That search was pure and simple retaliation for AB telling him to take his hands out of his pockets! Notice how his gang members backed him up instead of intervening and telling the butthurt cop to stop. Earning the hate. Earning the hate. And earning AB another easy peasy claim for compensation. "Just want to have a conversation with you." What a lie! It was very clear from the get go that they wanted to enforce their personal feelings on you. With them being very willing to act unlawfully in doing so. As long as they asserted their frame and didn't allow you to assert yours. And that's one big reason (out of quite a few) as to why there's such a disconnect between them and us. And why they are hated so much. "You've gotta talk to us..." Again a great big fat lie! And this exposes another reason for them being so hated. Their lack of respect for our rights - such as the right to remain silent.
"Take your glasses off. I can't see your eyes. I want to have a conversation with you." Does this dimwit think that we speak from our eyeballs, using some sort of audible light? Then "If you'd just said 'Apologies'." Apologies _for what,_ you ridiculous tyrant?
Police standards are so low ...they seem so confused...imagine a real crime? Bunch of headless chickens...well done AB..exposing Police incompetence 😅😅
I thought the one standing behind AB knew what was going on, but he went full tyrant too by the end, asserting that silence means guilt. Demonstrating again that there are no good cops.
The copper who rocked up on the scene second disappeared very quickly and very slyly when the 💩 started hitting the fan.... And he was one of the worst agitators. Coward!
@@AuditingBritainWe can see that. But then if you have done nothing about this (ie. a serious complaint) then it was all for nothing, but clicks and revenue. You also failed in not doing what they didn’t want (but could’nt stop) which was going back and filming those cars, to prove a (legal) point. Your only little ‘victory’ was stepping over that wall!
Whats funny, is right next door is St.Martins primary school. 🤣🤪 theres also an old church that was converted to a house that appeared on grand designs many years ago. Sits between the station and the primary school.
Elderly lady is robbed in her home-Police cannot attend due to lack of staff. A man with a camera in the police station grounds- 5+ come out. Shame they don't protect the public the way they do each other.
As the video proves they were 5 tyrants taking the liberty of an innocent man. 👏👏👏 Thank you AB for taking 5 Policy Enforcers of the streets albeit briefly.
They were inside the building playing video games. It’s too dangerous out on the streets until it’s night and then they go out and pick up drunk girls and get them in the back of the police van .
@@Answersonapostcardthey approach him, then try back tracking making excuses up at the end, wasting there own time. If you can't see that you yourself are a piggy.
Top tier, but the rage-gibbon at Solihull was the worst. Gloving up as he swaggered up, frothing and snarling that he would "lose his temper" if not instantly obeyed.
Hands in pockets while interacting with the public is against their own policy. Who is policing the police? Certainly not the hierarchy whose job it is to maintain discipline in their own force.
Greetings Sir AB. The behaviour of the five individuals captured in the footage demonstrates why being employed in policing is dishonourable, unprofessional and cowardly.
AB acted lawfully and got searched in cuffs, then 3 quarters of the way through the video, they all moved to one side to allow a woman pass, using a powered conveyance on the pavement??? You couldn't make it up 😂
This idea of suspicion from the police has to stop , this is getting out of hand , someone standing outside a police station and they immediately characterise it as suspicion. This needs drumming out of police , you don't police crime by going out and creating it yourselves. They essentially saw someone legally standing around and turned it criminal , that's like a traffic warden giving you a ticket for stopping at the traffic lights. Unbelievable that they have the cheek to accuse someone of being suspicious. If they think that why not watch on cameras before acting , how about waiting to see if a crime is committed before subjecting a member of the public to handcuffs. Absolutely appalling , these people are institutionalised gang members , they literally bully people. This isn't what policing should be , it's not even legal , they are effectively con men in uniforms that abuse the public for their own sadistic nature. This is bred into them , government have given these tyrants far too much power, started with thatcher where anyone going to football could be freely attacked by police and its just carried through to now being a member of the public outside a police station.
@@lastxp I agree. I do believe, that at some point in the not so distant future, we will be policing ourselves. These egos in fancy dress will become irrelevant. They are not fit for purpose anymore.
Detained a person carrying out legal activities, ignores woman breaking the law riding an electric scooter through a group of police officers. Gang of knobs.
The ugly face of Thug Police in Britain today abusing their powers to satisfy their ego and paranoia and not realising that they are on camera. I have no doubt that as soon as they learn that it was AB auditing they will find excuses for their behaviour and spin the story into "Well, if he had just complied ...", thus ensuring that this clusterf* of a showdown will happen again and again and again.
How dare a member of the public walk round a police station & look at it ? Dose he not realise that it is the their , special police station & he should'nt look at it . 👮🐷🤡
Yup. Sensitive little souls aren't they? You can just guarantee an over-the-top aggressive response with the slightest bit of ego-puncturing. They are truly pathetic.
Detained under Section 1 of PACE.......really ! How does the actions shown give the officers reasonable suspicion under Section 1? Another example of BAD policing !!
@@paullancaster7066 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 1. I was going to paste it on here but probably best you google it (too large). My point is... they may suspect any of the points listed in Section 1, theft, weapons etc, BUT on what grounds? Why do they suspect the offender falls under Section 1? They can say whatever reason stolen goods, dangerous weapons etc but I question WHY do you believe that. What has this guy done to give them reasonable cause? Respect is earned, treat members of the public with respect and it will be reciprocated. Do not treat everyone like the lowest common denominator. !!
Your wrong ! This is exactly how they are trained, they have zero ability to do real police work or attend a real crime !! Bald abusive thin blue line gang members.
I come from a family of police officers, all now retired, and they are all deeply saddened by the quality of policing across the UK today. As a member of the public, I'm ashamed of the UK's police forces. They are thugs and bullies.
