Even if there was "scientific miracles", it doesen't change the fact that it could be inspired by satan, a fallen angel with greater knowledge than us humans.
@@michaelg4919even if Satan didn't know that (debatable - I think) doesn't mean much in the way of him knowing way more than any human about science and such. Do we know for sure that he didn't know Jesus would rise again? I've heard Heiser speculate on that but just wondering if it can be proven. Peace
SUMMARY [86:6-8] "Now let man but think from what he is created! He is created from a drop emitted -Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs:" "Briefly, the Holy Qur’an is absolutely right in using the above words literally and scientifically too. All knowledge is in the Qur’an but some intellects are the one who fail to grasp it. The above mentioned physiological mechanism of ejaculation of the fluid and how the nerve impulses are discharged from the lumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord that lie within the first two lumbar vertebrae, which are below the 12th ribs and above the remaining lumbar and sacral vertebrae, the backbone. Is there any doubt what the Qur’an uniquely summarizes it, the nerve impulses are discharged “between the backbone and the ribs”?""
@@darkwolf7740hes not even mentioned in the ayah, it just says the hour has come and the moon has split in 2. Nothing indicates it was muhammad doing the splitting. Its only in the Hadith which come over 250 years after the quran.
"The quaran claims its revelations whilst in reality it took other preexisting information, got it wrong, and never gave credit" Well that explains the whole history of the Turks
This is false the claim that prophet Mohammed did not know how to read or write is supported by both Muslim and non Muslim historical sources. Muslims keep loving Jesus and some Christian’s keep disrespecting our traditions in return
Comparing ancient greeks with momo is like comparing rocket scientists with a caveman (even saying momo is like a caveman it would be an insult for the caveman)
Well, he did meditate in the Hira cave when Angel Gabriei came to him with revelation, I wonder if he was hallucinating, wonder if he became hungry and took some mushrooms or ate whatever was growing in that cave, felt weird and saw some visions cause shrooms cause hallucinations and came running down to his suger momma Khadija saying "cover me cover me" cause i feel cold.
@@KimberlyRuth-y8b Meeting Jabreel with 600 pairs of wings, a messenger for a 3 eyed god on throne held in space by goats is an overdose of something . ..
Not surprise, a pedophile, the contradictions on how to treat christians, the inaccurate stories, the inaccurate quotes, Ezra being worshipped as Messiah never happened, and the most ridicolous one, the Zu Al-Qarnayn part wich proves Quran is false no matter where you see it
I showed this to a sceptic friend of mine, and he said watching it was like that line from Lord of the Rings: *both of us looking at the Quaran* "Never thought I'd be fighting side by side with a Christian" "How about fighting side by side with a friend?" "Aye I could do that"
As a Muslim scholar, I must respectfully disagree with many of the claims and interpretations presented in this critique of Quranic scientific miracles. While I appreciate the effort to critically examine religious texts, I believe this analysis misrepresents Islamic teachings and oversimplifies complex theological and scientific issues. Let me address some of the key points: Embryology in the Quran: The Quranic description of embryonic development should be understood in its historical and linguistic context. While it's true that Greek philosophers like Aristotle and Galen made significant contributions to embryology, the Quranic account offers unique insights: The term "alaqah" used in the Quran (23:14) has multiple meanings, including "leech-like", "suspended thing", and "blood clot". Modern embryology has shown that the early embryo does indeed resemble a leech in shape and its attachment to the uterine wall. The Quran's description of the "mudghah" stage as "chewed-like" accurately reflects the somite pairs that form in the embryo, giving it an appearance similar to teeth marks in chewed substance. While it's true that bone and muscle formation overlap, the Quranic description of bones being clothed with flesh (23:14) can be understood as a simplified explanation of a complex process, focusing on the visible appearance of the embryo's development. The Big Bang in the Quran: The interpretation of Surah 21:30 as referring to the Big Bang is not universally accepted among Islamic scholars. However, the verse does present a concept of the universe's origins that aligns with modern cosmological theories: The idea of the heavens and earth being "joined together" before being "separated" does bear some resemblance to the concept of the universe expanding from a singularity. While this verse alone doesn't prove divine origin, it presents