'Complete nonsense!' | Bill Browder SLAMS Nigel Farage for justifying Putin's invasion of Ukraine 

Exactly right👍

But America can? Is that a double standard or an acceptance that America is just better than Russia so is allowed to that?

@@tedteddington6223 Clearly we're talking about dictating things at gunpoint, not about dictating things in general. Every country can try to dictate policies, that's not the problem here. For example, when Poland exited USSR, the west dictated a switch to open market, and Poland agreed. To this day we debate in Poland if the switch could be done better. But there wasn't a military threat from the West, we just wouldn't get some of the incentives. Nobody had a problem with this. Also, maybe you are not aware of the local sentiment that is the basis of the comment. The sentiment is, Russia has been hurting eastern europe for decades. Almost every person in eastern europe has a family member in last 2 generations who died due to Russia. When someone here says "Russia has no right to dictate us anything", we mean it in this particular context.

@@janb3625 Fair point well put. On the other end of that though is the SS division made up of Ukrainians who killed Poles. There's much hurt on all sides and there is much nuance within any point. Squadron 303, best damn pilots the (1940) RAF had. Cheers.

Only America does that through AIPAC

Strong arm, maybe not, but seduction?

@@simonlever Corporate regimes consider the very existence of nation-states to be seductive for the population of territories ruled by corporate entities. In Putin’s eyes Western nations is a pretence of secret “global government” to lure the entire population of the Earth under their control. He simply doesn’t believe that citizens can possibly nationalise their governments. And thus,he would see it as “seduction”, not a free choice of Citroens and nations.

See the interview again! He blamed Putin for the war!!!!!! And the alternative a PM that walks out on the vets at D day rememberance! A Labour party that may cut military expenses,!and even the UKs nukler deterant!

I suppose becoming less vulnerable to attack is "seductive" in a way.​@simonlever

@@Sdc164 Touché!

Well, you can ask all you like but NATO can always say NO!!! Countries leaders change all the time and one will want to join and the next may not!! but those that do not will have access to a lot of NATO'S defence information, whilst i have a lot of sympathy for these countries wishes but it can lead to a war that we would not have been involved in!!! Because Putin will not stop his advancement and the number of dead Russians means nothing to him!!!!

He's on the Kremlin payroll

@@user-zb9lv3gh8s if not, he certainly managed to cast aspersions to that himself

Exactly. You only have to look at Putin's speeches over many years where he shocks the international community by emoaning the loss of the Soviet empire and his false stances over the importance of a democratic Russia whereas he's created a totalitarian state.

Its only western politicians and talkshow queens who talk about Putn beeing threatened by NATOs expansion. Putin doesnt talk abou it. He will come up with every excuse to do whatever comes to his sick mind.

Excellent point. If NATO were looking for an excuse and opportunity to attack Russia, that would be it. Yet crickets from NATO in that regard.

I agree. 👍

I think it’s a little more nuanced, the Russians appear to fear Ukraine joining NATO but not say Finland. So there is another conversation going on inside Moscow other than the direct threat of NATO. So NATO didn’t provoke this, this is purely a Russian projection. They fear a democratic Ukraine doing well inside the western “umbrella”.

What a punk of a lot 🥴

But the difference is that the Rushin' army is a joke, and Germany had a real army

Yes, he overlooks the fact that Putin is an opportunist.

There's nothing irrational about what Putin is doing. We may disagree with his actions but it's not irrational. Do you think for example the UK would allow The Republic of Ireland to join a defence pact with China?

@@user-rv9hp6bo3yyour comment is irrational as per Putin. Ireland doesn’t want to join a pact with China. Neither does Mexico. Mexicans like America and want to be American. Nobody wants to be more like China. And don’t even start me on its poodle russia.

@@user-rv9hp6bo3y silly example, NATO is an organization formed of democratic countries, China is not

He’s a coward - the pompous theory university bubble type - likely avoiding actual fights his whole life. Kremlin talking points are cleverly embedded in even the people who pretend to condemn Putin’s invasion. Watch out for these types everyone! They act sensible but casually sneak into conversation what Putin wants. Stay united, disinformation is everywhere now, Slava Ukraine.

