Top 20 Disney Villains Who Were RIGHT All Along 

Which Disney villains do YOU think were right? Let us know below, and check out our video of the Top 20 Disney Characters Who Are Actually the Villain - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-qPeBG5GCgFw.html

Even though Skinner was exploiting Gusteau's name for proffit, he was still just doing his job, trying to keep a clean and irderly kitchen. Reporting Remy to the healt department was totally justified. If he were more pleasant to be around, you'd really feel sorry for him.

Ursula was actively sabotaging Ariel (in the lake and with the brainwashing of Eric) so she wasn't exactly in the right.

I loved how much of a father figure John Silver was to Jim in Treasure Planet. He may have been a pirate, but he had the heart of a good man.

A better title for this video should have been "villains who have a point" rather than villains were right all along because the current title makes it sound like everything they said was correct. Even when it's so blatantly obvious it was self-serving and used to manipulate the heroes

I agree with Gabby Gabby. She's not really malicious, and desperately wants to be played with. At least she gets a happy ending.

Even though he died, Syndrome was right when he said nobody would be super if everybody was

"After all...I am your biggest fan" will always be an iconic line

When it comes to Callaghan, not only can we sympathize with him, but I also admire how after seeing his daughter again, he instantly regrets everything he’s done, especially Tadashi. And in the series, he doesn’t even try to escape prison. He simply accepts the fact that he’s paying the price for his actions.

Nope. Ursula manipulated the whole situation to make sure that she was there to pick up the pieces. Just because Ariel signed away her voice willingly doesn't mean she was pure in intent. She clearly wasn't when she tried to take over Triton's kingdom.

For Maleficent you have to keep in mind she's also a member of the Fae. So some fairies getting invited while another was "not wanted" breaks fairy hospitality laws(which are mandatory, even if you're not informed) so Maleficent was following her own laws as they are within their rights to curse any member of the offending party.

Robert Callaghan was right, but, as seen in a previous video, he went to extremes to avenge his daughter’s supposed death. In the end, he got to see his daughter again, but he carted off to jail shortly after.

"You can't have heroes and villains when the wrong side is making the best sense." Roger Ebert on "I am Sam."

It’s funny that Hades is a “villain” because he really is passive in Greek mythology

Syndrome formerly known as “Incrediboy” went from the Mr. Incredible fanboy to the genius villain and a murderer in 2004’s ‘The Incredibles’, one of my top 3 favorite Pixar movies.

358: Denahi isn’t exactly a villain but he wasn’t aware of his brother’s transformation. I love it that he gets mentioned

“Cutting your hand off was only a childish prank” yeah because it’s normal for a kid to sever someone’s limbs

Well to be fair, Yzma was overstepping her bounds by doing Kuzko's job so her being fired was kind of justified whether of not what of kind of person Kuzko was.

I can’t help to think if I was a villain I would be the likes of Shere Khan. We both have the “whatever humans touch they destroy”mentality

I gotta disagree with Ursula. True Ariel could have swam away, but Ursula cheated. She had no intention of letting Ariel win. It was all a ploy to get the throne.

Contrary to popular belief, Syndrome was not right all along. Now allow me to explain. As we know, when he was Buddy Pine, all he wanted was to join Mr. Incredible and help him out, but Mr. Incredible kept refusing and rejecting him, which drove him to villainy. However, it never occurred to Buddy that his hero was only trying to protect him. After all, being a superhero can be dangerous, especially for children. If Mr. Incredible did let Buddy join him, he would have been allowing him to put his life in danger. Not to mention, Buddy had already proven how unfit he was to be super as he clearly didn't realize there's more to being super than cool suits, gadgets and beating up bad guys. If his massive ego hadn't prevented him from realizing the dangers of being super and that Mr. Incredible just wanted him safe, he wouldn't have turned bad. So really, it's Buddy's fault he turned bad. Though I do agree that Mr. Incredible could have been much more nicer about rejecting him.

I can feel Captain Hook's pain.

I always sympathized with Gantu, even as a kid. He was just a soldier taking orders and ended up being fired for the one time he failed a mission

Ursula cheated to win though. That's not right. Especially after she gave Ariel tools advice to get Eric after she questions giving up her voice.

