When I was a kid every time I would make something in the microwave I would have an existential crisis because I would watch the seconds tick away and realize that those seconds were gone and never coming back. Used to f*** me up, lol.
I hope when I die I wake up at 4 AM and I’m a 6’2” upright cockroach who just drank coffee late the previous day and dreamed I was a hairless pink monkey
Science and Philosophy are always connected, if only by one single strand that will always hold the two together: "What do we do with this information?"
Some people tend to find the bigger picture of reality when it comes to philosophy and such, it's very very important to truly know once it is found out but, learn that nothing could be done since the world is too busy evolutionizing technology and stuff, to make people lazier, given a lesser chance of philosophical thoughts being brought
@@limpbizkit6245 "Evolutionising technology" is great for philosophy! Technology is an essential feature of mankind and it is teleologically instilled within us. The technology we have right now enables us to learn about the contributions made by ancient and dead philosophers. It allows us to progress. There have been so many moments in which I constructed a rudimentary theory that had already been carefully constructed in greater detail by older philosophers. Without technology, we would permanently be stuck in a cycle in which we regurgitate the premade theories. With technology, theories that already exist become tangible and they enable us to build upon those theories and in some cases, form critiques of them.
@@SutsuMusic yeah but like, most technological advancements up to date, are just making people lazier and lazier, advancing smart phones, hands free beer machines, hands free food delivery. We're just technologically advancing towards a lazier life. While we should be working together as 1 and trying to evolve as a species instead of evolving towards laziness
According to the theory of relativity, time doesn't actually slow down. You just caught up to it at light speed. You experience time slower the closer you get to light speed, but time itself moves at the same rate of speed... At least until we start nearing the heat-death of the universe. Then things start getting kinda wonky.
@@colinsanders9397 no, time is a dimension. Really, it doesn't have a speed. Objects have a speed through it. But if you look at a Penrose diagram you'll see that the sum of the square of spatial and temporal velocity (||U||²) is always c². Therefore, as your spatial velocity increases, your temporal necessarily decreases and your passage through time slows.
@@jeffmorin5867 yes it does and is. Even if you consider a purely wave model... waves have a velocity. But serious, light doesn't have particle nature? Photons bruh. Gd.
Let's pause time for a second... Heisenberg's uncertancy principle starts lurking around the corner and sperm whales and Bowls of Petunias start appearing
Time is the tool for mesurement, its not what it messures. Time is the tool to messure change, something moving. Humanity misstakes the ruler for the messurement.
True, time travel is not possible because what we call time is actually just moments, a moment which doesnt move forward or backward, I think its just static, time doesnt move, it the moments or events that change
Mathematical definition of time: the change in relative position between at least two sets (and / or subsets). Within this framework you can invent conventions such as clocks or a theory of entropy or a theory of relativity, etc, etc. If there are zero changes in position between at least two sets (or subsets) then t = 0. Time as a negative value between at least two sets has never been observed in nature. It has been said "time stands still for a photon". If you were a photon and you "tried" to determine the change in relative position between two sets you would get t = 0. Thus, "time" is relative to the observer who is measuring the change in relative position between sets.
I feel humanity's absolute adherence to the concept of time is kind of a prison. I would love there to be no word for age or days of the week or months of hours. No concept of rotations around the sun. The only measurement of time would be intuitive. Incredible astronomical events would be witnessed by chance and be all kinds of special. I also feel like everything, past, present and future is happening all at once, so the idea of time is meaningless. I squirm about this a lot because.
This is just misuse of words, and the reason why physical theories are not formulated in words. Time cannot stop, pause, slow down, speed up. These are words that pertain to motion, and motion is a description of a change of spatial location with respect to time I.e. ds/dt. To refer to a change of location in time with respect to time is just dt/dt. It is not meaningful.
