Ukraine War Upd. EXTRA (20240625): Farage, RT, Putin, Johnson, Daily Mail, & Poor Strategy 

Spot on. And Finland & Sweden's decision to join NATO, following Putin's invasion of Ukraine, is a further example of this.

The EU uses it's trade policy to coerce countries into joining. Poor countries are bribed into joining

Brilliant comment. I am always interested in left leading armed forces service members.

Thank you mr Davydov! 👊

This is a really concise that very insightful comment

exactly 100%!

Let's hope not!

Yep, they had no choice, thousand of crimes was the only option they were left with. No way around it, says Farage.

Maybe so but we need to give true information out to ppl

Sometimes the only way to expose populist bs is to talk about it.

Terve Mika! ☺👋

@@ajsimo2677 Morjens AJ!🤗

Your absolutely correct and this was a point I was making the other day with regard to paying for NATO as the wrong way to look at it

Great point 100%!

Cheers mate

Heh. Good luck to them

John mcCain predicted it and the real reason

Good analogy

🥇

@@markaguilera493 🥇🏆

Is this really the case? I remember the Taliban being asked to eject those responsible for 9/11 from their country. They refused and sided with them. America launched their invasion after asking NATO allies for help

America was attacked. The USA invoked Article 5 as well as the ANZUS treaty. Not an invasion, a defenseive action.

I do get some of your criticisms but he also has some very valuable actual information

@ATPGeo I get that but be careful jp. It will be interesting to watch where he falls in 2025 Canadian conservatives party are anti-ukraine.

Farage risk "PUT" in a dead-hand, on Ucraine companies, viewing it as a "RISK" to invest. Practically killing their chances to get integrited to europe. Giving Russia room to EXPAND. ...

Great point

Your AI must be taking its input from elon muskovite's feed. This is nonsense. No 1991 agreement with NATO but there is one with r@ssiya and Ukraine. Look up that. From NATO's site (fact not AI fiction): NATO promised Russia it would not expand after the Cold War FACT Such an agreement was never made. NATO’s door has been open to new members since it was founded in 1949. This has never changed. No treaty signed by NATO Allies and Russia included provisions on NATO membership. Decisions on NATO membership are taken by consensus among all Allies. Russia does not have a veto. The idea of NATO enlargement beyond a united Germany was not on the agenda in 1989, particularly as the Warsaw Pact still existed until 1991. Mikhail Gorbachev said in an interview in 2014: "The topic of 'NATO expansion' was not discussed at all, and it wasn't brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn't bring it up either." Individual Allies cannot make agreements on NATO’s behalf. President Clinton consistently refused Boris Yeltsin's offer to commit that no former Soviet Republics would join NATO: "I can't make commitments on behalf of NATO, and I'm not going to be in the position myself of vetoing NATO expansion with respect to any country, much less letting you or anyone else do so… NATO operates by consensus," he said. The wording “NATO expansion” is already part of the myth. NATO did not hunt for new members or want to “expand eastward.” NATO respects every nation’s right to choose its own path. NATO membership is a decision for NATO Allies and those countries who wish to join alone.

actually 4th

@@iainlyall6475be kind. He tried hard.

Keep getting those "immigrants "😂😂😂 I hear British men can get pregnant.

They tried that with the NAZI party in Germany. The NAZIS took over completely banning nearly all political parties. It did not end well.

Absolutely agree. I'd also say his party gets far too much media coverage when they have zero MPs elected (bar a Tory defector) and only 2 councillors elected in May! Parties like the Lib Dems, Greens & Plaid Cymru have far more elected representatives and far less media attention.

Hardly defensive in Bosnia, bombing Serbia, occupying Kosovo, invading Afghanistan and bombing Libya

@@JesterEric that wasn’t NATO that was the UN

@@terryhannis8120 bombing Serbia by NATO was a violation of the UN charter. Where NATO had a UN resolution they have consistently exceeded what was authorised. A no fly zone in Libya became air support for rebels and the use of special forces. Authorisation to protect civilians in Bosnia became air support for a Croatian offensive.

@@JesterEric your talking absolute bollocks,NATO doesn’t have an army it can only come to the defence of a member state if attacked it has no powers outside that remit, a NATO country can do its own bidding outside the groups they might break UN charter but it’s nothing to do with NATO

@@JesterEric NATO didn’t do any of this,your thinking of the UN as NATO doesn’t have any military only an organisation on defence cooperation

I hope I remember that

@@ATPGeo I think I have a form of synesthesia as some politicians appear as caricatures to me and so get renamed according to how they are. Here are some others for your consideration: Fishy Nutsack, Weird Karma, Horrid Snobson, Cruella Bothersome, Vapid Cheese-knob, Dim Wrong 'Un, Shriveled Stump and Bad-diarrhoea Pukin'. Enjoy.