Update. I bought the RF 100-400mm Canon lens for my R100. I like the 100-400mm RF lens for photographing the moon at night. I mainly shoot flower n foliage photos, and can get good macro shots of flowers and zoom into the trees for leaf shots. I get good bokeh with the 100-400mm lens despite it being F5.6-8 aperture. I like that the RF 100-400mm lens has image stabilization. But I hardly use my 100-400mm lens now that I bought a used Canon 70-200mm constant F2.8 EF mount lens with lens image stabilization. I use an EF to RF Canon adapter to mount my EF 70-200mm lens to my R100 camera. I plan on buying the Sigma RF 18-50mm f2.8 lens in the future.
I haven’t used that combo specifically, but I had that lens for an EOS R a few years ago and it was great! It’s sharp and has macro abilities, but the only issue I had was pretty slow focusing.
Hi. Just purchased the Canon EOS R100 for a cruise to Alaska. As you pointed out, in your video, many of the lenses for this series of cameras are very, very expensive...more than the cost of the camera itself. If I was going to purchase only one additional lens in addition to the stock lens which came with the camera(18-45mm) which one would you recommend? I mainly take pictures of my two cats, an occasional selfie, and scenery when I'm on a cruise. Thanks for your time and advice. Jeff
I use the 100-400 on an r50. I use a lower iso, open up the aperture, slow down the shutter, and drop it on top of a tripod for lower light situations. And Lightroom brings it to life. Ahh the ways of the budget shooter.
I have R50, my lens are: - EF-S 24mm F/2.8, good semi-wide lens for cheap and bright aperture. - RF 50mm F/1.8, the famous nifty-fifty - EF-S 55-250mm IS STM F/4-5.6, another great lens from the DSLR era that works quite well with R50. - Sigma 150-600mm C F5.6-6.3, monster lens for wildlife photography. I found some old EF lens they are working fine with my R50, but the downside they look bulky (especially with additional adapter).
Exciting video as I have an R100 camera. I use the mount adapter to used my EF glass on my R100. But I plan on buying RF mount budget lenses in the future. You photograph a vast amount of interesting subject content in your photos demonstrating the various RF lenses you demo and review in this video. I am impressed with your variety of photo subject content in this video. Am debating of getting the Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM Lens or the 100-400mm RF lens.
I have the 100-400 on the 50. Depends which sport. Its not the fastest aperture so not amazing for internal low light and some night shooting. But i have found it great for fast action external shots. I'm shooting martial arts at the moment so looking more for the EF70-200 2.8 to handle the lower light without cranking up the ISO.
Hey I’m looking into buying the Canon R10 for filming music videos and I am new into being a videographer what is a good professional overall lens that you would recommend?
Retired and having major surgery next week. After recovering we want to travel and I need a good budget set up for landscape and street. I’m a struggling amateur level. Friend recommended the R50 body. I’d like ur help with lens for street and landscape shooting. Really appreciate the input 😊
Get an RF-S 10-18mm for landscapes and an RF 28mm f/2.8 or 50mm f/1.8 for street. If you can only afford one lens - the RF 28mm or 24mm will start you out well.
I need lens for vlogging nothing to expensive but a wide enough lens so when it crops it’s not too close to my face , any lens you would recommend for this ? for the r50
Hi, I am from Arunachal Pradesh, India. I have purchased a new r50 yesterday with 15-45mm lens. Now i want to buy a lens which can do both wildlife and sports photography. Which one should I chose? Or is there other lens options apart from what is shown in this video?
What do you think about SIGMA 18-50mm f2.8? Who do you think is it good for? Thank u. could I probably get that one and the Canon 100-400mm to get best of both worlds with my R10?
Hi, I am a beginner that just got my first camera, R7. And I am looking for lenses that will be good for portraits and landscape, but also affordable. Do you have any suggestions? And do you need an adapter for any of those lenses? Thank you love your videos
Congrats on the purchase! For landscapes, I would look into a wide angle like the RF-S 10-18mm, or 16mm. For portraits you can’t go wrong with the RF 50mm f1.8! None of those need to be adapted to use with the R7.
Thanks! I'm currently saving up for an R50 and a 100-400mm lens for a budget wildlife, aircraft, and motorsport setup. I currently use a T3i with an EFS 55-250, so it'll be a HUGE upgrade.
I used t3i/600d before and got m50. Even M50 felt like times traveling lmao. So futuristic and far ahead of our only 'kinda' reliable 1 center point cross type AF. R50 would be a frickin HUGE upgrade haha.
ty so much for this video i just got my r50 double lens kit and i love macro photography so that super cheap one is totally my next purchase i love water droplet photos so much great info!
Excellent video! I'm curious on what your opinion/recommendation would be for the following scenario. I'm using a Canon m50 mkII with a 15-45mm lense to mainly shoot video for sports subjects.... Vlogging and fitness videos where I am close to the subject. I find it hard to fully fit the subject in the entire frame due to space and distant constraints. (Closer to subject than I'd like) For that scenario would you think it would be best to get a 10-18mm or 10-22mm lense with perhaps an additional speed booster and 0.71x magnification to all a bigger field of view out of the APS-c sensor, making it closer to a full frame field of view. Sorry if I sound like a bit of a rookie but I'm just trying to make sense of it all.
R50 is more compact, 100 g lighter, it has just one dial versus two on R10. Two disks is good in that it allows adjusting two parameters easily while using the viewfinder. It supports the new Fv mode in which you can choose which parameters are automatic and which you adjust. It also is more sports oriented like faster bursts and larger buffers. If you want a more serious camera and use mainly the viewfinder and shoot sports get the R10. If you just want a compact camera get the R10. There are also two kit lenses. I would recommend the longer 18-150 mm.
@@corpseinmydrywall You can't just buy something, then act like it's the best thing ever. The 16mm is a terrible lens for apsc when compared with what sony and sigma make. How does the 60mm compare with the older canon ef-s version? Also the 100-400 does basically the same thing as the older ef-s 55-250mm, which you can get for less than $100 on ebay. There is just no context behind the stuff that he is reviewing, which makes it really unhelpful.
@@OutdoorswithJeremy I’m not going to lie here, I don’t know a ton about cameras and you probably know more about them me. But is it really possible to use a Sony lens on a canon camera? Also with my experience some of the lenses he recommended were very good. I like night photography and the rf 50mm is perfect.
@@corpseinmydrywall I’m pretty sure you can’t use Sony lenses on canon, but I could be wrong. The 50mm is great for astrophotography, specifically for smaller objects in the sky but I would personally go with something a bit wider because I prefer to photograph landscapes
The kit lens isn’t great, but it’ll get you started. If you know you won’t need a wider angle lens at least to start, the 50mm is a great replacement for it!
@@FoxTailWhipz thank you! After some researching, for someone who primarily uses this as a travel camera/life stills instead of heavy on portrait, the kit lens would be a better starting point, correct? Or would the zoom too insubstantial as a payoff? My last dslr (frankly was too young to really learn much from it) was a 18-105mm, so I’m worried I might be overestimating the utility of a 18-45mm
The kit lens will teach you which focal lengths you tend to shoot at the most. The 50mm will teach you how to shoot at one focal length. (For crop sensor cameras I recommend the RF 28mm over the 50mm.)
