Ukraine: the war is ending and here is why 

Insight appreciated even if limited. Don't stop bro you got this🤘

No worries man! Just saying if u ever run out of ideas, india's 5th gen program (AMCA) is always there for analysis

Stick to planes. You asked for it, so you got it. And now I'm going to watch the video.

@@gaborjuracsik4847 Agreed.

For what it's worth, I think you gave an excellent analysis. It's a shame the Ukrainians don't have the air support the allies had in the European campaign.

You'd need a ton of air power to be able to bypass the defense lines and directly hit supply bunkers, trenches and artillery.

This is why you need a crap ton of airpower. To breakthrough those lines, you need to hammer those trenches with GBUs months in advance.

This is what the cluster munitions are for , they will destroy paths through the minefields then destroy invaders in their trenches prior to the tanks and infantry attack .

@@A2Z1Two3 The whole reason cluster munitions have such a bad humanitarian rep is because of the high incidence of dangerous unexploded ordinance they leave behind, essentially turning them into mines. Targeting minefields with cluster weapons is essentially adding your own mines to the mix.

To see the Ukrainians trying to do this WITHOUT an air force is bonkers

laughed so loud at this moment xD

Huh there are some nice people left online, good onya matey

That was some weird cheapshot... 225k is def succesful yt channel... its almost like 1/5 of entire Estonian population... :DDD

he's going the Perun way, who also, at the end of his very first military analysis video, said something to the effect of "yeah i know i should go back to commenting on computer games" ;)

I'm an Aviation Fanatic too .... I have an extensive collection of mostly WWII airplanes but I grew up in an area loaded with early aviation history , probably one of the most impressive people in the field was knowing Igor Sikorsky ( from my Hometown once settled in America and His Personal history , This is also the home many fabulous planes including the F4-U and many flying Boats ... Fascinating...

Yes you are right. But this is not a war between Russia and Ukraine, this is a war between China and the United States. It's just that Russia is a military partner of China and the United States considered Russia a weak link and struck through a proxy force. Russia withstood the blow, and now the expression "war to the last Ukrainian" will soon cease to be just a saying. The United States will actually destroy all Ukrainians in this war, then the Poles will go to the slaughter. And all this in order to break Russia, leave China without resources and gain access to China by land through its north.

Thanks, to saving my 40 minutes.

bad losses and small progress are indication of war ending. this is because you can't build more and more well trained units indefinitely. ukr is already on multiple conscription while rus only ever did one. if ukr somehow succeeded in their offensive, it will end up as a pyrrhic victory. unfortunately lots of polarized people would go "what about kharkiv" something like that. the thing is that minor or major frontline changes happens all the time. what mattered is the strength and resources to conduct the war and see to its conclusion. i can name lots of nations or kingdoms that seized literal nation's sized land, only to lose it all by the end. one great example is how germany took a major swath of lands in europe, many times it's own size, only to lose them all in 5 years and having itself split between two superpowers by the end.

​@@far_centrist I disagree. In WW1 the first opening months were a very mobile war, with major changes to the frontlines, mostly because the battlefield was a game of chess, troops werent stationed at the first line and told to hold. Then both sides decided to dig trenches to stabilize their gains and inflict losses to the enemy. This caused the entire frontline to be manned 24/7 by millions of troops in only a few km in depth. I think the same has happened in Ukraine, but obviously in smaller numbers. In Kharkiv, Ukraine didnt assault trenches in platoon or company elements (as they do now), they assaulted villages in battalion attacks. Clearly the current offensive is so slow and costly because Russia has decided to put thousands of men at the first lines of defense, which in a lot of places is the only line of defense. This can work both against Ukraine and in favor of Ukraine, it just depends on how they play their cards. If Ukraine gets F16 quickly, effectively, and in numbers, then maybe they can achieve air superiority. Air superiority was ABSOLUTELY VITAL to Desert Storm and Iraq 2, where Iraqi forces got bombed to shreds in their fortified lines of trenches. Neither side wants to use trenches in the modern era, I mean look at how many Russian positions have been documented by satelite imagery. They're there for everyone to see! Small progress isnt an indication of the war ending, it's an indication of an uncertain offensive.

