Support Elhaam Magazine: yaseened.givin... Find us in other places: Facebook: / elhaammagazine Instagram: / elhaammagazine Tumblr: / elhaammagazine Website: elhaam.org/
Really great points explained.... This clip is an explanation of the imam's saying where he says whoever shed a tear deserves janat because tears equip us with weapon against carnal desires and submission to Lord's will.
It’s very good to have such a beautiful words. Why can not you translate the whole lecture in English?? I want to listen complete lectures too of all these men in English Subtitles. I can’t understand Persian.
@@PureExistence1 Hello brother, I totally understand your point of view and I think I agree with you about scholars focusing more on fiqh. I speak both English and Arabic, Arabic being my native language. And I have seen quite a few of the works of scholars like Hasan-Zadeh Amoli and Jawadi Amoli translated and I think maybe the main reason stopping scholars from translating their works is difficulty. Basically the scholar has to probably be someone who studied theoretical Irfan (Irfan nadhari/nazari), which comes after studying islamic philosophy, logic, Aqaed, and perhaps even more branches of knowledge. Adding to that, the scholar has to be able to not only understand two languages, but be someone who can precisely translate the works. Because it seems that especially with regards to Irfan related phrases, you have to be very specific with your words. Let alone the fact that Hasan-Zadeh Amoli had works that were related to astronomy, which most scholars are likely not going to understand. And I also have scrolled through a book of his that was about the soul, many points were quite unclear to me, I think mainly because there’s a specific terminology that scholars learn in philosophy/logic courses. So the whole point I’m trying to make is that their books (perhaps not all, but some of the ones I’ve seen) probably don’t come off as easy as these lectures are.