The one thing that I love about all these Disney villains is that even though their motives for villainy are all different they are all also understandable. Some of the characters on this list may not have chosen to be villains but for some of them being bad feels so good.

With Ursula, while Ariel DID go to her willingly, the only reason she failed was because Ursula took her own human form, hypnotized Eric, and used Ariel's voice to trick him on the last day. Not to mention her minions (probably on her orders) interrupted the kiss during the song "Kiss the Girl".

It’s worth noting that the sea witch in “The Little Mermaid” by Hans Christian Andersen isn’t as evil and manipulative as Ursula. Sure, the conditions that the sea witch laid out for the mermaid were harsh and bloody, but she never lied to the little mermaid about them. The sea witch never interfered with the mermaid’s plans to win the prince’s heart. However, when the little mermaid was unable to win the prince’s heart, the mermaid’s sisters were able to renegotiate the deal with the sea witch by trading in their locks of hair in exchange for a dagger that the mermaid would plunge into the prince’s heart in order to turn her back into a mermaid as opposed to sea foam. Furthermore, the little mermaid went to the sea witch on her own volition (as opposed to escaping an abusive father); and the sea witch initially refused to allow the mermaid become human for the prince only to then give in despite the sea witch’s warnings to the little mermaid that it would lead to heartbreak.

I’m sorry, Sid was horrible and Lotso had his chance for redemption but threw it away. I feel bad for what happened to him, but proved himself irredeemable when he left the toys to be incinerated.

Syndrome is one of the best villains of animated movies , better than many villains of movies and he has good points

I disagree with Lotso. He was the only toy who was replaced by Daisy. 6:51

At least Gantu gets redemption and his job back

Robert Callaghan may be a villain out for revenge but he is right to tell Hiro not to trust Keri

Lotso: “trauma response”? I understand that he went through a rough time after being forgotten by Daisy (his original owner), but how can that explain why he simply left the toys on the conveyor belt to fall into the incinerator? It doesn’t add up

No way, I can't agree on BALTHAZAR. Just because he worked for Madame for an extended period doesn't mean he's entitled to her ENTIRE estate. Normally in these situations there would be a generous lump sum set aside for him - commiserate with his longevity and diligence, but that's IT; he was an employee, neither friend nor family. Madame was entitled to give HER money to whomever she so chooses... no matter how outrageous the amount or how seemingly silly. Absolutely NOT 'misunderstood.'

11:33 But Ursula did play dirty. Ariel almost got Eric to kiss her, but was foiled by Ursula’s eels. Then she put a spell on Eric to fall in love with the wrong girl.

Fun fact: Sid is the garbage man from Toy Story 3. They even brought his original voice actor, Erik Von Detten, back for the role.

For Ursula, we don‘t know why she was banned and therefore we can‘t say, if her revenge plan was justified or not. In regard of Ariel, she lost her justified position at the moment, when she stole prince Eric from Ariel to guarantee, that Ariel would lose her part if the contract.

What about Stinky Pete from Toy Story 2? He was right when it's a dangerous world out there for toys and not being in good condition.

As a kid, I hated Disney Villains but as a grown up, I can understand them

Maleficent was actually entitled to a invitation. Based on the time period, the birth of an heir was something that'd even call a ceasefire in wars because you invite all neighboring monarchy to the event.

Majority if not all of these are a very large stretch. Just because they may have small relatable points. Doesn't mean their actions or behaviors are by any means appropriate. Can't just say, "well they felt this and that" and blah blah blah. Then expect us to accept their terrible behavior and actions.

WatchMojo-“Sid is developing skills surgeons, scientists, and engineers hone.” Me-“And serial killers.”

Peter Pan and Wendy kind of reversed the good guy and bad guy roles. It made Peter a bad friend and Hook a misunderstood character who just wanted to go home

For Sid I believe I heard a theory that his father is abusive and drunk (seen in the commercial scene, he’s asleep but he could be passed out drunk ) so he takes his frustration out on the toys to let out the anger and pain he gets from his father

Now I can see why Edgar would want to get rid of the cats. He was loyal to the woman for I don’t know how many years, but she left her fortune to her cats. I mean…what are the cats are going to do with the money?

Syndrome: "It's bigger! It's badder! Ladies and gentlemen, it's too much for Mr. Incredible! Whoa-hoa!"