@@far_centrist you are saying "war ending", like both sides are absolutely static and stable, they are not. Prigozhyn proved that russia has problems inside meaning instability, Ukrainians rely on the western support, which can be the point for instability with delays or small deliveries of sometimes poorly maintained vehicles

This is funny if satire :-D. But also may be true - there is no sign Russia will settle for anything less than the total conquest of Ukraine. The war ends the day Russia withdraws to its own borders, and is over until Russia starts another unprovoked war of conquest. So it doesn't matter if neither side can win. The war won't end.

Exactly. The Russians have the bit between their teeth and they’ve been crossed and fooled too many times with delay strategies and agreements that are never signed in good faith.

Yeah, the biggest issue here is that: A. Russia is not a reliable partner in negotiations. Russia had negotiated so many treaties with Ukraine and about Ukraine, and broke all of them. B. Russia's political goals in this war are, as was proven by a mistakenly posted article on the 2nd day of the war in a prime Russian newspaper, to "solve the Ukrainian question". This isn't a war that Russia will negotiate a settlement to, nor can Ukraine afford to do so because it ends Ukrainian existence as a state. So as much as we may like to kid ourselves that negotiations will somehow save us, they won't happen. Ukraine offered terms and Putin threw them back, because he wants everything, and after seeing what Russia has done to Ukraine and Ukrainians in the territories it has occupied, Ukraine knows what's in store if they lose or give up.

@@whitescar2 Russia broke treaties? interesting....

"There is no negotiated resolution that allows Ukraine to prepare for a round 2. That is a complete nonstarter." And it is a non-starter as a cease fire would allow Russia to re-arm too (and put Ukraine in a greater danger). This a fight for survival to them.

Especially when you consider that if they do negotiate a cease fire, knowing full well that Russia will opt for round 2, there is little chance Ukraine will get the same level of support for said second round. They are in this to the end. They will continue fighting until Russia decides to lose. They have no other choice.

​@@4Fixerdavethey arent going to get the same level of support going forward. Doesn't matter what leaders say - public opinion will turn, the UKR flags in the bio's will go, people are engaged with this in a shallow manner. As US elections approach this will shift for the worse for UKR

@@1988jeffy Not the view from where I'm living. Not going to speak for the rest of the world but, for what it's worth, polling so far indicates pretty broad support, including increased support for sending more weapons. And, considering the nations currently supporting Ukraine make up 40% of world GDP compared to Russia's 1.4%, even if half got distracted it would make little difference. 20% compared to 1.4% is still no contest. Bucha, abducting children, causing famines in Africa, nuclear sabre rattling every other Tuesday... Yeah, I really don't expect world sympathy to shift from Ukraine to Russia anytime soon. If Ukraine loses, Russia becomes *our* problem so we'll keep supporting Ukraine to make sure that doesn't happen. The EU could and will do that alone if they have to. Supporting Ukraine is way cheaper than garrisoning Eastern Europe. My point was that if Ukraine opted for a negotiated settlement then everyone would forget about it and support would dry up. If that happened, they would get rolled over when Russia attacked again. So, they're not going to negotiate unless it comes with absolute security guarantees, basically immediate NATO membership. And, NATO wins so long as the war continues... no... I don't think they're going to negotiate.

Zelensky admit: 1. Crimea and Donbass ARE Russian and ARE Russia 2. EU won't happen 3. NATO won't happen 4. Making nice with Russia is the only way to not get hanged in Red Square like he deserves

@4Fixerdave I am not sure. But no matter what happens i agree this is a huge victory for the west. Sweden and Finland have joined NATO. If there is a ceasefire the west will have the powerful Ukrainian military as a bulwark against Russia right on its border. Europe is taking defense more seriously and will not put up with Russian aggression the way they have in the past. The Russian military is squandering many of its modern warfighting capabilities and political capital on the world stage. And the west is able to test weapons in real world scenarios and learn the best ways to fight land wars for decades to come. All while providing a boost to the military industrial complex and sacrificing the lives of zero western soldiers. Aside from the obvious humanitarian reasons there is no incentive for west to want this war to end without a total defeat of Russia. The west wants to keep on winning so the low effort support that has helped keep Ukraine afloat will keep flowing as long as there is someone semi competent in charge. The only way I could see it change is if that Trump lunatic wins again since he is in Putin's pocket.

Thanks! Your daily videos, and DPAs', are the first daily news i watch, before moving to anything else.

a lot of comments from pro-genocide Zniks here, like on Weeb Union. It's no coincidence...

