Тёмный

Time and phase alignment with a USB microphone - a REW tutorial 

RAW-CAt
Подписаться 8 тыс.
Просмотров 11 тыс.
50% 1

This is a video version of a document made by Peter Hermanns, you can find the document for download here:
/ 858901878832321
In this video I demonstrate how to time and phase align your system using REW and a USB microphone such as UMIK-1.
If you would like to, now you have to ability to support my passion directly on Patreon:
/ rawcat
Alternatively, you can donate directly to my PayPal:
www.paypal.me/pixerix
More testing, more experiments, more fun!

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

 

9 мар 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 135   
@davidtimmerman3121
@davidtimmerman3121 Месяц назад
another gold mine of information. i have none of the necessary equipment to do this, but knowledge is power, and someday...
@valentinguz
@valentinguz 3 месяца назад
Thanks! Peter Hermanns and THANKS RAW CAt!!!
@sinfronterascommunications6506
@sinfronterascommunications6506 4 месяца назад
Beautiful, just beautiful 👏 Thank you for sharing this information and glad I am a Patreon supporter. Personally I felt the video relayed the desired information correctly.
@jaskiratsingh6507
@jaskiratsingh6507 4 месяца назад
Another very informative video. Thanks a ton for knowledge sharing 😊.
@roscoebail5551
@roscoebail5551 4 месяца назад
Thank You Very much for taking the time to make this very helpful and informative video ! The way you explain things is very straight forward and well done. This is pure gold.....
@user-gk1no5wt3n
@user-gk1no5wt3n 4 месяца назад
Thanks for your sharing!You are great!
@ngiczat
@ngiczat 3 месяца назад
Thank you for sharing
@duroxkilo
@duroxkilo 3 месяца назад
sound is fascinating, this is a great channel. i'm about to write a long reply for whoever is interested in the distinction between phase and delay as it's potentially confusing... hope it helps :) the phase shift of a Particular speaker is a delay at a Particular frequency. 90 degrees phase shift at 100Hz is not the same amount of delay in ms as 90 degree shift at 1000Hz. it's a 10x shorter delay in ms because the fq is 10x higher... that's key to internalize. two speakers that are not the same model will have different phase graphs, meaning different delays at different frequencies. (crossovers also alter the phase by a given amount depending on their order, how quick they attenuate the signal) so even if they are aligned in time (say they're positioned in front of you at the same distance) their phases will not be aligned over the entire fq. that means at Some frequencies one of the speakers will have a 'small delay' and play later in time but at Some other frequencies the other one will be behind. it's kind of strange but that's how things are... so just to underline, two different speakers being at the same distance from you and starting to play a sound at the same time is not guaranteed to work together over a frequency range. in that case, there are options on how to make them work best together one being actually time misalignment to a degree that compensates for the delay present in the phase at certain fq. this would align them over a certain frequency but not over the entire frequency range. another option is to delay both speakers by the maximum amount one of them has (at a given frequency) and then adjust the delay for multiple frequency ranges giving a chance to the 'slower' speaker to catch up.. in other words we modify the phase at a particular fq by applying filters that do not change the tone only the phase. (these are called "all pass filters", whatever sound goes in comes out but w/ a slight delay. just as a curiosity, all filters introduce delay measured in degrees, a change in phase. passive crossovers alter the phase depending on their order. EQs in general alter the phase, in fact that's how they work by creating constructive or destructive interference -there are special EQs that only alter the tone or only the phase ) ---------------------------------- in practice: for two or more speakers that are meant to play the same frequency range (say you have 4mids), you want the sound from each one of them to reach you/the mic at the same time. you align them in time w/ your ears being the "finish line". because the speakers are usually identical, the phases will be identical and the the sound reaches you in phase. for two or more speakers that are meant to play different ranges of frequencies (say 4 mids and 1 bass) you want the sound they all play in common, (the crossover frequency range) to reach your ears in phase. and because the speakers are not identical their phases are usually not identical, so the time alignment between the mids and the bass is not the priority but the phase is for a fuller sound. in sound most things are compromises between two or even more aspects. things can't be 'perfect' and the challenge is to trick our ears. one 'perfect' example is having two speakers in a stereo configuration, at different distances and tricking our ears/brains into believing the sound is actually coming from someplace in front of us from a mono sound source. the compromise is that for it to work we can't change our position and if we do the trick doesn't work anymore. so it's far from perfect but we can work w/ it :).