a cosmological view that was not common in 7th century Arabia. Water and Life: The Quranic emphasis on water as essential for life (21:30) goes beyond simply observing that living things need water. It presents water as the origin of all living things, which aligns with modern scientific understanding of life's origins in aqueous environments. Iron from the Heavens: The Quranic verse about iron being "sent down" (57:25) can be interpreted metaphorically or literally. If taken literally, it aligns with the scientific fact that iron on Earth originated from supernovae. While ancient cultures may have associated iron with the heavens, the Quranic verse presents this in the context of a broader discussion about the purpose and uses of iron, suggesting a more comprehensive understanding. Mountains as Pegs: The Quranic description of mountains as pegs (78:6-7) is more nuanced than simply stating mountains have roots. It suggests a stabilizing function, which, while not exactly matching modern plate tectonic theory, does reflect an understanding of the Earth's crust that was not common knowledge in 7th century Arabia. Stars as Missiles: The verses describing stars as missiles (67:5) should be understood in their context. Many scholars interpret this as referring to meteors or shooting stars, not actual stars. This interpretation doesn't contradict modern astronomical knowledge. Human Reproduction: The Quranic verse about the origin of reproductive fluids (86:5-7) uses the term "between the backbone and the ribs", which some scholars interpret as referring to the entire trunk of the body, including the reproductive organs. This interpretation aligns with the fact that embryonic gonads develop in the dorsal wall of the abdomen. Hadith on Child Resemblance: The hadith about child resemblance based on which parent's discharge comes first is not considered a scientific explanation but rather a simplified way of addressing the question of heredity in terms that 7th century Arabs could understand. Sex Determination: The hadith about an angel determining the sex of a baby should be understood in a spiritual context, not as a scientific explanation. It doesn't contradict the biological process of sex determination but speaks to the belief in divine involvement in human creation. Hygiene and Medical Advice: The hadiths about flies and camel urine should be understood in their historical and cultural context. Modern research has shown that some fly species do carry antimicrobial substances, and camel urine has been found to have some medicinal properties. However, these hadiths are not considered universal medical prescriptions in Islamic thought. Adam's Height: The hadith about Adam's height is considered by many scholars to be allegorical, not literal. It may be understood as emphasizing human potential and spiritual stature rather than physical size.
Bees has 16 chromosomes and Chapter the Bee is Chapter 16 ! This is just one, and there are SO MANY MORE pattens of 16 and even 32 too ( Male BEE = 16 chromosome, Female BEE = 32 chromosomes ) just regarding this topic of BEES and Chapter 16, The Bee alone !
Back in the 90s and early 2000s if any of you all know They used to say Niel Armstrong Hear their prayer in the Moon while There is no sound in space 🤣
@@uros2623 If you were mostly talking about those who convert to Islam why did you say 2 billion when virtually all of those people grew up as Muslims?
Also when he "splits the moon", you'd think someone else would see it right? I mean, for Jesus's death, when darkness fell, scientists in Asia reported an eclipse happening right then. One would think that at least someone would have noticed if the WHOLE MOON split in half.
The ENTIRE WORLD DIDN'T SEE THE MOON SPLIT IN HALF WHEN MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BEEN STARING AT THE SKY AT ANY GIVEN TIME. islam is comical and it doesn't explicitly say that allah's partner mahamed split the moon in half i believe...
I am from a Muslim country, we study these types of stuff, and most of us students hate it since we are all forced into learning them, but the thing they told us abt Mohammed splitting the moon was to prove the people which were against Allah that he actually existed and Mohammed was his profit, of course there's also some of our religious teachers saying that the reason some parts of Quran is messed up is because (if I'm correct) Mohammed heard the words of allah from an angel, and told them to a person which could write, and that could've changed some parts of it, but again, I'm not defending Islam for some of the weird stuff it has
They're converting because it's trendy. They want something to fight (Islamaphobia), so they convert thinking it's a hip, foreign, non-white version of Christianity
@@ohwni Yes and his arguments are not strong, takes hadiths as his source which is not reliable at all, uses translations of the quran and doesn’t give all of the context, or interpret badly the verses Did i answer your question?