The U.K. political class for all to show. Lions led by donkeys is a saying for a reason.

What do u actually know about Chamberlain?

I couldn’t agree more. It’s clear where this former diplomats sympathies lie.

I'm off topic slightly. Chamberlain did try to avoid war with the Czech agreement, it possibly slowed down Hitler's master plan and gave Britain time to improve their military preparedness. Chamberlain declared war in 1939 and he died in 1940,with hindsight I feel he acted responsibly for the British and the title of "appeaser" given to Chamberlain is not really justified as Britain was not ready for war in 1938.

Agree. Nobody can get the troIIs out as Bill Browder. I hope the Times Radio will do something about the Russian propaganda here.

totally agree, shame on Britain that they could ever appoint such a "man"

Absolutely agree.

Browder spouts the ususal mis-info and down right proovable lies. "NATO is a purely defensive Organisation" - just go and ask civilians in Serbis, Libya and Syria !!

Russia's actions made worse by their lies to Ukraine after making the 1994 Trilateral Statement Ukraine agreed to transfer its nuclear warheads to Russia and accepted U.S. assistance in dismantling missiles, bombers, and nuclear infrastructure. They got repaid by Russia in treachery with invasion by the very people who were supposed to be guaranteeing their safety. NEVER TRUST A RUSSIAN.

Exactly because he's running out of troops

Yes, I understand they've moved them and just about every other unit he can find to move to UKraine. He knows there will be no attack from NATO least of all from the Finnish border region.

@@Scaleyback317 of course putin always knew there was no threat from NATO..

Where are you getting this?

​@@mikedon5205Not exactly. They take troops out EXACTLY BECAUSE THEY KNOW NATO IS NOT A THREAT.

👏💯👏

The former President of Finland said it is the Democratic decision of each Sovereign Nation to join NATO, and nobody else. Definitely not kaputin. 🇫🇮🇺🇦💙💛

In December 2013, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland, was in Ukraine speaking with your US Ambassador. It was caught on audio and posted on you tube. It was reported by Reuters in February 2014. WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A conversation between a State Department official and the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine that was posted on RU-vid revealed an embarrassing exchange on U.S. strategy for a political transition in that country, including a crude American swipe at the European Union. The leaked conversation appeared certain to embarrass the United States and seemed designed to bolster charges - from Russia, among others - that the Ukrainian opposition is being manipulated by Washington, which President Barack Obama's administration strenuously disputes. A senior Kremlin aide accused the United States of arming Ukrainian "rebels" and warned Russia could intervene to maintain the security of its neighbor. Make of it what you will.

@@ChristineRead-ck1uq I heard the conversation. It consisted of foreign (US) diplomats in Ukraine speculating on who they'd like to see gain office in Ukraine during a period in which the Russian-backed president, Viktor Yanukovych, was being removed from office by the Ukrainian parliament for ordering the police to shoot demonstrators. Foreign diplomats talk about politics in the country to which they are posted all the time. I am sure that there are 1000s of conversations among foreign diplomats about whether they would like to see Biden or Trump win in November 2024 and what the outcome would mean for their country. The conversation was a giant nothingburger. Diplomats talking shop. That is what I make of it.

@@ChristineRead-ck1uq that is proof of nothing....you think that diplomatic conversations don't happen? Pretzel logic is hardly definitive proof and in this case it is laughable. Ukraine had had enough of ruzzian influence and as a sovereign, independent nation with political autonomy decided it was time to exercise their right to choose their own future......

PRECISELY.

Aye, and Cuba has every right to host military forces of any nation on earth. USA should have no say.

@@dazjackson1972 Yup, agreed. Would I prefer they don't? Absolutely. Is it their choice? Yes.

They don't really have a right per se joining NATO isn't some kind of universal right. NATO is an exclusive club of nations no one has rights to join especially if other countries feel it threatens their security. There's a reason why the US doesn't allow countries in South America to join defence pacts with other countries. They feel it undermines their security. I think that's wrong but we live in the real world and in the real world the powerful countries dictate. China would never be allowed to set up bases anywhere that threatens US security.

​@@user-rv9hp6bo3yThey have the to apply and self determination though. That is exactly what China is trying to do right now with it's belt and road initiative. But it looks like everyone is waking up to it and they are going to run out of money.

