The Wage Gap VS Rationalism 

Some important reaaons are that men dominate certain fields.

@@Cecilia-ky3uw women don't apply for those jobs They only want equal representation only in the air conditioned corporate office jobs but never as garbage collectors , miners , soldiers in combat etc lmao

@@Cecilia-ky3uw And that is also why men gain more money in certain fields.

"uhh uhh literally everyone who's not me or my clique is utterly POWERED by hatred for non-white non-men" Thats what they would say/think. They think people are cartoon villains purposefully "oppressing" women due to some hateful feeling of superiority. when you realize leftoids are projecting about 99% of the time when they try explaining their opponents' motivations, it all makes sense. Leftoids are fueled by pure envy/hatred. See Cecilia; wtf does she mean by saying "men dominate certain fields"... like... yes...? Is stating a fact an argument? What's the implication? That men "dominate", i.e. discriminate against women inherently*? On projection: women are very cliquey. I've observed women excluding other women from their groups for no particular reason except for spite. Potentially, women project their own female thought process onto men as a explanation why women may not be hired as much.

Maternity

Yep, a couple years ago during BLM protests I was called racist by an English teacher for saying to her that there should be no difference in how we treat blacks and whites, and that the BLM riots were hypocritical. Literally all I said. I was 15 at the time😂. Stay strong in clown world.

Both of you give this 32 year old hope. Stay strong and continue to call this stuff out.

Leftard teachers

This makes sense Im a girl is a misogynist is so logical right

This is well explained within the woke. It's a concept called internalised misogyny. If we're talking about race it would be calling minorities 'sellouts', 'bootlicker' or 'white-washed'. You don't count as diverse person if you exhibit the dominant power's views and values.

indeed. it was something i've never thought of

That's why I put extra emphasis on it. It's one of the most common points I see get missed whenever I see debates and discussions on the wage gap.

You can earn less but have more if you save up, or have multiple small paying side gigs that stack up etc.

@@MentisWave Maybe bc it would benefit both if we solve the wage gap, also they earn less for the same work

@@basqueball2141 why would you need to solve a non-issue? men pay women in relationships and so women being paid less at work is hardly a rational thing to be myopic over.

Link the paper please

@atrapanasatromhtos9426 I've mistaken it for an Oxford paper when I was writing this because I didn't remember and honestly didn't check, it was actually a Harvard paper. Here: scholar.harvard.edu/files/bolotnyy/files/be_gendergap.pdf

Give the title would be enough.

@@GregorianMG "Why Do Women Earn Less Than Men? Evidence from Bus and Train Operators"

To be fair though I think his point was that it wasn't due to discrimination in the sense that men weren't simply being forced by discrimination to take the roles themselves irrespective of bias involved in addressing the solutions.

We need to end male disposability

I usually see the opposite, might be a profesion/culture thing tho. From my experience women, WOMEN not young girls, are usually much more hard working and proffesional than men, although they gossip WAY too much. Most men I come by are either spoiled rich douchebags or deppresed doomers that are there just so they can buy bread.

I think It just depends on the person; I used to work in a restaurant as a dishwasher and some of the servers were good and there were others that didn't work very hard at all (and essentially made me clean the tables up) while they sat on their phones

Yeah I mean that’s not all women but it is definitely a gender difference. Women in general are more inclined to complain about their jobs than men

​@@waccness449 i think it's just women being immature, they are not expected to fix themselves and grow the F*ck up like men are... So they still act like 13 year olds.

God I remember when I used to work at Lowe’s receiving there was this one girl that was really lazy to work with, she was always on her phone, she would take advantage of the new people by making her do her work(putting sos patches on some ups/FedEx boxes basically special orders for customer and when lowes gets some pallets or materials mostly would be the new guys or me who has to confirm the paperwork because she wouldn’t do it) everytime when it’s really busy at receiving she would leave early because supposedly she wasn’t feeling well but when it was a slow day she feels fine

Bro is teaching us how to argue with Commies. It's a great brand.

If anything, people should be concerned about the reverse gap where women are starting to earn more than men when variables are controlled for.

@@Cecilia-ky3uwwhat are those reverse gap?

