Turkey-Greece Standoff in the Mediterranean Explained 

I am greek and my problem with the Turks is that my wife watches your Turkish series and never lets me watch football 😤

@@pelekson haha loved this!

relatable, i live in crete and once i went to paliochora which on the south part and i could listen to libyan and egyptian radio

So true! Especially close to the coast, like in Çeşme.

Hahahahaha nice one bro! In this joke from you is a big and good message: the problems between our countries are made in politics, not in societies - as we can see in world's Diaspora's.

Greece is a failed state

@@justabeardedguythatisahero9848 So is Turkey

@@eternal_riftz8801 dont think so

@@techninja1067 it is with erdogan and the lira is trash compared to the euro lmao

@@eternal_riftz8801 comparing euro to lira is not a wise way to determine which country is strong, because even a very stupid person can say that euro is associated to a bunch of countries not only to Greece. Anyways people who use "lmao" are not really smart enough to talk about this kind of things.

I can hear the cannons raging now, good times.

You know, most of the times the comments actually turn out to be pretty civil when people expect a Turkish-Greek flamewar.

@@ardagurbuz6924 Scroll down my friend, Scroll down, the comments are fine but the replies are a warzone.

@@AbdulGoodLooks Yeah, noticed that.

Ever saw India and Pakistan in the same video and look down the comments section?

@@Bill-zp2mt :))) you are always funny as usual! Do you know the intervention of a guarantor state is not an invasion according to the international laws even Greek laws! As you know there is a decision of Athens court that admits the intervention of Turkey is not an invasion! Beside of the such factors you continue telling lies! Today is not April fools day you know! So do not try to put people in a fool stiuation! Ok! And if you really want to learn which country is the invader in cyprus you can find the name of the invader state is Greece in cyprus! Greece is the first country which established the terrorist organization EOKA! That terrorist organization killed both Greek cypriots and Turkish cypriots! But people like you knows it well but you prefer telling lies! :))) You think you are the most smart one but that is exactly false! I know you will ignore the subjects what I talked about here! But keep calm down! Before ignoring the realities I advice you to reach the speech of the president of cyprus which was done in 19 july 1974 in UN! Yes man you will find that Greece killed so many innocent people in order to violate the island and tried to establish ENOSIS as you know it! And in that speech you will learned that Greece is the invader in cyprus! Greeks are not victim! Yes man when you read the speech of Bishop Macarios you will find the unswers of such questions ok! Than stop telling lies and shut up!

@@Bill-zp2mt when someone who has no idea about the history of the region says turkey invaded cyprus- i understand they are okay if muslims are killed and victim of terror in their homes and very religiously motivated to the issue.

@@Bill-zp2mt maybe you should study your own history mate

He isn’t saying the situation is fair @bill he’s saying how he represented the argument without bias is fair.

@@zorro-hq6qp Greece did not invade Cyprus though. In the 1970s, Cyprus made a democratic option to unify with Greece and the Turks were in the minority. Turkey did not like that and unilaterally invaded Cyprus. Only after Turkey sent troops did Greece replicate. This invasion was a breach in international law, and a breach of the Lausanne treaty. The moment Turkey invaded a third party, Greece no longer had an obligation to demilitarize the Aegean Islands. Like it or not, Northern Cyprus is recognized by one single country in the entire world while Greek Cyprus is recognized by the entire world. So rather than telling lies about what really happened, how about Turkey for once walks like it talks? Erdogan always blabs about respecting international law, but there are UN resolution that called for the Turkish army to leave Northern Cyprus and to allow the country unite back again. Based on the UN resolitions, only the 1st invasion of Cyprus was counted as somewhat legal. But that only captured 3% of the island. The second invasion, which happened after the Greek military Junta collapsed, was labeled unanimously as illegal by the UN Security Council and it is labeled internationally as an invasion (Resolution 353 & 360)

you know he is making money with youtube? :D

@@ddragon5587 This makes me unbelievably happy to know he's being paid

@@odobro9919 sure. great content :) totally agree

You should watch CaspianReport too. Very informational and full of content.