@@easypeasy9598 that cannot be equated to the speed of light because their examples are ludicrous. If one looks outside the realm, especially with the demonstration of the two mirrors and the individual walking, one cannot help but understand that light is instantaneous and that it never speeds up nor slows down and by all definition, is measured by its reflective brilliance. Not only can I prove this, but Hubble took a photo in 1996 that light is in fact, instantaneous and everything Einstein proposed about light was nothing more than PSEUDOSCIENCE, just like 90% of everything you hear about the cosmos. And that other 10%? Only believe HALF ¿`_
This is my new favourite video of yours. It started a thought process in me about time that made me realize that the concept of time I was thinking about was wrong, or at least incomplete. Basically, I've learned a lot and I'm grateful for it.
"What does the word Socrates refer to?" Well, to the idea of him. Find me an atom of love, or a molecule of loyalty. They clearly don't physically exist, but we still know and talk about them. Socrates no longer exists. Some of his words and ideas do.
Love and loyalty are subjective experiences..they dont have particle origins even though we can upto some extent relate them to the complex brain chemistry like love can be attributed to oxytocin..people on the other hand are not subjective like socrates and trump are two completely different persons..
@@jaygadpal4894 That's both my point and irrelevent to my point. Socrates as a man no longer exists. Like the non-material idea of things like love, loyalty, justice, etc., Socrates can only exist now as a collection of concepts. If you really want a physical location, Socrates exists today as only the brain pathways which store information about him.
@@gideonjones5712 yeah but socrates once had a physical manifestation that everyone agreed upon..but what's love or justice for you doesn't necessarily need to be the same emotions for others..thats why you cant possibly compare the two
@@gideonjones5712 also socrates is a single person but love is something we call when 2 humans like each other..so even though the people who loved someone in the past their love is non existent just like socrates but the notion of love still exists as other people might still be in love or fall in love..but socrates aint coming back and presentism asserts that he doesnt exists..
It can be real problems, as even if even the God's angels had rebellions (no loyalty). The energy and matter though could be fully at his control and most of the angels. So is gravity caused by time or time caused by gravity? Can you see which on is controlling the total flow?
“who among us is totally straight?” that homophobic great, great grandparent who is dead but apparently still should be on the list of things that exist: 😐
@Daniel Rodriguez that never happened but I'm glad they got fox news in Mexico now if only you had the brain to realize fox = 100% lies but it's cool keep voting for the reps so they can keep calling you a rapist and criminal and deport you
All the "past" stuff we know is because they left a "legacy" or a "mark" in to our present. For example I spill water on the floor. So the "legacy" it leaves in the present I'm in, is because of the action made. The first dimension is a line connecting any two points. It has no width or depth, only length. Imagine a 1D world. How is time working there? It's like a 2D plane passing through all the "1D line" and is registering all the events. | -> ------------------|------------------ | -> (1D line (horizontal) and the 2D plane (vertical) passing through the 1D reality) In a 2D world, time works different. You need a 3D object to be constantly passing through the 2D plane to register all the events. And in a 3D world like ours. We need a 4D "object" to be constantly passing through our reality to register all events and give them continuity. (X,Y & Z are registered, but the 4th coordinate plane is what makes time 4D) Past and future are only a recreation of our minds to remember or predict events. In the video Socrates is mentioned. How do we know about him?. He is in the "past", right? The reason we remember about him is because of his "legacy". There's no such thing as "traveling to the past" because there's nothing to record information about the Universe. You throw a glass to the floor, it brakes and how does the Universe know how was the organization of the atoms in the original structure? But, what if we can change the direction of time like in the 1D line. Instead of the 2D plane going to "the right", what if it goes to "the left"? I know this thought of mine it's messed up. I tried to write mi idea. lol
of course we can interpret time by that geometrical interpretation, and i agree with you. it's that time is just defined, it's just nothing real but to define a concept about changing 'position' or the cause of an effect. time travel to the past,i can say it may not exist. somehow it's just my conjecture it can be proven if time has nice relation to information and entropy. i can continue to tell the reason of why time travel to the past doesn't exist. first you know the effect caused by a cause, of course it's not provable, it's just consistent to the physics of the world.which mean an effect needed or must have information about the reason it originated, define time A and time B such that A < B, example, A = 2 second B must be larger than that value, at time B, which is relatively 'a future' to observer present at time A, and at time B, we time travel an apple to time A, at time A the apple will surely appear ( i assume that there's some kind of effect of that apple appearing but then we don't know the physics of time travel and of course we can do that, because the my reason i'm explaining is based on assumption that lead to contradiction which we can say just appeared) , that apple has no information, it doesn't have an effect, it doesn't came from the universe that's from time A, but it came from time B that yet not exist relative to time A and then the observer at time B should also experience apple appear in the past which doesn't make sense, that it became a loop, no origins and no end., which is why time travel(i sometime abbreviated time travel to the past is just time travel)is impossible , cannot be proven except the nice relation about information and time like example, any matter need information, of course it seems true but i believe it need a nicer explanation. there's another reason, that's by relation with energy . but this one is enough.