@@Millennium7HistoryTech Don't worry, lots of idiots watch those Kremlin paid for channels

@@Millennium7HistoryTech Be careful with them. They are not independent sources either. And they are sensationalising "battles of the next barn around the corner".

@@rosomak8244I’ve ​noticed they do tend to be much more objective than most sources, a true unbiased source of information is not currently possible (Even if the creator himself is trying his best to be unbiased). The best we can get at the moment is creators that instead of blatantly pushing propaganda actually try to be honest with the audience and lower their own biases; examples are WillyOAM, Free Russia Channel, DPA, Weeb Union, Military Summary, History Legends, Perun, etc. Some of these are self-admitted pro-ukraine (two actually), the others keep it ambiguous but claim neutrality. Personally I try to stay away from the most biased sources, I’ve found blatant pro-russian channels that I dislike as well as pro-ukraine channels that I also dislike because they are blatant propaganda (I have something against propaganda channels, I hate their inauthenticity) some examples are Denys Davydov, Artur Rehi, Airpower, and Hindustan Times, as well as most mainstream media.

Jackson Hinkle Scott Ritter Douglas McGregor

@@yonkeuulen8380 thanks, it is so easy to get stuck in a bubble with a lot of biased content.

War on the rocks.

No he's not, he's obviously biased, saying "let's hope that" the incident that happened in Dec. 2011 when Iraq captured an american drone won't happen again. Quite a big hint that he's pro-Ukrainian and anti-Russia. LOL look at this joker, "objective". ROFL!

@@yonkeuulen8380 I wouldn't say Ritter and McGregor are particularly trying to be objective... yes, they're mostly right, apart from McGregor's recent points on whether the US makes countries pay off their war debts... they do, this is largely the point here, Ukraine wasn't giving up enough of its country to Western capital that wants more assets to own, control, profit from, these war debts are forcing Ukraine to be sold off... that's why the F16s are coming for after the war, the investments will need protecting. Hinkle's not even close... like... it's a war for raw greed and power, it has nothing to do with "woke leftists" or whatever... when you need to trick people into supporting a war, the ideology of the tricked people is not the cause of the war... it's simply a tool that they have left themselves vulnerable to be controlled with.

Zero politics ? He didn't even tried to discuss options Russians have to win the war.

@@An1Kum because all other options, except 4 mentioned by author, leads to Russian win.

@@ololoken ALL ?

It is all politics! How many losses can you bear is politics, how many weapons can you receive is politics. Don't be naive, war is politics, you can not wash your hands and not take side.

Very brave from you to speak openly about the russo-ukranian conflict. The moment one doesn't kiss the feet of Kokeinsky the western NAFO bot assault hin as a Putin apologist. Being objective on this conflict mean recognizing Russian reasons and realizing that both the battlefield and the diplomatic scene favour Russia, not Ukraine. The more this war drags on the more Kiev loses. I am surprised that "NATO doctrines" are still taken seriously.. NATO doctrines of "maneuver warfare" and "shock and awe" are only effective against forces that cannot shoot back. They have only worked against prostrated technologically interior and ammunition starved formations.. whenever Russia or Ukraine tried manuever warfare against a near peer enemy with plenty of drones, AA and AT weapons they have always suffered heavy losses. Russia learned this and stopped charging head first and started degrading ukr firepower, Ukraine just doubled down. With predictable result.

Much better than legacy media. This is why Bob Iger has floated the idea of selling off Disney's portfolio of terrestrial media channels (except sports). He knows the days of legacy media are almost over.

They're pro Russian channels they being you what you want hear

@@rebelmango2141 You're sounding a lot like the people who were denigrating the people in alt-media who were skeptical of the main stream COVID narratives, calling them conspiracy theorists, and misinformation peddlers. As it turns out, they were mostly right, while the mainstream media, and their cheer leading internet trolls, were the conspiracy theorists and big pharma shills. Honestly, after everything that's happened over the past 6+ years, you really can't blame anyone for questioning a narrative that seems written by someone with an office in the C suite of a D.C. think tank, repeated almost verbatim by the talking heads on network TV, while alternate views are squelched by social media. People have become much better at sniffing out manufactured propaganda, and their paid internet trolls.

