something that was man made. When passing over the mountains near my house, it was only hundreds of feet in the air, and it's massive triangular shape clearly visible blocking out the stars in that evenings clear sky. To date, I have never heard any rational explanation.

This feels like it's endorsed and funded by AARO.

This is the best video on this subject I have, at 76, ever listened to, great work.

@briandunning 1) Why did you not mention the Navy pilots who saw/followed the UAPs and the corroborative radar reports from the ships including the target traveling 60 miles in one second? 2) Why did you not mention the Phoenix Lights which had thousands of observers and some with videos? 3) Why did you not mention the Stephenville Lights seen by many? etc etc I appreciated the Carter Sighting explained (although still confused as to why we put a barium cloud into the atmosphere). I believe you cherry-picked UAP events that fit your preconceived belief system.

If there really is something out there waiting for us in the darkness, then we'd damn well better hope that it's not like us at all. Knowing the bloody career of human history as I do.

So lucky THEY allowed you to upload the movie and let it online tho they don't want me to see it!

Didn't the US navy have radar data on the alleged UAP's which backed up the pilots accounts ?

Radar on the Princetown tracked what Mick West said in your show was a weather balloon travelling from 80,000 ft to sea-level in under 1 second, which is at least Mach 26. Please can Mick tell us where to purchase a latex balloon with this capability?

I was engaged until he started trying to debunk the African school kids encounter. They have been interviewed as adults and still don’t waiver from their experience. Maybe he should talk to these people before trashing them.

There are plenty of cases that are supported by radar data corroborating eyewitness stories, but this program completely ignored them. The Tic Tac UFO descended from 80,000 feet to the surface of the ocean in a second. Further, it took off at extremely fast speed that US F/A-18 pilots said was too fast for any person to survive, and it went to a location where these pilots were supposed to go for a dogfight in a matter of a second (not to mention that the dogfight location was a secret). There is proof, you just have to look.

This movie is so full of shit this movie is basically calling all the pilots and whistle blowers liers this movies has 3 cast members saying thousands of honest people are liers fucking funny as hell

Just because we can't travel many light years to other stars does not mean they haven't discovered how to do it!

If shows like this existed 500 years ago they would be telling us that human flight was impossible, that there will never be a cure for bacterial infection, travelling faster than the speed of sound is impossible and that the solar system and sun revolves around the earth. Never underestimate the 'know it all' arrogance of humans, especially those in the scientific community.

I only watched the Rendlesham segment then quickly concluded this Brian Dunning character is not a sceptic but a debunker. Highlighting the five second sequence of the lighthouse corresponding with the Halt recording but completely ignoring the fact they were seeing a "strange small RED light", and that the Orford Ness Lighthouse only displayed a white light is misleading in the extreme. I could go on, but simply can't be bothered. If Dunning can make such a sloppy attempt with Rendlesham then I haven't the time or inclination to watch the rest of his nonsense.

The ufo movie I do not want to watch.

one thing about time and distance that is often overlooked is that we always limit any extraterrestrial life form to a lifespan similar to our own even though we are aware of living things on Earth with lifespans far greater than ours. if an extraterrestrial species had lifespans lasting 10's of 1000's of years, or longer, they might not mind spending a few hundred years crossing interstellar space

Funny. I have followed the UFO phenomenon for years. I was an optical physicist at the Naval Air Warfare center and currently teach image processing at a university. Yet, I have never heard of your "expert" Mick West. Also, the objects were tracked by RADAR as well. Hard to imagine that our best pilots could make such a novice mistake.

i Cannot even continue to watch this KNOWING YOU ALREADY LIED TO ME .

This should be called "my opinion debunking UFOs without showing the entire stories or even a single witness" who was there! this is a better title and far more truthful !

"laws of physics, as WE know it", WE have barely scratched the surface IMO.

I enjoyed this. But I can't shake the nagging suspicion that it may have been just as much "engineered" as it was "objective". Information control can come in all shapes and sizes, even packaged as skeptical/open minded reporting. It was all just too "canned" for me.

really, you discount the position/experience of a Top-Gun pilot, not to mention the ability of an F16's tracking systems to capture another plane to this guy ...your truly special...

"But Captain, I canna change the laws a-physics"

On the Rendelsham Forest case how does the Offord Ness Lighthouse beacon light get viewed 6 miles inland when the lighthouse has an opaque backing screen preventing inland ingress of the light ?