And would your "family of police officers" just stand around doing nothing while a strange man acted suspiciously around a police station? If so, I'm glad they're all retired!
Yet again AB proves why the police NEED to be audited. Abusing powers because AB noticed they weren't following their own policy of professional appearance (hands out of pockets). Shameful behaviour. That said its always entertaining seeing the officers after the fact struggling to explain how it was lawful, you see it gradually dawn on the arresting officer that he's messed up and been caught
Know somebody nearby here that got threatened with a knife, told they was going to slit their throat and kill their dog. They know the persons car Reg, the persons address, they have several independent witnesses and even a recording of the attacker. Police response... Not enough evidence and not enough known about the attacker. stating - The suspect has not been identified (even with car reg, Photo/recording and address) No CCTV (Smart phone was out and recording) There are no witnesses (Never even asked the several people stood watching who's addresses we're also freely given by them) Case closed. Good to know the police will crack down on you walking and doing nothing illegal but will ignore the knife attacks
They can search if their ‘reasonable’ suspicions are not elevated. If you do not explain your actions, which is your right, they are then allowed to conduct a search. It’s your choice, explain/talk to them or get searched. Simples.
The bald officer with the tattoo’s was the only decent-ish guy there. If it was just him dealing with AB it would have been sound. The others are bullys! abusing their powers
This lot obviously haven’t been on any unconscious bias training, first thing they say to AB is do you speak English?! wtf 😳 unprofessional, rude and intimidating specimens, and five of them what a waste of taxpayers money !
@@asensibleyoungman2978 its already Paid, Coward Thugs Never Pay, Thats Why its called The Thin Blue Lying Gang, Stupidity you cant Help, The System is A Mess 🤯🤡🐷
The state of the UK police farce is very, very worrying indeed. I'd like to think that this new government will get to grips with them, but I'm not holding my breath on that one.
Please sue them..... the point was when you told the bold idiot to take his hand out of his pocket, just like he told you.... he can't stand the idea of taking orders from a civilan....
Quite. Beautiful irony of AB being told to take his hands out of his pockets earlier, but hated being told to do the same. That, and that alone, was the reason for the cuffs and the search.
The first officer comes up to a random stranger @2:43 and immediately asks "Do you speak English? I don't know if you are English or not." is as offensive and aggressive approach as you can get. He was clearly racial profiling right from the get go.
Quite staggering ignorance of law and illegal abuse ,despite countless memos from all senior police and sveral judgements from high court stating quite clearly without any doubt whatsoever FILMING IN PUBLIC IS A LEGAL RIGHT NO QUESTION.
but in 2020 Mr Justice Knowles remined a Inspector & 2PC's present before him that we do not have Cheka , Stasi or Gestapo in this country note the word "reminder" ------------now why would he "remind them" ,,,, naaaaaaaaaaaaais it's because they were , are still are behaving ,acting like Cheka , Stasi or Gestapo ,, and yet they are believed to be ""Crown servants 🤷♂ "geeeeeeeeeeez let us 🙏
The police shouldn’t be wasting time on that ether. They were set up to arrest actual criminals not middle aged women going shopping on an electric scooter. The whole system needs taking back to its purpose, Not harassing and abusing the public.
Everything in this needed for a clean cut claim. Unlawful commands, unlawful detainment, admittance of removal of liberty, admittance of being allowed on the property, zero reasonable grounds, lack of professional standards throughout. Just terrible how low the level of policing is.
Also another one where they say, without a hint of awareness ‘you just go around police stations looking for a reaction, don’t you?’… nice admittance that you know he isn’t up to anything illegal.
I totally agree and PC failed to seek "cooperation" of person before search takes place " code A3.2 before the search and went in with a "battery " using s.117 of PACE he now must explain WHY he used s.117 , (told to take hands out of pocket😭).... which must go on the search document , which I doubt will ,, either way, he is now down a rabbit hole , no exit and all the other PC's failed to intervene and are "liable " under Police Act 1996 ,, section 91,, (1) withhold his services, shall be guilty of an offence and liable-- (2) 2 years imprisonment & fine (3) Liability under subsection (1) for any behaviour is in addition to any civil liability for that behaviour ,, just a bunch of 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡, no way could they be a Crown servant as no Crown servant will behave in this manner ,,, geeeeeeez unreal , now we must 🙏 all the best 🙏
All of those police officers ignored that person cycling on the pavement, which is illegal, whilst trying to justify detaining AB for walking around in a public place, which obviously is not illegal.
What's with the accent after being so fluent?....officers were concerned for the peace and professional in today's society...fair play to the police for once
If there are signs there, they are meant to be read. You have every right to get close enough to comfortably read them. "Thanks very much for your time sir" is a robotic and offensive comment by the officer at the end.
I had an eastern european gypsy trying to steal something from my front garden recently, gave plod description and van reg, van still driving around the neighbourhood, they wrote to me saying they'd be taking no further action (I liked the word "further" as they'd done nothing) . If I'd gone on social media and insulted the gypsy I'd probably have been arrested. I've got no idea what plod are for anymore.
Lol. They also always use the phrase "Is there anything else we can do for you?" as if they have given you assistance and service just by speaking to you. Insane.
A farmer in Northants told me a story about the Police moving a camp of 'travellers' into the next county, and as soon as the last caravan crossed the line they stopped, went back and dragged the Police out of their cars and gave them a flogging.. And a Policeman told me that he was the only one from his Station who would drive through the local camp which had about 500 people living there, the rest were frightened of them.
@@johnvienta7622.... You know what?....I do actually believe that really did happen. Because in my opinion at least....you have to be a certain kind of person to want to become a police bully.