@@Meilk27 no problem, at least there's some restriction to time travelling , like when we look to the telescope, all we see is a past. but we cannot interact with it.
my 2 cents on Time : I've been often times very tempted to think Time as such does not exist. There is only movement and change within space. We invented the concept of Time to decribe movement and change. That however does not explain why Time moves slower as we move faster. I've been thinking about clocks that each show different time. Not two clocks - no matter how precise will ever show the same time. Perhaps Time is somewhat of collection of bubbles that surround objects in Space? I have no idea!
WOOOP WOOP POT NOODLE IS THE GOOD STUFF FOR THE VEINS, AS SHOWN BY THE FACT THE AS MYSTI SAYS GOD EATS THEM, THEREFORE I SHOULD EAT ALL THE POT NOODLE. GOD MAY JUDGE ME BUT HIS SINS OUTNUMBER MY OWN.
"Time pausing" doesn't make sense. If it paused, assuming it's flowing at all, then it can't be unpaused, since nothing could make it so. The only possibility is the existence of a time outside of time, but at some point, there must be an instance of time that cannot be paused.
That's because you are in The Matrix you can be pause anytime in time as time so chooses to. for instance the famous physicist scientist of our time at the time of the 70s whistleblower about Area 51 and its existence and there he witnessed machine that now we can prove carried this element which was discovered in the hedron collider and 2013 this element it's called element 115 as he mentioned in one of his stories when he was at s4251 he witnessed this machine that beamed the element 115 which has to do something with gravity stop a candle light and it was stuck in that present time there was no in that little circle there was no time it was just their paused.
I think your thesis is implausible because just like time gives our universe infinite possibilities based on the events within it. I think time is similar given time gives itself infinite possibilities depending on the events. If you believe their are multiple dimensions other than our 3D space. An external force could pause and play as they would like not effecting themselves but the contents that they can effect. Kinda like we can effectively pause a video game and then resume or do whatever to it’s time we like. same way a 4 dimensional being could pause our 3D world. Same way a 5th dimensional being could pause theirs etc. a “Pauseception” if you will 🙂
I believe that the past, present, and future exist all at once, and we can only perceive it one second at a time. Compare it to a book. Every book contains a complete story. The beginning, middle, and end. We can only read a book one word at a time, but it still exists all at once.
What strikes me once again in this video is the very notion of reality. Regarding the point whether Socrates actually exists if we today still can talk about him. The interesting question here is: What are memories? Where to they come from, why do we have them? It's cool how much stuff biology, physics etc. can explain on a physical level. Yet, on a philosophical level they fail miserably. It is one thing to explain how my brain works of a biological scale and how the scriptures of Socrates were discovered and physically readable. But this still doesn't explain what a memory or a fantasy actually is. We can use our physical brain and read a physical scripture - but how can this actually produce an imagination of Socrates? How does this lead to the real existence of a "meme", how does this lead to our perception of Socrates? Existence is so weird.
Time is very real Our perception of time, is indeed an ilusion, kinda... Its an illusion in the sense of what we call hours minutes and days While time can be bent by gravity, it can never be reversed or stopped I haven't watched, the video, nor will i, but i know im right 🧐
If things are moving from one spot to another then time must exist. Because they're actions are based in the past (where they previously were). And you can't have the past without time.
I thought for a while that people that travel by plane every week are experiencing time differently than those who stay earthbound. That's not to include the health effects of being in a compressed tube, being scanned often, and spending a lot of time further up the atmosphere.
