@@randomBBL I honest to god thought you meant Tucker Carlson for a minute... Or are you pointing out that even an "actor," as you say, knows more about simple science than ya boi Tuck?
What is your point humans contribute to like 0000.6% of o2 in the atmosphere witch causes climate change the planet releases tons of its own green gasses on its own causes its own climate change, climate change has never been predictable the planet does it itself
Tucker is that one kid who thought he was smarter than the science teacher. Edit for all the Tucker defenders: Fox News once won a court case by arguing that no reasonable person would take Tucker Carlson seriously.
It's more like Tucker is the one kid who thought he was smarter than the science teacher, but he didn't do any of the homework and he failed every test, but still thinks he's smart.
@@thomasmacisaac1503 ...because the question is malformed and idiotic. I mean... "when would the next ice age have happened" was the dumbest thing I've ever heard, the look on Bill's face was priceless. It's like handing somebody a cake and then saying... "I'm skeptical that this is a cake, just a question... when would the eggs used in this cake mix have hatched?".
This is the CC for the whole thing. Thank you for taking the time to caption the entire show for us. You brave soul. (Sarcasm is present, but not aimed at you @Lucifer)
Bill is a sellout and looking for TV attention. Tucker is supposed to fight with Bill for drama. They're both just trying to generate attention. Bill's right, that saying climate prediction is super volatile. We can barely predict the current daily weather, but we can see the skews. Determining our direct correlation to specifics in climate is actually kinda tough given so many outside factors. Even looking at historical data as well as political games show all sorts of funk that could alter our current perceived impact. TLDR; the only thing interesting going on here is that it's news drama for the sake of click baits.
He is not answering the question. You don't say 100%. you id1ot. you provide a reference from a per review document. you provide the name of the author and provide the real numbers not 100%. As he said already climate always changes. Our part in climate change can not be 100% or 200% stup1d asshol3 because the climate always changes 100 or 200 % would mean that we are literally responsible for climate Change in general, and without us the climate will always be the same. he is talking out of his azs. Tucker is calling him out and you are so clueless you don't even get it.
@@bigverybadtom we’re not dealing with absolutes because we are converting math into human ecological impact, so it can very well be an unquantifiable 200%
@@cryptic_rain8951 The theory is that there's a definitive way to know what the climate would be today if there was no carbon footprint. The logic is that humans have pushed carbon dioxide into the air and carbon dioxide warms things up a lot. You can do an experiment. Take a plastic bag and wrap it around your head. Leaving no air holes. See if you can survive for long.
I hate politics, one side is a bunch of pussys and the other side doesnt believe in science. Also the pussys don't believe in biology and are disgusting.
@@Demon_Lord_Coom you need to change your nick to "I am stupid" Because I don't buy your specific theory does not mean I don't believe in science. It means I think you have a BS theory. When one side keeps claiming the science is settled and we know their numbers are bogus and somebody stands to make a great deal of money and have an unprecedented amount of power if we believe them. There is not only cause but a responsibility for skepticism.
This is what it looks like to see a man so desperately out of his depth, and aware of it, trying his damned hardest not to look like an idiot whilst maintaining a solid position on something he knows absolutely zero about. This is really embarrassing to watch.
I do hope you are talking about Tucker. Big fan, by the way. What is most absurd is the lengths Tucker will go to in order to make sure Nye doesn’t get to finish making a point.
to the public that matters, which is any rational person it does. You climate cultists can group down vote and block comment this all you want. Science, time & nature are not on your side. You're over.
Nye embarrassing himself, doesn't have a single data point. The climate would be like 1750, when humans had been impacting the environment for thousands of years with millions of people burning wood for heat?? Interesting.
@@Darling137Carlson was trying to get ån Irrelevant answer he says “what is the rate and percentage of the change” where that isn’t Documented he wanted Nye to concede the point. The point Nye was preaching was that warming is accelerating. Carlson was clearly presenting a Strawman and not even trying to Listen.