@@blugaledoh2669 Specifically, young single women earn more, you can search it up

I don't really care about reverse wage gap, if a women is earning more by her own merit, then let her be..., UNLESS if its the government that's putting its nose where it shouldn't and making women earn more even if they work less, THEN THAT'S A VERY BIG PROBLEM, because you're taking from those who actually do the work, and giving to those who don't... and let's be honest, the vast majority of the governments do that to appease the communities that always talk about that old myth of the gender wage gap...

@@FenLupimo I'm giving them something to care about that's actually problematic, because it may be pointing signs that either men are lacking, or what they're provided with is less suitable to them, namely in education. Usually the lowest scorers of classes are boys, this is something I've noticed as a general rule.

Sounds like such a simple question but it completely destroys the leftist argument when you try to answer it.

In hindsight I might've been a little too worked up after watching his terrible video.

I agree with everything you say except the last part. Gay men = more effeminate?

@@the9970 He said that, not me. His thesis is that gay homos do better in school because they're less masculine and masculinity is a problem. Which conflicts with his social constructionist logic in every other part of the video.

@@the9970 that's debatable tbh, depends of the individual. I've seen effeminate straight man (usually they're soft spoken and doesn't have crass vocabulary).

@@the9970 It's more so "gay men = LGBT, therefore no longer part of the patriarchy". At least that's more what I assume he meant.

The same job position/title, or do you have metrics you had the same productivity and work hours as them? Meritocracy is what truly matters, not job titles/positions, the later are just formalities.

What's your experience or earned revenue for the company compared to him? Those are both important.

You're probably just not as good at the job as he is.

Not to beat a dead horse, but I must agree with the other comments to your post. You made a statement about a pay difference, then said it was because of gender while providing zero evidence that was the reason for the difference. Was your co-worker taller or shorter than you? How are you certain that it is not caused by height bias. You are assuming that an obvious bias exists because it has been propagandized to you, then want to apply it as the obvious reason.

Vet here, forget the coastal cities. Been there done that. If you had a way to make money on hand, they will come to you. Believe me, they arn't. Embrace this shit, go rural. Buy that land, polish that turd, use your training while you still have a healthy body to do it. If you did it right you are now in property development, making more money than you deserve, and your only real problem at that point is the tax man.

REEEEEEEEEE

​@@MentisWavepwned.

Naaaaaatuuuuure

@@speedlitezat Maternity does not exist, biological differences do not exist, you are a bigot if you disagree.

mammals ☕

Can't be living if you're undead 😅

Matter☕

Sex☕️

yeah tea is pretty good i guess

I like their videos because unlike most Socialists,they aren't as environmentalist and actually have their head screwed on.

>Breadtube >Drama with Kurzgesagt One's almost braindead while the other's funded by BIll Gates and the German government (via ZDF and ARD's MCN "Funk"). Bums fighting over an old sandwich would be more entertaining.

“Imagine think that reality is the reason behind the wage gap” I genuinely cannot believe that. Who would be dumb enough to SAY that?!

@@antoniotrivelloni8191Programming overcomes all logic

lmao

How's it coming?

@@sebastianlucas704 Script's been done and recorded for a while. Just have a family life I have to video edit around.

There's no need to unlearn economics, because the garbage peddled in colleges isn't economics in the first place.

​@@wrongthinker843Well what is economics?

Pretty sure they don't. They're not as good at men at multitasking, either.

It does look like her

Monogatari gang

Didn't watch it lol. But I will say that there are a lot of "blackpills" that are actually overblown.

How so?

​@@MentisWave I suggest you learn a bit more about the blackpill and the debates going on around it as the discussion of it was birthed from the unequal dating scene.

Voosh is a terrible debater but I would say he won that one Take a look at the vegan gains vs wheat waffles debate. Vegan gains is not a leftoid at all, but still wrecked wheat waffles badly Wheat waffles literally does not understand the concept of p-value lmfao

​@Hoomin Beeing Dude, I can't even believe anyone takes Vegan Gains seriously for one seccond due in his older videos. He was a total psycho and I have a hard time even thinking of him even as a pseudo intellectual. Also I think he's retarded.