I like how she defends the actions of Sid because she thinks there's nothing wrong his actions

At the end of Ratatouille all I could think of was the obscene amount of rat hair that must be in all the food

Even when he was a child, his anger at Mr. Incredible rejecting him became heavily outweighed by his lack of regard for what a super means and self-serving desires. This is especially true since: As a child, he was very reckless and ignorant; he went into Mr. Incredible's car without permission and even claimed that he didn't have to worry about training him because he, as Mr. Incredible's biggest fan, already knows his every move. He simply assumed that the reason he was told to go home was because he had no superpowers, even though it's evident that it's much more because he was interfering while Mr. Incredible was trying to stop Bomb Voyage and that Mr. Incredible was worrying about his safety, which he exploited. He believes that being a super is about wearing cool outfits and beating people up instead of saving lives. This shows that he had no desire to help other people and only wanted to be a super just for fame. Neither as a child or adult does he acknowledge that his recklessness nearly got himself and civilians on a train killed if it weren't for Mr. Incredible, leading to one of the lawsuits that forced supers into hiding. The other supers whom he killed and the citizens he endangered with his Omnidroids had nothing to do with Mr. Incredible rejecting him at all. While he didn't have a full understanding of what it means to be a superhero at the time, he developed vindictive personalities all because of Mr. Incredible rejecting him, despite being a little too harsh. So even though Mr. Incredible had rejected him in a harsh way, he doesn't deserve to have his whole family in danger. Ultimately, Mr. Incredible rejected him not only because he preferred to work solo, but also that it would have been irresponsible of him to take a child under his wing in a dangerous field of work. His ignorance and unawareness of the danger almost got himself killed by Bomb Voyage had Mr. Incredible not forgone apprehending him to save him, therefore he brought his own misery onto himself. Although Mr. Incredible could have handled it better, he still went far beyond the excuse. Even as a child, Syndrome is made clear to have already had self-serving desires and a total disregard for superhero principles. He believed that being a superhero was about wearing cool outfits and getting to beat people up, showing no real desire to help others. Essentially, Syndrome just cared for the "Super" part and not for the "Hero" one. This was proven when Syndrome tells Mr. Incredible that all he wanted is to help him, a flashback of Syndrome's memory is seen and the terrorist Bomb Voyage is absent from his mind. Therefore, although Mr. Incredible could have treated him better, perhaps even if Mr. Incredible had not rejected him, he would either still become a villain eventually, or at least an anti-hero as his reckless nature aside, Buddy's self-serving nature made him unworthy of being a hero. To be fair, however, he was a kid at the time, so he may not have understood what being a superhero really meant, though despite this, he didn't realize as he grew up that Mr. Incredible wasn't in the wrong, and even if he didn't want to forgive Mr. Incredible for his harsh treatment on him, that didn't justify going after supers who had nothing to do with his rejection. Also, when he recalled on how Mr. Incredible treated him that time, he omitted Bomb Voyage's presence and made his quote ("Fly home, Buddy. I work alone.") in a condescending tone rather than for his own good. As Woody points out, Lotso's backstory, while somewhat pitiful, doesn't justify anything he did. No matter how much Daisy "abandoning and replacing" him hurt him, his actions surpassed the excuse because: The reason why she replaced him was because he was her favorite toy and she lost him purely by accident, not because she didn't love him. Also, her parents are the ones to blame since they did not pick up her toys when she fell asleep and bought a replacement for her instead of going back to find him. Then again, replacing their child's lost toy rather than going out of their way to retrieve it in a remote location makes sense from an adult's perspective. He forced Chuckles and Big Baby to leave Daisy and join him in his suffering, even though they weren't even replaced at all, only him. Big Baby would spend years assuming he had been replaced too. Even when Chuckles tried to point out the truth about his replacement as well, he didn't listen and instead furiously insisted that she replaced all of them. To summarize it, he was the one who actually abandoned her and not the other way around, because as explained above, he forced his two former friends to run away from her even if they weren't replaced at all. The toys that he took his anger out on had nothing to do with him getting replaced and him abandoning her at all, with his horrendous treatment of them being his way of angrily lashing out at everyone else with the mindset that if he can't be happy, no one can, also when he left Woody and his gang to burn to death in the incinerator, all his sympathy was thrown out of the window. The animators also admitted that they increased Lotso's cruelty in the final version of the film in order to ensure that people understood that he deserved his defeat in the end. While her getting banished by King Triton sometime before the events of the franchise could be seen as a bit tragic, it is never played for sympathy nor does it justify her actions in any way, as she simply wants to overthrow him and take control of Atlantica herself instead of simply ruling by his side. Not to mention that she is not against turning him into a polyp (which is considered a fate worse than death) just to get what she wants. There's no proof of mistreatment from Triton so you can't put the accusing finger on him. Shere Khan also puts fear into other animals and show sadistic pleasure in doing it and hunts for pleasure and malice as opposed to survival according to Kaa's dislike which also makes him a villain besides his hatred of Man. Since Yzma stated that she practically raised Kuzco, it's obvious that he became selfish thanks to his upbringing by her which means that she's always bad before getting fired. We like the original Disney Peter Pan film and book the way they are including Peter Pan as the main protagonist and Captain Hook the main villain regardless of the boy's flaws so no swap is needed. Most of the time, Disney Villains are never misguided, just evil despite reasons and even then, they don't excuse their actions so they're mostly wrong and never right. Hopefully no more villains who are right things in future for you to correct yourself and the info I show to you will help you see and understand things.