TRUE

Idiotic. US almost started a nuclear war over the same thing in cuba....which they illegally sanction to this day

This was the deficiency in Brentons - and Farage's- argument. Russia has no right to attack or subvert neighbouring states, it's against the UN charter and the Budapest memorandum it signed. If we have to have a standoff like in Korea, that's better than giving Putin anything of what he wants.

@davidmullens2464 you had no right to invade iraq....but there you were. Debating law in a war is like debating law in a streetfight "you cant hit me bc its wrong"

Absolutely agree with Browder... Russians use everything western yet they badmouth the west and the western politicians still listen to Kremlin''s News channels...

He wants to restore the USSR.

I’ve been a big supporter of Nigel but his recents comments about the war have disturbed me. I think others will feel the same and with an election imminent his timing was appalling 👎

Please feel free to point out evidence of this.

​@@josimpson7999Exactly my thoughts, his closeness to convicted felon Trump, as well

@@stevezodiac491 Agreed!

Crimea was part of Ukraine, it still should be. One of the reasons we are where we are is very little was done about it.

​@@system11yt I never understood why the west never stepped in then when Putin were claiming the little green men were not Russian troops

​@@Boghopper9999because Merkel and Obama works for putin.

Part of Ukraine since 1954. Kruschev decided to award it to them. Not controversial back then - they were all in the Soviet Union. Putin captured it easily , partly because most Crimeans are Russian or Tatar.

@@daraorourke5798 The Tatars have no reason to love Russia. Russia did to Crimea what they always do, deport the natives and established ethnic settlers and Russify the place. Crimea had a lot of autonomy under Ukraine. Unfortunately Ukraine barely had an army to stop the invasion.

you say ignorant.. I say corrupt..

HIS facts were totally incorrect

He didn’t know there are minerals we don’t to benefit Russia and China

@@austinbourke9292 His conclusions are faulty. The Russians gave Ukraine every reason to want protection. Fact is that NATO was lukewarm about Ukrainian membership and Ukrainians mostly didn't want to signal intention to join NATO out of fear of Putin's reaction. Putin's aggression toward Ukraine far re-dated any talk of NATO membership.

He only got the job because at the time he was seen as very pro Russian. He his opinions have carried little weight since leaving his job. So why Times radio ask him to speak is a little bit strange maybe the original speak pullout at the last moment.

The thing is that the Rushin' army is a joke. The Ge rman army wasnt.

So your nothing

Do you know the Ukrainian mind?

@@winstonchurchill8300 yes, as well.

@@paulpaisley5291 projection.

Ambassador is 100% correct. Time to wake up before Europe don’t exist anymore because of Nato aggression. I have seen Nato aggression first hand when they bombed Serbia 78 days without UN resolution. NATO is an aggressive Arm of USA

Werent you charged with rap allegations?

@@bryandimery6509 Nope. Weren't you charged with stupidity allegations?

Where in Britain did you see wisdom since Tony Blair?

History proves that appeasement does not work with an aggressor, Britain is still marred by Neville Chamberlain's decision and what followed, had appeasement continued Europe would be very different now and not for the better. Should the Britain give up kent or France Normandy, It's ludicrous. Appeasement enables bullies, it does stop or deter them. Kids learn that in the playground. I agree, how was he our ambassador, shocking.

If only we all made Christ the main focus.....🙏🌈

@@deborahross9804 no

The dangerous are those who choose to ignore the blindingly obvious. Farage was simply saying that it is as a consequence of Nato and EU's move eastwards. That the West miscalculated is down to us.