​@@rebelmango2141anyone saying something against your narrative is pro russian right? Seems very convenient to dismiss facts

@@Lookmaxxed_Pikachu_69 no actually just the people I happen to argue against end up being that I've been provided non tho

The idea that a force that fires up to 10 × more than the other force but they have equal casualties is just one of his western view because that's who he gets most of his info from. So he will always be wrong following that strategy.

@@hawkbartril3016 I'm not saying that he is 100% correct, there is always room for mistake. But my comment is not directed only on this topic, he generally is very good on keeping attention. And of course everyone is making mistakes, we are all humans

​@@hawkbartril3016combat casualty survivability factors into Russia's higher casualty count. Russians with injuries are not getting the kind of care that you see elsewhere.

@@randymarsh1471 someone made the comment that he should stick to what he knows. But for someone who doesn't normally cover this subject, then he fared it very well, it's just there is a lot of emotion out there, so one has to be wary of the hot replies etc . I wasn't going after you man, but wanted to post something to be 'from the other side' as most here seem to back the Ukrainians. I have to say that I was instantly put off them as they had so much nazi influence and more. And if anyone says that is propaganda then look up ' Ukraine nazi's 2018' and then the US says they all disbanded. Well you believe that all you want but I've seen way to much evidence that says the contrary. Yes they washed the nazism from their minds just like that, right OK whatever. Do you know who that man is they carry big images of around ? They have a national holiday in memory of him, he is regarded as a hero and inspiration to Ukrainians. His name is Stephan Bandera, who every Ukrainian supporter should be made to look up and study. Take care and please stop supporting the wiping out of fighting aged men in Ukraine, as sending these men with little artillery cover to speak of plus crucially no air support. No 'normal' army would do that to there men, controlled suicide is how I call it. But remember who is their ultimate controller being the US & UK and they couldn't give a flying fu.......

@@frustrateduser9933 man how do you figure that when as I've said Russia fires up to 10 × artillery, have superior air defense, superior electronic warfare for drones and missiles, can kill any tank up to a distance of 9.5 km from a tank or any vehicle, has superior drones in fact they are the main reason Russia is winning, plus they have so many more troops, of which some have not done any fighting so far. Trained men not kidnapped off the street as in the Ukrainians case. Stop looking at western sites that are blatantly behind Ukraine because they will full you up with rubbish. When I first looked to find out, what was what, I found two professors and two ex-presidential advisors who also happened to be ex-army Col. Douglas MacGregor & Col. Richard Black , but look for geopolitical commentators that have a balanced view as their are many who are there to lead people astray. Good luck.

This is not a Russian-Ukrainian war! This is a Russian-NATO war on the territory of Ukraine! It is obvious that you, as well as millions of Europeans and Americans, are deceived by the false propaganda of the media of the NATO countries, which are controlled by Washington and London! Because the truth is that NATO started this war in Ukraine in February 2014, not Russia! This war has been going on for 9 years, starting with the bloody coup in Kiev, in the capital of Ukraine, which was carried out by NATO in February 2014, and established a puppet government in Kiev, which is controlled by NATO (Washington and London), which immediately, in 2014, unleashed a war against the rebellious regions of Ukraine that refused to obey the occupying forces of NATO (they refused to submit to Washington and London)... In the beginning, from 2014 to 2022, it was a war on the territory of Ukraine by the occupying forces of NATO in the person of the puppet regime in Kiev against the armies of the popular resistance forces in the east of Ukraine in the Donbass. But, in 2022, Russia came to the aid of the forces of popular resistance of Ukraine in the war against the occupation forces of NATO on the territory of Ukraine.

people who stands with the ucrainians wake one morning, like this guy, and will change from stop the "oh, we win, we defeat those Russians 🤬🤬" and start saying "oh, please negotiate, so many deads I want Peace, a frozen conflict" But , this train passed a year ago. in Septembre 2022, when Ucraine has the only one opportunity to negotiate. after that. becomes de downfall of the regime of Ucraine, Because perhaps the half of the country remains. but the 2014-Regime? men, this will fall down in the Half that remains the west, because the Half of the East, will be part of Russia, could be as new republics, or as Slavis Puerto-Ricos (an protectorate of U.S, that I think will be the destiny of many, many ucrainian provinces) this war starts because NATO greed, ¿what was the need to enter more countries? you have 27 in your own. you have encircled Russia, and now NATO is starting to crumble in the next years. this stupid american strategy of bleeding Russia, when America puts the money and Ucraine put the deads, just in order to get Bleeding Russia. was a very-very-very stupid strategy, and now , with the imminent destrucción of Ucraine are we seing the ressult

History Legends... hahahaha.

