Ultimate tymna kraum bluefarm deck tech

Подписаться 30 тыс.

Просмотров 6 тыс.

50% 1

What are the best cards to include inside a tymna and kraum deck? Well in this video we are looking at the % of what the majority play. But also look at the difference between decks that have a higher winrate and lower winrate. What cards dose the winning decks play and what cards dose the losing decks play.
MUSIC
If you like the song you hear in the background and wanna listen to it on a higher volum. Then here is a link. I uploaded it on anouther channel so you can have it in the background if you want to.
• Calm lo fo music in space
WANNA WATCH CEDH GAMEPLAY?
I have a youtube channel called cEDH TV gameplay where I upload all my gameplay videos. Here is a link for you: / @cedhtvgameplay3974
SUPPORT ME
If you wish to support my channel by purchasing cards from TCGplayer using this affiliate link helps cEDH TV grow.
tinyurl.com/TC...
I have a Patreon: www.patreon.co...
A lot of people are asking me about proxies. Here is a good website I got some of mine from.
customizedmtg....
DISCORD
Come and hangout with other cEDH players at my Discord: / discord
Here you can write to me if you wanna say something. Like "hi can I join in on the live stream games?"
#mtgcommander #cedh #edhgameplay #magicthegathering

Опубликовано:

30 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 59

@UTubeUniverseRajeshRambharose Год назад

Please make more vidoes like this 🙏

@cedhtv Год назад

That is the plan. Any commander you want to see?

@UTubeUniverseRajeshRambharose Год назад

@cedhtv Yes! I've seen Xyris gameplay on this channel, but I haven't seen anything on Nekusar! I know you're not huge into wheels, but there's been so many great upgrades for Nekusar, like Sheoldred the Apocalypse, Faerie Mastermind, and Orcish Bowmasters that have become in these deck now. It also helps that you're in Grixis colors so that you can Ad Naus for a thoracle or underworld breach win! If you made a dech tech video or something covering Nekusar, it would be my favorite video alongside your Vadrik deck tech video!

@cedhtv Год назад

Saddly there are no Nekusar decks that have been played at any tournaments. So I can't do a video like this. Or well I can go to moxfield and just look at different nekusar builds. But I think I would get casual decks form that. But I could try and build a nekusar deck myself I guess. With the idea of having him in cEDH.

@UTubeUniverseRajeshRambharose Год назад

@cedhtv That would be awesome! I'm probably the only person asking for this, but it would really mean a lot! Who knows, maybe he'll see more play in the future!

@SethG27 Год назад

@@cedhtv tivit

@caio0gobbo 3 месяца назад

Great analysis!

@cedhtv 3 месяца назад

Thank you.

@ThePublicStar Год назад

Decklist?

@cedhtv Год назад

This is from something like 65 different decks. edhtop16.com/commander/Kraum,%20Ludevic's%20Opus%20+%20Tymna%20the%20Weaver?tourney_filter__size__%24gte=64&tourney_filter__dateCreated__%24gte=1659422080 Here is where you can find all of them.

@The_Crazed_Collecter_ Год назад

What website is it that he's using?

@cedhtv Год назад

edhtop16.com/?tourney_filter__size__%24gte=64&tourney_filter__dateCreated__%24gte=1659422080&colorID=null

@breakingblackmagic7617 7 месяцев назад

great video... im new to Cedh.and this is the deck im building and learning on...idk if its to complicated for me or not.. *7yr player,never played cedh before, watched it plenty of times.) i know its a turbo ad naus with grindy midrange .my deck list is pretty standard i guess. is this a good deck to learn>? or what deck would u rec? maybe deck list too? thanks

@albertovelasco8910 Год назад

Thanks for the information; what deck do you think is the best cedh for tournaments?

@cedhtv Год назад

The most recent I made was najeela. And she got a 23,33% and rog si got 22,40 %. Hard to say. I think this commander pairI you just watched or najeela. But I actually think sisay could become the strongest commander in the format. But storm is also a good answer to your question. As long as your playing a proactive storm deck more or less your on point.

@albertovelasco8910 Год назад

@@cedhtv actually i am a najeela player, and im so glad of your video, i lern a lot of it. God bless!

@josemaniacthrasher Год назад

Hello i have tyk deck but i would like to play a fastest version with high wr, can you share what are the best variations of the prototype? Please 😊

@cedhtv Год назад

tyk? Do you mean that Jeskai bird token commander?

@josemaniacthrasher Год назад

@@cedhtv tymna kraum i mean

@Eliarbreton Год назад

This is awesome. I love the comparison between decks that did well and didn’t. Another reason some cards like the one ring might be lower percentage is that the card is newer and not in older deck lists (depending on how far back you’re pulling data from)

@cedhtv Год назад

That could be it. People don't want to test it in tournamenst jet.

@benjaminhaile8334 Год назад

Git Probe suffers from making mulling more difficult because you can kind of consider it an additional unknown card in your hand when you mull

@cedhtv Год назад

That is a really good argument.

@thomasnoonan2039 Год назад

Loved this style of video, thank you!

@albertovelasco8910 Год назад

I would really like to see the statistics of tymna/kraum considering 40% winrate and above (average win rate between 40% and 75%[i think is the higher], for example average winrate 55% and see the cards above and below that average without including bad decks statistics, I hope you can make a video like this in the future, I would be very grateful to you. I have been following you for a long time and I really like your videos, I agree a lot with your analysis and they make a lot of sense to me. Thanks again for this increible content and this valuable videos.