Only in that fantasy-land between your ears. So if Mexico let Russia park it's missiles and army in Mexico close to the US border the Americans would have no right to do anything about it? Well they already granted themselves the right long ago. Look up 'The Monroe Doctrine'. You are too naive in the ways of power. Have you ever heard of the Cuban missile crisis? Another one you need to look up to see the American hypocrisy. They were willing to nuke Russia over those missiles and Russia is doing the same thing only they are more patient and did not 'Shock and Awe' (destroy a nations infrastructure on day 1) Ukraine like the US did to Iraq and as was done to Libya. Putin waited over 2 years to target the grid and now they will surrender or freeze. There is much less support for NATO in Ukraine in the west than you realize Those against are not oligarchs who own the MSM, so you do not hear them. America is an empire in steep decline - if they had the goods and the courage they would be in Ukraine - how come you have not gone there to volunteer to fight the evil bad man Putin? Where is the courage of your conviction? Or are you a keyboard only warrior? You are witness to the world order changing. Change is the one constant. Don't get too attached - runaway climate change is at war with the humans and winning and it has yet to roll out the big guns. It's going to make all of you forget about these tribal spats because we will be too busy trying to get enough daily calories. Good luck to you.

NATO gave Russia many assurances that after the fall of the Berlin Wall that NATO would not expand one inch eastward. Multiple prominant leaders from NATO gave this assurance, then NATO proceeded to ignore these assurances and accept applications from the eastern countries and then proceed to perform regular military exercises in the counties bordering Russia, therefore provoking Russia. It doesn't matter how you view it, if you look at it from a nationalist Russian point of view, this is a provoking action.

​@delta4611 A free sovereign state should be free to choose which alliance system they want.

​@@rolandrothwell4840 Of course I agree, however there has been questionable CIA activity in the region over the years to shift ideology in the region away from Russia and towards the west and USA - so there is an argument to be made that they didn't "freely" choose in some cases and this can also contribute to provocation.

No doubt he is from the english boarding schools - they are taught to respect their bosses.

More likely on the payroll, if nothing else, Putin is an astute investor in 'useful idiots', he has worked out how to tap a deep vein of venality in the west.

There aren't all like that, but one or two are. I suspect it's a consequence of the power and prestige they once had. Having lost it, there's a subconscious temptation to get attention by saying outrageous things.

He’s awful

Who are you kidding? Ambassador gets it better than 100 people like you put together with Bill Browder.

@@IliyaOsnovikov I've been dealing with Russians for decades. The ambassador knows what Russians are _saying,_ but not what they are actually thinking and why.

@@gintasvilkelis2544 But Bill Browder seems to understand Russians even less than that ambassador.

browder decency ? that used to include telling the truth in the old days😂😂😂

By your logic it's none if America's business if Mexico joined military alliance with Russia or China and have missiles pointed it

Is Cuba free to station Russian nuclear missiles on its soil, too?

It's not NATO's duty to accept someone just because they ask. NATO should also take Russia's legitimate security questions into consideration as well.

@@jaimzx3625 Stop justifying evil, are Russian ships and submarines not in Cuba as we speak?

​@@user-rv9hp6bo3yelephant in the room Nato had not accepted ukraine into nato

What an idiot.

He states facts 😂 he was there he lived those moments. Putin himself has given many speeches and has said over and over again about the expansion of nato. Even to this day china's the Chinese say the same. Read their peace plan

I strongly disagree. Looking at the last 500 years of our experience with Russia,I think he has an excellent grasp of the real situation off today. Bill Browder is on a personal vendetta, that has dangerously blinded him.

Idiotic comment. Listen to him. He is not pro Russia. He is not a Putin supporter. Good God. Listen.

Putin apologist nonsense bot​@@winstonchurchill8300

Even less of The Collective West´s business too, but they´re the ones escalating it every 2-3 months. Can´t think why... _*#12TrillionDollarsWorthOfNaturalResourcesInTheUkraine

*tough luck

@@livingtribunal4110 #12 sounds like the same BS that was spouted for the two Gulf wars . And this term "Collective West" being used sounds like something out of the old discredited and dust bin Comintern lexicon. But they say some like to drag a dead horse by its..........

@@livingtribunal4110 The west is helping a country that was illegally invaded and asked for help, so yes, it is the west's business. You are obviously not very bright, so I will excuse your nonsense, but if you want to continue to embarrass yourself on the internet, I still suggest you do it elsewhere.

Ever heard about the Monroe doctrine?

In a sense he is, though. Rational though in a very evil and psychopathic way.

He's rational but his ideology is deranged.

Brenton is compromised .. t fsb have something on him

​@@hippophile To say that someone is rational and psychopathic is oxymoronic. Putin is simply a bad man who is very calculated in getting what he wants.