And I do not get why Ukrainians shoot Turkish Bairaktars when Russians did not have them

​@@andreycham4797blue on blue also known as friendly fire

Exactly! Not mentioning Lancet - it's a strong indicator that "Millennium 7" has no clue about what's going on in the that war ... or that he likes to cover up things. I appreciate his knowledge and some of his vids about airplanes. But him talking about the war ... he's very bad informed or likes to repeat narratives of the "West".

​@@christophmeier3185well cant blame him, those who dont repeat the narrative gets cancelled and lose their livelihoods

There are 'more' of them but not 'en masse'.

Wow.. you have to be brave to speak the truth.. what has the western “free” and “democratic” (😂😂😂😂😂😂😂) society come to 🙈 (well.. always been, but these days people are starting to notice it more🤷‍♂️)

Glad it helped!

Gen. Milley has criticised and expressed disapointment in Ukrainians to abandon the tactics they (US and allies) taught them. Well, maybe they abandoned it (most likely) because it is not working. It is the thing of the past, obviously. Besides, US has not encounter a peer or, at least, near-peer oponent. There are only two armies in the world who have mastered modern warfare. Ukraine and Russia.

Everything NATO plans for is based on the (probably correct) assumption that they will at the least have air support if not outright air superiority. This offensive was questionable at best without that.

The Russians had some success with it because they could bring a huge amount of artillery to bear. The Ukrainians can't match the Russian artillery, so what they are actually trying to do is keep bashing away with small units in the hope of wearing out the defenders. They are taking very heavy losses in exchange for minimal gains, but then losing those gains to counter attacks. This is not a successful tactic, just the only one they have left.

@@fifi23o5 I think it's obvious that Ukraine can't mass fires like the West can in support of a large scale mechanized operation. Ukrainians are also still short handed on equipment and competence operating that equipment. Some of the guys that come to receive western training have trouble getting down buddy rushing, let alone mastering complex company and platoon level combined arms fire and maneuver at the level of western armies. There is also still a serious shell crisis for both sides, and its yet to be seen which one will eventually gain the material advantage in that respect. I still think it's too early to tell, especially without either side being able to mass airpower effectively this is going to continue being a grinding attritional fight which either could ultimately win.

And most of the attrition is occurring on the Ukrainian side.

​@@jimh527and China, the manufacturing center of the world, is backstopping Russia on the tech front.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out who's going to run out of those 2 first

Russia probably starts running low on tanks early to middle of 2024. Perhaps some other equipment as well.

There is zero stalemate. That’s just nonsense. It’s a case of Russia waging a war of attrition. If they wanted to steamroll their way east they would.

How do you want to find a solution when one of the contenders wants to commit a genocide and make a country disappear? Ukrainians must fight till the end, russians can stop fightingand go home.

people who stands with the ucrainians wake one morning, like this guy, and will change from stop the "oh, we win, we defeat those Russians 🤬🤬" and start saying "oh, please negotiate, so many deads I want Peace, a frozen conflict" But , this train passed a year ago. in Septembre 2022, when Ucraine has the only one opportunity to negotiate. after that. becomes de downfall of the regime of Ucraine, Because perhaps the half of the country remains. but the 2014-Regime? men, this will fall down in the Half that remains the west, because the Half of the East, will be part of Russia, could be as new republics, or as Slavis Puerto-Ricos (an protectorate of U.S, that I think will be the destiny of many, many ucrainian provinces) this war starts because NATO greed, ¿what was the need to enter more countries? you have 27 in your own. you have encircled Russia, and now NATO is starting to crumble in the next years. this stupid american strategy of bleeding Russia, when America puts the money and Ucraine put the deads, just in order to get Bleeding Russia. was a very-very-very stupid strategy, and now , with the imminent destrucción of Ucraine are we seing the ressult

@@andresfelipeod6819 Perhaps, but even if that's the case, it does not exonerate Russia in any way, it's just that the Bully gets to win this time and the good guys lose.