Bob Ross No it's not. It's presenting turkey's propaganda as facts without any critical thinking. Greece is not trying to limit Turkey's rights what so ever. Demilitarisation of Greek islands is a totaly differant subject and Turkey only uses it to force Greece into a weak position in order to impose its will by means of threats of invasion as they did in 1974 in the demilitarised island of Cyprus. Lots of Greek islands are not concerned by the treaty of Lausanne because they where greek before or became greek after. Kastellorizo was Italian till 1945 and nothing prevents Greece from defending it with its armed forces. The turkish claim that all the aegean islands should be demilitarised is laughable.

no cap

The best*

Looks the beginning of The Expanse..sounds similar too

Yep

There is video by vox that talk about this. Its quite interesting.

They have to be enforced because otherwise whoever has the largest fishing fleet gets all the fish. In the case of India/Sri Lanka it's a far bigger problem for Sri Lanka since India has a bigger fleet. Unfortunately before regulation became stronger, the area between Sri Lanka and India became badly overfished and now it's tough for everyone. The only way to bring fishing back is to simply end fishing for a while. =/ The biggest offender is China, which has a habit of sending its fleets across the entire planet into EEZs of countries too poor to defend them.

Finland and Estonia settled for less than a median to accommodate a passage for Russia.

I am from Kerala too and I can confirm this. This back and forth has also claimed many lives and is made complicated by the fact that there are Tamils on both side of the border who at least in their perspective find themselves divided between two countries (not that it affects this particular issue that directly).

The problem With this example that he gives is that he tries to connect the two but they don't have the same circumstance.what you say is happening in Greece too but when they cross the maritine border they were inform to leave and thats that but the last decades Turkey does that intentional with fisherman so to cross the border but still the same actions. The difference with your case is that Turkey does that with warships if it was just fisherman it will still be acceptable.

El Dr. John daniel me ayudó a recuperar a mi ex esposa. No le creí antes, pero ahora es un hechicero muy real, envíale un mensaje en WhatsApp si quieres ser feliz como yo. (+2348100954052)..

El Dr. John daniel me ayudó a recuperar a mi ex esposa. No le creí antes, pero ahora es un hechicero muy real, envíale un mensaje en WhatsApp si quieres ser feliz como yo. (+2348100954052)..

Yes, but the so called "Greek" map it is not a map that Greece has created or anything. it is a map made by the Geneva University for the EU in the past based on the international laws and not by Greece. Greece's point of view is that as long as we haven't signed any treatment between us about the EEZ, you don't have the right to make researches in that area where my islands are. On the other hand, the Turkish "Blue Homeland" map is an official map made by Turkey and includes also half of the Aegean Sea. Yes half of the Greek islands are included on this map. This is is the real reason why Greece is willing to spend (once again) more money for warplanes and warships than any exploration of gas may give in the future. It is the sovereignty of the Greek islands we care about and not that @!#@ gas. And this gas exploration it is just "happened" to start now, while a lot of stuff going on with Turkey's behavior lately and it's worsening relationships with USA and EU and even bringing a war close to Russia this time.

@@panosfloyd yep this. None in greece actually cares about gas. We care about our islands, that turkey goes back and forth about how they are not truly greek. Just wrong and plain scary.

@@panosfloyd exactly well said the gas discoveries is only secondary

@SilverOrien The greece-egypt agreement is an order of magnitude more legit. However keep in mind that greece made the agreement with egypt as a reaction to the turkey-libya agreement. That means that even if turkeys agreement is pointless in theory, greece considered it a big enough threat to make a move.

@SilverOrien The agreement between Turkey and Libya was actually ratified and accepted by the UN though, which means we have legality on our side as we did the treaty before you did it with Egypt.

@@adidoki Posted on the UN board means nothing, it doesn't produce legal rights. It has to be accepted by the HoR and Lybia's HoR not only hasn't ratified it, it even pushes for a legal delimitation between Greece and Lybia. Lybians already know Turkey just wants the country's oil and military bases, Erdogan doesn't care about the people.

@SilverOrien We didn't sit on a table with a dictator. Our agreement was made with a prime-minister who is recognized by United Nations.

@SilverOrien What do you mean? He is a UN-recognized prime-minister. Doesn't the UN a valid organization for you?