I loved the presentation! Thank you for taking the time to put this together for us (: I have my own theories, but I enjoy learning and am very satisfied with how you have done so!
@@teofelusimene6496 possibly a previous universe, law of thermodynamics says it is most likely that entropy always increases but that is a statistical law. There is the smallest chance entropy could decrease instead of increasing possibly causing the reset of the universe
I had a crazy thought after watching a video that what if time was a material or one of the original forms of matter and what we measure as time is us moving through time. The video said that time can go either two ways, either time flows the same either direction or time flows slowing in one direction and faster or consistently in the other.
What I always found interesting about time was the fact that when the first humans walked the earth, all the materials already existed to build a spaceship or iPhone or whatever advanced device, they just didn’t figure out how for so long. Now just imagine what surrounds you and is awaiting to be discovered/built
As I see it, anyone can jump over a line backwards or forwards but no one can jump over nor climb a great giant wall that's horizontal & vertical and stretching endless both ways keepingin mind that this wall moves thus moving anything infront of it.
Time, that’s funny! I’m autistic with savant syndrome eidetic memory adhd, n the kickers dyslexia. I just study what I’m interested in. For long periods of time unaware what time it is or no concept of such a thing as time. I think linear. PAST PRESENT FUTURE ALL IN ONE ♾. I have come to the conclusion that the universe is infinite. Let that word sink in INFINITY ♾ never ending but like history has shown things were ok on the planet 🌎 till we speed things up n denied 🙅♂️ real truth. Today is world truth day we meditate 🧘♀️ everyone who participated was cool being apart of something so big. Let’s hope the USA 🇺🇸 disclosure of 180 days goes off June 24th fingers crossed 🤞
I'm not convinced that time actually exists. The only reason we even have a concept of time is because we can perceive things with 'cause and effect' as the frame of reference. If there is no consciousness to perceive "time" then the circumstance is similar to a photon traveling at *c* because in that frame of reference there is no time passing at all, it just becomes irrelevant and essentially doesn't exist. Maybe conscious minds just produce illusory perceptions of time in order to make sense of reality from moment to moment, otherwise we would be in a constant psychedelic state and unable to act with our egos. It seems to me that when I'm under the effects of mushrooms my brain's sense of time disappears yet I can still think and act albeit in different ways than usual, so perhaps the biggest difference between an organism with a mind and a photon is how the organism can remain consciously aware even with perception of time removed whereas the photon is merely a nonconscious particle without perception of time because it has no mechanism like consciousness to produce perception of time in the first place, but then _that_ calls into question whether or not velocity even matters at all if the prerequisite to "sense" time is to possess a conscious mind. Maybe in order to perceive time you must be sufficiently conscious _and_ moving in space? I'm not even sure anymore at this point but I would really like a definitive answer to these questions someday.
When my mother four years ago was turning 79. I told her as she was getting sick and I was bringing her to the hospital. I said Mom time is relevant, if you slipped and fell out to camp. If you could not get back up and you're in the process of dying. I said the seconds turn to minutes and the minutes turn to hours hours turn to days. When she died she slipped and fell on the floor. The very next night I stayed out to Camp with the dog and the cat. I talked to my mother the night before. I woke up it was in July and the dog was doing circles. So I got up off the couch and I noticed it was really really cold. The time was 2:30 in the morning, the dog was picking up that that's when she actually passed. So she laid on that floor for probably five to six hours. It's kind of like if you watch the pot of water boiling it takes longer. If you turn around and don't pay any attention to it and boils much quicker. Some people will say we live our whole lives out already and we're dead. When when time comes into the equation, it's your Consciousness perceiving time. So it can be played out on a scale just like the Fibonacci sequence. That's about what I can add to the subject as far as what I've seen. I hope everybody has a blessed night and a great day tomorrow.
_Time_ is simply the measurement of an ever-changing and constant moment. If energy can not be created or destroyed, this assumes an eternal past. If you are in the midst of eternity, the chance of being in the _here and now_ is either 1 of an infinite (if your duration is limited), which is an impossibility, or a 1 of 1 (if your duration is not limited). This means that it's more likely that you've always been and always will be. What more would an eternal being want than the perception of a beginning and an end? What if you've never began and will never end? What if you are eternal? If this comment has blown your mind, please share this information. I wonder if we are all from one origin, scattered from an eternal being. We now have others, a beginning, an ending and everything in between. Well, at least the perception of these things.
