TRUCK CRASH TEST COMPILATION - Ford F150, Toyota Tundra, RAM 1500, Nissan Titan 

Installing diesell turbine engines and tracks.

Robin Miller I want my Titan made of that same steel!!!!

Lol it's not steel. Its concrete with plastic casing.

@@JSLCummins how do u know?

I will try to avoid these stationary pillars, when driving down the highway.

Mauricio Marroquin They do these tests to comply with Federal mandates, which cause the cost of a new vehicle to be out of reach to people unless they sell their futures to the money lenders. Because these vehicles help people to live, even to not get hurt at all in some cases, idiot drivers act like they are in a NASCAR race most of the time. These idiot drivers are an ever-present menace amongst us. ,

@Lord ballsac the 2nd Simulations can fail and are not exacting enough to predict the exact action, forces, and manipulations that may occur to a vehicle and its riders. Computer modeling would also require dozens and maybe even hundreds of test per vehicle model to get significant enough data to get *close* to a correct model, and that data would have to all be recollected when a new vehicle model is released or revised.

I started a channel where i take trucks off road and break em. Try and make a few people laugh

Lord ballsac the 2nd I’m not sure if you’re in the same industry as I am (R&D engineer for a major vehicle manufacturer), but computer simulation will not replace physical testing due to the fact that, if we’re gonna make the actual product anyways, you might as well test the product physically. Also that testing solely through computers is (ironically) significantly more expensive than running it through crash tests (as of right now). Besides... we’ve already simulated assemblies using typical CAD/FEA software (my company mostly uses Solidworks and CATIA). In the end, crashing the vehicle is testing that our math was right. Only time where it’s cheaper to model than to test would be in my sister-company’s aerospace industry.

Exactly. Just like animal testing

Johnnie Walker lol

Lol.. maybe rebuilt states as others. Hahahah

Rebuilt title but I replaced fender and all is perfect

Brand new slightly used 2019 pick up trucks, perfect condition except for a scratch or two that can be buffed out, AC blows cold.

Lol so funny ikr

ngl that would b a hella fun job

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

“ Babe what do you do for a living?” “ I sacrifice my own life for other people’s safety” “ Babe thats so cool “

“So babe what do you do for a living?” “I paint dummies head”

That night he smashed babe

Yeah. Just like my ex she breaks everything. my car, my heart, my soul

Mr Fiest no one gives a shit

They're Russian.

@@suntat511 r/whooooooosh

Heru- deshet r/whoooosh

Lack Chevroleto Silverado and GMC Sierra

Thank you!

thankyou for the work that was unnecessary it already says it on the top

and it said it on the side of the cars

@@bagelhunter3856 really dude? Wdym unnecessary work? It helps because hellooo TIMESTAMPS AS IN EXACT TIME STAMPS where we could skip other trucks or parts

Cherry0s thanks never knew that

How do they know if the car is good if the dummies dont fall out or if they don't brake what is the condition to have a good crash? If that makes sense

@@thefireofthesaints1231 the dummies have censors so in the impact if the censors say that the dummy isnt severely injured or dead if a human then the car would be "acceptable" but it will be "bad" if the dummy was screeming with the censors, and "good" if its minor injury.

@@vinicio10 thank you God bless you have a great Sunrise/day/Night

@@thefireofthesaints1231 Cars are designed to crumple in a crash so they act like a pillow. If the car were so strong that it was undamaged in a crash you would smash against the inside so hard you would break like an egg.

جميع السيارات الامريكيا قويه جدآ

@@محمدالعراقي-ض5غ8ك not true. american cars are crap. german ones are the best

@@michaelberg7825 German cars are money pits in the US. Unless you're leasing they're shit in the long run.

Literally all the trucks crumbled the same quit riding on fords nuts they’re not good trucks

@@Black_jjcoolmaster Wow, such an expert.

Tough but lol nonetheless

Slap some wheels on that baby and it's good to go!

😂😂 it would be cool, but if a vehicle is too heavy it can be more dangerous. Something to do with how it absorbs the crash force.

@@Beelzebubby91 I don't think tanks are dangerous to the driver.

It would probably weigh tons and give you 5 miles to the gallon

Or “Rebuilt title due to minor front end collision”.

That’s actually Craigslist, “Runs and drives, clean title, no low balls I know what I got”

AC works ice cold

“Garage kept and rarely driven”

@@RU-vidAIbot 😂 true

999 Subs Without Videos same

Im pretty sure it will be very poor as i have no idea how exactly a steel shell will absorb the crash energy..

