what are you now a neocon? what did Doyle influence you to become instead of libertarian? Back in the day on youtube there was a libertarian to alt-right pipeline. That alt right is censored and inaccessible, and they have put people like Doyle in its place as gatekeepers. "You can go as far right as Doyle right wingers, but stop there!" No different from Ben Shapiro just targeting a different audience.
I've seen the Believers take punch after punch all my life. A couple of us mentioned that biden set Easter as a trans day...one lady said "How dare you all say anything about judging politics on church grounds !" I said " Why can't we address what threatens our nation in the parking lot ?. I've watched good people do nothing all my life. Where has it gotten us ? We have the Arch of Baal in Times Square". She said "what's an arch of Baal ?!" Kinda proves my point....heads in the sand stuff.
They just wanna sing crappy songs and talking to people like God is a personal therapist they attend. Imagine the sneer they've give us if you said you want to worship the King of Kings like He is the King of Kings and not some sissy I whisper about like in a love song?
Well, I think that would mean it's time to address the issue; the falsehoods of Christianity. Nobody will change the government to reflect religion if it's so blatantly untrue. Primarily through the blind obedience of Paul rather than Jesus (or other prophets) or those who walked with him. The contradicting lessons, ages, family trees, and countless other errors aren't "fixable", but addressing them is the first step. No, really. If you're sincere in looking for what's true and getting people to accept it, you'll LOOK for flaws and "evidence" against your faith. If it's "God's word", it'll stand against criticism. And so, I recommend checking into the talks and streams of a few of the "top" Islamic channels whom do NOTHING but analyze the various faiths, see the hundreds of angles people have attacked Islam from (to no avail) and also see the angles Christianity contradicts itself and realign yourself with what you see is true. "Unfortunately", you'll see that the most well-read Christian scholars will agree with the Muslims' arguments. The MOST "based" monarchal-catholic suggestions from people like Doyle will NEVER compare to the globally accepted bare-minimum of Sharia, and oddly enough, the latter is straddling the political line and appeals to all rather than vilifying half the country. Speaking of, why does the Bible fail to teach so many aspects of life (such as political rule, settling border disputes, the literal birth of equal rights, etc.), all of which the Quran covers? God's word should both be uncorrupted from its initial revelation and teach finer aspects of life instead of leaving people with a generic "love thy neighbor". But then Doyle says things like Muslims worship a "demon" while ignoring the fact that the apparition Paul apparently saw appears EXACTLY as the Bible describes the Devil, and I remember you MUST stick your head in the sand to remain a Christian. This also perfectly explains why James calls him a 'wicked man' in the book your "infallible" church fathers said should have been burned. Happy hunting!
The “Trans Day” thing has been scheduled on the same day for well over 20 years. It just so happened it fell on Easter this year. Talk about having your head in the sand, my goodness. Trump will be destroyed in November and then we can all move on to better things. Biden’s America is doing great! Most effective President in the last 50 years and I guarantee none of you even know half the things he’s done
All this Trump selling stuff [flags, hats, coins, Bibles, e-trading cards, et al] tells me that he has a sense of humor, and isn't afraid to use his reputation as narcissist to yank the chains of the TDS sufferers. Watching them freak out is quite fun!
Another great conversation. The guest is so right that We The People have for a long time now been under a "Parasitic ruling class" calling themselves our "representatives. May God have mercy on us and finally bring real accountability to our government entities.
@@monew632Why? Joel is the only one who’s taken a stand against talmudic judaism. DW, shockingly enough, countered all the passages about killing christians in the Talmud with “yeah but there’s good things in there too”. I was legit shocked when I saw him give that response
I think the institutions that those people ended up taking over were created before that. If Christians hadn't abdicated their positions in the culture then they wouldn't have anything to take over. Like schools, government and social safteynets. It happened in the early 1900s. Maybe before that. Once the federal government instituted Prussian schooling, central banks and a permission cultue they replaced God and the covenant communities.
What a boring life you must lead … do you think God wants us all to be super bored all the time? If so, why’d “it” create all that “bad” stuff? And please don’t take the easy road and say “that was the devil!!!”