@@IGotGills It's not a straw man and it's entirely relevant when proponents of a cause make very specific claims that X is happening because of Y. Tucker asks valid questions about metrics. If X is true, then tell us the details of the cost of ignoring our fighting it
Quick summery, Tucker thinks 2+2=3. He gets cranky and throws a fit. It’s explained to him that it’s 4, but he can’t comprehend it. He has a huge tantrum and goes to bed 👍🏽
There is nothing to be gained from looking at percentages as your metric. Like, there is not a percentage of the changed climate that was caused by humans, it's not how it works. The more useful way of looking at it is to look at the change in rate of climate change
@@potatotomato6094 I mean all of those characterizations you just gave is the average conservative who thinks that all media is fake unless the president approves of it, coronavirus is a hoax because the president said so, the government is corrupt “unless it’s my political party”, a whole bunch of conspiracy theories and even conspiracy groups such as QAnon and so forth. Just because you didn’t want to attach the appropriate label to the characterizations you gave in order to seem unbiased doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t lol.
@@s1t2e3i4n5 It happens because some people are completely ignorant of healthy,😊 constructive communication techniques. So they misinterpret what is said by both participants. Oops! Sorry I used a 12 letter word.😊
@Mary Charge To be fair, you sound as sure as a 5 year old identifying Luxembourg in geography class. And with comparable math skills, too. Anyone who knows how to solve 1/1 wouldn’t be asking if it’s a rate or not. Edit: maybe you’ll be better at tee ball after school. At least then your random swinging might land a hit.
@Mary Charge I didn’t think you were smart enough to see your own stupidity in stating his claim, then stating he has no claim. Edit: I still don’t think your smart enough to see your flawed argument and thought process.
I remember when this video came out and the Republicans tried to spin it as Tucker “Owning” Bill. That couldn’t be further from the truth. It’s like watching a toddler try and argue with their pre school teacher.
Tucker keeps asking "basic questions", but doesn't even understand the basics of climate change itself. Tucker wanted to try and make Bill Nye look dumb, but he made himself look like an idiot. Nye: answers questions Tucker: I'm open-minded, you are not. Nye: 🤨 (must be that cognitive dissonance i was talking about 😏)
@@magiccoleman6764 It makes me sad that people like tucker have such a wide platform. Imagine even thinking that you could get a simple answer to a topic as complex as climate change (even though Bill did what he could to make it bite sized). Tuckers metal capacity is so small, trying to explain that would be like ramming a tree into a pencil sharpener.
@@gondor532 he did give answers. The main point is that humans have speed up the time in which it takes for climate around the world to change. We would be in the position we are currently in in maybe another thousand years or so. But because of all the technology and fossil fuels we use, that change has come around in less than 100 years
If it's settled...why wouldn't he answer his question on "to what degree the climate would change if humans weren't a factor?" We need to know this if we have any way of preventing a future ice age or massive pole shifts. If it's settled, wouldn't the data show that? Settled, is to reach a conclusion with all the data...but where is the data? It's like a parent saying I'm right to their child so don't you dare question my authority. If climate change science is rooted in data and research... why not share the data? Yes, the earth is warming, but how can we prove that this isn't just apart of mother natures or gods design? We shouldn't be dismissive of others, it is divisive and not helpful in unifying people to come together and make positive changes.
@@JR-yd5pf The difference, of course, is that there is consensus in the scientific community that humans need water to live. There is no consensus on climate science, the impact of human activity and how to mitigate any impact. But maybe you're too stupid to understand that.
