TOP 10 Homemade ENGINES 

instaBlaster...

PJ C. The w32 is a great design and build but it doesn't run on its own it needs compressed air to turn it. That makes it impractical

@@brandysigmon9066 It's not made to be practical in any way, it's a hobby project - advanced one. And a piece of art, as the narrator said it might end up in a museum, and if not - it would be a pride item for the technology display in any school or univ.

I'm a machinist and I agree with you, he designed and made every part and smaller engines are far harder to manufacture.

Vbuhvv.

Downshifting Kiwi you are right

Downshifting Kiwi look at top comment

After burner bro!

best engine hand maker ever ...Genius ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QSntBIAlI00.html&spfreload=10

Exactly...

You should checkout the description.

Yeah too much yappitty yap

The engine was beautiful! But the bike? I don’t know about that seat all the way in the back? Looks cool, but may be weird to ride.

he copyed a Pratt & Whitney R-4360-35 Wasp Major, 4-Row, Radial 28 cylinder. nothing spectacular about something thats already been done..

Thanks, I missed a lot of engines so I will make another video soon. Quite a few engine videos coming up soon. Thanks for watching!

Thanks!

Lumpy Midge r nc

He is incredibly impressive,but let’s give credit to all the other builders here too,every one of them is very,very impressive,and way ahead of my capabilities. I just love the dedication,skill and enthusiasm which goes into each and every one. Well done to ALL you guys!👌

Alan Millyard is crazy but in the best possible way bless him!

Having an even number of cylinders in a radial, is a bad idea, due to ballance.

I wonder what the power output on that flying millyard it is that is cool

Cool, his Deltic engine is awesome!

That defeats how 2 stroke engines work...

3-stroke

Have personally seen and heard Russels 9 cylinder radial running. That man is a genius. Would love to see the bigger one.

I knew that ...but he be American

hm guess he turned it flat on the side but then its stabelizing gyro equal on both sides , or sideways v heads comingout on both sides .

It's actually a Victory 44, not Victoria 44 as he called.

Oh wow... I definitely typed what I heard on that one.

It depends on the scale you want. You can purchase very small spark plugs but I prefer to make my own with 6mm threads. It's not overly difficult. For timing, stay away from chains unless you're looking around 1/4 scale or larger. For miniature stuff either timing belts & pulleys can be purchased, or (as I prefer to do) use gear drives where you can make your own gears to the size and style you desire. My current project is a V4 with slightly less than 10cc displacement. Hoping to be finished this coming January (I started building it 3 years ago). Good luck.

I think this video is in RU-vid's recommended list or something because most of my subscribers have not seen the video yet.

Someone already did this on RU-vid, Donovan...it was a fabulous build! Just type in "4 cylinder Briggs"

See 805Roadking on RU-vid he built one

Came here to say this. Sounds great, too.

ik

i have seen the videos of it

You'll shoot your eye out, kid!

Exactly.. .looks like I wasted time writing a response you took care of already Mr. Jarvis.

61,9 cubic inches equals 1 litre

You mean Kermitt?

Powertek did it with hayabusa heads, powering the radical, I did actually look at buying one when I was in the custom business, boss was keen aswell as it has a load baring block. We knew it was going to be expensive, but at the time £50k (ten years ago at a guess) very very short life and extremely short service intervals was not justifiable

I agree!

@@JohnDoe-ck3pr u tr

With side valves, better still a rotary with side valves, lunacy, absolute lunacy but would be good to see😊.

excellent video by the way

draaibank

And it's the "victory", not "victoria"

CISWHITEMALE I

CISWHITEMALE o.o

​@Andrew Manche Lol, I think you need to learn facts first. The definition of an engine is "a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion". The definition has NOTHING to do with "fuel". Waiting for your apology and self-correction :)

@Andrew Manche You are literally still wrong. An engine isn't anything to do with fuel. It might be in your sector specifically but that is NOT the only definition. For example, their are entirely mathematical 'engines', physics 'engines' etc. These things adhere to the ACTUAL DEFINITION that I gave you, you know, the accepted standard definition of the word, not just something I've assumed/applied to the field I supposedly work in. Tbh, if you really DID work in those fields of engineering you'd have the understanding that the definition you are asserting isn't the only definition at all. If you could provide a source where your definition is given in academic material etc. I'll provide ten for you where mine is. Have a nice day ;)

@Andrew Manche Judging by the way you repeat yourself and the language you use, you are no older than 15. A motor is "a machine, especially one powered by electricity or internal combustion, that supplies motive power for a vehicle or for another device with moving parts" An engine is the LESS specific definition of "a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion". Here's several sources; en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/engine www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/engine (definition 4) www.dictionary.com/browse/engine (definition 4) www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/engine Now please stop replying if you're going to continue to use the phrase "parrot" and if you're going to continue to make yourself look rather daft with silly statements and Ad Hominem arguments.

@Andrew Manche okay, I'll stick to the actual definition and you stick to your made up definition (for which you have still provided no source for) and your made-up degree and made-up forty years of experience. If you really had a degree you'd be much less reluctant to provide a credible source for anything, you'd use much more mature language and be willing to explain yourself clearly and how definitions have multiple meanings, often specific to a field within which one is working (you'd have made that point yourself if you'd actually bothered to follow up on any of those links I posted). You allege that you are roughly 61 years old (18+3 year degree + 40 years of 'practical experience') and all you have managed to do here is embarrass yourself - if you really are that age, stop acting like an immature and particularly dense moron. Honestly, if your children (assuming you have any) could see your posts, they'd be utterly ashamed of the way you have acted.

@Andrew Manche Again, you've not addressed anything I've said in my comments. Utterly embarrassing yourself.