Hard to believe it's been almost three and a half years since I hit the FAA's mandatory retirement age from Continental/United. My final position was 777 Captain. In all that time I saw some spectacular sights. Everything from flying between columns of thunderstorms that made you feel like a small bird navigating thru a Redwood forest, to being lit up, instantaneously, as if by the sun, in the middle of the night, by a way to curious meteor. But I never saw anything I couldn't explain.

His lead scientist’s answer was “NO. Not possible!” 😂 I think this documentary may have an agenda… And it may be brought to you by the people of Philip Morris 😜

What he doesn't talk about with the tic-tac video from the aircraft carrier nemesis, the Nemesis had these objects on radar. He himself is not telling the hole story. The pilot himself testified before Congress, radar itself showed the object disappeared and seconds later reappear 60 miles away. Funny how he doesn't talk about that.

Do these guys really think that United States Navy aircraft carriers don’t have the radar capability to determine the speed and direction of an object for 100s of miles out on radar? Further - is that not the very information given to pilots to vector them into position to encounter these phenomena(as they testified to before Congress)? Are we also expected to believe that USN fighter pilots - graduates of Top Gun, cannot determine how fast an object is going in relation to their own aircraft…like they train for 100s of hours in dog fighting? That sets the bar for our fighter pilots and the Navy at a laughably low level. Just some food for thought on how little thought and effort was put into this analysis…The Navy has been using radar since WWII, they are not relying on IT guys to draw pretty lines on computers and say ‘watch your parallax and you will be ready to engage!’…Why? because they have RADAR - look up the meaning of the acronym and then tell us some more about ‘parallax’…

Hahaha, Brian Dunning graduate of Jim Oberg's School of debunkers. I'm going to side with the military police, and, there was about 25 or 30 of them that conducted the search operation at Rendlesham. These individuals were assigned to guard a nuclear stockpile, but were so stupid, they couldn't distinguish a lighthouse blinking light from a floating object that shot up into the sky, Yeah Ok. And, The Ariel School Incident, I'm going with Dr. John Mack's conclusion and the kids who witnessed and drew similar pictures, while separated from each other. And today their story remains the same. Couldn't continue, but, I'm sure you got it all explained.

This movie follows the typical debunker formula.

I watch, I listen, and I smile to myself. Such nonsense to those of us who know different.

The way this program is presented is with earthly human concepts and human way of thinking.

Why didn't you present the best Navy evidence from the Nimitz episode of 2004, David Fravor and the Tic Tac episode? That person and his co pilot were looking directly at the object and it had no known means of doing what it was doing. They also had collaborative radar information. Were they lying?

When he said it was a weather balloon I had a good laugh 😂

Lack of depth is stunning

I’m 73 and in 1969 I saw a triangular solid black object hovering 100 feet over my head in 35 to 40 mph wind gusts. It was completely black against a black sky it looked like a hole in the sky I couldn’t see the object or any details I could only see the absence of stars like a hole in the sky it was at least 350 to 400 feet on a each side it was moving slightly because the stars were winking in and out on the edge of the object. A blue white light came from the object and illuminated me my lady friend and my truck the circle of light was roughly twice as large as my 1969 Chevy half ton pickup truck. I was fishing on the beach in Fort Pierce Florida at the time and was standing in my truck bed changing into dry clothing as I had fallen into the surf and needed dry clothing. I looked up at the source of the light it was on for maybe 15 seconds and then shut off when the object started to move slowly south parallel to A1A and the beach. It was moving at about a slow walk for about 600 feet as it moved away the apparent shape changed to a narrow rectangle shape or the classic cigar shape as I was now looking at it from the side I still could not see the object only the absence of star light in the narrow rectangle shape. The blue white light turned on again and illuminated a car parked directly under the object on the side of the road a person got out of the driver side door and looked up at the object again the light was on for another 15 seconds or so and then turned off. I watched it move south and it got smaller and smaller until it disappeared. There were 6 other witnesses of which my lady friend was not one. She saw it just like I did but she ran to her car and disappeared. I’ve never saw her again. I tried to contact her but she wouldn’t return my calls and she quit her job and I don’t know what happened to her that was our first date. Of the other witnesses they all saw the same thing that I saw except one and he saw a completely different thing that didn’t conform with the rest of us he was very agitated and refused to talk about it ever again. He saw the light, but his description was completely different than everybody else’s. I don’t know what I saw but I know that nothing that we had flying at that time or now could hover silently in a 35 mph wind and not be buffeted around violently. I guess it was a classic unidentified flying object. Two odd things I had a 2 hour missing time occurrence and so did the rest of the whiteness’s I have had 3 other missing time occurrences years after this event, one of which also involved my wife.