Any politician that says putin is good and rusdia is right, is getting huge recompense to say so. When you hear these idiots say such things, know they are soiled by heavy russian bribes and payoffs. They should be investigated by state se unity services for walking that tightrope of crime

learn your history

So by your logic the Americans had no right to get upset when the USSR was putting missiles in Cuba 90 miles from the US and if Mexico let Russia put bases and air fields in Mexico the US would be the bad guys if they protested? You don't know what the Monroe Doctrine is do you? Have you even heard of the Cuban Missile crises and have a clue why we almost had a human extincting nuke war? All you safe space babies who did not grow up during the cold war are coddled and clueless.. . You need to prepare to be disappointed because Ukraine will be surrendering to Russia in the not too distant future. . I want to help so here is some practice disappointment. It 100% contradicts everything the so called experts have been telling y'all every day for 27.5 months running. .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ *Russia overtakes Japan to become the fourth largest economy in the world in PPP terms* . "The Russian economy has overtaken Japan to become the fourth largest in the world in PPP terms (purchase power parity), according to revised data from the World Bank released at the start of June. . As bne IntelliNews reported in August, Russia had already overtook Germany to become the fifth biggest economy in adjusted terms. Hit by multiple shocks recently and cut off from cheap Russian gas, Germany is now stagnating and has fallen to sixth place in the World Bank’s ranking. . PPP GDP measurement is preferred by many economists, as it takes into account the difference between local prices and nominal prices similar to The Economist’s famous Big Mac inde> despair index has fallen to its lowest level ever this year - the sum of inflation, unemployment and poverty. . As a result of these changes, economists estimate that Russia’s growth potential has increased from 1-1.5% pre-war to around 3.5% now. Last year, Russia’s economic growth caught analysts off guard with a 3.6% expansion. This year the World Bank has already almost trebled its forecast for growth from 1.1% to 3.2%. Russia’s Economic Ministry is similarly bullish. . Even the World Bank’s PPP adjusted size of the economy may be an underestimate. The World Bank also estimates that 39% of Russia’s economy is in the shadows, while the shadow economy only makes up 10% of Japan’s economy, which would add an additional $2.5 trillion to Russia’s $6.4 trillion PPP adjusted economic size - still not enough to overtake India’s $14.6 trillion PPP adjusted GDP value, but widening the gap with Japan further." . www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/russia-overtakes-japan-to-become-the-fourth-largest-economy-in-the-world-in-ppp-terms/ar-BB1nCnto ................... *Russia to grow faster than all advanced economies says IMF* . "An influential global body has forecast Russia's economy will grow faster than all of the world's advanced economies, including the US, this year. . The International Monetary Fund (IMF) expects Russia to grow 3.2% this year, significantly more than the UK, France and Germany. " . www.bbc.com/news/business-68823399 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ I was mistaken, not wrong, lied to y'all about. They neither knew nor cared what the Russian economy was doing because they are reading from a script. Now ask yourself what else have they got wrong/lied about. C'mon did you really believe that Russian forces were on the verge of losing for every single day for 27,5 months? Did you really believe the Russian people were on the verge of 'rising up' every single day for 27.5 months running? These things are just not possible in the real, adult world.

Why, cause he doesn't agree with you? Seems pretty fair and knowledgeable to me

@@markgtrheyes No, because Farage didn't 'justify' the invasion at all. Go and watch the Panorama interview and what Farage said in the EU parliament back in 2014..... He wasn't justifying anything..... He said Putin would use the threat of the ever expansionism of the EU/NATO into Eastern Europe, and the overthrowing of the then Ukrainian president Yanukovych, as an excuse to go to war with Ukraine..... And that is exactly what happened. He didn't say he agreed with the war, far from it, If anything, he was trying to get the EU parliament to de-escalate the tensions and stop pushing for Ukraine to join the EU, which only served to provoke tensions.

Bill is brilliant at no telling you the truth

@@picturesLondon he's speaking 100% facts.

@@Flornmonk Respect your view but if you do some research you may change your view.

@@picturesLondon I definitely don't respect your false and misinformed view.

@@Flornmonk That's OK I respect your right to give false information.

What ruzzia is doing in Ukraine goes far beyond "misdemeanors." The tally of war crimes is in the tens of thousands.