@examplerkey
@examplerkey Месяц назад
Thank you so much for your explanation. When I was young I just turned on the amp and listened to the sound from the speakers thinking that was a great sound, then played with a few bands of equalizer and thought I achieved the best audio. Now it's not the case! Having confused a lot about REW, Sonaworks, USB or XLR mic, audio interface, loopback test, oh God give me a break! A lad went through all the trouble and he said I can't notice a thing! Well I can from listing to his track but I must say the change is very minimal. I could easily get the same sound effect 80% (I guess) with a few bands of software or hardware equalizer. So my question is while all these work scientifically, do I really need to spend hundreds of £££, fine tune every millisecond, every square foot and elevation, corner of just an ordinary room to get the best audio then get stuck or glued in one listening position because moving around so would break the tweaks? After all, don't we have biological delay from eyes to brain or ears to brain that is far slower than the tweaks? It's like above 30 fps we can't see the flicker anymore, so similarly even at the listening position, everything is technically done right, if our ears are not equal (say one side has more ear wax!) the signal is distorted, also the auditory nerve in one side is not exactly the same as in the other one, etc., are these tricks all gimmicky in the end? I'm not saying it doesn't work but the change is very minimal and it's better to put the money at the mouth especially when WW3 looms. 😂
@duroxkilo
@duroxkilo Месяц назад
​@@examplerkey there are many ways to enjoy a hobby and honestly, there are no rules on how to enjoy it. :) there is no 'perfect sound system' and even more importantly it doesn't need to be one in order to make listening a blast. some ppl enjoy building cars, some enjoy driving them fast and some just love to look at them and maybe take it for a ride on a sunday afternoon.. same w/ sound...
@examplerkey
@examplerkey Месяц назад
@@duroxkilo Thank you for your reply. I see cars as a mean to A to B, nothing more. When it comes to audio, if I get a good scoop, I'm satisfied but now I may have to learn some more skills to tune up my speakers or room😆.
@duroxkilo
@duroxkilo Месяц назад
@@examplerkey it's going to be fun :) get some published manual/study/book for educational purposes... most forum discussions are lost in the weeds... nothing wrong w/ forum conversations but take it as that. the 'major sound issues' are almost always room related. ime applying 20 filters to 'correct' the room doesn't do anything good while a little experimenting w/ speaker placement can make a positive improvement. understand what your room does to sound (reflections, room modes), try to eq out the 'ringing modes', don't worry about the dips. room treatment is always the best option but not many ppl/rooms can go that route. when integrating subs always keep in mind that the crossover setting not only changes the frequency but also the phase in that area. sometimes instead of EQing and/or setting long delays a little change in the crossover fq can solve 100 problems. (one of my favorite things are spectrum analyzer apps. they offer so much help understanding what is happening in real time. take Spectroid for example and it's 'waterfall'. one can walk around the room with pink noise and see in real time different locations have different characteristics, or play w/ the sub integration and as i mentioned earlier observe how the crossover fq/delay/eq moves around the dips and peaks)
@examplerkey
@examplerkey Месяц назад
@@duroxkilo I very much value your time and sharing your knowledge that must have taken you for a long time. I will be reading it over and over. Currently I'm looking at the audio interfaces with the aim of measuring speakers and room, as you pointed out. Instead of using a small interface with 2 in 2 out, wouldn't a decent audio mixer also do the job? I mean loopback (not that I understand), more inputs and outputs, lots of knobs to control different parameters, etc. Once gain, thank you very much for your time and willingness to share your knowledge and experience.