Thank you for always dropping bangers. I was wondering if you could would touch a bit more on the nature of God from the Muslims perspective vs the Christian/ Jewish perspective
You've done plenty on atheist, Mormonism and Islam. How about Judaism, Hinduism and buddhism? It's really interesting learning about other faiths and how to proselytise to them
Honestly? Buddhism is probably the faith you don't need to criticize. They worship no false gods(Buddha never said to worship him, and while Bodhisatva Guanyin is sometimes said to be a Goddess, that's not canon), and they're generally good.
@@maxmccarrick5671 R. Isaac citing R. Ammi stated: If the woman emits her semen first she bears a male child; if the man emits his semen first she bears a female child; Babylonian Talmud, Nidda 31a
"Bloodshot eyed wojak Muhammad isn't real, he can't hurt you" Testify videos: --- In all seriousness, thank you for your work. I don't always agree with your conclusions, but I do appreciate your works, diligence, and commitment to a very intellectual approach to Christianity. God bless!
Brother he doesn't know that Mohammad was not able to read or write . so how can he copy this things ? he indirectly claimed that mohammad was expert in greek language, Hebrew, encient babylonian language and so on . how funny
@@TestifyApologetics OMG 😂😂😂 you have to consent to be civil before you can comment. Yet here you are mocking billions of people 😄😄😄 its always the W rage hahaha with the double standards. Anyway.. its funny how ya'll make these rage bait stuff for views. Lol 😆🤣😂 well ppl need to eat! Thanks for the laughs !!
Cmon man, Muhammad compared to Jesus Is not reliable at all, If I had a choice to choose between Muhammad and Jesus based of their contexts and stories, I would rather pick Jesus, For I want to serve a live Savoir
@@stephengray1344 yes, i see all over the internet saying the bible is false cause it was altered and that Jesus didn't really die, its just an alternation of our Biblie and many more blah blahs. And i cant find information
@@Petru-r9b The copying process for the gospels was completely decentralised, and our earliest manuscripts are exceedingly early compared to other documents from the classical era (we have gospel fragments from the second century and complete copies from the third century). And countless citations of the gospels in the writings of the Church Fathers. This means that any major alteration would have to have been made extremely early on for text critics to detect it. Something as major as "Jesus didn't really die" would have to have been edited out in the first generation of copies for all four gospels. If you want to look for more information on this there's an old Mike Winger playlist called evidence for the Bible and several of the videos deal with this. Or you can read James White's book The King James Only Controversy which is a good introduction to text criticism. Muslims making this claim are basically contradicting their own scripture. The Quran repeatedly claims that the Christians of Mohammed's day have authentic scriptures called the Injeel (the Arabic version of the Greek word for gospel). And that Christians should judge Mohammed's message by how well it measures up to that. Since we have so many copies that pre-date Mohammed we know for a fact that the gospel text the Christians of 7th century Arabia had was the same text that we have today. Watch any video on the Islamic Dilemma for more info on this.
There is a song here on YT parodying 'My Favorite Things' from which one line always jumps into my head whenever I hear apologists proclaiming the scientific illumination in the quran: "The quran is perfect, Allah never fibs, semen comes from between backbone and ribs..." Never fails to make me laugh.
From the saying of God Almighty: (My sperm-drop came forth from my rib and my backbone) instead of (Man is from my sperm-drop, then he came forth from between my rib and my backbone), meaning the human being is the fetus in his mother’s womb now, then we will return on the Day of Resurrection, meaning he will be resurrected as a new body.
Let's not forget that the quan copies virtually stories upon stories upon verses upon verses upon concepts upon concepts and there's not supposed to be any book like the quran? It's the most COMICAL THING I have EVER SEEN!!
Testify, since this video will bring anti theists and muslims saying: "Well, the bible has scientific errors too!" I suggest you do a video on those as well, and explaining them.