Exactly, you are spot on. And the ambassador is wrong in every aspect.

And Browder definitely understands more about Russia than Farage, but I suspect that's a pretty low bar.

Browder is a typical American brass and confrontational. Watch the Channel 4 video with George Robertson the former Secretary General of NATO on how the West let Putin and Russia down. You have to work with people to get things done not keep challenging them. Winston Churchill understood that more than 80 years ago. There was no point being superior and aggressive with Stalin you had to work with him to get results. Americans don’t understand that. Nigel Farage is correct.

Why did he have to completely misrepresent Putins approval rating data then?

In your sick mind.

i agree with bills comments about putin

Ukraine had about 1,740 nukes, the third most powerful nuclear power in the world. Since Ukraine's territorial integrity has not been protected as promised, shouldn't they have their nukes back? I wonder if russia would have invaded Crimea and the rest if Ukraine still had those 1,740 nukes?

@@larsrons7937 Ukraine never had any nukes - stop spreading this garbage !!!!

I wonder what would happen if Mexico signed an alliance treat with China? Would the Americans just accept it? The Cuban Missile Crisis proves no, they would not. "Who gave the United States veto rights over Cuba having Soviet missiles on its own sovereign territory?" You are at best ignorant, at worst a hypocrite.

If Scotland ever becomes independent should we then just chill out if they decided to join the Russian Federation? I know it's unlikely, but Alex Salmond did work for RT.

Who gave USA right to stop Iran Venezuela, and many others selling their oil. USA are worse than Russia for telling other Countries what to do.

@@maewest68 the era of spheres of influence is a tad bit outdated. letting a stronger country get away with invading their sovereign neighbours would just encourage other dictators to do the same and other smaller nations to seek nuclear deterrence. an absolute disaster for international relations.

@@tofu666 then there is only one question; if the West, and the key players in NATO, can invade Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, threaten to go to war to "defend" Taiwan, threaten regime change in Iran and assassinate Iranian generals on foreign territory, why can't Russia invade the Ukraine? The era of spheres of influence is not outdated at all, it is even more relevant today than it was 30 years ago in a "multipolar World". "Letting a stronger country get away with invading a sovereign nation would just encourage other "democracies" to do the same and other small nations to seek nuclear deterence (N. Korea, Iran etc) and defensive pacts (Russia and China) against these "democracies". An absolute disaster for international relations". You think you're clever but you're not.

Truth))) Browder is rich wordy clown.

He has to be everyday for the past 20 years , his life depends on it

Still dont agree with my hard earned tax money going to Ukraine when we have homeless veterans makes me sick mate

@@Adam-ms6ih Spend your taxes on the continued storage of the largely-obsolete weaponry and then its disposal in the US then. Will that result in a peace dividend when US contractors are engaged to rebuild Ukraine and Russia? I share your sympathy for the neglected vets; its a disgrace but not supplying weapons to Ukraine will not release money the Government spend on the problem.

​@@Adam-ms6ih UK is way down the list of money to Ukraine as part of the GDP. Please educate yourself by checking the facts (Kiel institute)and advocate that the UK should do better. They are fighting the war for the whole Europe!

The Russian/Ukrainian war has nothing to do with homelessness in the US. Been like that for decades. Not saying that the issue shouldn't be fixed, but...the issue was not even on the table for US government.

Under the Belgrade agreement in 1991, Ukraine agreed to dispose of all their nuclear weapons and NOT to join NATO as part of their independence from Russia.

Well it did actually. LOL but they are willing. That makes it OK. For now.

NATO invaded and attacked Afghanistan, Libya and bombed Serbia. Also, at the end of the cold war the Russians left Eastern Europe.... what did the Americans do... Did they leave Europe? It's a bit odd that our Western leaders just act like puppets and repeat what General Biden says isn't it... especially when what Washington does is against our own interests.

They never invaded those countries, who voluntarily joined NATO.

Ha ha ha love your sarcasm.

Finland and Sweden applied to join NATO fearing toxic Putin, perfectly understandable.

that's the reality isolationists like Farage, Trump, etc. like to avoid.

Just like a certain short Austrian with a ridiculous moustache.