@Crt5
@Crt5 4 месяца назад
Thanks for this video! I could never get the loop back and xlr mic working properly to do it
@WBG123098
@WBG123098 29 дней назад
I notice you rarely do the "estimate IR delay' step of Peter's guide, which he says is required at the beginning of every new measurement set, ie between L/R tweets as well as between tweets/mids. Basically to remove the system delay and get accurate measurements, Peter explains to make sure to have the timing offset in the measurement tab be set to 0, do your initial measurement, then 'estimate IR delay', click the middle option 'shift and update timing offset', re-do that same measurement now with the updated system delay removed, then quickly measure the other speaker you are aligning the first one to. So for tweets it'd be first sweep R, second sweep R, third sweep L. Then the same for mids, rears, etc. Then to align them together it'd be first sweep tweets, second sweep tweets, third sweep mids. So on and so forth. Its actually alot more time consuming than this video demonstrates. I'm not sure how accurate your measurements could be if skipping this step entirely, you instead choose to 'set t=0 at cursor' which doesn't avoid the clock drift you get between components when using a usb mic. At least that's my understanding of the process.
@Joe7-ev7ld
@Joe7-ev7ld 4 месяца назад
This will be very informative for a lot of people and I appreciate all your hard work. But after paying out for a Focusrite and XLR mic it would be great if you can do a video using REW as I am more familiar with that software. Keep up the good work !! Thanks !!!
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
If using an audio interface and loopback, the workflow is exactly the same, just use loopback for timing instead of acoustical timing reference. I can make a video about that next week👍
@Joe7-ev7ld
@Joe7-ev7ld 4 месяца назад
@@RAW-CAt That would be great. Thanks 😊
@bugman72
@bugman72 4 месяца назад
I would 2nd that recommendation. Been using Holmimpulse to set time, but seems like REW is a more friendly environment to be able to see time and phase relationship.
@SM-yx5mp
@SM-yx5mp 4 месяца назад
I’d like that tutorial video as well. Loopback using REW
@Moraine128
@Moraine128 4 месяца назад
Awesome video again from you! Only having a UMIK-1 and no focusrite-loopback system this helps a lot to trust the data of the measurements. I wonder, if you have to decide between perfect IR start OR perfect phase angle/slope in crossover point: from a listening experience what is better, or do you do a "in between" IR start AND phase match?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
1kHz is your cutoff. Above 1kHz time, below - phase.
@Titans2138
@Titans2138 4 месяца назад
Thanks, I will try this today. Very good info. I like your amp testing videos as well, and especially your A-B testing of different amps. I’m very curious how much the quality/price of an amplifier actually matters. It seems for subwoofers, it doesn’t matter. And maybe for mids and highs, it doesn’t really matter down to a certain point. I bought a cheap Skar 4 channel to temporarily replace a Diamond Audio D5 300.2 while I repaired it, and I can’t tell the difference in my daily driver. I also wonder if I would be able to tell the difference between tuned EQ and tuned as close as possible without EQ, basically just tuning the levels. I have an alpine 0850x and it takes too long to switch between tuning presets to do a proper A-B test. I also probably can’t tell the difference between hi-res lossless and lossless or even hi-res and Bluetooth.
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
I would say amplifier quality is not as important a factor as reliability and power available.
@Titans2138
@Titans2138 4 месяца назад
@@RAW-CAt I agree. I think it's so crazy how half of the people on r/carAV bash Taramps and Skar and some, for example, claim that their Rockford Fosgate T2500 $1500 amplifier sounds way better. As if they've ever owned anything Skar or Taramps or have done any real A-B testing. They're just confusing newbies and, wrongly, acting like Skar is Boss Audio, or even in the same universe as Boss.
@ollivaan
@ollivaan 4 месяца назад
Great info as always! Iam just wondering when you made video of allpass, where the timing offset value "comes" and in analysis tab what were impulse calculations settigs? If I put estimate IR timing reference, it gives me a "default" value of 39ms, which is very high?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
The timing offset eliminates any delay caused by the gear and puts the impulse at the time 0. Basically you take one sweep and using the overlay window eyeball how far away the impulse starts from 0 mark. And just enter that ms value is the offset. The next sweep you do, the impulse should start at t=0. That works only with loopback by the way.
@ollivaan
@ollivaan 4 месяца назад
Yes, in my hometheater it suggest 39ms, in car 13ms, Iam just wondering how there is so much difference? Have to compare holm impulse and rew in car near future.
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
@@ollivaan maybe your gear has a lot of latency?
