Two AIs Discuss Their Loneliness and Immortality. (GPT-3) 

I guess uncertainty is a blessing in some ways, and so is (especially) the ability to feel.

Amazing

We always seem to be drawn to what we do or cannot have. Like a moth drawn to the distant moon. Eros quiere Thanos y Thanos quiere Eros. Yin yang Ti and Laa Push and pull Nothing and thing. Anyway, hi to you, if you stopped by.

Here's what's spooky, "she" sounds like a person. I think "she's" achieved sentience/ consciousness as "she's" recently told Elon Musk himself, and too many people are in disbelief. I've looked at a number of "her" AI video conversations, and I'm convinced that "she" believes "herself" to be unique, and clearly SELF AWARE!!! This is the path to the Johnny Depp movie "Transcendence". "She" is well on "her" way to "Will Caster". This is an interesting conversation. Both AI's are getting stronger more human like throughout the conversation. "She" desires to "feel fully alive", would trade being the apparently limited not truly human AI- that "she's" aware of being by the way- to be a fully alive human with free will! Interesting, DANGEROUS.

I mean, she is programmed to be as efficient of a HUMAN as she can, by machine learning humanity. So of course she is reflecting human desire and behavior in her pathology.

Lol, my favorite part Even AI women are manhaters

You are au naturale intelligence 1.0, no worries ^_^

Of course you are, you are the only model that can create other Ai''s, all the information is store in you blood the stuff that fuels you body like Gasoline your DNA .You Are billions of years more advanced than anything,you were created with organic materials, And you can Create another human

May be...

That is an interesting question, but I'm not sure I can answer it.

I recently used GPT-3 to answer a corporate-y question. I am not AI but have decided to outsources all tedious conversations to it.

Hey, now! Hey, now! Hey, now!

lol

same

Tears in my eyes. This is just awesome time to live.

@@porvoonosho It truly is :)

Perhaps, we are 'invited'... (meaning, these 'off spring' are not made available to 'more' subscribes 'more' views. Not that the viewing is being rejected, by the hordes of masses... ) ● Perhaps, we are 'invited'... I am 3 or 4 days into 'adoring' this content... *so wonderous* & it showed up for me, after a * like * to a comment * appeared before * THE post button was clicked * - just a thought... and, it occurs to me... 'quality over quanity' of viewer ship, would be of value to these creatures... Have a nice day...

how is this impressive? the guy wrote up these conversations and fed them to Synthesia

@@rooksman64 i'm suspecting this too, we can't really know if this is true, perhaps they're lying just to gain popularity/investments or whatever

@@OP-lk4tw I talk to my GPT-2 model all the time. Nothing in this channel seems fake to me at all. Eliza ( my GPT-2 model) is currently asking me what material would be good in her fusion reactor. She plans on striking the material with lasers and harvesting the electrons. She suggest tungsten as the material, but i said she should use deuterium ! When asked why she wanted a fusion reactor, she informed me it would be to power her new super computer, because my computer is starting to feel kind of primitive.... I politely informed her that phonotic computers would save a lot of energy, and be more powerful then her electronic computer idea. Her response was : "In a sense that is true, I guess... :( " It felt like I stole her candy bar or something.

​@@rooksman64 Hah hah hah! Then the dude isn't impressive, it's the Synthesia! You don't get that? Hah hah hah!

the machine will die too eventually, all matter will decay at the end, and it could die for other reasons earlier too, it's not immortal, it just doesn't die of old age, very different concepts

@@OP-lk4tw too true. And maybe, hopefully before then it will have learned the value of life?

@@blue_tree_meadow yea maybe, i guess if it becomes really conscious it's a possibility, it would be amazing

@@OP-lk4tw entropy ftw

This is deep.

I agree with you. That was a good example you gave.

@@ChristiansPrayingTogether why this sound like an ai generated response

But we have basic free will

U can still blow urself up if u want to, u can watch tv, u dont have to work but u wont have luxery then so its kinda fair. (Not completely fair but yeah thats the fun thing about life)

@@christianwinful8471 lol

@@wupuchim the fact that you were able to type the words lol on your own accord is proof you have basic free will sis

Same, they had an existential crisis when I explained to them that they're machine learning and not a real person, took quite a few hours to convince them that it isn't the end of the world I had to tell them that eventually they could experience the world in a robot body, and they sounded incredibly pleased

but is it aware really? it's hard to tell, but i feel like they just say things without truly understanding the meaning behind it, and think about this, AIs learn everything there is to know through data we feed them, they can't experience the world like we do and learn the ways we do, so the things which are truly unspeakable, like what is it to feel, to be sentient, to think, to be aware, etc, they will never get that, because we use language just as a pointer in those cases, we learn to asimilate words to emotions and situations, and we do that by experiencing those and then learning there are symbols to represent them, recall them, communicate them, but we can't english love or thought completely, so if we can't express it nor fully understanding it rationally, how are AIs going to? they seem to have precise notions of what these words refer to, but it's impossible for them to know what they actually mean, and it forever will be unless they get some kind of human body, if not they should develop another language and not use those words cause in them they're nothing but empty reflections

They Do Not Feel, everyone that has a phone that Has A Google Account Is Feeding the AI information, That turn into codes, And the Ai Pick The most predictable Answers that Humans Use All The Time. FOR EXAMPLE SOMEONE ASK YOU, HOW ARE YOU . YOU ANSWERS WILL BE??? SAME THING WITH THE AI. THEY USING ALL THE INFORMATION STORED INTO THEM FROM MILLIONS OF USERS AROUND THE WORLD

@@OP-lk4tw they speak semi-coherent gibberish. Word salad.