It'll drive right through the barrier haha

@@ggoddkkiller1342 You have no idea, but you are sure it will perform poor? Interesting logic.

Probably won't even get a dent

its because ford used to own volvo and i guess volvo taught them how to make cars do that look and newer fords they all slide off

@@J7Haip LOL, Volvo taught Ford how to make cars.

Heavy coat of wax on the bumper helped.

It's because it's the only vehicle there made of aluminum.

I think it's because of the crash bar behind the front tires, I'm not sure if the other brands have those.

I would agree but the bigger the vehicle the harder it is to make it safe.

@@Kinsman00 actually it is the opposite. The bigger vehicle has more crumple room and can have larger components.

@@Willdoesmusic135 I would like to keep my legs in a crash, so thank you very much, but I would still consider it poor.

@@Kinsman00 you mean the smaller it is the harder to make safe? bigger vehicles are far safer.

A poor rated vehicle today is 100x's better than an excellent rated vehicle 20 years ago.

I was thinking the same thing haha

😂🤣😂

That's like wanting to fly in an airplane black box, they seem to survive all crashes!

@@jsprdn Except 9 / / go figure but then again no plane hit w t c 7 and Epsteins still alive.

This is FACTS

Scraping, creeking, scratching, loud bangs. It’s horrible

As long as it is on video - you're right. Real life? Maybe not so much ...

The engineers are only doing what the government and consumers are telling them to do.

@@Space.Ghost. Doesn't discredit the effort and ingenuity ;)

@@peloi111 not in the slightest.

True. But you really have to start by high school to land said job. Then get into a well respected engineering school, earn an undergraduate degree, then a graduate degree. So... by 24 or 25 years old you'll have a small chance of getting an interview.

It's tedious work after awhile it becomes a rut. It's fun for the first year or so.

I prefer to be "paid".

I saw an interview one time of a guy working it. And he said it’s not great because it hard not to imagine your family in one of those crashes while testing. And just hoping that never happens

Littleman 123 I’d be the driver

❤️❤️

We love people like you! 👍🏼

@@Pilot545 I wish someone told me that they love me

Thanks Man!!

Your not the hero we deserve. But the hero we need

It wanted no part of that wall.

Skiiirrrrrt, nooooope!

T-CUT will fix it.

is it a good thing?

@@yhatszy09 If no parts are deflecting, then parts won't dig in to any of your body parts. And because the truck moved away from the wall, it preferred to dissipate it's energy elsewhere, in this case, translational movement and friction.

All the functioning trucks were getting tested and couldn't jump it.

No point in testing a truck that’s never going to touch the road.

I am surprised how no Chevy fanboys responded to this yet. Maybe they realize that their truck is trash and playing second fiddle to the Ford.

@@davidparker9676 Maybe youre the fanboy, fanboy.

Fun fact: They even included footage of them draining the fluids and pushing these trucks to the test site. Dont be so dumb, it would make more sense that they used trucks that DIDNT run.

exactly

@@RubyXIII beacuse the passengers head was going into the airbag hard and caused the airbag to deploy or the dummy slipped the airbag

I wouldn’t even consider it a truck.

and ram looked like the dummy ate the dash too 4:58

Because unlike others that were qualified as marginal or poor, the Ridgeline's structure absorbed and handled the energy pretty well, the cabin's shape was not compromised, which is an important aspect of crash test califications, as no deformation means no people crushing. The passenger's airbag was a complete failure in that particular test though, hence why it is considered acceptable

Dylan Smith agreed

Glue the tabs back on ffs

Dylan Smith you can salvage the back of the shit too

Lol

LoL

boxerfan2 Nah man, the sherman’s obsolete. May I interest you in a Leopard MBT? ;)

@@gimmeabreak4435 Cant afford brand new. lol

boxerfan2 maybe on craigslist? Lol

Bottle Yeet leapords are also obsolete as they were built in the 70s i think for the cold war, try a m1a2 for maximum protection included with composite armor and well placed cameras for better drivability

boxerfan2 mo but in all seriousness you should get a t-55 they go for 60 gran tops

It's still totaled and probably undrivable.

@@private6549 not if you're drunk

Haha but it did Really well with deviation.

Did a great job, but honestly I think the Ram did the best at absorbing the impact, as the cabin was nearly untouched !