Also men are more likely to get laid off during a recession

"I ONLY SEND SKULLS FOR YOU SKULL HILL, AND BLOOD FOR YOUR PROPAIN EXCESSORIES. I hope this cover letter finds you well, and thank you for this opportunity. Sincerely Arturius the Furious Skullfucker, Esq."

Just a little. Most of it is memes, stuff I made myself, and public domain. I dislike copyright, but try to respect it anyways because having videos deleted due to copyright isn't worth the hassle. AI is basically a way to get around terrible IP restrictions.

@@MentisWave I see.

@@MentisWave Based an anti-copyright pilled

Until brain scans become that advanced we infact won’t know

Spay-shul Did he forget the root word is Space?

So? I have an annoyingly ethnic name, if my name was Mike Smith my job hunts would be vastly shorter. I consider this a feature, not a bug. The reality is no business wants to hire baggage and learning curves with a new hire, they just want a job done. Predictable names make predictable people, and predictable people make safe bets.

I would say that it may appear like discrimination but it is actually an understanding of human behavior, the woman is more likely to just accept the offered starting wage/salary while the man is more likely to negotiate so to avoid the headache that is negotiating they offer a higher starting salary/wage to males, if more women negotiated their salaries/wages (a disagreeable behavior) they probably wouldn't continue this tactic.

@@attemptedunkindness3632 being woman =/= long name. wtf you on?

@@Sumoniggro how is this still not discrimination?

@@arcioko2142 Because there is no system in place that prevents women from negotiating their salary, if they would negotiate they would get a higher salary, the onus is on the individual.

And? That doesn't disprove anything the video said. The wage gap is still pure nonsense.

@@1685Violin Okay. The video is about how the wage gap is a natural consequence of the differing incentives between men and women. Thing is, what you're incentivised to do is largely dependant on the society you live in. Let's say, for example, my motivation is to be respected by the people around me. In the modern western world, I might become a doctor or an engineer; in medieval europe, I would become a priest; in the roman republic I would become a soldier. In each case my motivation is the same but what I am incentivised to do is based on the society that I live in. Now one of the main claims of the video is that women who want to have children are incentivised to look for a job that's more flexible and that usually means a job that pays less. This only makes sense if you assume that the way our society is currently, is the only way that it can be. It's entirely possible to build a society in which jobs are flexible and pay well. This is a problem caused by the way we as a scoiety view work and the incentives of those who employ workers. The wage gap is one of the consequences of this broader problem.

Okay, prove there is a causal relationship between actually existing social pressures about sex roles and the wage gap. Good luck. Also, you might need to prove there aren't counterbalancing social pressures to those aforementionned. Good luck again.

@@americafy9195 Well, I'm not a sociologist so I'm not well versed in this area. However, this pamphlet from the Trades Union Council has a lot of information about the gender pay gap in the UK (where I live) including relevant statistics. www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/Pay_and_Parenthood_Touchstone_Extra_2016_LR.pdf It's also helpful to bear in mind that women are responsible for the vast majority of unpaid labour within most households (childcare, cooking, cleaning, etc.). This can be seen in this Office of National Statistics report from 2016. www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/articles/womenshouldertheresponsibilityofunpaidwork/2016-11-10

Then, it's not about direct discrimination against women doing the exact same job, it's about cultural habits according to you. You can discuss if that's the case and if it would be better to push culture in a different direction (more so than it's already being done, as women are more and more incentivized to build a career instead of being caregivers), but it's a different discussion. @@thebigreddub

Can't tell if you're being disingenuous or not. Its a percentage. A dollar has 100 cents in it. The claim is that for every dollar earned, a woman earns only $0.70. That is 30% less than a man. Yes, when you scale it down into the smallest amounts, thats 7 pennies for every dime a man earns. Trivial at that point, but when you scale it back up, thats $7,000 for a man's $10,000. Thats THEIR claim, which is bullshit for numerous reasons I have no need of going into here. Also, "Living wage" is a nebulous term meant to abuse a person's empathy for others in an attempt to win support for whatever arbitrary number gets thrown around. First it was $13. Then it was $15. Now its $20. They just keep adding to it and calling it a 'living wage.' It means nothing other than "Pay people far more for the same skill-less, mundane work they're already doing."