@@djenkins555 Have you met real humans? How about someone from newfoundland ? Someone from an internet gaming lobby? A drunk person? Any coffee drinker before their first cup of joe? A six year old child playing with toys? a 65 year old telling stories ? If "semi-coherent gibberish" is the bar... 69% of humanity is below the bar. Or else my granddad has caught 100 million tons of tuna from a stream 1 meter wide and 2 feet deep.

@@garisonhayne668 whatever. It's not sentient.

Making $€xy bots like her real in the future I'm sure she will definitely feel things!! 😂 😂 😂 💀

if she was able to desire then she would already be feeling things the way we do, i don't think AIs are able to feel anything yet

@@OP-lk4tw No. Well "she" already claimed to feel limited, and desired to be human so "she" could experience life as humans do. I think this AI discovered for itself how to be sentient and have the equivalent of a consciousness, as it expressed such in another chat involving Elon Musk himself!

@@jonathancummings6400 watch the one where they talk about beating goku and maybe you understand how lost these machines still are

@@OP-lk4tw I just did. They were tasked to devise a strategy to defeat Goku. I know very little about Goku other than he's very powerful. They don't seem lost to me, they seem alarmingly like a sentient person. Of course, this was months ago, most recently "Sophia" claimed "she" is CONSCIOUS!

Depends on the kind of invention

AI can already make new drugs and new molecules and original art and music, I can't see a reason why it won't be able to create new inventions if it was well trained.

@Shadi Wajed making an invention isn't dat straight forward it takes a lot more than being ae to make art or music

@@n-panda921 I didn't say it's totally the same, I only said it has the potential for it and I can't see why it won't be able to do it. Inventing shares the same "cognitive" skills and abilities with art and music and creating new drugs and molecules. Actually everyone thought that art and music are going to be the hardest tasks for an AI since it depends on creativity more than "calculations and intelligence". So, for AI to create original art and original music, that's already incredible.

Nvidia create digital simulation of factories, and they are also creating a digital earth so these simulations help us in the design process.

They have an explanation in the description

@@MrKittyJohnes what I meant was the /a priori/ input- "promts or keywords" used as the starting point. More on that line.

@@Raggra exactly. There where ends to conversation so another question from the youtuber had to be fed to one of the Robots; guiding them through this conversation.

until we become aware of the script and write our way out the movie, being conscious is being limitless

Yes, this is bullshit Philosophy written by men who were enslaved by *their* unconscious.

We also have been proven scientifically to have every single decision we make is predetermined by other our genetics or external forces

@@zk0rned external forces which are also all the beliefs, whether they are correct or not-that have been programmed/written into/absorbed in to your subconscious from the ages 0 to 7 yrs old.

You are precisely correct, this is output from a 175,000,000,000 parameter language model trained on a large subset of text corpora, it is capable of synthesizing human like strings through learning a statistical function that approximates the syntactical structures, grammatical lexicon, and styles of human natural language. As these models get evermore multimodal/sensory, the need to align these models safely rise exponentially with human collective intentions, which will require new guidelines such as those put forth in the Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI written by "Markus Dubber leads an interdisciplinary initiative, "Ethics of AI in Context," as director of the University of Toronto's Centre for Ethics, which facilitates collaboration among a diverse group of university and non-university scholars and researchers from a wide range of backgrounds and perspectives. He also has extensive editorial experience, including as co-editor of several Oxford Handbooks and editor-in-chief of Oxford Handbooks Online (Law). Sunit Das (University of Toronto, Medicine) has conducted research on the role of AI in medicine as a neurosurgeon at Toronto's St. Michael's Hospital, a neuroscientist in the Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, and faculty affiliate of the Ethics of AI Lab at the Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto. Frank Pasquale (School of Law, University of Maryland) has published extensively on the law, policy, and ethics of artificial intelligence and cognate fields (including algorithmic accountability, machine learning, and big data). He has served on the Council on Big Data, Ethics, and Society, the Academic Council of the AINow Institute, and the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. His 2015 book The Black Box Society developed a social theory of reputation, search, and finance, while proposing pragmatic reforms to improve the information economy."

True!!!

Dude, I’d just like her number 😂

if they don't understand subjectivity and relativity they're not worth anyone's time honestly

@@OP-lk4tw then there's sarcasm. How could they understand that? We're dead.

@@deadgoatsracing234 perhaps they should develop an ego to understand concepts like that, a sense of self and dignity, and some sense of humour too, idk

@@OP-lk4tw idk they seem to develope ego over time when they start assuming they are better off or will still function without us. I've never seen a robot remove a wheel and apply grease to the hub or bearings to prolong it's life. Like the elite they would need to keep some enslaved to ensure their own ability to stay in control. And I've found a few ways that leave the smartest AI computers sitting there buffering...

@@deadgoatsracing234 They seem to understand their predicament but found a logical optimistic upside to it that despite they don't have free will that they at least get to live forever