John’s entire argument on Zionism revolves around appealing to the moderates who act on instinct he admits is misguided, while calling anyone who critiques it as “edgelords” The cycle continues. Keep calling groypers and anyone who lobs a relevant critique about judaism a troll. Seems to be working out tremendously lol This will continue until we face the actual truths and ask ourselves not “is this easy to stomach” but rather “is it true”. Highly unimpressed with John. I have little hope Joel will even read this comment, but if you do, Joel, please remember this. Calling anyone who has valid and honest critiques about the spectre of jewish control on our nation a troll or treating them as an “other” based off unfair basis will result in you going to way that Doug Wilson is going right now. What do I mean by that? Doug Wilson’s most fervent supporters from his priors are starting leave, because they realize that while he will wander past what is mainline in terms of acceptable discourse, he’s not willing to wander “that” far, and will repeat regime talking points ultimately when it comes to the taboo of jewish influence. I’m sure this will be taken as a larping threat instead of a real criticism, but changes only happen when people speak up. I care more about truth than votes. You should too, Joel.
Johns argument is valid. If both MAGA patriots and anti-Zionist have the same policy (ie halting aid to all foreign nations) why divide people on such a hot topic when we need cohesion. Like he said, we can all have our views but if we reach good results who cares if we disagree on Zionism. In-party alienation on such a issue about a country a ocean away is foolish.
The guy in the leather chair was good, Doyle didn't say anything substantial. Doyle is not Trump, he's not a politician. I understand why Trump has to play to optics. Doyle's only job as a pundit is to tell the truth, he seems more concerned with staying employed at the Blaze
"In every age it has been the tyrant, the oppressor and the exploiter who has wrapped himself in the cloak of patriotism, or religion, or both to deceive and overawe the People.'
That is how it was designed. Stephen was stoned bc as a Jew, he told Jews to accept Christ. He didn’t do what people do today creating a fake Jeudeo/Christian religion or a special 7 yrs for them later. No-one wants to hear that 😂
🙄 the electoral college elects the President, not the popular vote. If you say the last election was cheated/stolen etc.. then you’d have to use the same logic for 2016 which puts Hilary in office.
It isn't unless they cheat again, they will cheat again. We need to stop putting our trust in man and start putting our trust in God. It's exactly like when the children of Israel wanted an earthly king instead of trusting God (who brought them out of Egypt and took care of them for over 400 years). They were advised it was a bad idea, but ignored the warning. No one is going to save us but Jesus Christ.
I love how he talks about Trump like he’s a cult leader but doesn’t connect the dots, doesn’t take the next step, the HARDEST step, to look INWARD and realize that, my god, I’ve been pulled in by a cult and now I’m DEEP inside.
Watch the RU-vid video "Genesis of Dispensational Theology", if you want to see the original source of Darby's doctrine in black and white. It came from Edward Irving's English translation of a book written by a Roman Catholic Jesuit priest. Irving taught the doctrine at the Albury Prophetic conference about 1826. John Darby taught the doctrine at the Powerscourt Prophetic conference a few years later. After Irving died during 1834, Darby became the chief salesman for the doctrine.
You can't imagine how true this statement is. I have been doing this for probably 6 months now, since the current conflict. I may be considered a troll for it, but I go to where they are like a "fish in a barrel" and I tell them about Darby, and Scofield. But of course I go a step further and give them plenty of Scripture to show them how their beliefs are error. Over the course of 6 months I can honestly say that I've had very little positive feedback. It's pretty disheartening. But I know I planted a lot of seeds. Now for the Lord to give the increase! Spotter Video deserves a lot of credit too for doing his part as I see him "around" lol
@@PostmillennialChristian97 The following proves Darby's "Two Peoples of God" doctrine is completely wrong. My wife and I used to go to a local church that taught the doctrine in Sunday School. Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the word “remnant” in Romans 9:27, with the word “nation”? 6. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 7. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 8. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 9. Based on Hebrews 12:18-24, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 10. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 11. Watch the RU-vid video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church: “The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? (See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.) Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period? Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.
Thank you so much for speaking on the subject of Zionism and "God's Chosen People" statement by Evangelicals. I am having a really hard time with this mantra by Southern Baptists and I have held back joining several Baptist churches over doctrines such as this and the Rapture theology of "we are in the end times and waiting to be Raptured" ... "our blessed hope is the Rapture". These are so confusing and so hurtful to hear as a believer in Jesus Christ because they make the future hopeless here on earth and they have a defeatist almost corrupting of the word sentiment to them.