situation of Ucraine is today, the same situation of Nagorno-Karabaj. yes , oh my, so bad Azeries take the home of many armenians, and... ¿so what? do you see U.N. saying or doing something real? not the clasical polite wordks, doing or saying something real? nope. the same thing is the fate of Ucraine. is lost. you are talking about moral judgements, @@OctavChelaru I am talking about the reality of life. yes, Russia was bad , América is bad for invading panama, Irak, and the long etcétera. even the Morroco is bad for invading western Sahara. and what´s the response? is : ¿so what? because the invasions never, or almost never in history get any punishment. neither minimal, but in real life, you play your cards. and Ucraine make a lot of mistakes that causes this invasion, mistakes like kiling a population of the country, only because they spoke another language, or mistakes like reject all the work that Israel Do in May of 2022, to sit both parts on a table to negotiate. right now , i think Ucraine is a lost cause, they are right now, the republic of South-Vietnam. a terminal patient who only survives with the assistance given by the U.S.

@@andresfelipeod6819 Thank you for your opinion.

Do you have proof that he is weaker now?

@@gunzishere what kind of fact would you accept as proof? Besides every political commentator saying it is so? And people now actually seeing that his regime is not eternal, and will not neccessarily survive until he dies? And people openly talk about what possible successors there might be? There can be no proof, in the strict mathematical sense, in social science or in political science. But we can take visible indications and go from there..

It's a battle between Hammer and Anvil. In this was Hammer Wooden handle will break.

Russia only needs to keep the conflict ongoing with a toe hold in Ukraine to block Ukraine from joining NATO.

Ukraine will never be admitted to NATO. Ukrainiann soldiers are dying and getting maimed for the vanity of the United States. WHY and HOW???? In 1993, George Soros hatched a plan to keep NATO alive. NATO's role is to expand - invite Japan, create Soros' mumbo jumbo open societies & partnership for “peace”, and to ensure that the US remains the only super power. As for the manpower, he presented his masterplan and perfected formula: (a) Arm Eastern Europeans with US-NATO weapons (& intel); and (b) Avoid NATO body bags. No US body bag either. You are seeing the Soros' master plan involving Ukraine playing out since 2014. The Eastern European Ukrainians have been armed with NATO weapons. As the Russian SMO progresses, no NATO boots in Ukraine and no US & no NATO body bags either. That is bad for US elections but great for the US/EU weapons manufacturing industries. LOTS of Ukrainian body bags are okay for the US & NATO. That is because the Ukrainian troops are just tools, war proxies and cannon fodder to ensure that the US remains the only super power. Hard to believe??? Go read George Soros article, "Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO" Published by: Open Society Foundations, November 1, 1993. www.georgesoros.com/1993/11/01/toward-a-new-world-order-the-future-of-nato/ Hit Alt+F, use keyword "manpower".

@@mtf_savage_beasts2565 70% of the Russian active equipment and reserves have been depleted. 0.5% of NATO's active equipment and reserves have been depleted. Just something to consider.

@@ArchOfficial If this was true, Ukraine would have pushed Russia back to their borders and taken back Crimea by now. The fact is, Ukraine is nowhere near doing that and getting demolished on the southern front while Russia just deployed 100,000 troops and 1,000 tanks on the northern line.

GOOD MORNING SARS

Exultant "western " wishful thinking ... alas forgot , All ports and shipping equipment Blown . Odessa was Main feed to front ..Worse ? ..All Bridges to Moldova blown [ Romanian connection ] .. As plan last hub is Poland to Lviv .. For fun you may wish to check Putin speech he references Rule # 1 of war [Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact ] .. and why ,, The man does not bluff

mined declared no go zone America acknowledge

"ANALYSIS", "REVIEV" in every comment, dumb russian bots...

I am good, thank you

@@Millennium7HistoryTech glad to hear that man. Take care.

I remember when war started I though "Oh boi we are going to have some interesting stuff on this channel in the future"

Lovely to see big brother!! And ONELOVE TO ALL THE PRETTY WOMENS

people who stands with the ucrainians wake one morning, like this guy, and will change from stop the "oh, we win, we defeat those Russians 🤬🤬" and start saying "oh, please negotiate, so many deads I want Peace, a frozen conflict" But , this train passed a year ago. in Septembre 2022, when Ucraine has the only one opportunity to negotiate. after that. becomes de downfall of the regime of Ucraine, Because perhaps the half of the country remains. but the 2014-Regime? men, this will fall down in the Half that remains the west, because the Half of the East, will be part of Russia, could be as new republics, or as Slavis Puerto-Ricos (an protectorate of U.S, that I think will be the destiny of many, many ucrainian provinces) this war starts because NATO greed, ¿what was the need to enter more countries? you have 27 in your own. you have encircled Russia, and now NATO is starting to crumble in the next years. this stupid american strategy of bleeding Russia, when America puts the money and Ucraine put the deads, just in order to get Bleeding Russia. was a very-very-very stupid strategy, and now , with the imminent destrucción of Ucraine are we seing the ressult

If you think this video was unbiased - then you are deeply deeply lost in the propaganda miasma.