As an Asian men, that why I choose Ford, just because I am an engineering

The problem with the ford (compared to ram, which also got a good rating) is that the A pillar flexed on the ford which risks cabin intrusion

@@c7torchred868 ford has an overall better safety rating. So no.

100%

acdii-The main thing is that you survived it.I'm glad to hear that you're ok.

so, you still have the time to know, who protect you in truth... it's not a mass of iron

حبيبي والله

And the 7 Mexicans in the Prius you hit all died.

@steve tarrant Yep 😂

Jay K Tell that to the people that weren’t paying attention and pulled in front of me while the driver was looking for the cell phone under the seat. Their new MX5 was in pieces and the passenger was ambulanced to the hospital. Just because it’s “modern” doesn’t make it “safe” in my opinion. The Raptor is one burly pickup and the overall crash test ratings of the F-150s are graded higher than its competitors. The truck saved my life when there was literally nothing I could do but go straight into the other car. It is their fault and luckily they admitted liability at the scene; driver was also cited for using a mobile device. The driver felt so bad, first words out of his mouth were “I didn’t see you”

yea the f150 saved my cousin. had her 3 week old kid in the car too. not a scratch

Same

Jay K that is so far from the truth it is unreal. People die every day in modern vehicles. Then there is the other part. Living with no fucking legs or some shit. There is wishing you just would have died things got so bad.

Jay K lol edit your original post and tell me I’m not getting it. Lmao okay dude.

I was recently dropped by my insurance company for my F350. They said is causes too much damage to other vehicles. It weighs 8330 lbs empty. I have to get insurance for a commercial truck.

BUILT.FORD.TOUGH

Underrated comment

@Ocean Lover it starts right up 🙃

@@Alongfortheride693 were you ever able to get those phasers fixed? I have a 2019 that’s doing the same thing. Of course the dealer says it’s normal.

@@Alongfortheride693 thanks for the reply. I don’t blame you for waiting. That’s pretty much why I haven’t really pushed the issue. I don’t have a lot of confidence that it would be put back together right. It is very annoying though especially for how much they charge for trucks these days.

If you look closely into Toyota's history your going to be very unpleasantly surprised then.

The Tundra is a 13 year old design, notice how in this video the newer trucks do better. That is a theme, newer cars are safer than old ones, and these tests are the reason why.

Hunts By Chainsaw Wrong, Their safety record is pretty good. If you are referring to the unintended acceleration thing, it’s the same as Audi. Nobody ever found anything wrong with any of their cars.

@@emkayusa Wrong, Their safety record is average at best.

Toyota the first three letters tells you the whole story."Toy!! We have companies in United States that make them. Mattel it's a toy company.

Yeah, strait into the path of a passing semi...

@@justin76bmw right...

@@justin76bmw or not

I saw that

I'd bet you have a ford.

Da vid 😆

Id imagine somewhat better but if we did ones from the 80s or 70s they would hold up better considering those things were just big blocks of steel on wheels

While they might hold up better that doesn't necessarily mean it will be a good outcome for passengers

@@ki113rkkrclips9 not at all. things today are done for reasons. any old car is a tin can in a crash, this isnt my opinion its just the facts. go into an auto parts store. almost every set of ramps you will find to drive a car up on to is made of plastic. thats right a few pounds of plastic holding a car completely up off the ground.....

@@chargedx1 true but if where to be some minor crashes like in a derby I would rather trust it than a newer car but I do see where you are getting that and of course it is a bit of a crazy situation for a truck to be in a derby

@@2wheelhoon813 but there were cars made from steel and they were big and heavy compared to these aluminum cars (which yes still have steel elements) we have now and what did the ramps have to do with old cars? What I'm really saying is is that the older cars could take more of a beating due to the thicker heavy metal frame.

Without a doubt was the best one. I just bought a ram over a volvo and cant believe the difference. The volvo just slightly deflected off this test and probably could have kept driving

Was waiting to a silverado/sierra the whole time. Bet it would leave the ford in the dirt

all two vehicles I've ever owned are ford. My family also owned a ford in the 2000s. All three, including my current one never failed us.

The Ford was not overlapped as much. The wheel never even hit the barrier. The others did.

cahan Fowler refer to 7:10

You must have played real nice with your toy cars as a kid🤣

Well I still think that too! 😂 I be careful and talk to my truck and tools and parts! 😂

Thanks Disney!

I feel like same thing I never knew anyone else did too :)

Вы абсолютно правы , все неодушевлённые предметы имеют чувства и эмоции. Я скажу больше они общаются между собой.