@kroooassant you don't know shit.

Mean while USA， whole pacific is mine

Turkey implements the same policy as well , even if it's not working out for them .

@@christermi why not ??

@@rubiskim6311 yeah true USA had done many things to cover in Pacific like they dont recognize the sea of Mexico,they are just powerful and nobody can say a word to them cuz the missile will knock their door the next day

Same mate😂😂

And your opinion about this situation sir?

@@user-vb4ub6pv6p why do you care, trying to start an argument ?

@@erdniealinik nah! I know who I am and what I’m doing and I’m doing everything right I’m not a barbaric..just curiosity

@@user-vb4ub6pv6p telling my opinion would cause the very thing i try to avoid. and are you trying to refer to someting with the verb barbaric or what :D

85 million population versus 10 million ? If there is no intervene from europe or us; it would be just a bubble bath for greece at bosphorus or eagen.

@@erdemgorgel4166 To be realistic Greece has no chance Turkey has the second largest army in NATO like After USA

@@fiagor3090 To be realistic, Greece has the whole EU backing it and an increasingly annoyed USA.

@@eLeft6 Yeah but we are comparing two countries

@@eLeft6 To be realistic Turkey can deal with EU and Greece same time because 85 million's heart became one

I think CaspianReport covered that already. (12 hours ago apparently) It's a good channel as well.

@@Ramy9619 Yes but he is Azerbaijani

If you watch the video, you can tell how careful he is to not take sides.

@@giorgos.efth43 he is surprisingly neutral though

@@sankarsah yes it is true but it wont matter. Because a Goverment is aouthortitarian it doesnt makes Azerbaijan who is unfair. Because it is their land. I would still support Azerbaijan even thought it is aouthortitarian.

The same things brits have doen around the world, cause war

British bases are here because Cyprus was Crown colony of the British Empire. Both greek and turkish cypriots and greek and turkish governments agreed that these bases can be there when Cyprus got it's independence in August of 16, 1960.

@Pengoto K what in Hong Kong?

@Pengoto K British didn't created conflict in Hong Kong. It was China that started to bend all treaties around Hong Kong they ever made. Hong Kong would be better as part of Great Britain.

@Pengoto K wtf? can u explain your logic?

I am Greek and I agree. It presents the arguments of both sides.

@@hectork-l9670 hello.

Turkey claim that’s islands have no right to EEZ and expanding to 12miles is an act of war, that makes turkey so stupid and you will end up with nothing

i am Greek and i agree with you. Very good video.

@@maladance5951 if the mainland demands the same are. first mainland then island. for me it makes sense even it a pity for the island.

@wa la ghaliba illAllah What prophecy?

@wa la ghaliba illAllah Yeah... It was an easy guess 😂

Its not unbiased. He presents the two views as having equal legitimacy, when the Turkish one is in violation of international law.

@@johanlassen6448 Please consider the following. Just because someone presents a situation that you don't like, it doesn't automatically make them biased. Which law does Turkey violate? Are you, by any chance, refering to the treaty which Turkey didn't sign? Here's some exposition, if you don't sign an agreement, it means you didn't agree to its terms, which means you are not legally bound by it. Even then, the same agreement says each situation should be handled specifically and a just distribution should be made. This is no agreement, this is an attempt to use "international law" to rob an enemy country of its rightful borders. Basically, it is how wars work in the democratic world of 2020's. Please be honest. Have you seen how little the area Greece's claims leave for Turkey? Imagine if that was France or Germany in Turkey's place, would you still say that country deserved that tiny excuse for a sea? Or are you picking sides because Turkey is a "barbaric enemy country" for you?

Then we draw a happy _little Chinese fl-_ I mean wave

just like the usa lol, they're siblings maybe, you know, superpower countries behavior

The problem here is that he is desperately trying to maintain an equal distance on an issue where Turkey is obviously violating international law. Some times you cant blame both sides. He says "there are two versions of the map , each of which would totally benefit either Turkey or Greece". He represents the "Greek map" like it is Greece's contrivance. No , there is a legal and compatible with the International law map , and an illegal one.

yes he said that at the end of the video already

@@truthseeker4931 I think we're zeroing in on the problem on why there will be no end to this international conflict

@@arafat464 I dont get your point. Maybe i didnt understand. Are you referring to creator of the video?