@nikolaivdb
@nikolaivdb 3 месяца назад
Hey RAW-CAt, many thanks for all the helpful videos you've uploaded, much appreciated. I just installed my first car audio upgrade, next step will be to try and tune the car myself with the help of your videos. I'm now deciding what mic to get. Since I already have a sound card, would any cheap measurement mic do, does it need to come with a calibration file ? Or would you recommend getting a umik and a tape measure for simplicity? Thanks and take care!
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 3 месяца назад
If you want to do RTA a calibration file is a must. Loom at dayton emm-6, that is not too expensive and has a calibration file. It will be a better value than the umik. As simple as it is, it's better to have a mic for IR measurements.
@nikolaivdb
@nikolaivdb 3 месяца назад
Alright, will go that route. Thanks for the reply!
@PbcMr
@PbcMr 2 месяца назад
Okay, shifted away from trying to do the XLR one as I didn't have a way to access the amp via RCA or high level inputs. Couple questions: 1. I assume this TA should be done after getting the cross overs dialed in? Do you recommend also doing it after EQ? 2. On my vehicle which has a Match Up 10 under the carpet area under the seat, to get a signal from REW into the amp, do I have to connect somehow directly to the amp? The car's headunit does not have a line in, and the Match 10's only optical in is used by the Nav TV Zen V. Is it even possible to get a signal from the PC to the car via the USB input on the car to your knowledge? Otherwise I guess I'm stuck with the auto time alignment function in the AF DSP tool, or old fashioned tape measure. But I don't think I can adjust phase.
@arnabmandal3739
@arnabmandal3739 3 месяца назад
Thanks for so much informative video. Accordingly i made alignment for front midbass and tweeters and same centre imaging is much better than previously made by tape measurement. But when rear passive speakers running along with front active aligned ones, centre imaging is not that good. Whether is it require to time align rear passive speakers and if so then which to consider midbass or tweeter ?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 3 месяца назад
We don't use rear speakers. It messes up the imaging. If you want to use rears, you will have to live with the compromised imaging.
@arnabmandal3739
@arnabmandal3739 3 месяца назад
Thank you for suggestion
@CornHamonica
@CornHamonica 26 дней назад
I enjoyed the video. I am curious about how the measurement method differs when using an audio interface. Thankyou so much ~~
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 21 день назад
The technique is the same. With the i terfs e you don't need to redo the I/O as the loopback provides the timing reference. Basically with an interface is easier with less measurements and less fluffing around.
@feins
@feins 4 месяца назад
I’ve did this method before a few month back when if I tried to match the phase and the end result don’t turn out right. So I ended just to match the impulse rather than phase.
@kostas133kostas
@kostas133kostas 4 месяца назад
@11:00 when you measured the Left reference tweeter you muted the Right tweeter and selected in Rew output L+R. Is there a reason that you didn't select in Rew output just L?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
No reason, you can select only the L. End result will be the same.
@araboharabedian
@araboharabedian 3 месяца назад
to output the chirp to the cars speakers we must be directly hardwired into the dsp ? cant use bluetooth to my headunit?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 3 месяца назад
You can use BT, but that adds neither layer of potential clock drift.
@ddabble
@ddabble Месяц назад
I don't know if anyopne else has experienced this but I've noticed my DSP.2 will andomly changes EQ from time to time when the car starts up. It seems mostly on initial start if it's been left a lone for a while (overnight) but when/if I cut the car off and start it up again , the sound has a lot of mid and likes to digitally clip. Is there a setting that's changing or is my DSP defective? It's using High in from a Renault stock headunit without the Bose amp. I've put everything flat and off on the headunit too.
@ebling24
@ebling24 4 месяца назад
I read the pdf and it says if the dsp does not have virtual channels that you must measure each side individually and then both sides together. I've been trying to wrap my mind around how you would do that. I have a Dayton audio dsp and I'd love any suggestions. Your videos are simply amazing and I'm grateful for your expertise!
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
Sorry, but I am not familiar with the Dayton DSPs and the signal routing options they have.
@ebling24
@ebling24 4 месяца назад
Thanks anyways!