@Megke17 Bro, he couldn't exactly pull out his phone to find the stat, do you know how long it takes for a apple tree to grow a perfectly ripe apple. No, cuz that's an obscure question that would be hard to memorize unless that was your whole career. Bill doesn't study only climate change, so he's probably not gonna know the stat of the top of his head seeing as he's done and is doing a lot of other stuff in his life
@@aidannolanlogansawyer9777 that's the irony of *ucker Carlson saying that he's bragging about having an open mind after refusing evidence and cutting the guy off so he can't refute the statement on open mindedness
"Is it 74.3% human activity that causes climate change?" -Tucker Carlson That right there, shows he doesn't even know what answer he wants. That itself, doesn't even make sense.
That was my take as well. He had to dumb it down to a lower and lower school age grade level for the ranting host who can’t be patient enough to hear an entire response
@@edwarddongres7866 Mechanical engineers have to take science classes, so they would understand the basics of science. The actual engineering classes then apply the sciences they learn to build things. So I think he's fairly qualified to talk about science.
@@wangstar No science class will show you the ice in the north till you actually fly over. I do often every time I fly to Thailand. Now where is the warm up again?
Crunchy Gum more like Tucker: asks simple question. Bill Nye the engineer Guy: avoids and deflects. Tucker: pushes for answer Bill Nye the has no background and fails at basic science Guy: How dare you make me answer a question any grade schooler knows but I don't! Your anti science *thumps religious text that's been scientifically disproven by real scientists.*
So you were able to gather the degree which humans have caused the climate to change? I didn't hear the answer please enlighten me. 100%? we know that's just not true, so what's the real number. When I hear "humans cause climate change". My first two questions are - 1.what exactly are we doing? 2.what degree of change is that (what we are doing) having on the planet? You really can't calculate one without the other. Bill didn't come close to answering those questions. Mostly he rattled off the effect of the climate changing - everyone concedes the climate is changing. Which brings us back to the two questions. They are having a circular argument because Bill refuses to answer the question.
@@SlimbyTheSillyGoose well if tucker would've let bill finish all of his responses he would've already answered the question, he is trying to explain the situation and how they got to the answer before answering the questions, like most intellectual people do, unlike other people, it is important for one to do this when explaining a topic in science
Bill asserts cognitive dissonance is the problem and he’s correct. The comments in this thread prove it. Bill deflected questions with irrelevant bullSchiff like wine growing instead of answering it scientifically, such as what the average global temperature would be today if not for human activity. 🙄
That’s so weird… bill nye gives answers and then tucker Carlson doesn’t agree with the answers…. So he says bill nye isn’t giving him real answers…. What is going on
did we watch the same debate. Bill Ni the appeal to authority guy said he wants to imprison people who disagree with him then when tucker questioned him he started talking about grapes.
"Tucker takes him on in an unforgettable debate". What? That wasn't a debate. That was just a guy who has no idea what he's talking about shouting louder than the guy who actually does.
Bill Nye is legitimately an actor, not a scientist. Thats a tv show to assist in indoctrinating the youth. He obviously couldnt explain one of his so called "scientific" concensus "facts". You cant just say that it is and it does. Thats not science; that is scientism otherwise known as authoritarian bs. If you cant explain your position on something without just regurgitating that its an "established fact" than you dont know your position very well and are most likely a paid actor. Of which he actually is.
Tim Harris why couldn’t Bill Nye answer simple questions? What degree is climate change caused by human activity? Why can’t the scientist answer? Because they don’t know.
@@wq198mnr when u r such an inbred sumbfuck, you can ignore the answers and listen to the host shout over him in the middle 'WHY CANT YOU ANSWER MUH Q" and you drool and repeat it mindlessly in the comments LOL
Except I doubt that Bill Nye himself reached out to the station to do an interview. They, most likely, reached out to him. So, if anyone is to blame for a poorly represented argument, it's the news network. However, they had an agenda to push, IE that climate change has little/nothing to do with humans and so they found someone willing to represent the argument that would fall short. Bill Nye isn't specialized in climate study. He has merely done "some" studying of it and drew conclusions. As we all do when we research something for a short period of time. The station prepared questions for Bill to answer full well knowing that he most likely would not be able to regurgitate numbers and statistical data. If anything, this showed Bill's tolerance for being lambasted in front of million of viewers and he took it in stride. It showed character.
if you think tucker really believes all the crap he peddles on FOX then you are just plain misguided. The same goes for any "news" anchor or host of any main stream media.
