I already have a Black Widow 2.0 solid and like it would the track paragon hybrid be a step up or step down or would it overlap the widow too much? Thanks appreciate the work you do on these vids.
paragon hybrid comes shiny out of box. it offers a lot more length, and a little more backend motion than the BW 2.0 solid. i do not think there would be too much overlap. be sure to keep the surface fresh on your BW 2.0 to give them a little separation. you could also look into the BW 2.0 Hybrid.
the sensor flares a little less, but the cover is stronger, for a longer/stronger motion compared to messenger PC pearl, which is a little smoother overall.
sensor has a lower diff core with a cleaner cover. sensor is built to handle less oil volume, with more length and more backend motion. PTP is more even front-to-back.
As a long-time bowler, I am not a fan of the core filler material. I prefer thick shell cover(2 peice) balls. I am well aware of the many reasons filler material is common in the industry, however I think a different approach might be a more useful tool. What if on 16 & 15 lb. and perhaps 14 lb. as well, you use thick cover(2 peice) balls? And only use dynami-core on the lighter balls so you can continue to use the same core throughout all weights? I think currently there is a big void of manufacturers making 2 peice balls. And for a company like Track, it could set them apart. Just my 2 cents.. thanks! Keep up the good work! Oh, and how good is the stealth? I'm 18mph, about 525rpm. and looking for something a little stronger than my proof solid. I thought I'd ask while I can still find them online..thanks again
i hear you. but 2-piece construction comes with some severe design limitations that adding an outer core helps a lot. since dynamicore gets us closer to the 2-piece hitting power, it's much better to use an outer and have a full range of RGs, shapes, and volumes to work with. there is a place for 2-piece still, but they will be fewer and further between. stealth has been an amazing performer, but categorically different than proof solid, i would not say stealth is stronger, but maybe a bit earlier if that's what you're looking for. legion solid would be closer to a 1:1 replacement for o.g. proof in motion.
@@BowlingBuckosh like I said. I understand most of the reasoning behind using "cheaper" material as filler. I think doing it the way I suggested sill gives you the ability to have rg/core values the same. Also, when you have multiple layers of different densities of material, temperature changes become a bigger issue. You and I both know this design makes every ball made more susceptible to cracking. I think ball manufacturers should continue to make high quality equipment and not use cheap filler on top end/expensive equipment. I know these companies try to justify it, but it is crap.. I'm not looking for a direct replacement for my proof. If I was I would be looking at the legion. Especially since it has the same cover. I'll ask it this way.. is the cover on the stealth stronger or weaker than the cover on the legion/proof?
low-RG high-dynamic cores are a no-go with 2-piece balls. RG is handcuffed by the density of the cover. then the density/volume relationship of the core alone is responsible for the gross weight. price is one minor factor, but the the driver behind why we use 3-piece is design. The cover is a bit stronger on Stealth, but the symm core is less dynamic, thus smoother overall. if you are looking for stronger/smoother, this is an option, but a big asym like a Paragon would naturally be more ball.
@@BowlingBuckosh I appreciate you taking the time to explain that. I hope we still see 2 peice balls every so often. The paragon does seem like the right choice..