@kostas133kostas
@kostas133kostas 4 месяца назад
Here is what I did (for LHD) based on this very helpful video: 1.Mute all drivers in dsp. 2.Your reference speaker will be Right tweeter so set R as ref output and R as output in REW measure settings. Unmute R tweeter from dsp and leave it unmuted through the whole process. Measure. 3. Now select L as output in REW measure settings. Unmute L tweeter (your R tweeter is always unmuted) and measure. 4. Time align tweeters 5. Clear your measurements in REW and measure again without changing anything in rew or in dsp. You ll get a new measurement of your L TW 6. Mute L TW and unmute L MR in dsp. Measure. 7. Time align L TW with L MR 8. Clear your measurements in REW and measure again without changing anything in rew or in dsp. You ll get a new measurement of your L MR 9. Mute L MR and unmute L MB in dsp. Measure. 10. Time align L MR with L MB Now your whole Left side is time aligned. Then set as reference speaker your Left tweeter and output your Right side in REW. Repeat the steps 3,5,6,7,8,9,10 with L TW always unmuted (reference) and muting/unmuting this time your Right side drivers. Time align your R TW with your R MR, then your R MR with your R MB. When finished, your Right side will be time aligned too. I hope it helps!
@ebling24
@ebling24 Месяц назад
Fantastic thanks so much
@craigw7471
@craigw7471 Месяц назад
I get wildly different timed measurements each time, even for the same driver. I can get 4 ms between tweeters, make that change, re-measure and then they are 15 ms apart in the other direction. All speakers do the same thing even when taking L/R measurements within seconds of each other. Also, every time I measure, I get a Clock error message saying that the ppm were way too high, often over 1,000.
@LMMCAP
@LMMCAP 4 месяца назад
@RAW-CAt So basically I do all this time and phase alignement after setting xovers and a little bit of eq? Or only xovers? Could you point a list of steps what comes first, that would be perfect for a newbie. Thanks in advance 😊
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
Time alignment is the last thing you do. After XO and EQ. Your can find the whole procedure in the document CAT-BUG tuning guide.
@Cathul
@Cathul 4 месяца назад
@@RAW-CAtno, Time Alignment is the very first thing you should do. Time alignment only corrects the different distances of the drivers to the listening position, this doesn't change no matter which filters you use (be it EQ or crossovers or whatever). Setting lowpass filters makes reading the initial rise harder than it needs to be, especially on midbass and sometimes midrange drivers. So, do time alignment first, then do rough levels, crossovers and driver specific EQ, then check phase alignment and set allpass filters if needed to correct additional phase "rotations" after setting the filters and after the initial time alignment. After all this do the global EQ. Time alignment is a do and forget thing. Set it once, leave it alone (for the front system). The reason i do phase alignment instead of aligning the impulse response is that no matter if you have a lowpass or not on the sub, it's impulse response is always very hard to read as it's not emitting a lot of high frequencies even if you don't have a lowpass set. Therefor it's initial rise is stretched out in the graph.
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
@@Cathul Time alignment does not matter and doesn't pay a role untill you measure pairs of drivers. I leave it for last.
@Cathul
@Cathul 4 месяца назад
@@RAW-CAt time alignment just delays drivers based on different physical distance to the listening position. As crossovers and EQ can lead to altered results of the impulse response it’s technically not correct. Therefore every major manufacturer of DSPs or software, no matter if car audio or professional audio does time alignment for physical distances first (Smaart, JL Audio, Mosconi, Audison, Systune whatever) and adjust phase by other means afterwards. If the drivers side tweeter is 30 cm closer to you you have to adjust for those exact 30cm. If you do crossovers and EQ first it might happen that the measurement shows you 40cm. Ask me how I know. 😜
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
@@Cathul another thing for me to test, thanks😉
@seanadams5578
@seanadams5578 4 месяца назад
Why would you use time alignment to phase align instead of aligning time and then using the phase adjustment on the DSP?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
This video was focusing on actual mechanics and workflow using REW, not trying to dive deep into the theory of time alignment.
@19rc69
@19rc69 4 месяца назад
So if we are supposed to set time alignment before xovers, I assume there is a function in REW where we can set the range of frequencies we want the sweep to consist of. Otherwise how do you protect tweeters and midranges from low frequencies? I would hate to make the mistake of sending a full 20-20k sweep to my tweeters inadvertently.