‘I will not be shouted down by people like you,’ says the man who is getting visibly frustrated by a scientist who is a lot calmer than I would be in that situation.
Am I missing something glaringly obvious about by comment? Everyone seems to see something that I don't. All I was saying is that Tucker is the one shouting at Bill while Bill remains completely calm, making his statement deeply ironic and making him seem even more obnoxious.
I am so sorry if you have to hear someone argue like this. If someone said “wait wait wait, slow down” to me that many times I would probably ask then if they needed me to break out the finger paints.
Tucker: “Ask honest answers” Bill: I don’t think you meant ask Tucker: I did mean ask. 🤣🤣🤣 he just arguing to argue because he has no argument. He even argued that he meant to say ask😂😂🤣
Yea umm. I wonder..is he a genuine philanthropist?? Can someone make sense of that interaction. I think im right. I think he saying he loves people 🤔 or was that to make fun.
Exactly I was just commenting to myself how fantastic the cameraman's work was. Psychology dictates that when you are losing an argument like that you have a lot of physical tells. I'm sorry Bill Nye I used to like you old boy but you're losing this argument pretty bad m
the only reason they have guest on this show is not to inform or hear a new opinion, it's just to talk over them and not let them speak then call THEM stupid and say see we won that debate because I called him dumb. it's like a kindergarten playground for adults. THIS IS WHATS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY! don't have guests if you never let them speak it's a disserves to everyone.
Tucker isn't denying climate change at all! He is simply asking bill if human interaction has had any significant influence on climate change in which he bill can't seem to answer.
@Reid Elson It's not about opposing anyone which, by the way, is a communist thing too. Being allergic or immune to facts. That's what happens when group identity is paramount. The left are commies 2020, they even turned on their own people. Like you did. =) It's about following the truth. No lefty can do that. They are, knowingly or unknowingly, following lies and propaganda. Nothing good *ever* came from the left, at least since WW2.
@Reid Elson They like make rules "based on whatever"(some kind of pretended science) without folks agreement. To get at least some agreement they spread lies..grew up inCzechochoslovakia
kittypie i swear I made that up tucker 😂 I was high af man when I made it. I used to do that to my lil brother when he was younger. Don’t take it the hard way tucker.
@@subswithoutcontentvid_at_k exactly, the only difference was Tucker didn't ask Bill Nye how long it took to interrupt him, from the very beginning Nye was interrupting.
The fact that the title is Tucker vs…. Shows that Fox News literally just wanted to put out content of division… it’s been exhausting at this point 😓 honestly
I agree, but I still love that he's not letting Bill give vague answers.😄😄 He's like if Bill knows he can explain it clearly and concisely, as Bill goes on a whole tangent about "we're not certain that ____" and humans cause this and that bad (which I'm not denying). Honestly it's awesome to be a skeptic b'coz I'll rarely be spoon fed anything. I am a skeptic about the whole humans call this and that terrible thing, b'coz while it might be true, it's immoral. For years scientists have had to come behind each other and correct something, the way the dinosaurs look have changed every 5 - 10 years almost, and at one point we didn't even know the concept of germs.😂😂😂 I take everything with the word "theory" in the name with a grain of salt. Half of the theories will be proven wrong in the next hundred years, anyway.
How is it embarrassing? They do it all the time, it's why people watch the channel. It's an engine that supports far-right opinions, and 99% of far-righters deny climate change.
And Bill says, "I love you as a person more than life itself" and Tucker goes, "before the name calling begins" I mean I know toxic masculinity is his thing, but come on
I was literally about to write this, how can you expect someone to have an open and honest debate as he kept going on about when you don't even let them talk for six seconds.