@@truthseeker4931 do you really think because of one single island, greece should have such a vast economic zone over the mediterannean? The EEZ that turkey claims as its own isnt a thing which is made up. That border has been referenced and defined multiple times in history like 1913 london agreement, 1923 lozan agreement etc. By that logic, should spain EEZ reach all the way to the morrocan coast because they have a few islands and cities there? No, it shouldnt. Morroco and spains EEZ equally distributes the sea of gibraltar while economic rights of spanish cities and little islands are limited to their territorial waters. Turkey says that it should have the EEZ that he claims because that territory is 200 nautical miles away from his coast. While also claiming that the greek kastelorizo island's economic rights should be limited to its territorial waters. Which is completley fair and making sense. Greece says it should have all the EEZ he claims over the medditranean because of a single island near the coast of turkey, far away from greece. So tell me, who is the logical one here?

hahaha what a joke

It's sad that this is true :/. As a Turk I really hope my country to have friendly relations with Greece. On my trips to Greece each year, I learned that without all these disputes we are just friends, but the current enviroment and unresolved issues from the past always comes in between. And both our governments are eager to show each other as public enemies, it works for their advantage. But I hope in the future people and with that, governments will get trough all this conflict and go for a fresh, friendly approach to each other. We need friends, not enemies especially as neighbours. Aggressive and ultra nationalist approaches are never the solution (っ˘̩╭╮˘̩)っ.

There is a huge profits in agean sea which is not enough for one country. I'm from Turkey and its seems certain. Also Greeks tend to think that we are in problem cause Turks stoled our treasures

@@yanksavgat4295 do i always have to see this stereotype of comment which basically says "governments baaad, nations guuud" It is not about being an ultranationalist or sth. This is basically geopolitics. These two nations will never have good relations, this can be sad but this is a fact and has nothing to do with govs.

Guys non of you got the joke.

@@AO00720 shhh let them enjoy their geopolitical opinions without cooking puns

What's the name of the music??? Maan it's so good zzzzzz

Adrián Berenguer - Continent

0:15

A simple example we the Greeks we are unable to ''read'' comprehend the Turks as a collective consciousness.. Par example how a nation feels that they have not established one city of importance, are they happy just renaming them? How does this works for them? Do they feel like locusts or are they happy with that? So deep is the gap.

What about if your brother was a strange gay incoming from an other car? A man who get in your car by force, put out your brother and stay in for him? Would you talk with him about the car owenership?

@@chrisimos588 hahahaha that example killed me but its true

So it does not accurately describe the problem then, since the entire affair is the fault of Turkey. It is not Greece that has a standing casus belli on Turkey in the event of Turkey claiming its international rights after all. The fact is that Greece is operating under the limits of international law, while Turkey is blatantly ignoring it and even denying islands like Crete and Rhodes territorial waters while attempting to enforce this with constant threats of war. Turkey is a bully.

qwertz is way better

his goal is to be unbiased putting that in is bias

@@OfficialJessP why is that Bias,if it is a fact

Naah i saw a youtube video just like this one and the person who made that video was totally biased toward armenia. Also he was speaking like a total jerk yet skill share decided to support him. So that's a no to skill share and yes to brilliant . org

@@abdullahk0405 i mean you did kill the Armenians

Its always these 7-8 Oil Companies Cabal American Exxon Mobil, American Chevron, British Petroleum, French Total, Royal Dutch Shell, Russian Rosneft/Gazprom, Chinese Petrochina and American Halliburton and few other companies do the Engineering work

It only benefits them while Greece and Turkey dogfighting. I think Turkey and Greece should unite their strong to take out the oil together without any outside country and company. This is the only win-win situation. But it seems western countries will have the oil in mediterranean too.

@@emregol3793 lol turkey want to fight for those oils because there are not in their territory... and we had issues when we drilled our oil in north aegean a long time ago... if turkey had the oils in their territory they would already been using them and we wouldnt even care or try to do anything... thats all facts from 1970 till now..