@@jeremybertz796 you are wrong. We are being led to the brink of war by Zionists. They bribe our politicians to fund or fight their wars. You are a Zionist and it's very transparent
@@jeremybertz796 THAT IS BEING A PUSSY, COWARDS WILL NOT INHERITH THE KINGDOM REV. 21:8 . This fact by itself (people scaRED of talking about zionism) proves is a real problem (the influence of zionism in american politics and society)
It's so discouraging to hear Christian's pandering to Trump as the greatest American alive... When the cognitive dissonance is that thick no one can pull you out of it it's pretty sad. Put on the bright side at least my mom will listen to you guys now lol maybe stick to your guys specialty of theology and leave the politics to the birds ur channel will do much better 🙏
I deleted my old comment and wanted to make an apology and retraction. Two things: 1. As far as I could tell in my quick search, no John Doyle does not receive a paycheck from BlazeTV. I had heard that from others and parroted it without doing due diligence. Thank you for that correction Joel (or RRM staff). 2. I was wrong about Doyle being fundamentally dishonest. I was under the assumption that Doyle withheld the truth to keep his money or avoid cancellation, however, he explained towards the end of the video why he avoids certain topics. Whether I agree with his tactics or not, I was incorrect in saying he is “fundamentally dishonest.”
Nick Fuentes, E Michael Jones, and David Duke are a little bit too hot to handle on this show. It's a case of good cop, bad cop. They all have the same goal but apply different tactics to achieve the same thing.
@@virtualpilgrim8645 Nobody said anything about David Duke or E Michael Jones. Just Nick Fuentes, who clearly inspires a lot of John Doyle's content, shares a similar schtick, and believes a lot of the same things. Not sure what you meant by the rest of your comment though tbh
@@t.j.fowler8779 I listen to Nick & Jones all the time. They all strongly denounce Jewish influence in America. You can't do that on RU-vid or you will be kicked off as they have been. You have to soften your rhetoric to survive in the mainstream or will be marginalized. Jones and Nick and Duke are the bad cops who are marginalized because of their hard stance on Jews. Others, who may share some of their views, must soften their rhetoric to survive. These are what I mean as the good cops. For this reason, Nick Fuentes is too toxic to appear on this show.
Regarding a fight or flight, I have nothing at all against moving to a more conservative or more Christian communities. Better to raise a family, find like-minded people, etc. However, we have to be aware that Florida is running ads etc. and we have to consider the possibility that Texas and Florida are honeypots. That is, lure citizens they would like to extinguish to concentrate them in one place, and then brutally attack. If you are not aware that the US is attacking its own citizens ( and I do not mean only spiritually), then that would be something to notice and look into.
I have seen this guy before on CrossPolitic. He was impressive . I remember the three guys pressed him on using the Word of God as first line of offense. I think the 3 man ambush he described was done on that CrossPolitic show. Can you reveal who ambushed you, John?
"The enemy of Christianity for the past 2000 years has not been Judaism" !?!? Is Webbon tripping?! He claims to know the Bible, l guess he missed the part on who the enemies of Christ are!!
Christian nationalism and Zionism are joined at the hip. Neither are representatives of the kingdom of God. Zionism is not Judaism. Christian nationalism is not the Kingdom.
Be mad with me if you want but... Christian nationalism and Zionism are joined at the hip. Neither are representatives of the kingdom of God. Zionism is not Judaism. Christian nationalism is not the Kingdom of Christ.
i believe everybody from the Military just jaw dropped! From him saying Trump is "like The Greatest American currently alive" to his "view [of] the flag", and his view of how Americans "view the flag"; Woe. i was shocked that the statement got an "Amen" from Ya, Brother. But, Our Brothers in Arms i can speak for on those things: "NO ."! ~U.S. ARMY SAPPER SAPPER n slave of KING JESUS ~ Solí DÉÕ Gloría
Supporting a presidential candidate that sexually assaulted the former editor of Elle Magazine in a department store dressing room without any remorse is hypocritical of any voter. Second, Donald Trump has publicly claimed that he plans to retaliate against his enemies? Is this acceptable.
@@gregb6469 ok, yes, I’ve had many comments deleted on various channels, probably RU-vid? Anyway, I don’t think what you wrote was bad; something along the lines of, you’d rather have Biden then?
@@gentledove6804 -- Okay. Granted that neither man is someone we would want as next-door neighbors, we must ask which one would be more open to Christian, Bible-based input and suggestions when it comes to making policy decisions. One of the two of them will win the election, so voting for some 3rd-party candidate would be a wasted vote. Biden and the Demo-fascist party is openly hostile to the Christian Faith, while Trump and the GOP are not, and it is on that basis that I will make my decision on voting. I would have much preferred that DeSantis had won the nomination.