@Dunxan Gilpatric....my that comment about "love you more than...." was starting the conversation with dishonesty. Tucker was getting flabbergasted because Nye couldn't answer. It's simple If the climate we have now is what it is solely because of man, what should it have been EXACTLY, because if you don't know, there's no way to know that it has changed solely because of man.
The "IDK what that means" at the end says it all. Tucker wouldn't let the man speak. That wasn't an adult conversation. Jesus that guy is something else. Poor Bill, did great trying to explain things to this over grown child.
Basically every time Fox has a guest that isn't a hardcore conservative. They will invite on everyone from doctors to economists like Richard Wolff to various scientists and Bill Nye, and then talk over them the entire time. Only to at the end go "I am right but you are wrong but I keep an open mind unlike you *supposed* experts."
Brick Tamland Now to be fair, Bill isn't a true scientist... However he might as well be with the amount of honorary scientific rewards he has. No joke, Bill is highly accepted as a scientific mind amongst the scientific community.
he asked him to what degree do humans affect climate change. then couldnt answer and said it was 100 percent. then goes on to smell his own farts and sway around his engineer title to end the argument.
True, and Tucker doesn't even have a science background! That's how bad Bill looked. Also, I like how people keep defending bill for being a "science" guy HAHAHAHAHAHA You guys need to stop being deepthroated by your childhood heroes. Bill says the science is settled! The biggest lie in the internet! It's like saying CNN is real news!
+Aaron Mendoza Well little boy, time to rewatch and educate. Here's a little guide for your underdeveloped mind. Tucker: The debate isn't settled, is climate change human caused or not? Bill: The debate is settled and it is human caused (see 90%+ climatology reports taken worldwide every year since 2007 for that answer to be explained) Tucker: To what degree is climate change occuring? (Question you want answered.) Bill: Well, instead of thousands of years, it's happening in decades. (You expected a percent, Bill gave you a different answer.) Tucker: To what degree is human activity responsible for that speed up? Bill: 100% Tucker: At what rate would it have changed without human activity? Bill: Here's a normal climate cycle. Think tens of thousands of years ago with the ice age. Now compare that to millions of years ago with the age of the dinosaurs...(bunch of facts about what time would be like if we lived in a similar climate, like being underwater)... But that's a million year gap. Tucker: You said thousands Bill: That's the ice age, I'm talking about the rate. There are a large people living on coasts (Remember those prehistoric conditions?) Tucker: What would the climate be like if humans weren't involved? Bill: The 1750's. (Proceeds to describe a world that would've been possible) IMBIue Those people include the majority of the scientific community who have graciously given Bill several honorary doctorates. Something that is unique in the community, but to be heavily honored, as his accomplishments have earned him that.
7:36 Nye is a popularizer of science. That is not a bad thing. Tucker interrupts guests trying to speak. We must look at the transcript to find Nye's answer. Nye said, "the climate would be like it was in 1750".
As a scientific researcher and member of the scientific community, I feel bill nye could have done a better job at explaining. Sometimes you gotta explain these things in layman’s terms to other people because most people don’t understand it. The fact is the question tucker asked has no straight answer. The climate change rate without human intervention is not easy to quantify. There can be a thousand factors associated with it. Bill nye could have clarified that. In stead they went after each other.
Bill Nye is a TV scientist, the way Telly Savalas was a TV policeman. A real scientist would have come up with graphs and other hard data and Bill Nye provided none.
Soooo.... you have no idea how the climate changes because there are a thousand factors assiciates with it, but when the 1001st factor is mankind all of a sudden you know exactly what is going to happen and why? Also: would you agree to Nyes statement at 5:10 that humans prevented a new ice age? If so, do you consider that a bad thing?