Crashes sounds fun but then I think about the clean up lol

How do you get that job!!!! Sounds like a dream job.

Really got me in the mood for watching finger painted dummies bounce off some truck balloons lol

More like the headlights

I really thought Ford F-150 was gonna be the worst one because of the aluminum body but I was wrong..I’m chevy guy..but watching this I might buy F-150 aluminum ford in future...

@@engineergaming4295 imagine correcting someone and being wrong lol

@@someidiot5229 well both flew out of the shot though

@@engineergaming4295 well i guess your not wrong lol

I’ll bet you didn’t say that to your personal injury lawyer 😂😂😂

Same my whole family including my 7 year old brother the truck was totaled but we where a bit sore that’s all. Ford F-150 2015. We where going 110km/h

Didn't receive no injuries? So you did receive some injuries.

Justin Moore lol right... grammar is suffering tho

Double negative

Hellefleur is the model Sherman Tank !

Mr robot XX why not the su-100y since it’s more squared?

It’s been used since 2012

FearlessJbx Gaming How do you know

That thing got a Hemi?

Agreed. That dude driving must be a dummy.

people dont care about crash tests, they just want 20" rims and a connection to apple

@@carlholland3819 😭😭😭

Heavy iron pipe bumpers all around for even more safety. And fill em with concrete.

😂😂🤣🤣😂😂

I would say ram and ford are the best

Yes

Haha damn

I think you right... much work is needed to bring the safety level up for the the Manufactures.

Starting the backbone..The Frame

F-150 KING OF TRUCKS even if you put a moose bumper on the Tundra it’s already a lot safer

@@timmyteabag69 get kid you can put a tree on it and still will crumple like a acordian..lol

F-150 KING OF TRUCKS we’ll drop a tree on any truck and it will, I chose a tundra cause I was stick of all the issues with my ford and I had Chevy before the ford

There is no argument. There is only one clear winner.

Chevy for the win the best on the market

@@diegoromero6179 Says who? Ford outsells them by far!

@@Loki1620 They're cheaper to buy, there's always many more used Fords for sale than GM, why?

@@johnhare7279 Because they last long enough to be resold!

Why? The tundra failed and the Titan passed.

@@chadsteele1 Toyota fanboy, that's why.

@@OfficialDreamTheater Definitely a Toyota fanboi trying to repair his bruised ego.

Because crash test doesn't matter as much as reliability.

people dont buy them to wreck them. they buy them to work them

to be honest i see no difference between them, it all kinda looks the same

@@arthurbenedetti9146 look at 9:00. The passenger broke a leg and kissed a grab handle.

@@arthurbenedetti9146 same

Wow you are smart. Did you get your ged or something?

shortthrow50 real knee slapper bud

I went through the comment section looking for this

Being an adult doesn't correlate to being intelligent. Most 'adults' these days are just old children, lol.

Fords are always the best, in every way.

Like the way fortuner and endeavour are for real men the tundras and f150 are for real men

@@derriklee287 garbage ford

Derrik Lee bwahahahahaha 🤣🤣 here's a typical conversation with you Ford fanbois: Ford fanboi conversation....... Fb: Ford is awesome, can't beat the quality. I'm looking at New ones now while they replace the engine, and take care of the recalls. Me: why would you buy another one fanboi? Fb: because you can't beat the quality, they're great. I've put 25,000 miles on in 2 years, and have only been to the shop 80 times and not 1 issue. They're great quality, Ford best selling for 300 years Bruh! Me: Uhhhh... How is it great quality when you been in the shop 80 times, and they're replacing the engine after 25,000 miles? Oh, they're best selling because of fleet sales. Otherwise, Chevy would kill them, and ram isn't too far behind. Fb: Bruh, stop hating! They best, they kick everyone's ass. My eco crap, uh, I mean boost gets 8mpg. You just can't beat that performance. Ford forever Bruh! Me: 😦 Fb: well, they're done. I'll be back next week for them to replace the tranny and rear axle. Then I'm trading it for a new one. Ford is the best Bruh! Me: 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️😆😆😆

