TP-Link AX3600 Access Point Find it on Amazon: amzn.to/3BiOgPv TP-Link Omada AX3600 Access Point Review & Setup (EAP660 HD) MUSIC: An Jone - Dulce Reggaeton
It looks like it doesn't natively support this. However there are slits in the mounting bracket you could potentially use to add your own hardware or clips to make this happen.
Why not use iperf3 for speed test? This will eliminate WAN capped speeds being a culprit. I can’t tell what the actual speed the device can achieve since I can’t tell if you download speed via wan is slower than what the device is capable of …
If I want to add it to my home network in the other floors to extend signal, what kind of configurations do I need to do since I have a router already in my network
What effect would it have if it weren't mounted in a ceiling but sat on a shelf or table? For a one-story house would it compromise its reach or strength?
What happens when the TP Link EAP 660 HD WAPs are mounted vertically on a wall. I have Cat 6 A cables in the walls of most of the rooms in my home. I do not want to mount WAPs on the ceilings because this would involve pulling down drywall to install additional Cat 6A cable in the ceilings
Hello sir. Thank you so much for an excellent tutorial for setting up the device. How many maximum number of device can be connected with this access point?
I just bought another one on the 660 access points for my Omada setup...Mounting it on a ceiling isnt going to work for me cause with all the ceiling fans and fire alarms it will crowd my ceiling...Wthat do you think about Wall mounting this unit
yes, 660hd is basically 2x faster. but in home environment that doesnt matter. in fact, HD models are designed for high density environments, with hundreds of devices connected to the AP. non HD options are better for homes, since they are more optimized for single link speeds than handling huge amount of devices at once. for instance 650 supports 160mhz bandwidth while 660hd does not. in home scenario, at least for a single user, 650 is faster. then there's always the 670. if i were you id look at 610, 650 or 670.
@@HardHeadMilitary yup 670 in home environment is better than 660hd. 670 supports 4x 160mhz streams at once. 660hd does have more capacity and speed for 2.4ghz channel, but realistically only your IoT devices will use 2.4ghz or your devices only in scenarios where 5ghz range doesnt reach them. so higher capacity and speeds for 5ghz matters more in practice and especially in home setting.
@@teemuvesala9575 if i purchase the omada controller, can I set the system to change over from one access point to the other based on signal? Or am i asking too much
You can certainly manage it locally yes. But if you want to use their omada management though, you may need a license. I show the local management in a browser in the video. There may be an app, but I didn't see one mentioned..
No you do not need a license to manage your omada hardware. License is needed when you use their cloud controller. You can host your own controller via docker or windows/Linux pc
You need to learn some math. Receive level should be in dBm not dB. dB is for gains and losses in a system not power. You said lower is better and this is not true. -51 dBm is a lower number vs -43 dBm. You also didn't show channel, channel width, and power for each AP for a fair comparison.