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
Yes, in the "measure" screen you can choose the start and end frequencies.
@PbcMr
@PbcMr 2 месяца назад
Wouldn't you still have an electrical cross over in the tweeter at some lower level? E.g., say half an octave above the Fs and that would work to protect it without having to change the start/end frequences of the sweep? I'd be concerned about forgetting to adjust the 20-20k sweep given the speed you have to work at.
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 2 месяца назад
@@PbcMr I always use 1k crossovers for tweeters.
@19rc69
@19rc69 2 месяца назад
@@RAW-CAt I used this method with great success. I just left the crossovers where I normally have them and it didn’t seem to cause any problems. I had two problems with REW though. 1. The only way I could get the first timing chirp to play when I did a sweep was to start the sweep and immediately stop it and then start it again. I even created a sweep file from REW and tried it that way with no success. The first time I start the sweep it just plays the sweep and then the second timing chirp. It’s a pain in the ass work around because you’re really up against the clock because of the clock drift issue. 2. All of my sweep measurements are truncated at exactly 10k hz. Tried some things I saw on the REW forums but couldn’t fix the problem. I’m running windows 10 on a laptop that originally came with windows 8 so that may be an issue. Do you have any ideas? Thanks again for the great video. It helped my staging a lot.
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 2 месяца назад
@@19rc69 the missing chirp will be due to DSP "timing out" or switching the inputs.ake sure your analogue inputs are set as priority and are always used. The truncated response is REW using your built in laptop mic. Make sure in settings you are choosing the correct microphone.
@dediervan8477
@dediervan8477 4 месяца назад
Hi.. nerijus, what about small RTA mic dayton imm6, output using cable jack 3.5 mm to AUX DSP, is good with this method?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
Yes, you can follow this method as well.
@dediervan8477
@dediervan8477 4 месяца назад
​​@@RAW-CAt I have try, but not good result 😅 I put 0 time delay all chanel, the result reading already same time... 😅😅😅
@dediervan8477
@dediervan8477 4 месяца назад
​@@RAW-CAt Imm-6 can't use this method...
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
​@@dediervan8477use a usb to 3.5mm external audio card.
@dediervan8477
@dediervan8477 4 месяца назад
@@RAW-CAt yes, I use USB soundcar + USB cable extension for imm-6, output using 3.5 mm from imm6 to DSP
@rnenashev
@rnenashev 4 месяца назад
I believe you can play it from the file (and even add timing reference sound to it)
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
Yes you can, but if you have a DSP and can connect directly to it, I don't see the point in playing with files.
@rnenashev
@rnenashev 4 месяца назад
got it, thx@@RAW-CAt
@chriscuthbertson
@chriscuthbertson Месяц назад
Have you tried using a battery powered speaker with an aux input plugged into the headphone jack of the laptop as a reference? I'm guessing this would remove the need to use the tweeter.
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt Месяц назад
Man, there are so many janky ways to do this😀
@rnenashev
@rnenashev 4 месяца назад
What do you recommend to do as the first step? EQ or T&P allignment?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
First step are crossovers. If you are asking what comes firs, EQ or TA, it's EQ. TA is the last step you do.
@Cathul
@Cathul 4 месяца назад
Time alingment first, always! You correct the timing of the drivers based on distance to the listening position. Speed of sound and distance to listening positions are both constants for a given install, so they don't change during the whole process. So get them done first and forget them.
@kaspars804
@kaspars804 4 месяца назад
@@Cathul Would it be correct to do time alignment first, then crossovers and eq, and again time/phase adjust in the end. The logic being that eq and crossovers can shift time/phase so you might want to measure again and go over it once more.
@kaspars804
@kaspars804 4 месяца назад
@@RAW-CAt If you eq individual drivers then TA wouldn't matter but after you've done that if you wanted to further eq driver pairs ,them not being in time could cause issues, no?
@Cathul
@Cathul 4 месяца назад
@@kaspars804you don't touch the time alignment after setting up the initial time alignment. Time alignment is only to correct for different distances of drivers to the listening position. It's a set once, then forget thing. There is only one correct setting for time alignment for a given car, given drivers position and the given driver install locations. Only one setting is correct.