@@barryscott6222 So what was the bias? Is it possible that you also lost your way in the propaganda?

Thank you for an actual mature, realistic comment. The first week was fun in 2022 when there were immediate negotiations but watching a years-long civil war in real-time is terrible.

@@magnusthorssten1662 it's not a civil war. It's a genocidal inter-state war waged by Russia against a smaller sovereign neighbor.

@@jesan733 he is russian bot

As long as both sides still think they can win, the war will go on. Both sides think they'll reach a more favorable starting point for negotiations. When the results of the counter offensive are visible they'll be the starting point of negotiations.

@@joachimfrank4134 if the results of the counteroffensive is negative for Ukraine, they'll try again next summer with F16s and more equipment, after more attrition of Russian artillery and other equipment. They're unlikely to accept a status quo, and Russia's historical equipment advantage is melting away.

@@jesan733Very much would be my point as well. Frankly, whilst the West is united behind Ukraine, her victory is assured

@@jesan733 you are forgetting about the rate Russia is producing new warfare: unlike the non-homogeneous Western coalition, Russia can concentrate immense resources for replenishing practically all the required items. In particular, the number of combat airplanes and helicopters is already practically the same, if not more, that prior to the war (despite heavy losses in the 1st few months).

@@michaelgrossmann6902 human resource of Ukraine is the limiting factor: even trading 1-to-1 with Russia, it is doomed to run out of combat-capable troops. And since Ukraine is desperately trying to attack, while Russia has 1) more artillery 2) air superiority 3) effective drones like Lanzet 4) well-established defense lines it is quite hard to believe that even 1-to-1 is possible (much worse for Ukraine, I believe)

More than 3 days unfortunately... the underlying thesis is that, since it has become a stalemate, it will end in some sort of compromise for exhaustion.

@@Millennium7HistoryTech But is happening now you said, you used the present tense. Are we to take no notice of what the title says?

DPA is badass, both the DPA War (link in description on this vid), but also the geopolitical analysis on the main channel (Defense Politics Asia), as well as the very interesting weekly gathering on the DPA Open Mic. On the latter, folks watching DPA get on stream, and converse a broad range of topics, ofc including the Ukraine war. Highly recommend everyone her to take a peek at DPA.

ha ha ha...nothing here is refreshing just the tons of bullshit and deluded fantasies of some middle age fat guy who thinks he is the grandmaster of war strategies and general who plays too much his PC games alone in his mother's basement. First of all Ukrainians are not some kind of super people that can simply just invade Russia and depose Vladimir Putin from his throne. Ukraine is one extremely dysfunctional, disorganized, heavily corrupted and failed rumped state in eastern Europe that has sustained ultra heavy losses on the battlefield against Russia in this war of attrition and lost more than 50 % of it's army and donated equipment by the NATO. Russia on the other hand is like Taliban in Afghanistan or Vietcong in Vietnam. Waiting for it's chance when Ukraine and NATO will suffer some catastrophic defeat on the front.

Amazing how supporters of russia's invasion of Ukraine swarm this page and have the nerve to talk about 'honest' and 'refreshing'.

@@theangrycheeto DPA is not "supporting the invasion", it's almost all speakers are completely anti-war. Yes, some or pro-Russia, and there's to a lesser extent pro-Ukraine and/or pro-NATO. The vast majority are neither, as the people are from all over the world. I'm talking about the DPA Open Mic in particular. Typically streams sometime on saturdays. You should join the conversations, be it Ukraine, or other facets of geopolitics Always more fun when there's differing perspectives.

Where is the DPA Community post?