Thing is apart from some evangelical fundamentalists, Christians generally don't claim the Bible has scientific miracles like muslims do. Muslims do but even top academics admit it has none.
@@Tungsteinn Death is irreversible, so according to science, Jesus is dead. Heaven, hell, and God cannot be proven true through empirical evidence. Snakes can't talk, and enchantments defy the laws of physics. I could spend an entire day discussing the unscientific aspects mentioned in the Bible...
1:00 Perhaps more importantly, the Quran makes no mention of the fertilization of the ovum by spermatazoa, which other ancient scientists didn't know about either. It seems to reflect the idea that babies are made directly from semen, a common misconception in ancient embryology. Something similar can be seen in Surah at-Tariq ayah 6. Of course, semen simply carries the spermatazoa which themselves develop into embryos, but ancient scientists seemed to believe that humans are basically just hardened semen.
The bible actually does have scientific miracles. In Revelations 21:15-21 12 gemstones are used to build the new Jerusalem. “The first was jasper, the second sapphire, the third agate, the fourth emerald, 20 the fifth onyx, the sixth carnelian, the seventh chrysolite, the eighth beryl, the ninth topaz, the tenth chrysoprase, the eleventh jacinth, the twelfth amethyst.” The property that these gems share is that their crystal structure is anisotropic. When you observe anisotropic crystals with a microscope using cross polarised light the show all the colours of the rainbow, whereas isotopic crystals like diamond or ruby behave like a polarising filter meaning at certain angles, cross polarised light would make them appear black. Nobody knew about this phenomenon until centuries later and John the apostle sure as heck didn’t know about it either
@christianfreedom-seeker934 So? All 12 gems are anisotropic. Whether it's symbolic or not doesn't hide the weird coincidence that all the gems mentioned are anisotropic.
Look iam onther religion iam from norway look your not cool imagine someone making fun of your religion you will be pissed same as me just respect them there all same spiecies like us
Hello, testify! I have 2 questions, one is about the inaccuracy of the LXX and how the church fathers relied on it, and the issue of about the authorship of Timothy and Titus can you answer one of them, it would be much appreciated! if you'd like I can send you my argument of the LXX so you can understand my objection better.
I discuss the pastorals here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zlRGlVrmqm0.html LXX is fine, but I don't have content on that. I don't really focus on OT issues at the moment.
@@TestifyApologetics Oh thank you! For the LXX the issue I uphold is the LXX is unreliable and incorrect translation. This is only compounded when you see no church father could read Hebrew except Jerome. This means ONLY post Jerome is reliable. Another objection I hold is Isiah 7:14 translation of the word עַלְמָה (Almah) to virgin rather than young women. (Note: I am a native Hebrew speaker)
@@Dee-nonamnamrson8718 That argument is an appeal to assumption. Unless you can prove social standards in the antiquity of Israel equivocated virgins and young women as synonymous.
@@maxmccarrick5671 LXX was used by Jesus. modern PROTESTANT scholars literally admit that. your version of the bible came 800 to 1000 after jesus lived and died and even if you push date down , you wil atmost get 100 to 200 after jesus lived and even then we don't know for sure because jews debated eachother which books are inspired and which aren't and if you add some signs of their bias like removing virgin birth to young women you will see big problem with jewish translation. Really man seek information out, early church fathers and jesus himself used LXX so why you don't listen to verison of old testament that god himsef used?
Here in India online Mulims claim two 'scientific theories' in Quran. First is Embryology and second is - Muhammad predicted that deep ocean is dark! 😂
As a christian who has studied the Quran, I must say that the strongest piece of evidence FOR it is the way that it is written. Islam claims that Muhammed couldn't read or write, and while that may be false, it doesn't change how absolutely beautifully written the Quran is. If you could make a video on the linguistic structure of the Quran, that would probably be the slam dunk for anyone who has read it with sincerity.
