Trying to Replicate My Friend's Build with Terrible Instructions... 

You should do it again but there is a 4th person and 2 people try to build what the builder built so we can see different interpretations of it

The ultimate version of this should be something made ahead of time that fits in a predetermined box size (like 15x15x15) by your community. The first describes how to build the item to the second person on a timer (about 3 min maybe?), and then the second person describes the building process of what they have to the third. Then you can have like an unboxing reveal of the original item and then what it became. The video would probably be on the second person's channel since they would have the most interaction. Then just rotate until everyone has had the chance to play each role.

Scrapman has an almost neurotic way of describing things and you have such a logical brain I'm honestly surprised there were any differences at all.

This was definately a change for the better, you've got to be confident in the instruction the first time though :p Idea for future telephones, build challenge vehicles but then the describer has to drive the finished product

Is that a wedge in the thumbnail??? Kan wedge gang confirmed???

So his mistake, was that he thought he made a mistake :D

Great video man! Scrapman was over clarifying tho to makeup for the fact you couldn't ask clarifying questions lol, the most fun thing about telephone games like this is to see how far off you were at the end, and y'all communicate to well so it's like damn near perfect every time.

I like the telephone challenge but one suggestion. Maybe add a light system for the builder so they do not have to talk. Maybe a button or switch for wait, next step, repeat, oh crap.... just a suggestion.

- So you have 9x9 concrete base - Yeah. (No he don't) XD

Love this series! What about the first one is pre-recorded, so kan only gets the audio of the instructions. Can pause and rewind, but no questions

MM Idea: Have your communities suggest prompts for "Quick Builds" and take the most interesting ones, slap them on a randomizer wheel and give it a spin. Whatever comes up, you all have to build within a certain time limit. Maybe optionally you do three rounds where the two non-spinners for that round compete against each other, to prevent whoever spins the wheel for that round having an unfair advantage since they'd know what their community suggestions are and could plan for it, giving everyone two rounds of building and one round of spectating / judging?

Oh no..... Here we go again

This gave me an idea for a great zeepkist video Each of you have to take a cool part or segment or trick in one of the other person's previous tracks or take a track that a previous person is built and make a different path through it Theme being inspiration

great vid. fun idea might be to drscribe it twice (so Kan describing to moonbo, and moonbo describing to scrap man after. and see how the three builds differ

I enjoyed telephone again, but I still think this would be better without complete dimensions. I want to laugh when the person replicating makes something similar but also way off. For example instead of 16x16 base into 32x32, could say something like a large concrete base. then a brick pillar about 1/8 the size of the base. That isn't completely square but rounded on the sides. Stuff like that, really make the replicator think and imagine what's going on. Would make the building process more entertaining as well because we can laugh at mistakes as we go. Currently it still feels like I'm just watching someone build ikea furniture.

Hey kAN, it seems like you guys have a problem with orientation. So why not use the garage as a reference point. Facing the garage is North. I'm sure you can figure out the rest of the directions from their. Just a suggestion for the next telephone challenge.

0:40 - oh this parity problem always gets ya.

That was pretty good. Besides that 1 error of making it fat, it was spot on.

nice! an idea maybe could be a creation with a list of things that has to include the creation, you guys make together but the first person gets an amount of time to start it, then stops and the second creator starts building further without seeing what the first one had built until it's his time to create and so on, I don't know if this is something you guys can do that is interesting enough

The baseball one was so funny

now imagine trying to do this, but building a complicated build, such as a piston walker.

Good timing

My God, so Moonbo doesn't know how to explain stuff and Scrapman over-explains stuff, now I wonder how Kan explains stuff

You should do telephone again with a Halloween theme

I know you've done something like a tractor pull. I'd like to see a tractor pull but with a realistic sled, as a multiplayer monday. Maybe with other farm related tasks for an olympic theme

I like this Format alot!

oh I really like these vids and just wait till one of you come up with 50 parts weld assembly

good team work

I do like this idea. Is Moonbo Interested in playing zeepkist with you guys?

bread 👍

im not sure if i like the fact that you put "terrible instructions" because they were pretty instructions. but other wise from thattt nice video

This is sometHing i feel like i would do better at but it would not be anywhere near as much fun to watch

Finally its here

🌞

this was funny

Hi kAN

Next time don't give any numbers. Like, don't give any block numbers for length, height, or width. Just small, medium, large, and huge.

Sweet great job!

Instead of writing names, use their image like face stickers :)

Is railroad online coming back i miss it

i think you guys misunderstood how to make the challenge better. rather the new rules should have been as follows: 1) builder cannot ask questions, except to repeat. of which the speaker must repeat as close to what they said as they can. 2) builder may respond to speakers questions. (such as saying "yes" to "are you done with that?", or other such to keep on pace) 3) neither player may mention specific dimensions only general dimensions. how ever the players may use shapes and other concepts. (so no x blocks by y blocks, but instead a medium rectangle on its side)(remember players may not ask any questions other than to repeat) 4) neither player may name specific blocks, only block concepts.(such as chair, driver seat, pipe, wedge)(remember the speaker can still use size descriptors, so large pipe or large wedge is still valid even though it is the name of a part. however warehouse ramp is a specific name and may not be used. same goes for materials. wood and concrete are valid, where as wood 3 and metal 2 are not) 5) neither player may mention specific colors, only color concepts. (dark blue/light green is valid, where red 2nd from bottom is not) the format seems fun but the issue is getting bogged down in details. where as it would be more interesting to see what came of a game where the speaker said build a red brick house with a large sloped roof made of wedges from front to back, a fireplace with chimney, seating for 3 pointed at a stand in the middle, with a wedge on display, spinning, with lighting.

More of this

I liked this

Goodjob. better than moombo.

Commenting for the algorithm

Just tell them what to connect but not where or how

10 mins gang

You should show then you explain it to someone

its Tuesday

Hi

7 min gang

is it me or is that lighthouse look THICK! MM monday idea! - selfish idea checkout my challange! build n defend! 7 minutes of bot onslaught build your forts build your defences whoever survives the longest wins (challenge countiues indefiantly if you don't press the button to finish/escape)

4 minute gang

KAN pls play scrap mechnic survival?😢 please i want survival

E

I’m early for once

Telephone? Who tales on phones these days? Next challenge should be "text". It would be more relatable to your fans' age group AND would be a harder challenge. The person describing it must do so in written form.

Early

Please kan play railroads online.....

dude stop reusing stuff and make new stuff jeez