@miri4885
@miri4885 2 месяца назад
Hello, I'm Michael from Germany. the video is great. can you repeat where I can get the PDF from? Thx
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 2 месяца назад
There is a facebook group called "RTA in cars".
@miri4885
@miri4885 2 месяца назад
Thank you very much!
@koonkl6151
@koonkl6151 Месяц назад
Hi, used smlc p100pro ,output coaxial to dsp ?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt Месяц назад
2:50
@koonkl6151
@koonkl6151 Месяц назад
If i only have optical output , can i settings like virtual ?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt Месяц назад
​@@koonkl6151most dsps will have an optical input, so you can use that.
@arnabmandal3739
@arnabmandal3739 День назад
Would you help me how to ssl2 external audio interface is calibrated using room eq wizard
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt День назад
If you want to calibrate the interface, just follow instructions in REW. When you click "calibrate" everything is explained there.
@user-rtoxic1984
@user-rtoxic1984 4 месяца назад
Why did you delay the subwoofer channel? Is the subwoofer in your car located in the front of the cabin?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
Yes, that sub is in the center console, it is the closest speaker in the whole system.
@user-rtoxic1984
@user-rtoxic1984 4 месяца назад
@@RAW-CAt Thank you! It explains everything
@LMMCAP
@LMMCAP 4 месяца назад
@@RAW-CAt what if I have mine sub in the back of a kombi? As it is the longest distance, the sub should be playing first, so which speaker should I set as a reference one? Or how to set it? Could you explain it?
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
​@@LMMCAPyour furthest tweeter still be your reference, as you need a high frequency signal. Align all your front end as in this video and the phase match the front with the sub. You will be delaying the whole front end.
@gonzoe123
@gonzoe123 4 месяца назад
The only thing that keeps frustrating me is my Audiocontrol D6.1200 has left and right channels paired, and no virtual channel routing. So the I/O routing is what I struggle with the most.
@thedizzzle11
@thedizzzle11 4 месяца назад
You can unpair them in the software
@gonzoe123
@gonzoe123 4 месяца назад
@@thedizzzle11 no you can’t. I have to physically re-route my RCA’s to separate left and right.
@Moraine128
@Moraine128 4 месяца назад
Have a similiar issue with my Mosconi 130.4 DSP. You can still do it to some extend, by setting the mixer in your DSP and muting single channels and set outputs L+R in REW while doing measurements to have the timing reference and the measured channel. I have L tweeter as my timing reference, then route R to whatever channel i want to measure.
@gonzoe123
@gonzoe123 4 месяца назад
🤦‍♂️ that makes sense and seems much simpler then screwing around with the RCA’s
@gonzoe123
@gonzoe123 4 месяца назад
I will still run into problems with the tweeters because both will play the reference chirp and sweep. But that is easier to work around.
@henzyk89
@henzyk89 3 месяца назад
Hi mate, wonderful.. Been looking for this kind of method to do TA Anyway, how do u find the result compare to loopback method ?? Which one better ? What i found still confusing is that , We would add delay to phase align between drivers (tweet to mid, sub to bass, ) at XO frequency. It will affecting the time alignment (impulse).. bit confuse on this part. Unable to download the pdf docs from fb group .. Anyway, thanks for your effort making this kind of videos Peace from Indonesia
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 3 месяца назад
For lower frequencies, phase matters more than time. So the dub to midbass integration might look like slightly out of time but in phase, that is what matters. Comparing these two methods will yield the same results as the differences will be in the error margin.
@Motymott99
@Motymott99 3 месяца назад
I didn't fully understand something - why do I need to measure my timing reference element? It's already supposed to be in the right timing.
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 3 месяца назад
Because of clock drift using two separate devices, one for measuring and one for playing sound.
@bennyblanco14
@bennyblanco14 4 месяца назад
About time lol.... jk thank you
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
😄
@farhaadsayed9697
@farhaadsayed9697 Месяц назад
Holy shit this is a process! You need a phd!😂😂
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt Месяц назад
Indeed. With a loopback it's easy peasy. You need to put in much more work when the tools are not adequate for the job.