@@wurstbrot1772please do some actual research. We could estimate it pretty well, but it is impossible to predict exactly what would happen. The climate is a chaotic system (look up the double pendulum and how even a tiny difference in input can completely change how it swings, this is an example of a chaotic system). To simplify, the main changes would be due to solar cycles (11 year periods of hot and cold due to solar activity), slight changes in the earth’s orbit and a yearly fluctuations due to different weather patterns (Look up the el nino southern oscillation), also volcanic eruptions have a slight cooling effect (can see some dips in annual temp due to this, it’s quite interesting. If we extrapolate these effects (extrapolation is taking data and estimating what it would be like in the future, it’s very simple, you can look it up, children are taught it in high/middle school (uk/us I think)) they would be very small compared to the observed change over the past few decades. Just look at any graph and see the increase since the industrial revolution. The evidence is there, the evidence is clear, all you need to do is look into it. You can even look at scientific papers on the subject (use google scholar, although I’d recommend only looking at the abstract and conclusion, they use a lot of technical jargon, science and maths that is difficult for non specialists to understand. But if evidence doesn’t interest you, I ask you this. Who has more to gain from lying, Tucker, a rich right wing presenter who relies on support from his climate denying base, or scientists who are looking at evidence to try to answer a question. You seriously don’t think that if scientists found climate change wasn’t real, they wouldn’t report on it? They would. I hope you look into it. This mindset is why we have antivaxers (the autism paper had falsified data, and was produced by a conman paid to diacredit the mmr vaccine so a company could sue them. He also released his own vaccine after releasing the paper on gut disease causing autism, caused by vaccines. Watch the hbomberguy video on antivaxers if you are one, the founder of the movement was a truly evil man who even paid children at a birthday party to draw their blood (he boasted about this and it was caught on camera)). But that aside, I hope you and others like you can look into it, it’s just the future of the world at stake.
yours is probably the smartest comment. i see everyone, even "important" people just repeating what bil says and calling tucker names, when every respectable scientist would not call you evilz instead just go through the data WITH YOU! instead of saying "it's settled" when every sientific paper in the world starts and ends with "it isn't. we can't reasonably predict how the climate will evolve"
@@Soundslikekong 100% ok. 30 years ago they told us we'd freeze and they put celebrities to advocate for it. Do you realize these claims are insane? Especially since they don't go after the countries who cause the most "global warming" why?
@@annafromtheblock2224 They didn't, though. Global freezing was a fringe theory even in the 1970s and was overwhelmingly rejected in favor of the same sort of climate change we warn about to this day. Anybody (yourself included) that throws that out there to discredit scientists is falling for the same propaganda they accuse others of falling for. And, we do go after countries that cause the most global warming. The idea that it's up to the consumer to reduce their usage while megacorps pollute en masse is propaganda BY those megacorps. The purpose is twofold: it shifts the burden from the culprits, and it makes pro-environmental efforts look like a joke by association. And it works! Here you are. Two examples of you taking BP Oil talking points hook, line, and sinker while complaining others are too gullible...
For all those who deny Bill Nye is a scientist... sci·en·tist noun a person who is studying or has expert knowledge of one or more of the natural or physical sciences. Bill Nye has a degree in engineering. en·gi·neer·ing noun the branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures. He studies and has expert knowledge of one or more sciences. He is a scientist. Spelled out like a 1st grade teacher for you. Stop trying to discredit someone's character instead of their arguments.
@@LibertyFascism has he ever considered.... Looking at the statistics and data? Or doing his own research? Instead of doing nothing and being skeptical towards a scientist?
@@connormartin5053 Yeah. What % down to the 3rd decimal digit did humans affect climate change. Let's skip for a sec the fact that it is not a % affect, I mean what does it even mean to affect 50% on climate change if you have no baseline..., Just the fact that humans deffinatly changed the climate, and by a factor of 1000s of years should matter...