Do you have any book to suggest me?

its one of the stupid !! suported by some delusional western people mostly conservatives !!!

this is why Ukraine is in war today is because of such people who cares about business with russia ... hide behind peace an humanity !! they dont care that after you stoping the war russia will kill and put in prison even more Ukrainians !!!! I don't even say what russia is going to do after one year of gaining more weapons and people will do against Ukraine !! all this morons including you so call profesor or whoever u r dont give a shit about people in east europe !!you just want your comfortable life back !!! and I think all of you scared of russia !! this is the reality BUT NOT PEACE !! SOMEONE SAID " BETTER TO DIE KILLING INVADERS INSTEAD KNEE ALL YOUR LIFE IN FRONT OF THEM AS A SLAVE"

Yes

@@Millennium7HistoryTechunfortunately CIAmerica wants the destruction of Europe and doesn't care if it leads to nuclear suicide for everyone

@@Millennium7HistoryTechCIA wants it back to the way it was at the end of WW2 where they came out on top and this is what you are seeing played out here a second time at the risk of total death everywhere

Those oppressors also built industry, free housing, shipbuilding, science, healthcare system, etc, etc. Poor Ukrainians😅!

Russians are indeed trying very very hard to work in a way that wouldn't trigger direct NATO intervention. There is manpower support from Poland, but done by personnel that have discharged from military and became volunteers/contractors.

If Ukr had a reasonable sized air force with even semi up to date advanced weapons tech back when this first started OR soon after, this conflict would nearly be over...and heavily in Ukr's favor. But that was not nor did it 'become' the case because of the nuclear threat Russia presents esp. un Putin's crazy, delusional and unstable mentality. We (US & Nato) should been prepping prepping Ukr with every thing needed except the planes...sent Ukr all the weaponry, maint. and support hardware and training they req. Then send in then planes (fully loaded with anti-radar missiles) w/ Ukr pilots and backed by a couple dozens of tank killing Apache AH-64s and several A-10s for badley needed close air support. Again, pre-shipping everything needed and release them just soon as training is complete...w/ zero warning! But we didn't and now Russia had time to mine the hell outta the lines and prep. Nato totally blew it! Smdh!

@@darrenyorston Because Russia doesn't have the logistical capacity to supply the army it can theoretically raise. Heck They've had to resort to using T-62's and T-55's.

If they are not "interested in advancing", then what exactly is their end game?

@@getsideways7257 obviously the endgame is to have a destroyed military capability of Ukraine, as it is a proclaimed goal: demilitarization of Ukraine. If the Ukraine themselves sends their troops to the russian arty, why should Russia advance then? On the other hand the Ukrainian (US/western) logistics (ALL of Ukraines logistics are planned, supplied and financed by the west) have to come over more then a thousand kilometers from the polish border to Donbass... Why should Russia at this stage shorten the Ukrainian/western logistic lines? For instance, a salvaged damaged western tank has to be moved back to Poland for repair, and then back to the front lines! Once Ukraines military runs out of manpower and air defenses, Russia's advance would be way less costly.

This is the phenomenon of fighting a peer force.

Two things to note, 1. Entirety of USA+EU+Korea+Japan put together currently produce about 100k - 150k 155mm shells a year. Meanwhile Russia single handedly produces 2.5mil such shells (not to mention the vast stocks of ammo they inherited from USSR). So even when the entire west upscale shell production by 10x, it's still not enough. 2. Russia probably has the best layered air-defense network anywhere in the world (Yes, you can dispute that but sill you have to acknowledge it's effectiveness). From Tor, Buk, Pantsir to S-300, S-350, S-400, S-500 batteries. So, unless it's top of the line stealth aircrafts, F-16 or whatever other fighters Ukr gets will do pretty much nothing. Don't forget, Ukr had one of the best airforces in Europe when the war began. Why do they need F-16s now? Because Russia shot down all the things they had. Ukr is in a no win scenario no matter what you do.

@@neb-yr5589 Your second point is not disputable. No other force in the world has a better air defense system.

Wouldnt matter, we already know that russia would deny any air superiority to ukraine. They have the air defenses with the capacity for that.

Saying all that, wouldn't it be better to end it now? The deaths already is unbelievable, but people on here seem more interested in the capabilities of this or that weapon while people die in huge numbers. These weapons are used to kill people, not to entertain them.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-l6zYM3SH91E.html

Who's army is at Crimea ? Paper BS doesnt mean jack shit without an army to support it.

Is russian territory.

@@nikorey27 You wish, vatnik.

@@MrMatmulan So international law means nothing? Russia is a terrorist state. It cannot be tolerated and must be defeated.