Hello and welcome on Millennium 7* Please, make yourself at home.
In this channel we are going to cover military history and military technology in particular, with a heavy bias on aerospace, from slightly unusual point of views. We will try to stimulate your critical thinking and have some fun in the process. If you are a geek, a student or just curious, please subscribe to the channel, share on social media and support us.
Enjoy! --------------------------- This channel is NOT addressed to children under 13. --------------------------- A word of caution: we are not associated in any way to the almost namesake channel Millennium 7 that you can find here. ru-vid.com We suggest you to visit it, it is an excellent channel with interesting content. The similarity of names is totally fortuitous and doesn't imply any relationship.
Modern planes use an alloy of Aluminium called duralumin, Titanium for joints and composites mostly carbon fibre, all knuckle and moving joints are usually Titanium. Alluminium stress hardens and fractures far too easily.
China build another around 6 nos and warships with Big Gun with anti missile rocker detect submarine in 3500 sea level around 4 nos for own nation to defend against enemy coming to SCS Sea water or yellow Sea water .
I can see the issue very clearly. A year ago they had airfields in the wast that Russians ouldnt hit. Now the fields have been hit and patched multiple times. The jests they do have are for the most part conducting operations out of barns, garages, forest cannopies and such along interstate and highways so that they end up with pavements that are smooth enough to launch and land aircraft that are hardy and robust like an A-10. An F-16 is fangile and has landing gear thag can not land just anyplace and air intakes that sit low on the belly to suck in anything it finds on the side od s highway.
This is a non-biased video which is informative. Thank you for sharing. Unfortunately, less subscribers. The channels that ridicule China garnered much more subscribers and also more trolls in the comments. I think many will think combat experience is one of US advantage. IMHO, there 's other option to counter this advantage. Through experience, we will know what are the best actions and what are the possible outcomes or reactions ( sort of proven with records). The way to counter is strategy and training. A good strategist will study previous records to know what are expected and how to overcome. A good strategist will know the weaknesses as well. the strategist need to plan the attack and defense . The next step is comprehensive trainings. China won't start a war; but, only with war they can prove to the world who they are
The new Chinese Aircraft carrier is just that homework meme that goes copy my homework but change it a little so it isn't obvious, and kick of it is they have no Idea how to use this at this time😂
For those think made-in-china equals bad quality, I'd say we chinese like what you think, and prefer you keep thinking that way. Elon used to laughed at Chinese, now he is asking US gov for help. For years, US market barely have 2-3 EV producers (laterally just one), versus There are tens of that in China, the competition in china created the best EV producers. Whereas the monopoly hindered the development in the US-- ironically, the market principle works better in China. The US EV producer Ravin, for example, they issued stock, got tons of investment, yet for year and years, they never produced a single car, funny, it does not take IQ100 to see it is total scam, yest people keep pouring money into it.
Good video. In engineering, we have a saying, "cheap, fast or right, pick any two." I know this is an inaccurate sample size of one, but my wife of ten years is from China. Cheap and fast is all she cares about. I'm hoping this is true of their whole military, but who knows. I'm sure they get things right and nobody knows because they really haven't been tested in a very long time.
You said you don't understand why the rivalry? You are either lying or incompetent. Ccp have supported Russia invasion of Ukraine and have always made it's goal to conquer Taiwan. Yea, you are lying alright. In the video and to yourself
"THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN" THE CHINESE HAD ALL THE EXPERIENCE THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO SO DID THE EGYPTIANS PHOENICIANS PEOPLE FROM THE SEA ATLANTEANS ROMANS GREEKS ETC ETC
worldsmasterofspiritsknightsofchrist,tm* wow they almost got it this time almost but sadly if anything big hits near that aircraft c, it shall bunckle inwards and on thee 4th rimm s men just look downwards see thy box at thee bottom left ok do i need to say anything else? anything anything questions? any, any at all ? why is it that no one want too go help them this guy sounds like a cook tasty ship hahahaha he knows nothing about these how is it that when we try to help we are told were being mean? i like china ok so pissoff man i have friends many in hongkong ok sso get off my back man lol now i have seen there other one as well and again theres something wrong with well with the steal i know it looks ok but for crying out loud take a look and hey this is from what 20 30 40 feet above soooooooooooooo like who are you trying to kidd
I ALREADY THANKED YOU, BUT YOU FORGOT TO MENTION THE H3 OPERATION, WHICH IRANIAN ATTACK H3 BASE, WITH 2 TIMES MID AIR REFUELING TO DESTROY MOST OF H3 FIGHTERS!!!! WHAT WAS IT REALLY???? IN THE BEGINING YOU SAID RIGHT THINGS BUT IN THE END YOU DIDN'T MENTIONED?!!!!! IM TOTALLY CONFUSED NOW!!!!!!
