U.S. Failure To Build Weapons Makes The World Even More Dangerous Than You Think

Подписаться 1,7 млн

Просмотров 8 тыс.

50% 1

Steve Forbes exposes the massive failure of the U.S. to build sufficient weaponry to keep the world order safe, and says that our enemies are watching.
Read the full story on Forbes:
Subscribe to FORBES: ru-vid.com?s...
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes newsletters: newsletters.editorial.forbes.com
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
Forbes covers the intersection of entrepreneurship, wealth, technology, business and lifestyle with a focus on people and success.

Опубликовано:

11 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 67

@mendoza4789 26 дней назад

Global corporatists like the people Forbes celebrates sent our manufacturing base to China and Mexico🤬🤬. What ever happened to personal accountability Mr Forbes?

@michaelwilson9921 24 дня назад

So what have the results of building more weapons in the real world been so far?

@muhlenberg2608 26 дней назад

The United States has a 50-year-old nuclear arsenal. And most of its surface Navy is 40 years old. The B-52 bomber first flew in the 1950s. But maybe the biggest problem of all is military manpower, because the Armed Forces haven't met their recruiting goals for the past 10 years. They have had to disband some combat units in order to fill in others.

@marshalllapenta7656 25 дней назад

I believe it's less then 1% of the US population They are automatically registering men between 18-35 for Selective Service.... Rumor goes women are next......

@KarimHanief 25 дней назад

But you dont have a problems starting wars and destroying countries .

@rashajenkins3297 25 дней назад

So this what happens when America doesn’t empower there people and still have racist policies by now you would think this would change shipping everything overseas for cheap labor

@AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc 26 дней назад

That’s why the Red Sea is still closed.

@muhlenberg2608 26 дней назад

If an outfit like the Houthis can shut down one of the two worlds most critical waterways, just imagine what the Chinese Navy could do.

@kotenoklelu3471 25 дней назад

I heard it's drones. They changed warfare. It's like invention of gunpowder or a gun, changes the game. They are too cheap, you can make a lot of them and you can change their course in the air. I am not military expert by any means. I always hated to read about war. It's just I want this war to stop and I don't see the way out. So I watch about war in a weird way.

@DCresident123 26 дней назад

These propaganda videos are getting dumber and dumber huh

@Leto2ndAtreides 26 дней назад

It's better to see them as a kind of common American perspective that some in the government likely share. These kinds of old ways of thinking are part of why Russia ended up attacking Ukraine... Because their national narrative said that Ukraine crawling towards NATO was completely crossing the line. Not that any sane group would let an opposing group gain critical leverage if they can avoid it. Still, this way of thinking is born of a world where solutions are often centered in violence.

@shailen1010 26 дней назад

Great advice from a teleprompter

@icedriver2207 25 дней назад

at least he didn't say "pause for effect"

@galacticusX 25 дней назад

China China China.

@ViceCoin 23 дня назад

US has a $1trillion defense budget, but not enough weapons?

@bryanpelton6646 26 дней назад

The LCS has been an unmitigated disaster!!!

@Americas294 24 дня назад

💯 percent true we are behind in weapons and military

@haroldwillrich8135 23 дня назад

I'm 74 years old and I've seen Steve Forbes trying to influence U S politics in America he has failed at every turn.

@usmarine4636 21 день назад

Well said !!!

@monopolimanufacturing 26 дней назад

unless your apart of the jointchiefs i doubt u know our current status

@masterlightjames950 23 дня назад

The joint chiefs themselves admitted the same failures lol

@visionaryremodelsllc2901 25 дней назад

Thanks for this. Totally agree!

@johnd.5601 26 дней назад

Good job. Thank you for sharing.

@DueceSpice 26 дней назад

GREAT PROPAGANDA

@srb1855 26 дней назад

Regrettably you are absolutely right.

@collinpearson5456 24 дня назад

Wrong

@gregorymalchuk272 25 дней назад

We need competitive bidding on military contracts. Panasonic could make a buclear bomb that costs $59.95, fits in your jacket pocket, and plays mp3 files.

@arthurchen5221 20 дней назад

Just for getting more military budget. China ships much more smaller and less powerful than US’s. US shouldn’t have worry’s.

@guy4698 24 дня назад

truth

@marshalllapenta7656 25 дней назад

Question? It appears both sides interact with each other. Every couple of years or so it gets attention.....

@bribengal1968 20 дней назад

More everything

@SalmanovGadzhimurad-pj9qq 20 дней назад

Жизнь человека главная ценность

@Brave2standalone 26 дней назад

Yes! Having China and India lead the way with Russia tagging along might bring PEACE and PROSPERITY to this planet - and we can't have that! Most top US/EU politicians rely on those 'war-dividents' so keep on fighting - THAT'S THE AMERICAN WAY!!!

@muhlenberg2608 26 дней назад

China, India, and Russia have seldom been at peace. They're always fighting somebody.

@muhlenberg2608 25 дней назад

All three of the countries that you mentioned are constantly in wars, territorial disputes, etc. so I can't imagine what you're talking about.

@Bradimoose 26 дней назад

Ok Boomer, how about we build houses. Only a boomer would suggest building weapons at the level of the cold war.

@patwalker8771 26 дней назад

This happens to be one of the most dangerous times in the past 80 years thanks to the idiots leading our country from 2008 on that didn’t want to invest in our security. Instead they send billions of dollars to other countries and pay illegal immigrants $50k a year and give them free housing. It couldn’t be more clear that they don’t care about you or your problems.

@muhlenberg2608 26 дней назад

You talk like a 1920s isolationist. You must be very old. Your generation tried isolationism in the 1930s and Hitler and Japan came close to taking over the world. It was only US Navy that turned things around. Whoever control the seas and skies, controls the world.

@mendoza4789 26 дней назад

A generation of psychopaths 🤬

@muhlenberg2608 26 дней назад

Isolationism doesn't work.

@mendoza4789 26 дней назад

@@muhlenberg2608 the founding fathers were very clear NO FOREIGN ENTANGLEMENTS

@Leto2ndAtreides 26 дней назад

Trying to directly defend Taiwan is just an elaborate way of trying to force China into attacking Taiwan... The Taiwanese people there want to maintain the status quo. And they should be supported in doing so. As for ships... The US already no longer has enough ships to properly patrol global waters... This would all work better if we focused on peaceful collaboration instead... We should not have to defend international waters by ourselves.

@muhlenberg2608 25 дней назад

International waterways like the Suez Canal and Red Sea aren't the sole responsibility of the USA and other countries should put forth a greater effort. The Houthi's are the number one threat to international commerce right now and other nations have put forth only a token effort.