Time is just numbers. Quick exercise in realisation: Half 1 second until you find the centre... Hint: yourl go on halfing it for infinity, why? because numbers are paradoxical by nature in the same way as the glass is both half full and half empty or neither and not one or the other. (You can go on trying to figure out that one for a life time before finally realising it's both at the same time, a non dualistic perspective) but by all means please continue halfing that second until you find the centre of "time" if you wish. So time does not exist as anything more than a man made construct. Most people confuse time with movement, such as degeneration of cells, the multiplying of cells, movement of water and clouds and so on... there is movement yes, but time is just a way of measuring that movement against a constant with numbers or tally marks. And all counting takes place... you guessed it... in the now. The time is now and all movement and happenings happen in this endless moment. 🙏
at what speed does time pass? and if time is passing by at some speed, could it accelerate or deaccelerate? and if so would living beings move slower/faster (pov of relativism?) or would they move at normal speed (pov of absolutism?)? but then what counts as normal speed? but if time passes by slowly (e.g), how long would a second, minute, etc.. take to pass. Seconds, minutes, etc... are used to represent time but aren't time itself so would time taken for a second to pass be longer or would it stay the same because it represents time. but if it represents time then it changes at the same speed as time, meaning it would technically not take longer for a second to pass because it's changing at the same speed as time.
Maybe they already all happened at once and are now being sequenced, cards are being pulled and laid down in some particular order...stories are being written or simulations are being played out. I think in the big bang it was all laid out, all the moves and all the options.
No time just measures things that happen. It's impossible for everything to happen all at once because of physical laws such as matter unable to occupy multiple places at once and multiple objects unable to occupy the same space at once. Events have duration the same way space has distance. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FDYPQIJY14s.html
@@teody7240 I think all the possibilities were created and now we skip along through life choice by choice, selecting and living through the particular course, but I am beginning to postulate an idea that other forms of ourselves are skipping along on other life paths that presented themselves at points of decisions. I think, too, that it is possible that we catch glimpses of our other selves out in the world from time to time. Maybe my mother was another form of me and my grandmother, her grandmother before her. I don't know though about this part at all except to say that a pine tree has cones and those cones drop to the ground and grow and those trees one day make cones and drop down the hillside and grow more trees. Maybe it is all the same tree being born over and over. Maybe our relatives are not just related to us, but they are us. We keep cycling around, trying to do better, I suppose.
@@jennykuser6149 That's jumping from world lines. You will be able to jump at any moment in time in a different world line (parallel universes which are similar to us but different in some way). Paradoxes about time will be solved since you are on different worlds/ timelines. In our universe, it is believed that everything is predetermined, and that moment in the past, present, and future was already set from the moment of the big bang. But if you relate quantum mechanics to it, it's a different story. Events will be uncertain, and that's when TIME comes in order to organize these moments as observers make sense of these events.
For presentism, Socrates might not exist but the history book do. We talk about Socrates? No, our brain chemicals that exist now arouse us to say the word, so Soceates might not exist but talking about Socrates do exist right now. But whatever time is, human conversation is indeed unable to be a prove.
Time is a tool you can put on the wall or wear it on your wrist. The past is far behind us and the future doesn't exist. What's the time? A quarter to nine, time to take a bath. What do you mean? We're already clean. Scrub scrub scrub to the water's Brown.
A small thought about presentism, not that i agree on it completely. Socrates does not exist. The thing that does exist because we keep it alive is our understanding of what used to exist. Socrates will not be the Socrates that did exist in the past just our small understanding of what we thought he was. Everything that is not currently present does not exist because no one can completely understand it. I know it sounds weird but based on our five senses if we truly saw, heard, tasted, smelled and felt something it would be there in existence. As no one can say they can do any of the five with Socrates he does not exist. And even if someone could conjure up pictures so we can see, audio so we could hear, statues down to the most minute detail so we could feel. The thing that they cannot completely replicate or make is the brain and experiences that he had so even it it was an android of him, it wouldn't be him. Just the android. Everything that was in the past and might be in the future simply does not exist and if it is in one of those things then it is in it's own present until the point it ceases to be. If that makes any kind of sense, oof how did i end up stumbling upon this video...? Now i'll have nightmares.