The Chinese energy storage system will most likely to be much smaller than the US counterpart. This is because Ford uses a AC-AC system with a flywheel energy storage device to provide additional power, so it is a mechanical energy storage device. Fujian uses the AC-DC-AC system with super capacitors attached to the DC bus and it is a high density electrical device and by default it is going to be much smaller than a flywheel.
this is me beating a dead horse, but the F-35's most original & uncopiable part is its spaghetti codes even if the J-35 copy anything from the F-35, its essential codes would still be Chinese-written and none copied from the F-35's pile of spaghetti codes
I have two years of sea time on 4 different carriers. Rarely did I see both aft elevators being used. The port elevator is rarely used during flight ops. Most of the time during flight ops that is used for extra parking. Much easier to use the two starboard elevators as there are no flight ops to interfere with.
Building war machines is What for? Will They leave it to rot? For sure they will use it for war to be disposed off. Like Putin disposing it's war machines in ukraine
Sukhoi designed the finest 4th generation fighter airframe in the Su-27. F-15 fans may argue otherwise. But, the vast number of Russian and Chinese variants of this airframe makes its case. The Russian navy's decision to develop the MiG 29, instead of the Su-33, was foremost a financial decision. Even with the introduction of the J-35 - 5th gen air-superiority fighter, the J-15D will be PLAN's primary carrier-based strike fighter for decades to come.
Firstly, you need to understand that Fujian ships use electromagnetic catapults similar to the most advanced Ford class aircraft carriers of the US military. Secondly, China's electromagnetic catapults use direct current, which is more stable than the American alternating current catapults.
I'm still confused as to the mission of this Carrier. It won't be useful for the invasion of Taiwan. They aren't interested in intervention abroad. They have no interest in protecting international trade. I'm rather confused.
When they attack Taiwan, their fleets that face off the American/Japanese fleets east of Taiwan will need air cover, Most likely those are areas too far for their land based planes to stay in the air for air combat, but probably will be within the range of their land based missiles, they don't plan to go far with this carrier, that is why it is not nuclear powered.
@@camu9721 and be vulnerable to submarines and anti ship missiles? Unlikely. They'll need to be far away and at that point you're better off using land based aircraft
@@user-fs9kc1vo4oIt will be sunk by US, Japanese, or Australian submarines before it left port if that was the case. It could also be attacked by land based missiles in the Philippines. So no, an Aircraft Carrier wont be useful against the US. It's not about protecting trade routes either. China is investing heavily in the New Silk Road to bypass sea routes. Not to mention China has done nothing to protect international trade routes in the Red Sea and that affects China heavily. China has done nothing to protect Maritime trade as of recently.
PLAN does not need to have expeditionary capabilities now. That can come later on. Further it is not a insurmountable hill to climb. PLAN only need to make sure that their carriers can prevent USN and USAF assets being deployed from Atlantic and Indian Ocean to Pacific Ocean. And they need to defeat USN in the Western Pacific around their waters just like the smaller British fleet did against the mighty Spanish Armada. Once PLAN does that then they will be able to rule the waves of Pacific and Indian Ocean just like the British Royal Navy ruled the Atlantic and Indian Ocean post the decimation of Spanish Armada.
They should be able to differentiate by different bells and whistles in the pilots helmet. Furthermore, missiles shpuld have their own type of chaff and flare depending on the type of missile, IR or radat guided.