@cedhtv Год назад

I will eventually get back to this commander. in the future. So don't worry.

@kend6916 Год назад

Great analysis. Although I hope you analyze decks with a winning rate above 50% not 40 as it is still low

@cedhtv Год назад

25% winrate is a normall winrate. But I can do 50% or even 60% next time.

@27ardii Год назад

what's the site?

@cedhtv Год назад

edhtop16.com/?tourney_filter__size__%24gte=64&tourney_filter__dateCreated__%24gte=1659422080&colorID=null This is the site I was sitting and gatherd data from.

@27ardii Год назад

thanks king@@cedhtv

@dwrecked9329 Год назад

Good video. One thing about statistics like this.. the variance is super high with games. You have 99 cards. 3 opponents with 99 cards each. Then your sample size is super low. Mainly you can only really say something like " X people who played this deck and won had Y card in their instead of a different card." You can't draw any inclusions on if that decision helped, hurt, or even mattered. I would be very careful about giving conclusions about them. I think these stats are most useful for showing trends over time of people cutting certain cards and running certain cards across the meta for that deck.

@cedhtv Год назад

That is way I was trying to look at a lot of decks 66 in this case. But you are correct. For example I had that gilded drake that none of the top 40% winrate decks played. But you can still lose even if you don't have that card in there. I think this more gives players an idea of what cards people consider strong. Not what is going to give them a better winrate. But I think it can give you an idea of what cards could be better then other cards. A tiny bit. But I agree. statistics like this is tricky. hard to say things like this in text.

@DoubleBeast Год назад

@cedhtv The inclusion of Guilded Drake may indicate decks that devote more slots to interaction, and these decks may end up not placing as well as more "all-in" decks. We could be examine and compare the deck lists in greater detail to verify this theory.

@dwrecked9329 Год назад

@@cedhtv Yea, I agree with what you're saying and I am sure you understand what conclusions can be drawn and and whatnot. I just meant from a content creator perspective, I'd want to be careful about wording and how to present the data in general so that other people can see the correct conclusions. You did great here though

@justinhuber5497 Год назад

This is the content I crave. Please do more

@cedhtv Год назад

That is the plan. Any commander you want to see?

@justinhuber5497 Год назад

@@cedhtv K’rrik! I know you already have some content on him but more would be cool to see

@cedhtv Год назад

@@justinhuber5497 He is not the one I am working on now. But he can be the one after I am finish counting on Tivit.

@PedruKosta Год назад

Great Video. Could you make theese statistics available to further analyse?

@cedhtv Год назад

That is the plan. anything you want me to look into? Or do you mean you want me to send it to you? Or want me to look into different commander?

@Ganeshahax Год назад

Not sure how much work it would be, but an analysis of each card ran would be amazing. Idk if you have to go through it manually or if you can just copy paste.

@cedhtv Год назад

@@Ganeshahax It is both copy and past and manully. But I sceptic. There are a few cards you don't have to see. I mean you can't mean all. Or I think even 50 cards would be a lot. Most of them will just be 100% or 89% and you don't learny much from it.

@Ganeshahax Год назад

@@cedhtv could you maybe release the full data? then we could sort through it. Yeah the 100% ones probs dont need to be included.

@jelkojerbic7051 Год назад

Super informative. Must have been a lot of work to make this video. But very good

@cedhtv Год назад

Thank you! Well a lot of math was used.

@stevekeenan9673 Год назад

I had jhoira cheerios that felt like griselbrand, so went this way because it has a lot of the best mtg cards

@msolace580 Год назад

Love it, but next time mark which side was the upper winners vs lower better. took awhile to find out which graph was the one i should look at first :P some of us are slow :)

@cedhtv Год назад

I think I can add that.

@BisyBackson365 Год назад

Amazing! How were you able to do the card inclusion rates?

@cedhtv Год назад

MATH .... I hate and love math. But there are some programs that help out.

@kaisersoto4448 Год назад

This is great- would love to see for other popular decks you have data for- tivit, etc

@cedhtv Год назад

Fun fact I am actually working on Tivit next.

@roggeotube Год назад

Excelente video. realmente muito bom

@cedhtv Год назад

Thank you! muito obrigado

@_Dohoss Год назад

I recently cut ad nauseam from the deck and I think it actually makes the deck better from my perspective. Cutting ad naus allows you to play cards that have a higher mana value in exchange for being higher quality cards. In my opinion intuition acts as the replacement because it’s an instant speed card that sets you up for the win on your turn, that to me has more upside. It’s cheaper to cast meaning it’s easier to hold open mana for, but also it can be used politically to stop someone else’s win attempt while still setting you up quite nicely for yours. Cutting ad naus turns the deck into more of a midrange/control deck which in my experience is more successful and performs better. There’s also a political advantage after the first time someone swings at you because they assume you’re on ad naus to which you can tell them that you don’t play it. It then makes the table assume you’re on a weird build of the deck so often opponents won’t respect the deck as much.

@renato_n.n Год назад

Nice video mons. I was looking for a website like this one to check the inclusion rates of Grinding Station in grixis deck. I decided to cut it from my Sauron deck, but now I can check the statistics. Thanks