I saw it with my own eyes and less than 200 feet above my head, a big "Vanta" black isoseles triangle with six tiny lights, three at each corner and three halfway between each corner. The lights matched the apparent size and brightness of the background stars. This "craft"...and it certainly was a craft NOT an airplane, a helicopter, a balloon, a kite, a flock of geese, nor a cloud of gas. It was as large and expansive as a building. Two tips of its wings spanned the banks of the river I was near. It was just above the tree tops and silently hovering...then moving almost imperceptibly slow following the river in a NW direction. Its mass blocked the known nighttime star constellations as it passed over. If you were not looking directly at it, you would have missed it. I pointed it out to a friend who was walking with me. He had trouble locating it even as I was pointing directly at the center of this massive craft. He was trying to find something much smaller or farther up. I was losing it...screaming, "It's huge, it's right above us...right there!" following it the whole time with my finger. It then began to pick up speed but, still gliding soundlessly towards the horizon. When it hit the horizon there was a bright flash...and it was gone. My friend only saw the flash that lit up the horizon just as my finger pointed towards that very spot. This made us both jump. My friend asked me, "What was that?" I said, "I don't know." This happened in late Autumn, early Winter 1980. As far as I know, our military didn't have anything like that.

It's funny that this movie only has three cast members trying to say that thousands of government officials and whistleblowers are full of s*** and liers

"UFO The Movie You Don't Want To See" 👽🌌

In reference to the gimbal videos, if the rotation of the moving pivots of the camera are what caused the object to rotate, would rather just the single object in the frame rotating, the entire view would rotate in the same manner as the object. If you attribute the objects rotation to camera rotation, why only one object rotates?

I watched this with an open mind as I like to always like to consider both sides of a story. We are all more than familiar with the incidents that you covered and obviously know about the debunks. Something new would have been interesting. However, the most disappointing thing was your lineup of experts, especially the astronomers. "Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light" Astronomers should be aware that galaxies have been proven to be moving faster away from each other than the speed of light. What we know about physics is being updated, and amended constantly. What is true today in physics might not be in the future. To state that we understand the laws of physics, based on 100 + year old theories is naive. We should all keep an open mind!

What a terrible program. The McMinnville incident has never been shown to be a hoax.

I don't CARE what anyone says about me.... I saw a space ship while I was on the USS PRESERVER ARS-8.

This feels like a desperate project blue book part 2 in documentary form

Trying to explain a type of Advanced Technology with ‘Conventional Science’ is absurd. This documentary had an agenda from the very start and it was to take a certain point of view and disprove whatever was reported. Since the filmmakers were so eager to say that even pilots can make mistakes, so can scientists. What about the tens of thousands that saw The Phoenix Lights and many earlier in the twilight of that evening saw a very large triangular object. What about Roswell and the many people who saw the Craft and the debris, and the testimony of Jesse Marcel decades after the fact? And the lives threatened if they said anything of what they’d seen. They can’t possibly all be lying. The extraordinary testimony of Betty & Barney Hill, Travis Walton and the eyewitnesses in the Rendlesham Forest Incident in England clearly were not seeing a lighthouse in the distance. And those Navy Pilots off the Coast of Southern California clearly saw large tick-tack objects moving at a rate that defied conventional ‘Physics.’ This film indeed had an agenda to prove and it clearly was so one sided that even Carl Sagan would have had issues with it. Also, the testimony of Officer Lonnie Zamora outside Albuquerque, New Mexico in 1964 has NEVER been disproven. He was an Officer of the Law who was so highly respected by his superiors all of whom attested that he clearly was telling the TRUTH. This is one case that because of the man’s extraordinary integrity has NEVER been questioned or disproven.

By far the best program and explanation of this subject i have ever seen, thank you so much Brian

The concept that you could see the lighthouse, at ground level, through the trees - but it wasn't visible from the elevated control tower on the nearby air base seems unlikely. Also on the tape the guy said the light was red. Lighthouses don't have red lights.

Haha, "alien can't break the laws of physics that we humans made up." That is so damn stupid to say. There are planets out there where they without a doubt have different material sciences that we have. They could have a different periodic table, or they have more stable versions of elements in plenty that we do not.

The amount of highly credible military insiders that talk about being directly involved with working on and with ETs is astounding.

Brian, that is one of the most honest and informative movies about the UFO phenomenon that I have ever seen. Thank you and keep up the good work.

@Brian Dunning love this. I saw the Easter egg behind you, nice touch.

