Timeline Of The Rulers Of Bulgaria 

3:47 Picture of Chaka is wrong, sorry for the mistake.

4:53 5:43 Funfact: Those Simeon are the same person

FINALLY !!! You're back !

Great Work as Always Brother You are the Best

Very good video. I really liked the maps aswell. Fairly accurate.

great job. glad you're back

Nice job

The mistake you made is that Asparuh is not the first Bulgarian ruler. Bulgaria signed the first peace treaty with the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) in 481 and this is recorded in historical sources written by Roman chroniclers. But if we ignore this information, we must start with the ruler of Old Great Bulgaria, Kubrat, who ruled Bulgaria from 632 to 665.

Nice job!

Just like to say love this video

Fajne mate!

Nice!

Bulgaria for Bulgarians

Could you tell me which program you use to make timeline videos? Serbian ruller in 3:47 his name is Caslav Klonimirovic Well done for the effort. Like and sub.

missed something, other Bulgaria does not show, such as Old Great Bulgaria and Volga Bulgaria. 😌😄🙈

Nice

Video suggestion: Timeline of the Brazilian rulers.

Fajne!

Great job!. #Rosalina

Witam i pozdrawiam ciekawie w materiale 🙌

Are your graphics HD warshsw?

Fajne

Can you make the timeline for Turkey and Albania?

Good video, but you made few mistakes. 1/ The last ruler of the first bulgarian empire is Presian II who ruled for a few months 2/ Ivan sratsimir ruled the tsardom of Vidin (which is part of the hiatory of the second bulgarian empire) from 1356 to 1396 3/ After Ivan Sratsimir, Constantine II Asen came to power and ruled the tsardom of Vidin from 1396 to 1422. Also at the end why did you put the prime ministers of Bulgaria and not the presidents?

Best

Timeline inaccuracies and spelling mistakes but the effort to make this video is appreciated. It is hard to find any information on the topic of Bulgarian rulers.

The communists: Simeon, you are not going to rule in Bulgaria anymore. Simeon: Hold my glass of rakia.

Weird how this little child in 4:45 and the last guy in 5:45 are the same person

Nikov is the first Bulgarian historian to pay special attention to, and attri bute great significance to, the Turkic components in the Bulgarian ethnogen esis (i.e., after the Bulgars) and among the ruling aristocracy. He elaborated on the issue of the "Turkic element's" influence upon Bulgarian history in a 1928 unpublished manuscript (delivered as a public lecture). Nikov began with the following policy-setting statement: There is no period in our history on which the Turkic element did not exert its strongest influence and did not leave the deepest traces in the development of our people. [...] None of the Balkan peoples has experi enced the Turkic influence so strongly as our people, The Turkic pressure began from Central Asia and had two directions to the northwest through southern Russia, and to the southwest through Persia and Asia Minor. The Bulgarian state was founded due to one of the Turkic peoples, the Bulgars, who themselves joined a number of Turkic tribal alliances (of Huns, Kutrigurs, Utigurs, Avars, and Khazars). During Byzantine rule, the Turkic Pechenegs and Uz came from the north; many of them crossed the Danube and were assimilated by the Bulgarian people. Then came the Cumans, without whose decisive help the uprising of Asenevtsi would hardly have succeeded. Thus, just as the First Bulgarian Kingdom was founded with the help of the Turkic Bulgars, the Second Kingdom was founded with "the decisive collabora tion of the Turkic Cumans."129 Not only did Cumans settle south of the Danube and become assimilated and absorbed by the Slavic-Bulgarian people, but they were also of great significance politically in the Second Kingdom, whose dynas ties all had Cuman blood in them. There were also many Bulgarian boyars of Cuman origin, including Balic in Dobrudzha. It could even be said that the Cumans acquired a dominant position in the political life of the state. 130 There followed the influence of the Mongol Tartars, who even supplied one Bulgarian king, Chaka. But of greatest importance were the Ottoman and Seljuk Turks, who conquered the Balkans from Asia Minor. Concerning the Cumans, Nikov considers the "transfusion of blood" from Turkic "elements" an asset, a means of rejuvenating and strengthening the "race" and enhancing the vitality of the Bulgarian people (in contrast with the conquering Turks).

How did you made this video

4:50 1918-1943 RIP Boris was the last good one to died + bulgarian monarchy. afther that it went to communist heel and so called (fake and corrupted to the core) democracy :(

Simeon The Great 😁👍

Hello ,neighbor from Turkey.

Mashallah

Hmmm

Greetings

What about Kubrat?

where is Constantin II Asen

150 left to 2000 🥳

Who ruled in the 1990-91 gap?

Interesting... but why you didn't put Dimitrov, who had even a mausoleum for himslef? Also, a photo of Ganev here: persons-info.com/persons/GANEV_Dimitr

Simeon The second is the same guy Simeon Sakskoburggotski cause he admit he was the last king 2001-05

Moi wladcy :o

The ending is so depressing

Best rulers : Asparukh Tervel Kardam Krum Omurtag Simeon the Great Samuel Petar IV (or Petar II) Ivan Asen I Kaloyan Ivan Asen II Todor Svetoslav Boris III

Big Boi Boyko

Simeon the II and Simeon Saxocoburg are the same person

Why is Simeon II a child

Hello

At the time,the new Khazar qaganate was expanding westward,squeezing out the Onogurs,or Bulghars as they begin to be named. One of the Kuvrat’s sons,the Asparuch (Asparux,Isperih) now celebrated as the founder of Bulgaria,forcibly crossed to the Danube arpund 679 to occupy imperial territory Moesia after defeating the forces of Constantine IV (668-685). The event is recorded in the preserved text of a Hebrew letter of a Khazar qahan,who wrote that the Vununtur(=Onogurs=Bulghars) has fled across the Duna,the Danube. Even if numerous for the steppe,Asparuch’s pastoralist warriors and their families were of necessity relatively few as compared to the agricultural Slav population that lived south of the Danube,and thus the Turkic-speaking Bulghars were assimilated linguistically by the Slav majority to form the medieval and modern Bulgarians. This particular ethnogenesis occuree gradually over a period of more than two centuries: there was the Turkic qan (or khan) Krum (803-814),Qan Omurtag (814-831),Qan Presian (836-852),then the wan who converted Boris I (852-889);then came Tsar Symeon (893-923), Tsar Peter I (927-970),and so on.But this transformation of Turkic shamanists into Slavic Christians did nothing to diminish the warlike character of the empire’s new neighbours. Because even warlike neighbours can be useful at times,the relations between the empire and the new Bulghar qaganate encompassed every possible variation,from intimate allience to all out-war,as exemplified by the career of the Bulghar qan or khan Tervel (or Tarvel-Terbelis in our Greek sources),the successor and probably son of Asparukh who ruled for some twenty-one years within the period 695-721,extant chronologies being inconsistent. “Bulghars and Bulgarians.” The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire, by EDWARD N. LUTTWAK, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, 2009, pp. 173

fajen

Fun fact: Most of them were Turkic (Bulgarian Empire) and a few them were Germanic (Kingdom of Bulgaria)😅

sus

Even though we consider the Samoil period as a Macedonian Kingdom (because he revolted against Bulgaria and Byzantium and was based in Macedonia and other technicalities), the vid is pretty cool 👌

Fajne

Moi wladcy :o