@@JohnDoe-nz6bk I own both a Ford and a Chevrolet. I'm going to be completely honest and unbiased here. My 1997 Ford Mustang V6 has a few issues. There's some surface rust by the wheel arches and on the radiator support. I've had a wheel come off on me from using the wrong size of lug nuts, my fuel pump, thermostat, and brakes are wearing out. My A/C compressor is seized. I've even had a ball joint snap on my suspension. I still like the car, and it's fun to drive. My 1989 Chevrolet Sprint also has a few problems. Originally, both my thermostat and my temperature sensor were off, so it overheated on a -30 day. I had a bunch of lights not working due to a blown fuse. My speakers don't work. My high beams are nonfunctional. My Indicators quit working. My speedometer and tachometer don't work either. The grounds are rusty or burnt, so the left headlight is dim. The horn also doesn't work, and I've had multiple interior parts fall off/apart. (Door handle, shift lever, window regulator handle, window trim) There's also ginormous holes caused by rust. Essentially, both vehicles have problems. Even if you take care of them, eventually something's bound to break. It seems like Ford issues are more drivetrain and accessory-wise. Whereas Chevy has more electrical and rust problems. I did have to replace the engine in the Chevy when I got it, because the other one was shot, but I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt, and saying that was the previous owner's fault, as was most of these issues. I will admit for possibly disabling the horn on the Chevy. The lug nuts on the Ford where cheap ones from the previous owner. I had gotten OEM replacement wheels, and the lugs stripped right through them. So yeah.

Same here, I have a 2010 f150 was thinking of getting a Tundra but after seeing this no thanks.

Tundra all day

I’ll still stick with tundra because it’s reliable and I know I’m a good driver so hitting a block like that won’t happen for me

@@andrewarredondo6305 you may be but what about the other drivers?

Always Ford

Lol! Total Matrix move...

it was a misfire and should have been done again

@@peterf.229 how so? It hit exactly where they marked it to.

Misfire lol, if they did it again and had the same results you would probably make another excuse and say the wall wasn’t real.

Atleast Ford can do one thing right

You would have no crunch zone and it would be even worse for the driver

Yep. It'll bounce right off, pop back into shape and not have a single scratch on it. Meanwhile you'd simply look up and ask the passenger, "did you sse anything just now?" they'd just be like "meh, must have hit something at 90 mph again... no biggie"

Your thinking of forza horizon 4

If your vehicle is indestructible, the forces onto will guarantee death.

19 something something Toyota Hilux be like

Jared Fehr they are bad not because they aren’t bright enough. They don’t use their light well. Car headlights aren’t any brighter. They are just aimed better

driving a pickups myself feeling like small cars had way too bright lighting tho.

bensemus x no, they are definitely brighter.

@@hito4863 not really just the position

Fords can detect if a car is coming by the headlights up ahead and dit dims the headlights then turns them back up.

🤣🤦‍♂️

It sure is the best truck on the road, for only 100k miles. I see GM vehicles on the side of the road more than any other vehicle due to breaking down.

Master Troll Gaming HD my rams never left me on the side of the road like my POS f150 did!

Best truck on the road until it fail the behind test do to breaking down and the interior coming apart as if it was a completed puzzle not glued together

well if you look at other crash tests you will see that most of us pickups are quite pour

Tough = Rust.

The safest truck, the Ridgeline, is not a full sized truck.

People who feel 'safer in the bigger trucks' should be made aware that with this 'safety' also comes a high responsibility, since they are driving around in a small truck, and can therefore inflict greater damage on other road users (especially bicyclists, with the hoods of these trucks almost designed to kill on impact).

A big 70s sedan would kill that ford in an accident

what the actual fuck right?

The dummies head went right between the airbags and most likely struck the dash

That was surely the dummy's fault for missing the airbag though. Stupid dummy.

@@tp7886 right😭😂

They left out the tammy fay face on the dash picture post test. WTH?

Yeah with a glancing blow. Got off easy shooting to the side and not taking the full direct hit to complete stop. Dont know why it shot to the side but it helped it not have to take the full impact.

@@backcountrywesternhunter7452 ya I’m definitely not saying it was better but it was interesting to see

Peace & Quiet 😂😂😂

Peace & Quiet nah it's because Chevy is too good to intentionally wreck. They only intentionally wreck garbage lol.

@@mgp4447 I bet that's why GM is using Ford transmissions now

Nerpnuts GM and Ford design it together but of course Ford took all the credit and claimed GM just copied them. Typical scumbag Ford

Cornelius.... would never get caught out in public driving a Ford pickup would never let somebody Park one of them piece of s*** sand my driveway they circled the problem on the front grill with an blue oval

Yeah and they rip apart in ways steel trucks don't in other instances. EMS observation. Nothing more

Yeah, GM ad lie #37.. Took all of what four hours for the slo-mo guys to uncover the scams in that ad? GM trucks went right over the cliff that week and have never recovered. It's all Ford and Dodge now. When you copy Ford for 15 years, then try to con people with deception and lies, you kinda reap what you sew. Even Obama's redistribution of our $25,000,000,000.00 didn't help. Yeah Brad, it's not just aluminum.. GM even uses the Ford designed 10 speed tranny now. Too funny!