@@drabberfrog If you didn’t see the first 10 seconds, he wants to imprison anyone who doesn’t agree with his “theory” and saying engineer though is an appeal to authority
@@consciouspresence5880 you're right, him being a mechanical engineer is an appeal to authority, and Bill has made some pretty extreme comments about people who don't think human caused climate change is real. But I do think there is a reason Bill is smarter than Tucker, it's because Bill can do a very simple, but at the same time difficult thing which Tucker cannot. Bill can recognize scientific consensus and change his views accordingly. Over 99% of climate scientists agree that humans burning fossil fuels is causing climate change. And I will appeal to their authority because they have spent their entire careers studying the earth's climate. They know what they are talking about and if you think you understand the climate better than them as a non expert then I'd read a paper written by David Dunning and Justin Kruger. And at the end of the day, these are just two men talking about climate change on TV. Bill honestly didn't do that well in the debate because I have seen him debate against intellectuals and Bill definitely stands his own against them but against the science denying village idiot? He kept falling for the logical fallacies Tucker kept throwing at him because Bill wasn't prepared for someone use dumb, illogical arguments against him because intellectuals don't do that because they know they are stupid, and as Mark Twain said "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". And that is exactly what Tucker did when he kept asking what percentage of climate change is caused by humans because"the climate is always changing ". There's no number for something like that but Tucker knew that if he asked him a very specific question like that Bill would not know it and I'm not sure anyone actually knows it other than just saying 100%.
@@chasepotter2376 oh come on, Tucker didn't even attempt to give him a chance to reply. Did you just say, none of his answers were scientifically accurate? On what authority can you confirm that?
@@venomman ohhhh really I’m to stupid to understand okay tell me why global warming has been disproven 3 times in 30 years. Tell me why the Earth is actually cooling down. Don’t you ever call me stupid I’ll put you in your place in a blink of an eye
During the the Roman era in the British isle 2000 years ago, the climate in Britain was similar to what northern Italy is today and it was perfect for growing grapes.
@star cruiser oh did you do research on reliable and informational websites and study that topic for years or did you search up "Why is global warming real" and called it a day after the first website. Seems like the 2nd one to me.
star cruiser what evidence, do you mean about climate change? and if you do ask any scientist who studies it and they will give you more than enough evidence. you can also look it up, idk how that’s so hard for you to do
@star cruiser Do you know what greenhouse gases are or the ozone layer or did you not pass eighth-grade science? It must be infuriating to people who study topics for years and get people who claim they are wrong. Especially with doctors and scientists with COVID.
No. Tucker is saying you can’t know definitively what the weather would be like if humans werent affecting the climate. While you can predict and reasonably assume what the climate would be like without human interference, you cant be definitively sure.
@@Poopopotamusgaming no we didn’t actually have records of it happening, so we had to use fossil records to notice dips in populations and judging off of the patterns, it’s actually really easy to predict when it would’ve happened if there were no human intervention
Yes you can, that’s like saying if I throw a apple off a roof you can’t be 100% sure it will break, it will almost every time but there’s always a tiny tiny little chance it won’t,
Absolutely the best moment of the video. Carlson's eyebrows raise and he grins briefly at having been slammed for his disrespect. Carlson's foundation was to gaslight and be the "reasonable" one. So when he foundered, he knew it.
@@privatename2426 improv actor amongst dozens of other things, tucker carlson is an elitist who acts like he’s working and asking questions for the people lmfao
@@privatename2426 Do *you* realize that he has a degree in mechanical engineering and studied at Cornell University and the Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering? Not to mention his continual involvement in so many science related educational and advocacy things that I literally couldn't list them all in this comment, how is that not enough credibility for you? Plus, it's not like all of the stuff that he is saying is only his opinion and is only based on his research; he is getting his information from, I have honestly no idea how many, but a large number of sources of research that you are more than welcome to look up for yourself as well to confirm what he is saying, but considering how little bearing you put on his education I doubt that you think they are any more credible.
@Donald Ring Seriously? It's a saying that a large majority of people use, except for some who are religious. They aren't saying that they know God, it's just a phrase.