1. States and even counties have different costs of living. I did the math based off my own expenses, which are probably a bit high considering I live in Alabama and I like to keep my house cool, and it is possible to live off less than $15/hour or $30k/year. It's not going to be pleasant. You'll have to be disciplined in what you spend money on, but it is possible as long as you don't have debt to worry about. $30k/year in California or NYC isn't anywhere near enough to cover rent. 2. Companies have an incentive to pay their employees enough to keep them. No matter how much experience an employee has and how little skill is needed, there's going to be a learning curve while they are brought up to speed on how things work in the company and are trained on the various systems they'll need to know to do their jobs. Companies also have to pay for mandatory gear (and honestly I think any company that wants things standardized should consider it as part of investing into their workforce, but that's a different topic) The more turnover you have, the more overhead you have because you're having to spend more hours training new employees. You also risk burning out your management staff, which if you lose them causes even more headaches. Minimum wage in Alabama is $7.25, but most of the job postings I'm seeing for fast food places are offering $12/hour. Whether or not they are actually paying that is a different matter entirely, but the point is that those places are offering wages that are a good deal higher than the minimum, and pretty close to what I was making at my old job. If you do even a half-way decent job, you're likely to get raises, and if you're willing to work extra shifts, you can also get overtime (assuming that you're working full time) which bumps that up to $18/hr. It's not get rich kind of money, but where I live, at least, it's enough to survive on your own while you build up skills or look for other job opportunities. 3. Not all labor is equal. Working a cash register, using a mop, and washing dishes in a sink are not high skill jobs. This isn't a dunk on the people who do those jobs, but you can learn most of what you need in less than thirty minutes and they are jobs that almost anyone can do. Basically, the pool of people that a company can pull from to fill those positions is huge compared to more skilled positions. If you want better pay, look at where there aren't enough people to fill the need. The US is in dire need of tradespeople like machinists, welders, plumbers, carpenters, and mechanics. Most companies are willing to take people on as apprentices or pay for them to go to a trade school. The work is hard, but I'd argue that it's a more fulfilling career than most white collar ones. 4. Raising the minimum wage isn't going to solve an issue with cost of living. It adds a fixed overhead cost that a business owner has to pay in order hire extra hands, which means that business owner either needs to accept lower margins or raise their prices. People like to harp on business owners and corporations being greedy, but there is case law on the books that a company has to maximize shareholder returns. Not raising prices not only opens up the owner or CEO to more risk, but also opens them up to being sued. So the increased costs of raising minimum wages, which causes everyone's wages to go up since a company is going to want to keep people it's trained working for them since they've already invested time and money into them, leads to increased prices to cover those costs. In addition, even the company doesn't need to lay off anyone, they now have to pay more for each employee that they grow by, slowing growth and disincentivizing companies from hiring new people. Sure, you may not lose jobs, but you're also going to have a harder job growing the job market. This means more unemployment which leads to further strains on government budgets as they try to pay for welfare programs with a reduced tax base. So no, raising minimum wage isn't the answer. Letting the market do it's think is more likely to be beneficial in the long run rather than trying to meddle with it and mucking things up.

Men have better reflexes and mouvement coordination on average

He's mispronouncing spatial, showing us mens' lack of language processing. I assumed it was an intentional joke

@@gladman1it’s just reading a script and forgetting to double check pronunciation. Try reading out loud and see how often you mess up. Then do it into a microphone. Now imagine re-recording a line read a few times. Corrections happen less and less as you add more stuff to focus on.

yet they use most of that processing power to communicate warped ideas about everyday life that are objective bullshit lol they're not too great at processing intellectual honesty lol

Don't argue fallacy fallacy(that an argument is completely baseless as at least a portion of it is based on a fallacy,) especially when you aren't actually explaining what fallacies were made.

Chill dude. Her name Youva Gottanochance.

@@MisterRose90 it was kind of a joke.... you must be great at parties.

@dozyproductionss my response was a joke, too. You must be great at parties. We'd get along well.

@@MisterRose90can you guys just get a room already

If hi tler said he prefered orange juice over lemonade it doesnt mean orange juice is automatically evil.

Seems like that makes it even better, as it's using their terms against them verbatim. They can't refute the definition if they are the ones that set it.