Bob Lazar's explained experiences working on a UAP. The workings of the craft. What element 115 is and how it's used. There being many too many unexplainable occurrences since the 40's and early 50s.

In the missile silos, then no one noticed that the electricity is out? And there was no way to find the guards who were on the ground at the time of the incident to tell if they saw anything?

Before travelling faster than the sound breaking the sound barrier , people also told the same: "It is not possible to go faster than the sound, it might break the laws of the physics ... he he".

THANK YOU BRIAN!! It is so refreshing to watch a program on the subject of UFOs/UAPs that approaches it from a hard science perspective. I particularly enjoyed the historical research you did on the more famous UFO stories frequently cited as "evidence" on pseudo-scientific television shows. Also, the segment on Mick West and his analysis of navy pilot UAP videos, using his Sitrec program, was fascinating. I think this documentary should be mandatory viewing for anyone in congress holding hearings on this subject, and certainly for anyone assigned to establish a task force to investigate UFO/UAP reports. Please keep up the great work! I can only hope more people will watch this documentary and, in the end, gain an appreciation for a skeptical approach to extraordinary claims and the value of a rigorous scientific analysis of them.

As Mr. Dunnung stated early on in this video " don't believe everything you see on tv".

As someone who has done a deep dive into this topic for over 2 decades, I can say with complete confidence that nearly every one of these cases has been completely glossed over in this video. The whole thing comes across as a disingenuous attempt to explain away the reality that more and more people are waking up to everyday. This phenomenon is 100% real.

Extremely fair! Great job

He lost me when his explanation if the Gimbal was "There you have it, probably nothing at all" 😅.. What a detailed explanation.😮

Interesting🙂I love science and reality. I just want to say that in this debunking there is some holes to be filled out. And let me tell a story from 1985 in Denmark. I was a intelligens patrol soldier in the Danish army at that time and was nearly living in the forest constantly. It was the cold war so the Red Army was our main objective at that time. I remember one night the alarm goes off and we all run to our main duties getting ready for what was comming. In the background we could hear the F 104 starfighter warming up and in a few minuttes they was airborne with full power beyound mack 2 on the way to a Danish Island Bornholm close to the Russian Border. We found out later that Nato has been watching on rader 2 misiles(at the time that was what the fought) comming in at 18000 km/h toward Danish teritorie. The pilots could see the objects on rader and 4 different raders on the ground as well observe the objects. Then the f 104 arrive the spot and the pilots looked out and confirmed the objects visual. And all this is on record🙂The pilots then say to ground control the bookey is right ahead weapons locket on, and then the pilots looked op and no objects to see. The pilots report back bookey was gone, then the ground rader could see that objects have accellerated up trogh Sweeden with 22000 km/h. And all this is comfirmed from 4 radar stations and pilots as well. So debunk that 🙂

Well this has turned me completely off being interested in ufos!

so we are assuming that what we have to limit ourselves to with regards to space travel, speed of light etc.. we limit alien species to as well. The arrogance of the human species is astounding. Our understanding of physics and maths is ours and ours alone. We know little to if anything of the universe.

So this movie is based on the fact that our understanding of physics dictates aliens can't reach us, and look we're not destroyed by aliens and haven't seen any so aliens don't exist and can't reach us? That is thinking like an ant in an anthill.

SO ,WHO IS IT THAT DOESN'T WANT US TO SEE THIS VIDEO??

Brilliant, real scientific evidence ! Thank goodness for scientists like him.

200 years or more ago it wasn't even possible wishful thinking of flying or communicating with a cellphone more powerful today than the computer they used 60 years ago. If you would have taken the smartest scientific people and asked them about that they would have laughed and tell you that it's physically impossible. Do you get it?

The Dunning-Kruger effect came to mind while watching this video but it is was still worth a watch.

The last 3 minutes about interstellar phone calls is brilliant. The speed of light is the maximum speed limit of the universe. Consider the Voyager probes we sent off into the galaxy in 1977. How many light years have they travelled so far? One or 10? Neither. They have so travelled less than ONE LIGHT DAY from Earth.

Are any aliens interested in us ? They probably pity us because we are on a path of making our planet uninhabitable with nuclear weapons, over population, air, water, and land pollution, very destructive wars, other forms of planetary injustices that are slowly and not so slowly killing off life here on earth.😅

Sir, they were NOT seeing the Orfordness lighthouse. The Orfordness lighthouse had a WHITE beacon, not a RED beacon. I don't know of any lighthouse that has a red beacon. I also take issue with the timing of your beeps. All you need to do to find out what colour beacon the lighthouse has is a few quick internet searches. Is this your outstanding level of evidence you're talking about? Now it becomes very clear that you have an agenda.