@@Muchoyo Oh dear - Godwins Law to the rescue You people really have so little imagination...

So who is going to stop him?

@@frankhyland6333 Ukraine, with the continued aid of the West. That’s why Trump is so dangerous.

Bill Bowder was destroyed 😂

Cambridge Five revisited 😉

He is from the muppet show

A former UK ambassador to russia that sounds more like a russian ambassador to the UK.

He sure doesn't know the history of the USSR and the Russian empire prior to 1949.

Was thinking the same thing myself. Seems anyone with a connection to Putin becomes tainted for one reason or another. He should perhaps team up with Farage and Trump to contest for the title of most uninteresting personality on the planet.

He was speaking facts 😊

Perhaps he's worried about all the honey trap media the FSB has on him

He's just a fool.

usa did the same 1962 they stopped cuba joining russia same thing

How so ?

You do not "negotiate" with the West, you do as they "suggest" or it's regime change.

So the Solomon islands are free to have Chinese military bases on its soil?

Indeed. Unlike the current candidates, Browder is not demented or fascist.

*Imagine if Sir Bill Browder (born in USA; British since 1999) somehow, one day became American President, or British Prime Minister ?🇬🇧🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇸*

No proof for such a story. It's a mere story that Putin asked Robertson when Russia would be invited, a MERE STORY. Robertson simply said Russia would have to APPLY to NATO, and it never did.

The people enable putin by giving their power away. ..they had no idea it would be abused to create deaths and invasions ...and now they are stuck ,unable to protest .

There in lies the problem.

Putin is making NATO grow. Hardly any countries joined NATO the last 20 years. Until Putin attacked a sovereign country!

​@rufanuf1 Only problem is russia

@@pauldench1299 True, and they ain't going away sadly. They say nations get the leaders they deserve. This is why the world is in the state its in.

He spent a looong time in Moscow

I don't want Arthur Neville Chamberlain again as my PM. Nigel Farage (now "NEVILLE GARAGE") has now lost my otherwise definite Reform vote((

Huh? So why do they have numerous CIA bases there

This is very true....

Indeed. Nor does he actually care about ethnic Russians anywhere. Putin's invasion has devastated the people of the Donbas.

He doesn't need to be concerned about Russians in Russia, because they are happy and have better lives than people in the UK and USA. In the west out governments hate us, tax us so much, then hate us some more

How do you know? Do you speak Russian? How many years have you spent in Russia? Do tell all.

"Sensor" - - - - -> rus-bot alert!!! Brand new rus bot (not a human), created 22 June 2024 only a few hours ago.

If there’s no negotiation, there will be no Ukraine territory

@@paulthomas-hh2kv other way round, Ivan. When are you going into the meat grinder?

@@0nFoot nobody gave a damn about Ukraine previously, and not about to go to war for it 😊

@@paulthomas-hh2kv not your choice, Putin will decide

The people who live on that territory should be able to decide what they want and I'm certain it wouldn't be a continuation of this war.. The Ukraine conflict is as much about civil war as a struggle between the Kremlin and Kiev and its Western allies, a fact that seems totally forgotten from any media reports..

😂😂😂

Choosing the truth is always the best option

Muppet😂😂

@chipsatterly4902 I think you should do your research Bill Browder is a propagandist for America a known liar and history twister..

Are you sure NATO isn't forcing you to believe in Bill Browder? 🤣

AND YOU SHOULD. BYE.!!!!!!!!

Bull💩

​@@gillianslater9227you sound like your allready there or just a dillusional traitor

​@@gillianslater9227I think you should Gillian. You sound like you'd love Russia this time with of year. 😂

@@sharonharris9782 MORE YOUR SCENE THAN MINE THANKS. ENJOY. BYE.!!!!!

Elon

Locking up people for opinions you don't like ironically sounds like something Putin is a accused of doing...

@@user-rv9hp6bo3y War Criminal, leading an insurgency to overthrow an elected government, Russian agent, and the man who sponsors it all. Nah, pretty sure it's not about their opinions.

Get a grip.

@@user-rv9hp6bo3y it isn't elon's opinion that is the problem. It is the traitorous actions he took in stopping a Ukrainian attack. He is a traitor to democracy