This video contains procedures and examples of how to perform 8 step troop leading procedures in accordance with U.S. Army FM 5-0, The Operations Process.
Lol, true. If everyone atleast gets the basics right when it pops off & no casualties occur I'd call it a success. Taliban setup some nasty ambushes, lots of experience.
METT-TC dependent obv, a unit could just jump in the trucks and go but most the preparation time usually has to do with being mounted and that you don't want anything to go wrong that could have been prevented.
I remember seeing a series a few years ago about a LT having a dream about his first long term op of peace keeping. His first dream was about bringing the right resources for establishing a FOB, second dream was about understanding the local to win hearts and minds, the third dream was about self control of yourself and your men/ having the proper Overwatch for defense and the rest I forgot. Anybody know what I’m talking about?
I am sure after risk assessment and you decide you need additional support . It is as easy as ASKING FOR IT . I am sure they have support guys standing around waiting to be called upon .
well, if you ever get the chance to do it irl, you'll see that the 9hrs is helpful and can go by quick. They don't HAVE to have that amount of time if during normal downtime(if any) the vics are good to go they prob could let know whoever is going and within an hour or less could be on thier way. Only thing I don't like about this conventional idea is that it doesnt go well with ANA that leak planned routes to the enemy.
i find your lack of PT belts disturbing! lol yeah i was in for 6 years and didn't find out until after i got out about us being allowed to have vbs2 lite. :(
not sure if it's too secure to do a briefing on a mission in the middle of a fob whose interior that can be seen from miles away correct me if that's common practice
USMC: Not understanding basic instructions for 300 years. This procedure itself can be used to adapt, overcome, and improvise if only you are capable of adapting, overcoming, and improvising. It's stated that this process can be changed to suit different situations, and only says that you must go over each step so that you're sure not to forget anything when leading a unit. If you were able to comprehend the video, you could see that. Maybe if certain Marines had better comprehension, they'd they could figure out how to apply such procedures in a way that would better help them overcome their situation. For instance, that was a long ass WARNO in the video. I have never heard a WARNO with that much detail. That's like too much for a WARNO. No one does a WARNO that long unless they have a ridiculous amount of time to go through the TLP. Even then, that WARNO is way to detailed. That's like an OPORD.
EduEnYT You're missing the point. This is an instructional video, regarding the Operations Process, TLPs and Convoy Ops. The scenario is simple so you don't get bogged down with details. They include all aspects of TLPs to that you become familiar with them and what what to consider. It's like fixing a car. You don't brute-force check everything, only what you think might be wrong. But you only have a reference for what might be wrong once you've learned a good bit about all the systems within the car and how they should work. From there, the better you get, the better your mind becomes at doing what you need to do and not doing what doesn't fit the situation. Then adapting it further to suit what is in front of you. You don't jump right "improvise adapt overcome" until you learn the doctrine and the "book solution." Winging it is what gets people maimed or killed needlessly, regardless of what service you are in. Each echelon from Company Command down to fire team has its role to play as part of the team, which includes being technically and tactically proficient.
Also, we totally used similar procedures in the Marine Corps. (Troops Leading Steps? BAMCIS, anyone? Dont tell me you dont remember learning that in bootcamp.) It would be stupid to go on any mission without doing so. And the OPORD is a format used by all military branches. We would always get an OPORD/Op-Order for a mission, be it a simple ass patrol to a complex helo-op supporting another unit outside of our AO. And as always, nothing go as planned. That's why we emphasize Commander's Intent. And when shit does hit the fan, that's where "improvise, adapt, and overcome" comes into play to achieve the desired endstate.
What, no catchy acronym? RIMIRCIS: Rimmy Ruckus.... Yeah, that doesn't quite work out. Why in the old days we had BAMCIS, IJJTEDDIBUCKLE, SMEAC, SCHMEGMA.
RU-vid sees and understands the content you've been watching. This is also knowledge that will be valuable if ever we would be in service for any reason.
This is good use of technology to provide information...especially in our current COVID 19 social distancing environment. There are some improvements that could be made that are a bit annoying to those watching. Here they are: 1. It appears that everyone taking notes writes with their left hands.2. The CC is in full gear and everyone else was in a T-shirt.3. No one appeared to be carrying a weapon, not even a pistol...unrealistic.4. Graphics, overlap...technology and editor attention to detail. I'm sure I can go on...I'm not knocking the overall content. Its pretty good considering. But there is room for improvement. Thanks for providing it.
I wonder how much more it cost to get those crappy video game graphics then it would have cost to just film some service members walking around on a base. It’s okay. Navy does the same thing with its training. Spends 10s of 1000s of dollars on slide shows with 3D models of h-60s, when a simple photo would have done the trick.
Some of these guys look like they got hit in the face w/ a hot shovel... lol. Guessing this was made either a ways back, on a very low budget/time constraint or didn't have a 3D model asset prepped.
I don't get this video series at all, why are there soldiers here who say great video, don't you guys get trained for this ? why do you need a video isn't the training a standard for everyone in this position ? weird !
The keyword is LEADING. This is leadership training, mostly for officers or NCOs. A soldier doesn't learn this in Basic Combat Training. They learn this when they are on track to become a leader.
Elizabeth Zuniga wow, !! are you a soldier ? i dont think a soldier can look so good and be so smart ! not from America voting Trump ! you should come to sandhurst and learn to be a proper officer under the motherland, under the British army !