I mean, Evelyn being right all along is a reach. The supers weren’t vigilantes, they were federally recognized officers of the law.

I don't see Denhai as evil at all, he wasn't like that until he thought he lost both Sitka and Kenai... actually, he was the one trying to stop Kenai taking revenge on Sitka in the 1st place. It's Kenai that left him no choice but to be this way - if he wasn't this stubborn, none of it would have happened. Kenai in my opinion in a way reminds me of Kuzco the main character who's actually the reason many of the bad stuff happened in the 1st place and we just get the chance to see them evolving and changing for the better. had both of them behaved better and smarter - they wouldn't find themselves in this situation. again - that's my opinon (and i am a sucker for BOTH films of Brother Bear)

While it is true the contract Ursula had was binding, she did sabotage Ariel's efforts in the midst of her getting closer to Eric. So..... not exactly what I'd call completely justified/fair. Also, Kuzco's way or ruling was influenced by Yzma. If supplemental material is taken into account. His parents died and she did raise him. And the way she treats people is much the same as him at the start.

No. 15, Woody: "Lotso, she was like 5 okay. And she didn't replace you, her parents did. And they only replaced you 'because' Daisy loved you so much. Lots O'Hugging Bear: "You're right, all this time I've been angry for nothing. I'm sorry, everybody." Rex: "Yeah, if anyone should be furious it should: Big Baby or Chuckles. They didn't replaced at all."

Edgar only had to take care of the cats then he would have inherited anyhow...

According to TV Tropes this list would be an example of "Anti-Villain," "Villain Has a Point" and "Well-Intentioned Extremist."

I feel like this video should be called giving excuses to villains 😂

Maleficent is truly one of the most scariest villas of Disney

I don't think Ursula gets to be counted in this. Yes, Ariel signed the contract willingly. HOWEVER - Ariel was going to quite easily fulfill her end of the deal, but Ursula deliberately sabotaged it. Ariel didn't try to back out of the deal she agreed to, she was going to win, but Ursula went out of her way to interfere.

I agree with Shenzi, Banzai & Ed Imagine being kicked out of ur home and being left to starve for possibly years? We have no idea how long they had gone without food, and someone all of a sudden came up to u and promised u tons of food if u followed their lead? Would u not do what they say? They were hungry and Scar promised them that they’d never go hungry again as long as he was king. That’s just my opinion anyway

15:53 THAT WAS HIS STEAK 🥩.

Kind of hard to put Gabby Gabby in the villain category since Toy Story 4 kind of didn’t have a villain per say… as opposed to the others in 1-3

I really feel for Goob. It all could have worked out if he or the mc talked about it. He should have switched rooms. People be more inclined to listen in on others feelings.

On the aristocats one. It's not unheard of in several places in the world to write pets as heritants and people as their steward, it's a construction to guarantee the animals' wellbeing. The steward gets access to the resources for all practical purposes. What the cats would do with the money is let their steward manage the house, and pay himself a reasonable salary until they go

Dark Path. Sure, I don’t exactly call throwing eggs at your old roommate’s home a “dark path” but being used by Doris, invented by Lewis, is. Doris might be a hat but she uses Michael to get revenge on her inventor but Michael didn’t want that kind of revenge

Once again Syndrome is proven to be the greatest Pixar & Disney villain as he lands the number one spot.

