The wild power of aggregation theory 

Yes but no.

I miss the old days!! What happened to kids playing outside like we did, this generation sits behind screens.. next generation what will they be doing?

Yeah

Terrifyingly so

@@impendio Just yes

so that you visit the site again and again but instead buy other stuff. *hypothesis*

I mean, even if an internet business can break the traditional laws of physical constraints, there a finite amount of production capacity in the world. I guarantee if given the demand, if there were PS5s and RTX 3080s available from the supplier, they’d definitely sell them

My dog looks just like the one in your pfp!

Paradigm?

The place we always come to "The lock"

You don't understand irony.

Tesla Yes, because that’s where all the people are. I wish we could do something about it but till there is regulation or another competitor, we have to deal with it.

@@CH-vm6cq Well, if you understood the point of the video, you'd see the irony in it.

Its and old irony. Was said that the the capitalism aways win, since the socialist still needed to pay for the panflets e the rent of the meeting room. Google have no problem if someone makes a youtube video criticizing them, since they make money of that video.

You get free express quality backups still even after the high quality uses your storage

Check out "CNBC explains", it's basically the same type of videos but they've got a head start on the subject(s)...

yup and as the customers here we are talking about whats the water quality when they own the pipes

@@voidmayonnaise dude that's so true too!! Crazy how bad it is

You know how open source goes, you either make it and get it famous IMMEDIATELY or someone will just steal it and sell it and call it their own

x2

I was like wtf when he said that. The rest of the video is pretty good tho

Only that their ultimate motivation to solve problems is not helping the customers, but growing in power by helping customers, so they reach more of them.

@@atrombonist I don't see anything wrong about that. They are businesses. Not nonprofit organizations.

@@jamuojisan Just be aware that they are not your friend but you are their revenue generator

@@atrombonist just try to live without them.

You should be more afraid of facebook amazon apple google twitter and mainstream media as they are all friends instead of fearing Bill Gates

because they have got the dough

Yeah, Apple has a much better defense against the accusations that can be levied against other "big tech." Their superpower is their brand. As you said, even though Android has many more users (who download more apps), Apple customers spend more on apps. Nevertheless, Apple have been abusive in their treatment of developers, and it wouldn't hurt to make that harder for them to do.

But anyways Apple just creates their own Walmart (the Apple ecosystem). The probability for a loyal customer (that purchased an iPhone, AirPods, Macbook, iPad, Apple Watch and tons of exclusive macOS/iOS apps) to quit theit ecosystem for Android leads to zero when one spent too much for the "magic". I find services of the big tech companies very convenient since it's big and global. No one wants to use tons of messengers when there is one/two where all of your friends are. No one wants to search and download another local taxi service while travelling. But the closed ecosystems might be evil. My opinion is that key is to oblige big tech to make the services compatible with each other. Not to forcefully split them into smaller businesses.

👀

DuckDuckGo is buying search results from google, but without giving it any important data. In theory you should be getting similar results on both, but in reality you will always get better results from google because they can customise the results for you.

@@TheBalkanSpy DuckDuckGo uses Bing.

@@ushdhyxywb Actually it buys from Bing, Yahoo, Yandex and Google. But if you go and have a look at their (very transparent) data. You will find thad during 2019, about 87% of searches they bought were from Google...

then its up to the population, which today is bordering on idiocracy(2006)

While I agree with your sentiment, should we judge them by their assumed intentions, or the real world effects, the companies they are the face of, have?

@@Voulltapher both. Remember that their companies all have very different effects on the world. I can't think of two companies more different than google and amazon, for example

@@WalterGirao they generate data and business for each other.

Either they find your country too small or too complex logistically or too risky in legal terms (licensing, taxes, etc)

@@anvarzhonzhurajev2393 There are smaller countries with Amazon so that's not the case I don't have much information about the second thing you said but I think the reason why they avoid stepping in is the competition. We already have a site which has same role as Amazon. Would they be able to compete ? Probably not, that's why they stay away.

lol, everyone wants a piece of the capitalism pie, until their share gets too small.

Facebook owns Instagram and WhatsApp

@@benjaminltang Yes but Instagram and WhatsApp users don't get those fabled event invitations that apparently everyone is using.

LOL good catch