@@nikosvougioukas8061 thats your point of view from your media. Grecee can only sell oil. You guys cant drill. You dont have the tech. You said its your oil. Somebody can easily say otherwise(cause there i no aggrement). I dont think turkey will let this oil go. Neither grecee. If it comes the war. We know who is gonna win. I wish that day will never happen. It is better that both countires come to an aggrement. Because, grecee will sell this oil almost for free, . Because of these dogfight, grecee have to buy weapons from west, turkey spents its money to militarazing. Only west will benefit here.

@@emregol3793 Though I agree and try to advocate for this, we have to remember that the west has facilitated/benefited heavily from our ongoing tensions over the past 200 years. It is a shame we are both so dependent on them that we can not put our own wellbeing as a priority

Love Greece!

Likewise, I hope we figure out something that beneficial to all of us.

🤮🤮🤮

El Dr. John daniel me ayudó a recuperar a mi ex esposa. No le creí antes, pero ahora es un hechicero muy real, envíale un mensaje en WhatsApp si quieres ser feliz como yo. (+2348100954052)..

it is not objective , he is talking about a dispute , there is no dispute , the turks are threatening to attack Greece if they don't surrender their EEZ . If someone comes into your home at gun point saying "your money or your life" it is a robbery and threat to kill , not a dispute

@@donarw1064 who cares ?

@@theolonius8865 us

@@donarw1064 do you guys in Greece not learn anything about critical thinking lmao

didn't the USA do the same to hundreds of countries also Libya doesn't have a government anymore(from what I believe in)

Turkey not ratified unclos, it is meaningless in this case

🇬🇷❤️🇪🇬 :)) Egypt is our closest ally and we love your country and the people of Egypt!! greece and Egypt forever bros🇬🇷🇪🇬🇬🇷🇪🇬🇬🇷🇪🇬🇬🇷🇪🇬

They love muslims so muchhhh 😂

@@dcjkl8088 first off all not all Egyptians are muslims 20% of egyptians are Christians, and I just wanna get ur point !

@@stevasmr6024 well I’m talking about the majority and egypt is a muslim country

@@dcjkl8088 Cleopatre was greek

The republic of Cyprus is a kind of temporary country. Half of the island belongs to Turks. Also Cyprus is famous with "laundering of illicit money" especially Russian money. Not to mention "selling EU passport to criminals for money" issues. So Nobody cares "The republic of Cyprus" agreements because It is a criminal, temporary and abstract country.

@@home-uf3tg No, the entire island belongs to Cyprus. The "Turkish" half is just an illegal occupation.

@@johanlassen6448 whos cares

@@fatihyaldz5266 Everyone outside Turkey

Check out caspian report.

@@_robustus_ Caspian Report has a slight bias towards the Turkish side, given the fact that the commentator is an Azeri. I saw that video and I got that bias vibe. It also portrayed Greece as some sort of villain for making a deal with Egypt, while ignoring that Turkey made a deal with the Libyan GNA first, despite the fact that the Libyan GNA does not control the eastern part of the country.

The Pale God Nevertheless it's not objective. You can't pretend in the same video that Greece is just applying the Law of Sea and that Greece is trying to limit Turkey's rights. Greece did not put its islands there to limit Turkey's EEZ what so ever. Greece defined it's EEZ according to the rules of the law of sea, respecting what the said law gives to Turkey. On the other hand, the EEZ claimed by Turkey is not respecting Greece's rights according to the law of sea and tries to force Greece into submission by threats of war.

toprowsky123 Turkey recognised it de facto by signing a treaty with Bulgaria and another one with Libya defining it's own EEZ. You can't have you cake and it it. Either Turkey wants an EEZ and aknowledges the UN treaty defining what an EEZ is, or Turkey remains in the revious legal order whith no EEZ what so ever. Hypocrisy is not allowed in legal matters. Greece on the other had is part of the UN treaty and is just applying it. Turkey is the one threatenig of war here. Greece is legalist. You see Greece is not taking anything from Turkey but from the international waters. International waters, as the name suggests are not the proprety of Turkey. Therefore Greece is not require to ask Turkey?s opinion on that matter. Your status quo bullshit is fantasy. The UN provided a way to resolve differants resulting from the law of sea in court. Just behave like decent human beings and ask the court to set the limits of you EEZ.