Also, your quip about maleficint "if you didn't want to invite her, you should have kept it as a small party" gives off victim blaming vibes. "Well if you didn't want your child to die in the shooting, you should have had them befriend the shooter!"

Hades being worked in the underworld is a Grimm job and he hates it. Honestly, you can’t blame a guy that hates his job of his every day. Even not being like his brothers Zeus and Poseidon

URSULA’S CRAZY SISTER!

U meant "Disney and Pixar" villans

Top ten Pixar characters we can identify them as mcu characters 1. Woody: captain America 2. Buzz lightyear: iron man 3. Bo peep: black widow 4. Sulley and mike: hulk, or groot and rocket 5.Jessie: Hawkeye 6. Lotso: thanos 7. The incredibles: the guardians of the galaxies or black widows family 8. Boo: baby groot or Cassie lang (the young version) 9. Hopper: thanos 10. Flit: Scott lang

You forgot Stinky Pete in Toy Story 2. He convinces Woody that is loving rightful owner Andy is growing up and will eventually out grow him. And we all know what ended up happening in toy Story 3 and 4.

You know, when looking at things from Sid Phillips' point of view, I can see him psychologically as either a surgeon or an engineer, like my Papa! Maybe if he would not be psychologically scarred by the alive toys, if the toys were not sentient, he would probably grow up with a pretty well-paying job. Maybe as he matures, he'd probably be a pretty good, decent-at-worst, co-worker with my Papa at Textron. And on the case of Maleficent... yeah, if I were the king, I would invite Maleficent over to Aurora's baby shower. Even as a villain, though, I think she's quite a charismatic character, with her majestic appearance, and Elanor Audley's voice, I would probably invite her, even with a little... tips for her, like try not to scare the baby, but make her dramatic appearance as she wishes. Maybe request some entertainment from her too.

I had a feeling that this would be a topic. 🤣

So glad this got updated

Woody and several other toys scared the crap out of the adolescent character Sid Phillps in the first ‘Toy Story’ movie.

Hades Yzma and Hook are the most relatable to me

Sid is a psychopath... the stuff he did is what serial killers do after they grow up. Lotso was just Stalin as a bear.

You guys are completely WRONG about Hades. He wasn't BANISHED to the underworld, he was ASSIGNED the underworld. SOMEONE has to manage the dead, after all. Hades wanted to take over Olympus for S&Gs

I have to disagree with shere khan the tiger being justified. The only reason he has it out for humans is because he wants to stay at top of the food chain in the jungle, he knows that humans are above tigers in the food chain, so he wants to get rid of the kid. It has nothing to do with him wanting the jungle and it’s animals to be safe from humans.

In Greek Mythology, Hades felt like the only normal god there. If you look at what the other gods are doing, especially Zeus, Hades is Kida the gentleman here

Syndrome was just a kid who didn't truly know the reality of Superhero life.

I have to disagree on the subject Ursula. Even though she never made Ariel do anything she didn’t want to do, she sabotaged almost every aspect of the deal to work in her favor

Sorry, but Sid from Toy Story WAS wrong. You seem to have missed that a lot of those toys he destroyed were NOT, in fact, his. They were his SISTER’S. So he was completely in the wrong.

I’ve never believed that Maleficent was motivated by ‘not being invited’. She didn’t care about that. She just wanted to rob the kingdom of its future by cursing their newborn princess. Her goal is to make as many people miserable as possible.

Most of this list is bullcrud - Villains having understandable motives for their misdeeds does not mean they are in the right. It sounds like "I am right for kidnapping your children because you bullied me in highschool".

The answer is Scar. Yes, Mufasa turned out to be a great king and Scar was absolutely wrong for killing him, but what if Mufasa wasn't go great? He was only king because of birth order, and Simba only inherited the kingdom because he was the oldest son of the son. I feel like most of the world has already figured this out about monarchies, but...That's a really messed up way to do things. What if the leaders/future leaders are incompetent or corrupt? They get to be in charge just because of birth order and gender? What could go wrong? (I think the history books show us what could go wrong.) The only way to save the kingdom would be to do something like Scar did. In the case of "The Lion King," Scar turned out to be the evil one, but what if he wasn't evil? What if Mufasa and/or Simba were evil? Then Scar's actions would have been justified. While he went about it in the wrong way, Scar wasn't wrong in his opinion that the birthright system is extremely flawed. Theoretically, how is it fair that he never had a chance to be king? Just because his brother fathered a son? The fate of the entire kingdom depended on what kind of child (if any) Mufasa had.

