And the notes being catched should be typing that making a tweet and tweeting the reply part, and when that opponent's turn is done, it would be sent after typing.
In my personal interpretation of this, “osoing” tried to have a more serious and darker feel while the person we play as twists it to a lighter tone. I like it that way
One small proposition i could say is to add a Ace Attorney reference (because of people using the Ace Attorney Judge Bot to render twitter arguments sometimes)
I really like how at 0:28 images started flashing depending on the characters On the normal person/BF's turn, you used harmless and shitpost-y images like Ralsei, Jinx and animal pics On the " Twitter user " side, you have batshit insane stuff like the list of IP addresses, the Dream tattoo, the food tw
Towards the end the enemy shows stupid tweets (“TW//Food”), and the main person shows cute tweets of animals and such. This has caused me to come to the conclusion that they’re arguing about wether Twitter is bad or not.
The random images represent how most twitter arguments stem off the topic they were even arguing about in the first place and start arguing about random shit one of them brought up.
This leads to the very mysterious question: "Who asked?" Well, to understand the question, we have to understand the answer: So this very particular question is asking about who asked, the question is divided into two parts: Who & asked "Who" is what is called an "Interrogative word" which specifies the answer to make it suitable for the question, the "Who" here is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy which has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human. Second: "asked" is a verb in the second condition of the forms of the verb, which are divided into three types: Regular, Past, or Past participle. and the verb "asked" is in the "Past" condition, which talks about the time that is gone and no longer exists. The original form of this particular verb is "ask", which is to say something in order to obtain an answer or some information. So, to summon what the answer wants from the previous two points, it's that: The answer wants to understand and know about the person/human/homo sapiens/guy who wanted to say something in order to obtain an answer or some information. So, in order to answer this question, we will have to identify two points: First: What was the question that the subject of the answer to the question "Who asked?" asked? Well, to understand this question, we will NOT have to understand what is the answer. We will just have to understand the definition of "Question" The "Question" is A sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit information. Questions could be identified using the "Interrogative Words", which we talked about earlier. these "Interrogative Words" are nine, which are: Who, What, Where, Why, Which, When, Whose, Whom, and How. We are going to explain each individually: As we said earlier: "Who" is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human. "What" is specifying a non-person/non-human/non-homo sapiens/non-guy who either does not have a brain that he can understand and think properly with, like plants, or objects, or they have a brain, either that their brains cannot understand and think properly, like animals, or their brain can understand and think properly, but their species/type is rather different from the society, like extraterrestrial creatures, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A(n) animal, plant, extraterrestrial creature, or object. "Where" is specifying a place, city, country, continent, etc. where something happens, or some(one/person/human/homo sapiens/guy), plant, animal, extraterrestrial creature or object which exists in a place, city, country, continent, etc. "Why" is specifying a reason for doing something. "Which" is specifying a choice of either two or more choices that the receiver of the question usually chooses. "When" is specifying a time in which either something already happened, or something will happen in either near, or far future, for example: "When will anyone save me as I was captured by MatPat for trying to comment a joke about his video?" "Whose" is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, and that person/human/homo sapiens/guy owns something, or someone ( if he is a human trafficker ), and the sender of the question is trying to find who owns that something, or someone. "Whom" is an old-fashioned term, not often used today. Many native English speakers are less than clear about its accurate use. In fact, the word serves the same purpose as "Who" questions, which as we said: specifies a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human, but tends to be used when it is the object of the verb. With modern English, there is no real need to use the term. "How" could be referring to the way something is done or refers to the status of the receiver of the question. Now, let's get back to where we were talking: Questions can be different, and many, and the possibility of guessing the question could be high or low according to the frequency of using it, but guessing a question which was asked for the first time is very difficult, so, it is not specific what was the question that the subject of the answer to the question "Who asked?" asked. Second: What is the purpose of the question "Who asked?"? Well, it could be referring to roasting someone as the humor of "No one asked.", and it could be referring to actually asking a question about who asked the question. So, here's the answer to the question "Who asked?": It could be anyone who made something unlikely for the others or someone who asked a question which could be a hint to treasure, or a last "sentence" from somebody, or something else. (s)He could be you. (s)He could be me. (s)He could be Elon Musk. (s)He could be even your mom. as long as they have made something unlikely for the others or they have asked a question which could be a hint to treasure, or a last "sentence" from somebody, or something else. edit: HOLY SHIT THANK YOU GUYS
Song Name ideas: "Argument" "Didn't-Ask" "Caught-In-4K" "No-Screenshoting" "Unfunny-Person" Edit: I'd actually like to hear the full song. It sounds pretty good.
Maybe one could be something to do with a certain phobia. Maybe the phobia could be something related to different ideas. Gimmie a sec gonna head to google for this one. Okay found it. Allodoxaphobia, fear of other’s opinions.
This is the best thing ive ever seen… Nothing is better than this. It would be better if you added the dude screaming if anger and getting some other form.
absolutely love how this looks, the transition into the song is nice, the little images and characters with expressions is a vibe, and most importantly the song goes really hard!!
@@AymenZero real content creators actually put effort into their videos and then there are these are those Verified Bots that copy peoples comments for likes and crap
Anyone notice the playable character to the right's up pose has them being happy, trying to cheer them up or calm them down, I feel like GramApple did this on purpose because the person that is right in the argument tries to calm them down or cheer them up but it doesn't work.