toprowsky123 those are Bullshit Treaties anyway. You can't deal with Libya about Greek waters because Libya has no sovereignty over Greek waters. It's absurd and will only lead to war. Turkey is just creating more unstability with stupid moves all over the region. Do you understand that if Turkey does not sign the Montego Bay treaty Turkey has no right to an EEZ what so ever. Singing treaties will fallen states is not a solution. Threatening an EU membre is not a good idea. Art. 42 of the treaty of the EU says that in case one state member is invaded, all other state members shall provide help by all means. This means Turkey, by invading Greek waters, exposes itself to a war with 29 advanced countries. And the definition of 'invasion' does not depend on Turkish bullshit teaties with bullshit goverments of failed countries. Sounds quite stupid if you ask me.

He couldnt, the Turkish navy had lost against the Greek navy during that war and the balkan wars before it. That is how Greece got a lot of the islands

You guys need to refresh your history knowledge. Those twelve islands - which are given to Italians after 1911-1912 Italian - Turkish war. Ottomans lost this war because the 1st Balkan War started. Whatever, Ottomans and Italians signed and agreement. Which Italians call Trattato di Losanna and Turks call it Ouchy in order to avoid confusion with Lousanne Treaty. According to this agreement, Italy accepted to give those Islands back to the Ottomans. But they never did that. After losing WW2, Italy gave those islands to the greece in 1947. So those Islands become greek 9 years after death of Atatürk. Its because you lived there for a long time doesnt make it yours. I am sorry, Byzantine Empire is gone as well. The borders of the countries are being determined by the agreements. So yeah, they are yours... For now :) :)

@@cashbg3535 Well, if the Greeks having them for 2,000 plus years doesn’t count, then the Ottoman’s having them for about 300 years, and the Turkish Republic owning them for ZERO years mustn’t count either; because they now belong to the modern Hellenic Republic. Do you really think Turkey is going to go to war for those islands? Big mistake even for someone as diluded as Erdogan and his barking dog of a foreign minister.

This doesn't have to do with the Turkish people they are just under heavy propaganda and many of them uneducated it's the Turkish government

Highly doubt that.

@@christoforosvogiatzis4898 the guy said who has greece flag is his profile

@@ferhatgulsuyu4041 😂😭

@@christoforosvogiatzis4898 wow, says the man with the greek flag. Very credible

Economics explained: Norway Real life lore: toyota corolla

there is the international court of the Hague, where Greece and Turkey can go to solve that issue.

.

So an island with people living on it, is considered rock for you? Regardless of what myself and yourself say, there are laws. Greece simply say let's go to Hague to solve our issues (as so many countries did before) but Turkey doesn't want that, guess why...

@@savvas.k why dont u check aggrement between France and england about islands between? Also frace is your big supporter. Look how they decided there and now

@Bruce Lee literally the UNCLOS (meaning the international law) says that inhabited islands with economic life have the right to EEZ. This is what all countries adhere to. Besides Turkey.

@@vassilisxerikos3908 if you really think that turkey would succumb to beeing landlocked over an agreement that she didn't sign, you are delisional. Even a small rock can be fitted into description of an island which has economic activities, however and island which has a population whole year round and can sustain itself is very debatable. I am all for solutions, we could search and drill together as neighbors but our respective governments have other plans.

@@denizkizilates3063 you are not landlocked. You will have the amount of territorial waters and EEZ that international law provisions for your country. No more. Now Greece has been extremely patient and generous with this behavior, and tries to genuinely sway turkey towards international law. But If you keep up this attitude and make the mistake of trying to conquer what is not yours, be prepared to lose your airforce. In three days.

Adrián Berenguer - Continent

According to the right of the sea turks can go everywhere to Aegian but not with warships and for searches . Turkey must agree for EEZ with Greece

El Dr. John daniel me ayudó a recuperar a mi ex esposa. No le creí antes, pero ahora es un hechicero muy real, envíale un mensaje en WhatsApp si quieres ser feliz como yo. (+2348100954052)..