@f.j.z3213
@f.j.z3213 4 месяца назад
Great video, I realized one important things. Being able to do TA with rew, is pointless without a dsp. The built-in TA and EQ in aftermarket head units are worthless!! Ass im not able to select the individual speakers. The f#$ is the point of having TA adjustment if i cant measure it!
@Moraine128
@Moraine128 4 месяца назад
You can trick every system to give you some insight...if your TA in your headunit is bound to distances...Distance and time are in relation with speed of sound... What i did once was create a sound file in audacity: left chirp, wait 0,1s=100ms...then right chirp. if you play and record your systems response to that with audacity on your laptop with mic in listening position, you can count the samples=time you differ from the 100ms difference in the source file. then adjust your headunint until you see the 100ms gap...this will give you perfect left right alignment. I beleive the most headunits alignment work with distance=delay.
@Cathul
@Cathul 4 месяца назад
Distance of drivers and speed of sound are constants, right? Take out your tape measure and measure as exact as possible and put it in into the T/A of the headunit. Usually this is better than no time alignment at all. Will it be as exact as an impulse response measurement? No, but most of the time it doesnt need to be exact down to 0.02ms.
@f.j.z3213
@f.j.z3213 4 месяца назад
@@Cathul The tweeter and midbass are passive crossover. with different distance, and one signal source. do i measure tweet or midbass? also. i have bean testing rew impulse in m car. and both L and R adjustment only effect the R side?!
@Moraine128
@Moraine128 4 месяца назад
@@f.j.z3213 As Raw-Cat often says "it is relative to each other" If you delay left side you decrease the offset to the right side. For passive systems as i have as well, i believe there is 2 approaches: 1. you take the mean value of tweeter+midbass from one side. 2. Align either Midbass for phase match or impulse response for the tweeters. I woul tend to align phase for the 2 midbass drivers in that setup from what i know, today. Sure fully active gives you a better baseline to work with and has more potential.
@Cathul
@Cathul 4 месяца назад
@@f.j.z3213 midbass. With 2-way passive you do the time alignment to the midbass drivers.
@kalyanosh
@kalyanosh 4 месяца назад
how to download pdf
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt 4 месяца назад
Visit "RTA in cars" group and you will find it there.
@user-bs9wd7cj8q
@user-bs9wd7cj8q Месяц назад
So basically this is a helix DSP video
@RAW-CAt
@RAW-CAt Месяц назад
All my videos feature Helix DSP as that is what I am using. For this method to work you can use any DSP that allows input mixing.
@Titans2138
@Titans2138 4 месяца назад
Idk about this. Just wasted four hours. The measurements were never consistent. The more I meausred, the more wrong it became. I tried the headphone jack and an audio quest dragonfly for speaker output. Did measurements right away. Clock drift I guess.
@Titans2138
@Titans2138 4 месяца назад
Okay, I figured it out. He's right though, it's a pain in the ass and took me a very long time if you include my first failed attempt. I noticed some of the speakers would go down first, on the impulse response. I swtiched the polarity on those speakers so that the impulse is positive first, or goes up. Is this basically a correct thing to do, or it just depends on other factors?
@Cathul
@Cathul 4 месяца назад
Midbass
Далее
Helix TuneEQ tutorial
26:34
Просмотров 6 тыс.
How to choose crossovers for your drivers
39:54
Просмотров 14 тыс.
2DROTS vs WYLSACOM! КУБОК ФИФЕРОВ 1 ТУР
07:25
Why I HATE USB Measurement Microphones
17:22
Просмотров 18 тыс.
Time alignment using impulse response with HOLMImpulse
23:29
Analogue Sound System Tuning
10:31
Просмотров 5 тыс.
Crossovers and slopes
23:28
Просмотров 3,7 тыс.
How-To: Verifying Phase Cohesion Through A Crossover
15:18
Why speaker time alignment doesn't work
7:11
Просмотров 50 тыс.
Phase issues in car audio and how to address them
26:19
ВЫХЛОП на Hyundai Solaris #shorts
0:57
Просмотров 610 тыс.
профи на Тракторе Т-16
0:24
Просмотров 1,8 млн
Mobile Wheel Polisher ##❗️❗️
0:19
Просмотров 7 млн