Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts - Yamato And A Half 

*visible confusion* Sir, I’m an Architect

Shipwright: God the admirals drunk again.

Diesels original prototype used coal dust as fuel and coal-water slurry can be used in even modern industrial diesel engines with relatively modest modifications.

Why an architect, why not engineer?

9 guns 3 turrets. 15 guns 5 turrets.

@@malnutritionboy 15 main guns...overkill.

I read “I have 5" as “I have 5 inch"

*AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*

*FIREEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!*

@@paulfrancistorres7144 Meanhile the deck crew of the enemy dreadnought: what are those bright lig- AH FUGK 18 inch shells: prepare for surprise butt $ex

@@warbirdgaming8091 Would be more like - ''Cosa sono quelle lu* AAAAAA'' :) And on the Alfonso - ''Disfruten que muchachos calientes de pasta'' :D

Itsa mea Alafonso-a

He did that TWICE. TWICE

Yes!

Which one?

My great-grand uncle fought on the ship....he was the spotter...responsible for spotting incoming targets...rip

Too soon.

Jesus christ, that is overkill and a half...

Thatsa Lotta Damage...

@Victor Wilson FLEX TAPE CAN'T FIX THAT

@Victor Wilson WE'LL NEED FLEX SEAL FOR THIS

How did he destroy the rudder with a hit amidships damn

"Alfonso-class, The Pride of Spanish Armada."

@@hanselsihotang NOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH ARMADA-QUISITION!

@@airplanemaniacgaming7877 "Pride of a Nation, a Beast made of steel...", Wait wrong ship.

THE BISMARCK IS NO MATCH FOR THE ALFONSO XIII! NOW SPANISH SCIENCE IS THE GREATEST IN THE WORLD!

There was actually a Spanish dreadnought named Alfonso XIII, of the España Class. Although in reality it only displaced 17000 t, not 90000 lol

and only 2 survivors..........if even for that cruiser!

I'm Gay Ayy, a Mighty Jingles reference! Now THAT’S a paddlin’!

thats what i call a thanos shell

*Laughs in Carrier*

If we get aa in this game Alfonso will be even more deadlier With radar and other equipments the aa’s will fill the skies with bullets with the accuracy of a sniper rifle

@@zagreus1249 There's nothing you can fit on a single ship to stop a determined aerial attack

Overtoast Its a game Not real life Probably some stupid shit might happen Or maybe some lucky shots

@@zagreus1249 if they go for realism, a large enough air attack will gut the ship, even with amazing AA

Excepy for the one made later by @History Guy Gaming, WHICH IS THE EXACT NUMBER OF GUNS AND EXTERIOR DESIGN! (Except for a few differences I forgot.)

wyland nares l

I imagine small shells can still kill and wound crew? What are the chances of that happening?

@RyanJosepher small very small

They're obviously WoWS DD mains lmao

@@kurumi394 as a DD main i can tell you i send in my torps as soon as i know they are in range

obv, they have snipers onboard, duh

Brave Italians sailing to their death, to try and save the Italian navy from the mighty Alfonso XIII o7

There aren't any AA guns in this game nor aircraft... :/

@@thebushwolf710 There will be, according to a post on Steam Forums, but it won't be a thing on release day either. My assumption is that we're getting them by 2021

@@hanswang7891 Still, no need to think about that if its going to be something in the far future. But if that still is the case than I cant wait for Aircraft carriers :D

For the AA variant, just replace those 7" guns with 5" DP guns and give them VT fuze shells. Throw up an impenetrable wall of explosive death.

@@zuthalsoraniz6764 why not keep them as 7 inch and just make new AA ammo?

I don't think more AA guns will help. Though, maybe we can have Yamatos protected by two Shinano!

@@ziavanzaa.r6335 that was literally her biggest weakness. She didnt have any mid range AA guns so there was a window where aircraft attacking the ship were basically safe.

@@MudkipsAreEpicWin yes, but then we have to accept the fact that, even with more amount of AA guns, the ones shootings are still human. Not fire systems. And, no matter how many amount of AAs, she was still swarmed with a lot of planes that a gunner could not handle. AA probably won't matter, but air superiority will be the winning game.

Yep, imagine the amount of AA fire this ship, but with every single secondary slot housing a triple 5" turret firing proximity-fuzed HE shells would put out. Not to mention the insane number of Bofors guns that would fit on her!

@@ziavanzaa.r6335 I never said more AA, I said a better set up. She still had a pretty fearsome AA setup, not to mention AAA was never very effective at actually shooting down planes to begin with. Sometimes you get a hit, usually it just scares the fuck out of the pilot, which can cause them to miss their drop.

But all those cannons would ruin the beautiful lines and weigh them down when they need to run away or switch sides

Well of course, all those cannons would just ruin the beautiful lines and weigh them down when they might need to run away or switch sides

@@weldonwin Italy did not switch sides, it's a common misconception. I can explain it to you if you want.

