UNBELIEVABLE UK DASH CAMERAS | Tesla Autopilot Crash, Road Rage Caught On Dash Cam, Cuts Off!  

Absolutely agree. Cammer should have let coach in by leaving space. It's the sensible and safest practice at this type of road junction.

Just drop back a bit, not too hard, bellend of the week.

@@monteceitomoocher Just simply change lanes as there was nothing in the right lane for miles and could've overtook the bus before the copper came pass

​@@nekotranslatesOr floated in after the copper. Bus can't stop, coz then he/she has to start from a standstill....

LOL, coach driver is 100% at fault

gota protect the diverse cultures after all

This one is a little difficult - the highway code says the coach driver must give priority to people already on the road and so should not have entered the carriageway in the path of the cammer. Rule 259 of the highway code says this "You should give priority to traffic already on the motorway" However - and it is a big however. Rule 259 also says "you should match your speed to fit safely into the traffic flow in the left-hand lane" Coaches are large vehicles which take time to get up to speed, the driver knowing this had tried to position themselves in front of the cammer to avoid having to enter the carriageway at a slower speed - given the first time the coach driver would have been aware of the cammer, this seems reasonable. The Coach might have expected the cammer to move right or reduce speed a little and give them some space - this also seems reasonable though not required. The Cammer was unable to change lanes due to the overtaking emergency vehicle - therefore could have reduced their speed a little and made this a non-issue. Given also that hard braking is not recommended for passenger vehicles (passengers and all that), most drivers would have reduced speed a little to help the coach out. So technically the coach driver was in the wrong - however the reality of motorway driving is that we all should try and help one another - the cammer did not help this situation at all.

​@@gavinminion8515 in reality the cammer should of pulled out to let the coach in and either legally overtake or slip back in behind afterwards. By not he essentially caused a non-event.

NORMAL person... yes

@@AzguardMikeshould he of? Have course he should. Of a nice day

Easily avoided if the driver had simply eased off a bit and allowed the coach to merge. It wasn't a difficult situation

only because it was broken.

@@mp3vault True story! 😄

Too many idiots

Yea for divershitty.

Yup 100%

the guy on the skooter was the wrong skin colour for the police to do anything about it...

And he has one of those oversized nitrous oxide cans in his hand. So, is unable to use brakes.

Too much paper work. They now rely on the public to carry out the investigations and provide evidence. Hence why without traceable licence plates the scooter just scoots away.

they didnt loose out because they were found at fault, they lost out because of the repairs they had to make to their own bike. if they didnt have insurance, then theres nothing to claim from?

Nothing to do with the country being broken. That's just life.

@@whitemarmite Perhaps another reason why all road users should have insurance, i used to be a bike club member and we had insurance, not many cyclists will be insured unless as part of home insurance.

The e-scooter guy buggered off, according to the captions, so there was no one to claim from! It does make sense to have bicycle insurgence oneself though. I had £300 worth of damage done to my Brompton when my wheel hit a deep pothole. My insurance paid in full.

​@@portlyoldman how much is the insurance where £300 is actually worth claiming after the excess and increase in premiums?

@Dudleymiddleton Agree. Instead of picking easy targets and strategically placed speed cameras to maximise revenue, we need tough law enforcement on Britain's roads. Of course there are few road coppers left. Five year re-tests would be my answer. People forget how to drive & use their indicators correctly (no one should not slap on the indicators whilst breaking & turning). I however love to see a vosa roadblock, placed so there is no escape for the untaxed & uninsured vehicles.

As a hgv driver you must have seen lots of accidents, mostly caused by hgv’s.

Yes. If one only sees the Fuzz (les flics) on blue light 'exciting' chases then at least over their cups of tea in a back office they should examine with due regard such video evidence as cyclists being injured and undertaking and brake checking mergers.

99% of UK police are scum. The other 1% are murdering scum.

German government: We see something new which could cause issues - let's gather evidence, put laws in place, enforce those laws and review the results. UK Government: We see something new which could cause issues - but the duckpond in my country mansion needs a clean so I'll look at this later.

Depends which bit of the UK to be honest. London is a mess but outside the M5 things get better, until you get to Yorkshire!

If they're not made illegal by the government then the police can do nothing. If you want to play the blame game then try to understand the system..?

Why would you even put on autopilot while driving around the UK, the road infrastructure here is terrible.

I don't think standard autopilot is designed for anything but motorways. Autopilot is certainly not FSD.

Only lazy fu.kers uses auto pilot in the UK 🤮🤮🤮🖕🖕🖕🖕

I did'nt even know using 'autopilot' was legal in the UK.

The Tesla with "autopilot" should be renamed as auto guidance, driver should be paying attention to the car and not expecting the car to drive itself!

How many drivers in Uk knows when merge bloody curved arows means YOU DO NOT HAVE PRIORITY,YOUR LANE IT'S ENDED

@@mihai-danut6955 Thanks but I don't understand your comment.