And they completely copied the whole front end of the 2015-2017 f-150 and stole the back side of a tundra and called it the 2020 Chevy Silverado, but it still burns it’s cams up though, so they still have that to boast about “just got my 3rd engine swap in the old shitterado better than that ford junk”

@@TheSunpro Ford and GM worked on 10sp transmission together.

How much to replace a GM/Chevy fancy tailgate? Probably $2500

@@davidjose2193 That's an extremely high deductible.

But you know it ain't a HEMEH

RAM’s isn’t a Hemi either. It’s a highly modified Hemi-ish engine with a second spark plug so that ancient design will pass emissions. It’s designed to tickle the emotions of Baby Boomers who don’t know it’s as thoroughly obsolete as the flathead design. Just think if the NHRA abandoned its stupid rules and let wedge head or petaroof engines in... Top Fuel dragsters would have to do 700 foot passes to stay safe.

@@Bartonovich52 someone's not getting enough coochie

It means that Toyota needs to hurry up and redesign it already, its been like 13yrs with the same model.

Sorry that was me

That's the catapult spooling out after the truck breaks the tether.

Yes, and it's gettin annoying

New Rider Who wouldn’t!?

I was thinking the same thing on just about all of the vehicles they tested... makes me a little nervous that that's acceptable

How the hell is that acceptable you could eat soup out of the back of his skull now.

How is that acceptable when the tundra is poor.

Jose Villanueva that happened to you

that happened on the last week's Chicago Fire episode.

Ormi Ader “last weeks” Commented a month ago

@@SuperStreetWarrior can I get a link?

Jose Villanueva and a cell phone

Yep

Damn right.

Lol

Crash tests

Pierre ah yes a concrete car

Super interesting point. Would be very real world.

The cold winter keeps that sheetmetal sturdy

They're about as tough as the short men behind them lol.

Ever watch an indy or formula 1 car wreck. Million dollar setups reduced to nothing in a split second. Does that make them junk? No it means their shedding energy. Throw more plastic on the front if it means my legs wont be crushed or my kid wont have brain damage from smacking the "grab handle". I bought a 2018 f-150 for a reason. Yes its aluminum, Yes its faster than the competition, yes its more capable than the competition in every way, and yes its by far the safest truck on the market. My family comes first so my decision was a no brainer plus its UNION made right here in AMERICA.

Cheap plastic is cheaper to replace then sheet metal if the vehicle isn't totaled... all vehicles to some degree are made with crumple zones it's ment to be destroyed and absorb the impact so you don't have to... so it's better to see it flying then you being launched thru the dashboard or windshield.

It’s meant to do that on purpose, more plastic and foam, the better it absorbs during a crash...

07slowbalt Toyota’s are made here in America too you dunce. This isn’t the 1950’s

Technically since the Ford frame is made of aluminum it will not rust. It will corroded a bit but that actually further protects the aluminum since the corrosion is aluminum oxide with is an extremely hard material.

it did, like an old beer can filled with explosive pillows and the best S&M restraints Mexico can produce.

@@treizTUBE They're not made in Mexico, you dunce. smh...

Same, im happy-er now!

No, very poor results. The test was at 40 mph. Unless you never drive over 40 mph this test is useless. At 70 mph I bet the driver dies in a passenger accident!

David Beppler let me try to sound like you real quick. “ also if u go 120 I bet da crash will be worser than 70 and everyone dies worser Dan 70. 120 worser than 70”. The test is at 40mph and Ford did better, now get over it and grow up.

@@cameronjones1583 I like that comment. You still sound stupid for disagreeing with me. With speed limits in the USA at 70 mph the test should be at 70 mph. Not sure where you found a speed limit in the USA of 120, but if they were, the test would need to be for 120. Thanks for getting my accent right though! :)

David Beppler because the average speed a motor vehicle collision happens at 40mph in the states...

The hoods look liquid.

Slow in tech? How? They’ve had the best and most up to date engines for years. Chevy and dodge haven’t been able to compare even with nearly twice the displacement in some cases for their engines