@@KadeKreuger thats the best you can think of? Lol even secular texts from the similar regions the quran was written was written more beautifully than the quran. And if the argument is "its beautiful therefore it could be true" is like saying an attractive person is way more trustworthy because theyre eye candy lol
I could perhaps shed some light on this. Since you have studied the Quran, you likely are aware that many of the stories found in it are plagiarized. Well, this also accounts for a lot of the Quran’s “beauty”, many beautiful passages from it are just reskinned Christian hymns about Jesus, ironic right? And on a personal note, as someone who has also studied the Quran, even buying and reading part of a physical copy, its not all that beautiful. About 99% passages consist of “X is among the wrongdoers, and surely a most grievous punishment awaits them.” or “Allah is the most X and the All-Y (99 times over)” And for the little parts of the Quran that could possibly be original, the “eloquence” just sounds like an 8th grader trying to do an impression of an English aristocrat, you can so obviously tell Muhammed was trying to use big words and fancy phrases where they add nothing to the text. There is even a Hadith where Muhammed says that he has been blessed with eloquent speech, so we can infer from this he was already somewhat known for his unique style of language, not exactly hard to translate those skills into your “revelations”. Lastly, even if the Quran really was more beautiful and brilliantly eloquent than any human can do (which its not), it can easily be explained as the work of a fallen angel, evil spiritual beings with far greater knowledge and skill than us. Consider the voice we hear from the one TRUE God in the Bible, it is firm, still, and plain, God feels NO need to impress us with fancy words and poetics, when he speaks in first person in the bible, its always in a way the reader can understand, firm, commanding, yet still and plain. Only Satan and his minions feel the need to flaunt with poetics. Hope this helps.
Let me be clear, I am not talking about the use of big words, anyone can write big words. But if you look at the Quran in arabic, there are many beautifully written verses that are read the same both forwards and backwards, and has many other amazing literary features which Muhammed did not call attention to, it was only when it was studied many years later that these things were discovered. As for the argument of the Quran perhaps being the work of a demon collaborating with humans, this IS possible, but not at all conclusive. Let's not take away from an interesting discussion by dismissing it as "satanic" without any solid proof.
If one attempts to debunk all religious texts with a consistant methodology, one might arrive at science. If one picks a favourite ideology first, one might just end up with religion, and by picking methodology second, one becomes an apolegetic.
@@briandiehl9257 'very' isn't enough, im talking about a consistant methodology. I wrote comments on all the videos before too, can't say im impressed by the consistany. Every rule one has should be used to consistantly across all evidence. One would probably arrive at regular ol' science if one did this, but im open to new approaches.
'But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,' ~ 1 Peter 3:15
This vid: Everything was well known centuries before Muhammad. Ok Just think that a man in the harsh conditions of the Arabian desert invents a verse like this, "And from water we created every living thing!" Absolute Mic drop and destroys this entire video
The problem is, there is absolutely no proof that Muhammad said these things. He never wrote down one single word, the Qu'uran was written after his death. Oh, sorry I should have said: Qu'uarans. Because there were many different versions, at least ten of them. But then a caliph burnt them all and left one, that he liked the best. It is not exactly proving anything about Muhammad. But let's say, it is not a copy. Okay. But Muhammad said a lot of things about the Bible which are false. The Bible that even he considered holy. To get out of that loop muslim scholars say the Bible was corrupted, but it is not true. The finding of the dead see scrolls pove that the Bible was almost the same two thousand years ago as now. And by the way, the Bible that was available in his time is the same as today. So, if he said to the jews, that you have the Torah, obey it, and Christians have the Gospels, obey it, he was talking about the Bible of today. Which has nothing about him or any other non jewish prophet, and which contradicts almost everything he teaches.
@@nikolettakondi5679 Your claims are extremely false. The Quran was revealed during Muhammad PBUH's life, over 23 years to be exact. You don't even have the real bible in the original language, how is it the TRUE ONE WORD OF GOD?
@@f4football322 Are you arguing with history?Uthman ibn Affan burnt all the Qu'urans, he only left his one. And he was no god or prophet. You cannot be sure that the Qu-uran you have is the words of Muhammad. And what original language are you talking about? The Bible was revealed to the hebrews, they wrote it in hebrew. The Gospels were written to everybody, so it was written in the lingua franca of the age: koine greek. The God of Abraham, Isac and Jacob selected the jews. All the prophets and Jesus were jewish. Muhammad had nothing to do with this God. His words and his teachings contradicted the Bible that he named as holy.