Because it's not right

Some things are just unsenseable. A peble of an Island cannot (well it can but it is very unjustice) strip a major body of land from it’s rights to the sea of of its coastline. It just doesn’t make sense from a logical point of view. Greece should stop pushing their agenda, which is unrational and plain unjustice towards Turkey and its rights, which is that they own the eastern med just because they fortunately own a nearly uninhabited island.

@@AC-ys4vc well that it is too bad you don't have that island 🤷🏻‍♂️.

@@AC-ys4vc so war is the best solution? I see that Greece agreed for eez with Italy, Egypt and decided to go to international Court for eez after a mutual agreement with Albania. there are solution and always better than war. Instead Turkey is involved in several wars. does anything sound weird? as much as Erdogan has economic problems, lives into wealth, does not care about his people, send people into jail, fight free press etc he will always present to his people imaginary "enemies". There are not enemies to Turkish people. it's 2020 and there are better solutions instead of war.

@@salmp7 Turkey asked and accepted to come to terms with the situation through dialogue but Greece denied.

Canada might give a small favor to France. But Canada did not have to. just a favor to old french speaking friend. nothing more.

@Chris Serafim it is open wide atlantic ocean. i do not see huge gains compared to canada's EEZ. they just opened a small corridor to international waters. french gained 18% of the territory that french had initially claimed.(wikipedia). greeks claim half of the east mediterranean. no water for turkish side. how is that fair.

@@yusufilkerozturk4715 you can only receive what your entitled under the law of the sea. And half way when in other areas.

​@@leosword7142 Completely wrong as UNCLOS wasn't the only UN sea law convention and there were like half of a dozen conventions before that!! So in case of Turkey, Israel or US etc not signing UNCLOS previous UN sea law convention is binding for those countries and according to that convention both Turkey and Greece signed Turkey can declare 200 nmiles EEZ while literally ignoring islands as that convention is giving mainland more weight compared to islands. So Turkey's claims aren't illegal at all rather they are the legal claims in current situation especially if we consider how Greece is trying to use Meis island to completely butcher Turkish EEZ (Why claimed Greek EEZ has W shape around Turkey) while it is only 1.9 km away from Turkey and 550 km away from Athens and there are only 300 people living on it!! It is so extremely small a magnifying glass is needed to see it even then it could steal the rights of 80 million people only according to Greece ofc...

@@ggoddkkiller1342 you fail to understand that the Greek islands is Greece. Not just Athens. That is if an island is 2km away from Turkey its Greece that is 2km away from Turkey. ANKARA is a further 900km? away from the greek islands.

@Ahmet Özkan Sais the dog whose only contribution to history was stealing shit better men than him created

Always has been

@Ahmet Özkan Yeah, that's why the Ottomans tried so hard (and succeeded eventually) to mix with local Greek, Armenian, Bulgarian, Albanian and Serbian population in order to form the so called "Turkish" nation.. Please show more respect to the land and its original people. Even Mehmed the Conqueror did that back in the time !

@Ahmet Özkan Threatening people with death, demolishing their villages if they didn't convert to Islam, taking their children away by force from all different ethnic groups (not just the Greeks) is your idea of "just couldn't avoid it" ?? Also, I'm only talking here about the Balkans because you mentioned something about "Balkan peasants".. If we were to consider Anatolia, its people were either assimilated by the Greeks or the Persians some thousands years ago and eventually get to become Roman citizens as everyone else. So I don't see what you don't understand about originality here ?

@Ahmet Özkan But everyone in the Ottoman empire was an Ottoman citizen, including the Greeks at the time - that's not the point here. What you need to be careful about is what kind of characterization you use for those people that were indigenous to the land for thousands of years, before the progressive establishment of Turkic tribes in Anatolia. Eastern Rome that your people so much wanted to resemble and conquer was comprised of all those "peasants" that eventually became unified under the same hellenistic culture. Who told you that I'm talking only about the Janissaries here ? Make a quick history check about Turkish nation's genetic background and then we can have a conversation. Lastly, of course everyone speaks their language and practices their religion !! We've fought hard to preserve that right !