But when Lewis was returned to his own time, he fixed things for Goob so he caught the ball and went on to have a happy life.

Now that i'm a grown man, i get this top. So, great job Ms Mojo, and a happy saturday afternoon to you as well. Take care and God bless you, greetings from Colombia.

9:24 to 9:32 GLUTTONY and overhunting that's why mufasa banished them

Sid from Toy Story will never be redeemable in my eyes. He may be be creative, but the act of dismembering toys and reattaching them is the first sign of a sociopath. Next, he'll upgrade to animals and before you know it, we'll have another Jeffrey Dahmer on our hands

I blame the writers for not allowing denahi to hear his brother's voice inside the bear's body. If that was possible, then denahi would have realized the truth sooner

Now that I'm older, these villains deserve so much better!

Treasure Planet was such an underrated gem

Just realised Evelyn Devour is wordplay of 'Evil Endeavor' hahahah the writers were crafty for this one

While Evelyn Dever's loss of her parents is tragic, it doesn't make her right because super heroes and their are very practical because they can do things that regular police, firemen and even the military can't, which saves even more lives whose could have been otherwise lost. Her anti-dependant on supers also puts society of great danger because what if there was a villian with super powers? If you had a super villian then no amount of police or a huge army could stand against him or her (well, it can depending on the power but let's for argument sake say that the villian have tremendous powers or is like Jack-Jack, have a huge variety of powers) then you need super heroes who could fight this super villian and prevent him or her from taking over the world and rule it as an all-powerful ruthless dictator. Plus Evelyn/Screenslaver's method of killing several innocent people and supers (including the cvilians at the docks) doesn't justify her idiotic plight, it just makes her a heartless monster. If I were Elastigirl, I would let her die and not save her because it wasn't a life worth saving and death is the best punishment to a irredeemable monster (like so many villians). Violet said the point in the film that she could use her wealth to bribe the best lawyer into saving her from lifetime in jail (which would be too nice a punishment, like I said she deserved death for her actions and irradical thinking despite her tragic background, also it was the ban of the supers that caused her parents death like her brother said, so he is right and she was wrong) which could result in her attempting to make supers banned again or getting revenge by becoming a villian (let's hope it doesn't go that way if there'll be an Incredibles 3 but there's a new villian and this time an ACTUAL SUPER VILLIAN with powers and making him ruthless, cold and downright evil, no more symphetic or suprise villians, just the classical villian we love to hate and get the punishment he or she deserves). So NO, she wasn't right at all!

Sid Phillips: *Displays psychopathic behavioral traits. This video: "He's gonna be a doctor one day!!!!"

I think several of these aren't necessarily "right", but just complex beyond the understanding of the children they were designed to entertain. I remember despising a lot of these characters as a child, but actually felt bad for them when I saw them again as an adult.

I think the ones who right are Hook and Callaghan but I can't get behind Sid, they are toys out there made for you to take part and make things with, he didn't have use toys that were not built for that. Also where is it in the Hercules movie does it say Hades and Zeus are brothers? I know they are in mythology but that movie doesn't exactly follow the mythology closely or Hera would've been the villain! And she would've been right in her actions!

You need to rethink your definition of right. Just because there was a tragedy in their past, doesn't justify bad actions.

Y’all have THREE (3) people who tried to UNALIVE CHILDREN, but when it comes to Syd who was bullying younger kids (including his own sister), STEALING their toys, and not just destroying them, but DISMEMBERING them, (and it’s been repeated several times a child dismembering their dolls is a sign of psychopathy) and y’all said that’s NORMAL bc he’s a child???? And not to mention he played with EXPLOSIVES and while dismembering all those toys he stole he imagined they were real. No, he doesn’t know they’re sentient , but he imagines that they are, he imagined they were alive and he was hurting them! Y’all made this list to piss us off.