I would think time is just a way of describing passing moments or advancement of something. In a completely empty universe with no objects there would be no time so it is dependent on "things"
We actually DON'T know that time has moved at the same pace from the Beginning. What we Do know is that both time and light move at different rates based on gravitational forces. I'll leave it at that.....
Times sexuality...time is a sociopathic sexual deviant that screws us all in the end. Time steals everything we have, everyone we know, and never looks back...
Time only exists because of our perception of moving through space. Going from reference point A to reference point B creates the illusion that there was a “then” for “A” and a “now” for “B”.
6:20 Simple. Socrates refers to an idea of a person that once was on the list of things that existed. Anything that is said to exist in the future is just an idea and nothing else, even if the idea coming true is extremely likely
time is simply change if nothing changes there is no time but things get complicated if you consider the possibility or alternate dimensions/realities/universes/simulations
Somewhere out there is an electron created in the first few moments of the Universe that is moving so fast that it hasn't yet experienced one Planck second.
hmm, if say the universe were paused and a million years passed and it was resumed we would never know. But like how could we say its a million years if time itself has frozen, we cant measure time with time, that makes no sense. It would just be frozen and time would become an abstract concept, it owuld just disppear
A question which fascinates me concerning time is, how long is 'now'? A simply attempt to subjectively narrow the limits of 'now' have always, to me, always pointed to an event which is greater than 1 tenth of a second but far shorter than 5 tenths (100ms and 500ms respectively). Interestingly, from a neurological perspective there is strong evidence that if an event occurs in our visual field which last for less then approx 200 ms, we do not perceive it. Equally, an audio signal has to exist for around a minimum time of 150 ms. So, prima facie, it seems that 'now is related to our nervous system and our ability to perceive events. Is this a coincidence? If not then what does is tell us about 'now'? As a footnote - how many have experienced the astonishing sense of time that certain drugs can induce? A smoke of some good weed and 'now' stretches out for a crazy length of time. Psychedlics can turn seconds of conventional time into years of trippy time. Clearly 'now' is not an objective event - but what does that mean for time itself?
Hear me out here right, time doesn’t exist. It’s an illusion where things happen and we find patterns in them. How do we measure time? You could say technology. So we measure it by a circuit doing whatever a circuit does (I’m not a sparky) in repetitions. Then we as humans do what we’re best at doing and find a pattern in how often this happens and call that a second, a year etc. All we’re doing is measuring things happening and add numbers to it for every time this happens. We’re not measuring “time” we’re just counting the repetitions of something happening. You might say well without technology we could use the sun or the position of the stars. So we’d then be using our orbit of the sun due to gravity as a measurement of this thing called time when in reality it has nothing to do with it. Yes we were there in our orbit and we can now predict that we will end up at another point in our orbit given other things that have happened before that we’ve taken note of. But that doesn’t constitute the past present or future or even time itself because once again we are just watching things happening, counting their repetitions, identifying a pattern in their frequencies and labelling it as time… it’s a complete illusion. The only thing that truly exists is now, thinking like that is a very powerful thing and it really lets you embrace the “time” you have here. Just try stay in the moment boyos. PS if anyone with an actual degree on a relevant subject or better logic than me can explain why I’m wrong please call me out on it cos I have no clue what I’m talking about, I’m just waffling troops.
Time do not exist ! Time is imprinted in us from once who wants to control us ! There is no and and beginning ! If we understand that we will not fear death ! We are pure concessions experiencing this moment ! Being in human materialistic body is just an experience ! They want to convince us that we are just material in that case time time theory works perfectly ! But we are much more ! We are endless in a spiritual universe ! Love ❤️
Wait so if something is near a blackhole for a few minutes to us its been a millions years so are we a million years old or are we a few minutes old right now, I want to scream now.