I'm 53 year's old now. And there are two things that I've seen with my own eyes that have no explanation. The long ass lines at Walmart on any given Tuesday and the fact that only 3 people work at my local DMV. Just baffling!!

This is definitely the best UFO documentary film that I have ever seen. It is based on science, logic and common sense. Which is quite rare in today’s so-called Ufology. This is one film that everyone needs to see.

this movie brought tears to my eyes it is so refreshing to see an honest narrative....godspeed to all the true seekers of truth, the non-bullshitters, the honest scientists, the people of reason.....godspeed.

We humans based everything around our understanding, so basically, we think if it can't be done, then it's never been done before. 😕🙄

I am a pilot I saw a black triangle. 50 feet over my head, moving at 10 miles an hour. I was not alone, but other witnesses solve the exact same thing explain that.

The one thing this program gets wrong is that the can't explain how they've already gotten here.

The laws of physics are the same everywhere, says Dr. I think it's very narrow-minded, because we're sitting here on a planet and we don't know what the neighbor is doing, it's very arrogant to say that the laws are the same everywhere. You can say "probably" ok, but something like "no" is not acceptable. Timestamp: 13:50

These comments, man. I just can't... It's so sad seeing people make the usual logical fallacies when their beliefs are confronted.

No one said that you CAN'T travel faster than light. What they said is as you approach the speed of light, time stops and gravity becomes infinite. That doesn't rule out wormholes. In fact, a wormhole used to be called an Einstein Rosen Bridge. Any travel is considered time travel. Scientists have placed atomic clocks on airliners and found they the slowed down a couple of microseconds the faster and longer they travel. This was on NOVA a decade ago. Albiciurrie LITERALLY DID THE MATH ON WARP TRAVEL,..

That Rendlesham forest explanation is absurd, He conveniently leaves out part of the tape where Halt says "it is sending a beam down to the ground". His lighthouse theory is absurd.

Is anyone else here because they have a video of ufo activity on their phone? I have an incredible 1min video of me and my brother out walleye fishing around 1030pm in lake Michigan

It's stupid to say our laws of physics are the same universe wide because of a telescope and a theory..gimmie a break

Oh well.... That's an hour and a half of my life life that I will never get back!...

This was brilliant. The comments are hilarious, too. It's like people don't want us to use the scientific method, or demand good evidence.

Skeptics are frequently berated for not having an 'open mind.' But just suggest to a True Believer that there may well be naturalistic, rational explanations for these observations and watch the minds snap shut.

I've seen them, I've been abducted many times since 1964...they do exist. As to where they're from I have no idea. Believe or not...I don't care. They can deny and debunk all they want but it doesn't change the fact that they've been visiting here for a VERY long time.

A limitation of this documentary is its reliance on the limitations of Newtonian physics when he states that it's physically impossible to traverse the vast distances of space. What it doesn't take into account at all is the possibilities opened up by quantum mechanics. Why couldn't someone warp space/time? We have people on this planet who think it can be done.

A debunker is someone who actively tries to disprove a claim or theory by presenting evidence that contradicts it. They may have a strong bias or agenda against the claim or theory in question and may use aggressive tactics to discredit it. On the other hand, a skeptic is someone who approaches claims and theories with a critical and questioning attitude, and who is open to changing their beliefs based on evidence. Skeptics do not necessarily set out to prove or disprove a claim, but rather seek to evaluate the evidence and arguments for or against it. While both debunkers and skeptics are concerned with the accuracy of claims and theories, their approaches and attitudes are quite different. Debunkers tend to be more dogmatic and rigid in their thinking, while skeptics are more open-minded and willing to consider multiple perspectives. -ChatGPT

Lt.Corso a decorated WW2: veteran wrote the day after Roswell,he literally saw dead aliens, somehow escaped this production lol

"You can't break the laws of physics"....LMAOL

Being ex-military and having served 5 years in an Air Photo Unit (as both Imagery Analyst, as well as System Operator), I can confirm pilots have little idea how some of the imaging pods work, especially the fighter jet guys since their imaging legs and sorties are relatively short, and they have to actually focus on flying vs imaging. Leave the videos and photos to the proper Imagery Analysts. Also, US Congress has proven to be filled with the dumbest and most incompetent people now. That being said, I am hoping hope that there will be another radio signal from the civilisation that sent us the Wow! radio signal. Hopefully, within this lifetime! (or we confirm that the signal is a stochastic repeater...)