The one on the idiot scooter was the one in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Thank you Giovanni! ☺️🤚

Gosh, I bet that makes the brakes pull to one side quite badly.

When was a fast lane introduced? I thought that the middle and outside lanes were overtaking lanes?

if he was renting it then the police cold find him by requesting his details, since they track the scooters locations at all times.

@@ge2719 Won't the cyclist be able to claim from the motor insurance bureau for losses? As the scooter has a motor?

Nope, it wasn't a hire scooter that he was on. I'm going through the process with the MIB now to see if I can get anything to cover the damage.

they all got crushed didnt they? the governments genius scheme of buying old cars so long as they get scrapped.

If well-serviced and reliable, what does it matter about the bodywork...the rain alone keeps them fairly clean and a bit of dust hides the marks.

Where will old bangers come from unless someone buys new cars in the first place?

A228 Cuxton Kent.

El autobús tenía un ceda el paso tenía que parar

"move over to let traffic on no issue" other than you've just blocked a police car on blue lights. Maybe just ease up on the accelerator or knock cruise control off. I think that'd be a better option.

@@roaduser6438 lol. .dream on , he had a calendar year b4 pc plod got there.🤣

With one lane effectively being closed due to "the plod" with his blues on, there was really only two options: 1) Car slow down and let the bus on. 2 ) Coach Slow down and filter in behind the Car. Legally: The coach is an idiot for being a bully and refusing to slow down and follow the highway code. The Car driver is a idiot for not seeing a hazard (Blue lights) and a) either speed up to get ahead of the coach or b) slow down and let the coach on. There's an obstruction in lane 2 and getting that close to the coach is "must get ahead" and is stupid for no reason.

@kinkaito5433 interesting take on a simple conclusion, two lanes free for the car to either slow down or move over b4 the police got there and move back to lane one, allways gives me a bit of a chuckle people on utube making a simple situation more complicated then it should be playing verbal gymnastics trying to tie others in knots 🪢. 🤦‍♂️

@@paul8161 Cammer was barely travelling faster than the coach. Had the cammer moved out and overtaken the coach, the copper would have had to be slowing because of the cammer being in the way or slowing in case the cammer didn't move out of the way in time. From the coach being visible to the cop car going past was just 7 seconds, allow 1 second reaction time for the cammer to decide the best course of action, allow 2 seconds for the coppers to be reacting and braking in case the cammer doesn't move out the way and you're talking about circa 4 seconds to perform 3 manoeuvres, pulling out, overtaking and pulling back in. Absolute rubbish to suggest that 4 seconds is plenty of time. Do you drive? If so that's shocking to think that you'd pull out and block emergency services like that.

Not prosthetic just pathetic !

They are an outright danger. The wheels are so tiny it's near impossible to ride them controllably. I used to see one being ridden through morning traffic regularly, and it was swerving all over the place.

Highway code: Rule 259 also says "you should match your speed to fit safely into the traffic flow in the left-hand lane" Coach didn't merge Correctly, he should of backed off and merged behind the car already on the motorway.

no

no, theyre changing lanes. but also i dont get what the camera cars problem is. they can see the coach is going the same speed as them, and is out in front of them, the camera car has to decide to either speed up a lot to overtake them in time to allow them to merge in behind them, or slow down a bit to make it clear they can go in front of them

100% no. The coach has to give priority to the vehicles already on the motorway. The cammer had plenty of time to slow down and make it a non-issue though...

@pitophyllis pull across is the safer option on a duel carriage way/motorway. Slowing down creates issues further back and possibly an accident. The bottom line is, the coach did not have priority. Edited. The police car obviously did not allow them to pull across. The coach still forced right of way. Do that on a test and see what happens.

Thanks lads for clearing that up for me 👍

Made a similar comment. It's disgusting and shouldn't be here. I think the channel owner needs to apologise for this.

they already are regulated, e scooters and high powered ebikes are classed as motorcycles.

@george-ev1dq not what I meant..eg they should have licences training and be insured like cars and motorbikes , e scooter arnt road legal and need to be used on private land , only legal ones are the ones In town centres licenced to be used by the public.

@@paul8161 Well, that is what motorcyclists are supposed to do hence the reason I stated that these vehicles are classed as motorcycles in the UK.

@@paul8161 Well, motorcyclists require everything you mentioned hence the reason I stated that they are classed as motorcycles in the UK.

@@george-ev1dq I'm not talking about motorcycles..hence the original comment.

did you miss the emergency vehicle in the other lane, thought so.

Hit the nail on the head with that one..bang on.

Nah that is so sad.

Do you laugh at people getting hurt in car accidents to.?!🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️..,bet you do .

what federal government would that be?

​@@george-ev1dqha da ha ha, obviously American..Mr not so witty.🤦‍♀️