@@anzacwashington7050 Firstly, suing for peace is different from surrendering. Secondly, whilst it is true that the Head of State did not change, you have to remember that Italy was a parliamentarian monarchy, where power was held by Parliament and the PM, not the Monarch. Therefore, to state that the political line of Italy should have stayed the same after Mussolini was overthrown would be erroneous, as it would imply that it was decided by the Monarch and not by Parliament. Lastly, while it is true that the Italian army was badly equipped in both world wars, I feel like its contribution is highly underestimated, as the British like to do with other nations. If on one hand the Italian army was outmatched by the Austrian one in ww1, on the other hand it still managed to hold a large portion of the Austrian army and four German divisions, which after 191ü could have been used to break the Western front open (there were only 10000 americans there at the time, the main body of reinforcements was yet to come). As for ww2, the fact that the Maori battalion was outnumbered is of marginal importance to me: the British troops on the African front were equipped with heavy artillery and tanks which the Italian troops were not capable of piercing, thus making the Italian numerical advantage useless. On the other hand, Italian and German troops were badly supplied, especially in regards of Rommel's Afrikakorps, as most supplies were directed towards the Eastern front. Italian troops were still capable of proving themselves fighting, like in the battle of El Alamein, where the division "Folgore" was finally destroyed after 3 days of combat, during which the soldiers hid in the sand with Molotov's and jumped on Matildas passing by to blow them up, or in the Easter front, where the mountaineer divisions (Alpini) were encircled by the Russians and fought their way out of the pocket.

@@anzacwashington7050 Italy was very much not an absolute monarchy, be it as a constitutional one (Statuto Albertino) or with parliament overruling the king, but the decision were very much not taken by the king alone. For example, prime Minister Giolitti before ww1 had a plan to prevent Italy from entering the war: Parliament would rule that Italy was to stay neutral, the king would abdicate (so as to be freed from the promise made in the London Pact of 1915), thus making the new king free to let parliament do its bidding. As for Italian leadership in ww2, I do agree that it was bad, save from a few cases, as most generals were nominated not because of their skill, but their loyalty to the regime.

Those destroyers held off until the main battle force was destroyed, instead of closing it for a torpedo attack. And using 12 cm guns at 10 km range? Against that monster? Close in for the kill, overwhelm the defences. That was a lemming train of World of Tanks proportions.

57thorns that's the way I'd play it. Hell if the torpedoes didn't hit I'd order the DD's to ram it. I'm probably going to lose them anyway so may as well

spacewolf6 Panic does that to even the stoutest captains, after all, something you never met, Firing shells so heavy that the “Battleships” of your convoy are almost detonated with HE shells....terrifying.

I understood that reference

@@firestorm165 I don't think they would get that close. He was killing everything within 10km with one salvo. Five DDs are not bullrushing that beast for a ram, they won't last. .the only chance they had was torps at maximum range....but even if you slowed down the bear, his fire control and 18's just ruin your day

Aka The USS Second Amendment Rights

weldonwin I liked to call it the Freedom Bringer Battlewagon.

@@USMValor-jc5xu Or if you are into Warhammer 40K the USS *WAAAAAAAAAAGHHH!!!*

It's also my most watched video ever.

Imagine a campagin where naval airpower never took off. So with CV's being primarily recon platforms, imagine what the secondary batteries are gonna be like.

@@Sorain1 well the Battleship would remain as the heart and shield of the fleet. They would just get bigger and bigger

@@phantomwraith1984 the bigger the better.

Tea will be served on board once they have buffed that damaged barbette. But medals are always welcome.

Probably with a side of churros too.

They're Spanish, so Sangria and Medals

weldonwin with a side order of sopapilla cake

Seems to be one of the few Dutch people who actually knows how to be human. I've known a few Dutch online and they turned into real pricks. High respect to Stealth for keeping things neutral while focusing on the game without going all SJW, as Dutch people are now known for doing. I'm watching one video after the next from Stealth. +1

​@@jensreimers6625 laughs in Québec

I couldn’t tell he’s Dutch

Hell, I thought it was an Irish accent

Secondary towers don't weigh that much. Besides, the ship was perfectly balanced now

Also u could of put the funnels behind the second tower if u put that behind the main tower so the smoke from the funnels don’t get in the way

If it becomes too complicated then it'll become unplayable, as other games have become. I hope some things are kept simplified so you can hop in and play without too much stressing. But yeah, you're correct that a ship without a crew is just a husk.

@@ArcticuKitsu I agree that if it would be too complicated it won't appeal to the casual player, but I am sure they can make a very simple manpower factor like ships in total war games

HULL BREAK.

I built the Ultimate Iowa class.....be interesting to see it go up against this.

Makarov The Plat Arch warhammer did a couple of vids on UA:D and they were great to watch as well. Like I said on his vid listening to his commentary was like listening to my old history teacher again. One part teacher, two parts storyteller and three parts comedian. I blame him for my utter obsession with history today

Tortuga's videos on this and Rule the Waves 1 and 2 are really good.

Who was it?

Wait till they shoot the positron shock cannons at the enemy fleet

or maybe FRANKENMATO...

Thanks for the info :). I've seen a big increase in views and subs lately.

*Commander puts on sunglasses after ship explodes - CSI Miami theme starts*

@@Stealth17Gaming That's it, you just won my heart, I'm subscribing right here, right now.

After the first few salvos, you'd prolly be almost willin to dive overboard to get away from them.

@@bubba9384 Might still be worth it

@@UtterlyShagged If you were close enough you would die from the shockwave, if not, your eardrums won't be feeling too good.

Hope you'll like it!

Agreed. In this game I've had the AI just run away from me one too many times. That's why I lean towards building faster battleships.

Yes I could have, but that would mean 1 less gun in broadside firing.

Something that seems weird to me is that the number of guns in a turret doesn't look like it changes the size of the turret. It changes it's displacement and cost, but that's it, having a single or double gun turret takes up the same deck space as a triple gun turret.

Stealth17 Gaming oh I see

Nutty31313 that true

@@Stealth17Gaming could you stagger them diagonally for cross deck fire, or is that just not allowed?

Even if every shot missed, the ship would still need to return to port for some bio clean up....

It does dosnt it? AoN adds weight only to the deck armour, while turtleback adds to the entire armour belt.

Conquering new lands from cannibals for Christianity isn't stealing. 🤗