Love the videos, could you make a video debunking the alleged miracles Allah performed that are mentioned in the Quaran such as him splitting the moon?
thank you so much for this man, i wrote it all down in a wordpad called: exposing islam. i got plenty of evidence , from some like sam shamoun, godlogic, speakercorner's bob and now you. again, highly appreciated. this kind of information is invaluable.
dsomething to note about Adam being 90 feet, Adam is made identical to the image of allah, so the mulsim god is 90 feet, has 2 right hands, loins, 3 or more eyes, it just keeps getting worse, but what is bad is he by these verses has a shape 💀
The Quran is not a book of science. The quran gives very concise descriptions about many scientific phenomena. Also, the Quran uses the arabic word مصابيح in chapter 67 verse 5. The word مصابيح means lantern i.e. any source of light. So the Quran cannot be restricted in the meaning of that word to just refer to stars. This therefore makes it evident that the Quran did not get the terminology wrong as meteorites can also be a source of light as it experiences friction upon entry into the earths atmosphere although it (the Quran) is concise and does not focus on science
@@ChaiKitty7779 Islam rejects the trinity because they believe "Allah" to be one unitary God. They don't believe in a God the Father, God the Son, or the Holy Spirit. They just believe in God, Allah.
Regarding the verse about the formation of the fetus, could it not be that the lump of flesh is the flesh in which the bone is formed, since the flesh intended in the verse is the formation of muscles in a manner consistent with the bone? As for the male semen, the testicles are nourished by nerves and blood supplies from places extending to the lower spine. The nerve network that nourishes the testicles comes from areas near the lower spine (sacrum), which may explain the connection between the sacrum and the testicles. Mountains actually act like pegs according to the concept of isostasis and tectonic equilibrium, which could fit the Quranic description. However, this description should be understood in a rhetorical context, because in modern science, there are approaches that show that mountains play an important role in the equilibrium of the Earth’s crust, which reinforces the idea that mountains act as pegs or supports. Speaking about scientific miracles in general, it does not mean that the Qur’an was the first to give this information, but rather it corrects it. Yes, there are those who thought the same as what was written in the Qur’an, but the Qur’an did not say that no one thought about or stated these matters. Also, you should talk in an upcoming video about the numerical miracle in the Quran, because I found it very convincing, Since Muhammad (May God bless him and grant him peace) was illiterate.
Great man You are doing a great job on behalf of many Christians and let me just say that you have taught me a lot after I used to doubt. God bless you.❤❤❤
The Quran has no scientific miracles. All the verses that seem to try and talk about scientific stuff were already known before Islam was created. Try and read about one of Muhammed’s companion called Al-Hārith ibn Kalada. He was a physician who was knowledgeable about such stuff.
This doesnt prove anything that the video claims. If you want to debate, then debate the problem that have been shown in the video. Not just blindly claim that your prophet is illiterate therefore all of its content is true. That doesnt make any sense the world of science. No wonder your people still act like people from 600 AD. Your reasonal thinking doesnt even developed and you cant even bring any reasonable reason to a debate. Go educate yourself and learn in a scientific way. Not like a caveman that live in the years 600
@@TestifyApologetics I appreciate your videos you do on islam, but you should definitely do a deep dive into Catholicism for your own sakes as it's not Christian.
Personally I don’t like to use the Hadith as a source because the Hadith was recorded a minimum of 200 years after Muhammad’s death. So even if it’s in Sahih Al Bukhari, there’s no way of knowi mg if Muhammad actually said that. However, the scientific mistakes that the Quran makes are perfectly valid for criticising.
Perhaps Mohammed was originally a Christian Prophet to the Arabs, but the wicked changed his teachings and now people are desperate to prove him a Prophet from their traditions? Isaiah 65:1 and James 1:5