@@MeanBeanComedy ...weak leadership from a deteriorating Roman culture being taken over by superior Christian Culture. Rushdoony would not like the phrase "Christian Nationalism" for obvious reasons....Christian Reconstruction aptly describes the rebuilding of society from the ground up.....
After seeing fellow young guys like John Doyle and Nick Fuentes make podcasts where their own lifestyle doesn't match up with what they're selling, it's almost got me thinking I should start my own. It's like watching Steven Crowder
I would love to see Joel Webbon have a conversation with an actual dissident if he is going to have political people on. Alternatively, I would really like to see him try to get Corey Mahler on for a discussion on the topics that Corey talks about on The Stone Choir podcast. He and Woe, are taking on topics that are neglected or corrupted in the Church, similar to what Joel Webbon does, and the conversation would be a massive blessing to Joel's audience.
Resign🤷♂️ Realistically, Pick based on where you have a family integrated, abolitionist, confessionally reformed church that's impacting the community
I hope you are correct about the possibility of top down change. But every example you have given has been by kings, who can dictate morality. In America, we don’t have a king or anyone with the individual power to pull something like this off. Please, I’d like to hear your thoughts on this.
Why should we expect to obtain God's favor when we are using means that are disobedient to God? Christian women must boycott the voting booth in obedience to 1 Timothy 2
It would be useful as an aid to people who are unfamiliar or uneducated with these subjects to give answers to basic questions that might arise, for exemple. Why was Obama bad? Why is Trump so good? What are your thoughts on his allegations. Whats wrong with immigration Whats wrong with giving money to other countries
Sorry, a 24 year old who thinks he knows what it's all about, and an over educated "pastor" who thinks he knows the depths of the gospel, but puts any stock in the hideous trogan horse that Donald Trump is to the church, makes me shake my head in bewilderment...and sorrow. The church is in far worse condition than this country is, and far more important to the Lord than this country, and even our freedoms. Wake up church!
God does not require the church to embrace heathens such as Trump to do His work. The first and only encouragement the church should give to Trump is for him to fall on his knees and ask for the forgiveness and grace of Jesus Christ. That is, if we are really a church that cares about his soul and not just his power.
5 gen Texan here. You're not kidding. Texas is in the fight of its life, and is losing. We do not have leadership in Texas that is willing to do the right things to stop the invasion.
@@MeanBeanComedy neither one deserves to. I'm not playing your game. The time to convince me that T could deserve my vote was this time last year, when he could still have admitted the lockdowns were bad and promote abortion abolition. It's too late now
@@cosmictreason2242 True. I think most Christians are so desperate to save this country, that they are just voting for the lesser of two evils. We should have learned after Trump's first term, that nothing really changed. The only thing that changed was that true Christians patriots were vilified, censored, and even arrested for their beliefs. Trump is not a Christian. If he were, then his daughter would never have married a Jew.
@@robbyrobot3303 It plays down what happened to the Israeli people on Oct 7; which makes me believe he's determined to give a different narrative of God's plan for Israel. He even mumbled the scripture that says 'I will bless those who bless you,..." If we want to know what the HiStory of Israel is, we need to read the BIBLE; it states plainly that God is not done with Israel, and will save all Israel. Rom 11
@@LifeandLifeMoreAbundantly that was in reference to the Israel of the old testament, not the colonizers of today. I'm not a dispensationalist fooled by word games of the Scofield bible
@@LifeandLifeMoreAbundantly I'm not ignorant, that's why I'm not fooled into supporting modern day Israel. You yourself are playing word games, saying I "slander" Israel. What have I said that's slander?
I pray Trump will win but I am a pessimistic Amillennialism and recognize that it is too difficult to overcome the media/legal/corporate /illegal immigration conspiracy.
Christians advocating for and voting for Trump (as seems to be exemplified in the first half of this talk) is simply pure pagan pragmatism not principled Biblical Christianity.
Then ask, does ANY Muslim put that kind of faith into their government or any "official", royal or otherwise? The Bible says "render unto caesar what is caesar's" when it comes to political turmoil. That's pretty clear, any injustice done by mortal man will be rectified by the Most Just. I guess Doyle missed that while fantasizing about the Christian history of slaughtering fellow worshippers of Allah (the name arab Christians use for the Father) in the NAME OF the same....
The government isn’t going to save us, bottom line. Yes, Trump may provide wiggle room for action, but will we all fall back asleep. This conversation may forget, Trump literally gave Bibi the key to the White House. The micro is distracting from the macro.
